Cited by 144Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsDoping in SportsSports injuries and prevention

Prophylactic Use of NSAIDs by Athletes: A Risk/Benefit Assessment

Warden, Stuart J.·2010·The Physician and Sportsmedicine

Abstract

Athletes often seek artificial means to gain advantage and prolong participation when competing. This often involves taking naturally occurring or chemically synthesized compounds. The World Anti-Doping Agency does not prohibit the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) because these agents are not performance enhancing, and their analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects are at best performance enabling. Consequently, athletes have relatively unrestricted access to NSAIDs, which are readily available as over-the-counter drugs. However, concern has been raised on athletes' prophylactic use of these agents. Data from many sporting fields have consistently demonstrated that many individuals self-administer NSAIDs prior to athletic participation to prevent pain and inflammation before it occurs. However, scientific evidence for this approach is currently lacking, and athletes should be aware of the potential risks in using NSAIDs as a prophylactic agent. These agents are not benign, and can produce significant side effects, including gastrointestinal and cardiovascular conditions, as well as musculoskeletal and renal side effects. The latter side effects appear paradoxical to the rationale for prophylactic use of NSAIDs. This article discusses current observations regarding athlete use of NSAIDs, and the possible benefits and potential risks of their use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3810/psm.2010.04.1770

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Warden, S. J.
Affiliations
Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Corresponding author
Warden, Stuart J.
Venue
The Physician and Sportsmedicine
Published
2010-04
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
132-138
ISSN
  • 0091-3847 (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-3660
OpenAlex
W2034077814
Cited by
144
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Physician and Sportsmedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Doping in Sports
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
Keywords
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, athletes, anti-doping regulations, performance-enhancing drugs, NSAID adverse effects, gastrointestinal adverse effects, cardiovascular adverse events, renal adverse effects, musculoskeletal adverse effects
MeSH terms
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Athletic Injuries, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Humans, Inflammation, Pain, Physical Endurance, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review