Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unconscious perception: A model-based approach to method and evidence

Open access
Snodgrass, Michael, Bernat, Edward, Shevrin, Howard·2004·Perception & Psychophysics
DOI 10.3758/bf03194978
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03194978

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 108

  1. Abrams, R. L., &Greenwald, A. G. (2000). Parts outweigh the whole (word) in unconscious analysis of meaning.Psychological Science,11, 118–124. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Adams, J. K. (1957). Laboratory studies of behavior without awareness.Psychological Bulletin,54, 383–405. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ashby, F. G., &Perrin, N. (1988). Toward a unified theory of similarity and recognition.Psychological Review,95, 124–150. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Ashby, F. G., &Townsend, J. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence.Psychological Review,93, 154–179. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Baars, B. (1997). Contrastive phenomenology: A thoroughly empirical approach to consciousness. In N. Block, O. Flanagan, & G. Guzeldere (Eds.),The nature of consciousness: Philosophical debates (pp. 187–201). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  6. Balota, D. A. (1983). Automatic semantic activation and episodic memory encoding.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 88–104. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bernat, E., Shevrin, H., &Snodgrass, M. (2001). Subliminal visual oddball stimuli evoke a P300 component.Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology,112, 159–171. · DOI
  8. Bernstein, I. H., Bissonnette, V., Vyas, A., &Barclay, P. (1989). Semantic priming: Subliminal perception or context?Perception & Psychophysics,45, 153–161. · DOI
  9. Block, N. (2001). Paradox and cross purposes in recent work on consciousness.Cognition,79, 197–219. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Carr, T. H., &Dagenbach, D. (1990). Semantic priming and repetition priming from masked words: Evidence for a center-surround attentional mechanism in perceptual recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 341–350. · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.2.341 · Paper page
  11. Carr, T. H., McCauley, C., Sperber, R. D., &Parmelee, C. M. (1982) Words, pictures, and priming: On semantic activation, conscious identification, and the automaticity of information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 757–777. · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.8.6.757 · Paper page
  12. Cheesman, J., &Merikle, P. M. (1984). Priming with and without awareness.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 387–395. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Cheesman, J., &Merikle, P. M. (1986). Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes.Canadian Journal of Psychology,40, 343–367. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Dagenbach, D. &Carr, T. H. (1994). Inhibitory processes in perceptual recognition: Evidence for a center-surround attentional mechanism. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 327–357). San Diego: Academic Press.
  15. Dagenbach, D., Carr, T. H., &Wilhelmsen, A. (1989). Task-induced strategies and near-threshold priming: Conscious influences on unconscious perception.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 412–443. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Dark, V. J. (1988). Semantic priming, prime reportability, and retroactive priming are interdependent.Memory & Cognition,16, 299–308. · DOI
  17. Dark, V. J., &Benson, K. (1991). Semantic priming and identification of near threshold primes in a lexical decision task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,43A, 53–78. · DOI
  18. Dixon, N. (1981).Preconscious processing. New York: Wiley.
  19. Dosher, B. A. (1998). The response-window regression method—Some problematic assumptions: Comment on Draine and Greenwald (1998).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 311–317. · DOI
  20. Doyle, J. R. (1990) Detectionless processing with semantic activation? A footnote to Greenwald, Klinger, and Liu (1989).Memory & Cognition,18, 428–429. · DOI
  21. Doyle, J. R., &Leach, C. (1988). Word superiority in signal detection: Barely a glimpse, yet reading nonetheless.Cognitive Psychology,20, 283–318. · DOI
  22. Draine, S. C., &Greenwald, A. G. (1998). Replicable unconscious semantic priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 286–303. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Dulany, D. E. (1997). Consciousness in the explicit (deliberative) and implicit (evocative). In J. D. Cohen & J. W. Schooler (Eds.),Scientific approaches to consciousness (pp. 179–212). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  24. Duncan, J. (1985). Two techniques for investigating perception without awareness.Perception & Psychophysics,38, 296–298. · DOI
  25. Dunn, J. C., &Kirsner, K. (1988). Discovering functionally independent mental processes: The principle of reversed association.Psychological Review,95, 91–101. · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.1.91 · Paper page
  26. Dunn, J. C., &Kirsner, K. (1989). Implicit memory: Task or process? In S. Lewandowsky, J. Dunn, & K. Kirsner (Eds.),Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 17–31). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  27. Durante, R., &Hirshman, E. (1994). Retrospective priming and masked semantic priming: The interfering effects of prime activation.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 112–127. · DOI
  28. Eimer, M. (1999). Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioral performance.Acta Psychologica,101, 293–313. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Eimer, M., &Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1737–1747. · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1737 · Paper page
  30. Eimer, M., &Schlaghecken, F. (2002). Links between conscious awareness and response inhibition: Evidence from masked priming.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 514–520. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Erdelyi, M. H. (1985).Psychoanalysis: Freud’s cognitive psychology. New York: W. H. Freeman.
  32. Erdelyi, M. H. (1986). Experimental indeterminacies in the dissociation paradigm of subliminal perception.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,9, 30–31. · DOI
  33. Eriksen, C. W. (1960). Discrimination and learning without awareness: A methodological survey and evaluation.Psychological Review,67, 279–300. · DOI · Paper page
  34. Fowler, C. A., Wolford, G., Slade, R., &Tassinary, L. (1981). Lexical access with and without awareness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 341–362. · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.110.3.341 · Paper page
  35. Gescheider, G. (1997).Psychophysics: The fundamentals (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  36. Goldiamond, I. (1958). Indicators of perception: I. Subliminal perception, subception, unconscious perception: An analysis in terms of psychophysical indicator methodology.Psychological Bulletin,55, 373–411. · DOI · Paper page
  37. Green, D. M., &Birdsall, T. (1978). Detection and recognition.Psychological Review,85, 192–206. · DOI
  38. Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A. (1966).Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
  39. Greenwald, A. G., &Draine, S. C. (1998). Distinguishing unconscious from conscious cognition—Reasonable assumptions and replicable findings: Reply to Merikle and Reingold (1998) and Dosher (1998).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 320–324. · DOI
  40. Greenwald, A. G., Draine, S. C., &Abrams, R. L. (1996). Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation.Science,273, 1699–1702. · DOI · Paper page
  41. Greenwald, A. G., Klinger, M. R., &Liu, T. J. (1989). Unconscious processing of dichoptically masked words.Memory & Cognition,17, 35–47. · DOI · Paper page
  42. Greenwald, A. G., Klinger, M. R., &Schuh, E. S. (1995). Activation by marginally perceptible (“subliminal”) stimuli: Dissociation of unconscious from conscious cognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 22–42. · DOI · Paper page
  43. Groeger, J. A. (1988). Qualitatively different effects of undetected and unidentified auditory primes.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 323–339. · doi:10.1080/02724988843000140
  44. Haase, S. J. (1994). A signal detection theory interpretation of “unconscious” perception. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Dissertation Abstracts International,55(06), 2422B.
  45. Haase, S. J., &Fisk, G. D. (2001). Confidence in word detection predicts word identification: Implications for an unconscious perception paradigm.American Journal of Psychology,114, 439–468. · DOI
  46. Haase, S. J., Theios, J., &Jenison, R. (1999). A signal detection theory analysis of an unconscious perception effect.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 986–992. · doi:10.3758/bf03206912
  47. Hines, D. (1992). Subthreshold semantic priming: Not a context effect.Current Psychology: Research & Reviews,11, 157–163. · DOI
  48. Hines, D. (1993). Effect of masked picture primes on semantic priming for easy- and difficult-to-name words.Journal of General Psychology,120, 149–165. · DOI
  49. Hines, D., Czerwinski, M., Sawyer, P., &Dwyer, M. (1986). Automatic semantic priming: Effect of category exemplar level and word association level.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,12, 370–379. · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.12.3.370
  50. Hirshman, E., &Durante, R. (1992). Prime identification and semantic priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 255–265. · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.2.255
  51. Holender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,9, 1–23. · DOI · Paper page
  52. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 513–541. · DOI · Paper page
  53. Jones, G. (1987). Independence and exclusivity among psychological processes: Implications for the structure of recall.Psychological Review,94, 229–235. · DOI
  54. Kahan, T. A. (2000). Negative priming from masked words: Retrospective prime clarification or center-surround inhibition?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1392–1410. · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1392
  55. Kemp-Wheeler, S., &Hill, A. (1988). Semantic priming without awareness: Some methodological considerations and replications.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 671–692. · DOI
  56. Kemp-Wheeler, S., &Hill, A. (1992). Semantic and emotional priming below objective detection threshold.Cognition & Emotion,6, 113–128. · DOI
  57. Klapp, S., &Hinkley, L. (2002). The negative compatibility effect: Unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,131, 255–269. · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.131.2.255
  58. Klauer, K., &Greenwald, A. G. (2000). Measurement error in subliminal perception experiments: Simulation analyses of two regression methods—Comment on Miller (2000).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1506–1508. · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.4.1506
  59. Klauer, K., Greenwald, A., &Draine, S. (1998). Correcting for measurement error in detecting unconscious cognition: Comment on Draine and Greenwald (1998).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 318–319. · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.127.3.318
  60. Klinger, M. R., Burton, P. C., &Pitts, G. S. (2000). Mechanisms of unconscious priming: I. Response competition, not spreading activation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 441–455. · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.2.441 · Paper page
  61. Klinger, M. R., &Greenwald, A. G. (1995). Unconscious priming of association judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 569–581. · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.569
  62. Klotz, W., &Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 976–992. · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.976 · Paper page
  63. Macmillan, N. A. (1986). The psychophysics of subliminal perception.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,9, 38–39. · DOI
  64. Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  65. Mandler, G. (1994). Hypermnesia, incubation, and mind popping: On remembering without really trying. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV (pp. 3–33). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  66. Marcel, A. J. (1983a). Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition.Cognitive Psychology,15, 197–237. · DOI · Paper page
  67. Marcel, A. J. (1983b). Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes.Cognitive Psychology,15, 238–300. · DOI · Paper page
  68. Maxfield, L. (1997). Attention and semantic priming: A review of prime task effects.Consciousness & Cognition,6, 94–113. · DOI
  69. McCauley, C., Parmelee, C. M., Sperber, R. D., &Carr, T. H. (1980). Early extraction of meaning from pictures and its relation to conscious identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 265–276. · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.6.2.265 · Paper page
  70. McClelland, J. L. (1987). The case for interactionism in language processing. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
  71. McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: 1. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407. · DOI · Paper page
  72. Merikle, P. M. (1982). Unconscious perception revisited.Perception & Psychophysics,31, 298–301. · DOI · Paper page
  73. Merikle, P. M. (1984). Toward a definition of awareness.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,22, 449–450. · DOI
  74. Merikle, P. M. (1992). Perception without awareness: Critical issues.American Psychologist,47, 792–795. · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.47.6.792 · Paper page
  75. Merikle, P. M., &Daneman, M. (1998). Psychological investigations of unconscious perception.Journal of Consciousness Studies,5, 5–18.
  76. Merikle, P. M., &Daneman, M. (2000). Conscious vs. unconscious perception. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.),The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 1295–1303). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  77. Merikle, P. M., &Joordens, S. (1997a). Measuring unconscious influences. In J. Cohen & J. Schooler (Eds.),Scientific approaches to consciousness (pp. 109–123). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  78. Merikle, P. M., &Joordens, S. (1997b). Parallels between perception without attention and perception without awareness.Consciousness & Cognition,6, 219–236. · DOI · Paper page
  79. Merikle, P. M., Joordens, S., &Stolz, J. A. (1995). Measuring the relative magnitude of unconscious influences.Consciousness & Cognition,4, 422–439. · DOI · Paper page
  80. Merikle, P. M., &Reingold, E. M. (1990). Recognition and lexical decision without detection: Unconscious perception?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 574–583. · DOI
  81. Merikle, P. M., Smilek, D., &Eastwood, J. D. (2001). Perception without awareness: Perspectives from cognitive psychology.Cognition,79, 115–134. · DOI · Paper page
  82. Miller, J. (2000). Measurement error in subliminal perception experiments: Simulation analyses of two regression methods.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1461–1477. · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.4.1461
  83. Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 226–254. · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.106.3.226 · Paper page
  84. Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner (Ed.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–364). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  85. Nolan, K. A., &Caramazza, A. (1982). Unconscious perception of meaning: A failure to replicate.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,20, 23–26. · DOI
  86. Price, M. C. (1990).Processing and awareness of masked stimuli. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.
  87. Price, M. C. (2001). Now you see it, now you don’t: Preventing consciousness with visual masking. In P. Grossenbacher (Ed.),Finding consciousness in the brain: A neurocognitive approach (pp. 25–60). London: John Benjamins. · doi:10.1075/aicr.8.08pri
  88. Pritchard, W. (1981). Psychophysiology of P300.Psychological Bulletin,89, 506–540. · DOI · Paper page
  89. Purcell, D. G., Stewart, A. L., &Stanovich, K. E. (1983). Another look at semantic priming without awareness.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 65–71. · DOI
  90. Reingold, E. M., &Merikle, P. M. (1988). Using direct and indirect measures to study perception without awareness.Perception & Psychophysics,44, 563–575. · DOI · Paper page
  91. Reingold, E. M., &Merikle, P. M. (1990). On the inter-relatedness of theory and measurement in the study of unconscious processes.Mind & Language,5, 9–28. · DOI · Paper page
  92. Shallice, T. (1988). Information-processing models of consciousness: Possibilities and problems. In A. Marcel & E. Bisiach (Eds.),Consciousness in contemporary science (pp. 305–333). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  93. Shevrin, H., &Fritzler, D. (1968a). Brain response correlates of repressiveness.Psychological Reports,23, 887–892. · doi:10.2466/pr0.1968.23.3.887
  94. Shevrin, H., &Fritzler, D. (1968b). Visual evoked response correlates of unconscious mental processes.Science,161, 295–298. · DOI
  95. Shevrin, H., &Rennick, P. (1967). Cortical response to a tactile stimulus during attention, mental arithmetic, and free associations.Psychophysiology,3, 381–388. · DOI
  96. Shevrin, H., Smith, W., &Fritzler, D. (1969). Repressiveness as a factor in the subliminal activation of brain and verbal responses.Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease,149, 261–269. · doi:10.1097/00005053-196909000-00003
  97. Shevrin, H., Smith, W., &Fritzler, D. (1970). Subliminally stimulated brain and verbal responses of twins differing in repressiveness.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,76, 39–46. · doi:10.1037/h0029558
  98. Shevrin, H., Smith, W., &Fritzler, D. (1971). Average evoked response and verbal correlates of unconscious mental processes.Psychophysiology,8, 149–162. · DOI
  99. Smith, M., Besner, D., &Miyoshi, H. (1994). New limits to automaticity: Context modulates semantic priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 104–115. · DOI
  100. Smith, M., Theodor, L., &Franklin, P. (1983). The relationship between contextual facilitation and depth of processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 697–712. · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.9.4.697
  101. Snodgrass, M. (2002). Disambiguating conscious and unconscious influences: Do exclusion paradigms demonstrate unconscious perception?American Journal of Psychology,115, 545–580. · DOI
  102. Snodgrass, M. (in press).Unconscious perception and its implications for consciousness: Theory, method, and evidence. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  103. Snodgrass, M., Shevrin, H., &Kopka, M. (1993). The mediation of intentional judgments by unconscious perceptions: The influences of task strategy, task preference, word meaning, and motivation.Consciousness & Cognition,2, 169–193. · DOI
  104. Stenberg, G., Lindgren, M., Johansson, M., Olsson, A., &Rosen, I. (2000). Semantic processing without conscious identification: Evidence from event-related potentials.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 973–1004. · DOI
  105. Stolz, J. A., &Besner, D. (1997). Visual word recognition: Effort after meaning but not (necessarily) meaning after effort.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 1314–1322. · DOI
  106. Van Selst, M., &Merikle, P. M. (1993). Perception below the objective threshold?Consciousness & Cognition,2, 194–203. · DOI
  107. Van Voorhis, B. A., &Dark, V. J. (1995). Semantic matching, response mode, and response mapping as contributors to retroactive and proactive priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 913–932. · DOI
  108. Visser, T. A. W., &Merikle, P. M. (1999). Conscious and unconscious processes: The effects of motivation.Consciousness & Cognition,8, 94–113. · DOI

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Snodgrass, M., Bernat, E., & Shevrin, H.
Venue
Perception & Psychophysics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2004-07
Volume
66
Issue
5
Pages
846-867
ISSN
  • 0031-5117 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5962
DOI
10.3758/bf03194978
OpenAlex
W1998187695
Cited by
174
References
3
FWCI
5.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unconscious perception: A model-based approach to method and evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3758/bf03194978
The paper
Snodgrass, M., Bernat, E., & Shevrin, H. (2004). Unconscious perception: A model-based approach to method and evidence. Perception & Psychophysics. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194978

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.