Cited by 234Phytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesFood Chemistry and Fat AnalysisCoffee research and impacts

Flavonoid-Rich Cocoa Consumption Affects Multiple Cardiovascular Risk Factors in a Meta-Analysis of Short-Term Studies

Open access
Shrime, Mark G., Bauer, Scott R., McDonald, Anna C., Chowdhury, Nubaha H., Coltart, Cordelia E.M., Ding, Eric L.·2011·The Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

A growing body of evidence suggests that the consumption of foods rich in polyphenolic compounds, particularly cocoa, may have cardioprotective effects. No review, however, has yet examined the effect of flavonoid-rich cocoa (FRC) on all major cardiovascular risk factors or has examined potential dose-response relationships for these effects. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials was performed to evaluate the effect of FRC on cardiovascular risk factors and to assess a dose-response relationship. Inclusion and exclusion criteria as well as dependent and independent variables were determined a priori. Data were collected for: blood pressure, pulse, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, TG, BMI, C-reactive protein, flow-mediated vascular dilation (FMD), fasting glucose, fasting insulin, serum isoprostane, and insulin sensitivity/resistance indices. Twenty-four papers, with 1106 participants, met the criteria for final analysis. In response to FRC consumption, systolic blood pressure decreased by 1.63 mm Hg (P = 0.033), LDL cholesterol decreased by 0.077 mmol/L (P = 0.038), and HDL cholesterol increased by 0.046 mmol/L (P = 0.037), whereas total cholesterol, TG, and C-reactive protein remained the same. Moreover, insulin resistance decreased (HOMA-IR: -0.94 points; P < 0.001), whereas FMD increased (1.53%; P < 0.001). A nonlinear dose-response relationship was found between FRC and FMD (P = 0.004), with maximum effect observed at a flavonoid dose of 500 mg/d; a similar relationship may exist with HDL cholesterol levels (P = 0.06). FRC consumption significantly improves blood pressure, insulin resistance, lipid profiles, and FMD. These short-term benefits warrant larger long-term investigations into the cardioprotective role of FRC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/jn.111.145482

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A few short-term trials of other dietary sources (e.g., tea, red wine, grapes) or specific flavonoid extracts have not consistently improved BP, lipid levels, or endothelial function.

    “A few short-term trials of other dietary sources (e.g., tea, red wine, grapes) or specific flavonoid extracts have not consistently improved BP, lipid levels, or endothelial function.295-297”
  • In laboratory studies and randomized trials, flavonoid-rich cocoa has small but measurable benefits on BP, endothelial function, insulin resistance, and blood lipids.

    “In laboratory studies and randomized trials, flavonoid-rich cocoa has small but measurable benefits on BP, endothelial function, insulin resistance, and blood lipids.295-297”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Higgins JP, Green S, editors. Analysing and reporting results. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 8.7.2 (updated May 2005). Cichester (UK): Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2007.
  2. Begg CB. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Stat Med. 1985;4:1-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shrime, M. G., Bauer, S. R., McDonald, A. C., Chowdhury, N. H., Coltart, C. E. M., & Ding, E. L.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
  • Shrime, Mark G.
  • Ding, Eric L.
Venue
The Journal of Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
141
Issue
11
Pages
1982-1988
ISSN
0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149628027
Cited by
234
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
Keywords
cocoa consumption, cardiovascular risk factors, blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, C-reactive protein, flow-mediated dilation, insulin resistance, HOMA-IR, dose-response relationship, polyphenols, cardioprotection, insulin sensitivity
MeSH terms
Cacao, Cardiovascular System, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Flavonoids, Humans, Risk Factors, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review