Cited by 239Stress Responses and CortisolNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Epigenetic Programming by Maternal Behavior and Pharmacological Intervention Nature Versus Nurture: Let's Call The Whole Thing Off

Open access
Weaver, Ian C.G.·2007·Epigenetics

Abstract

The nature of maternal care that an infant receives can effect the child's emotional and cognitive development, which is endured into adulthood. Similarly, maternal behavior in rodents is associated with long-term programming of individual differences in behavioral and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal responses to stress in the offspring. One critical question is how is such 'environmental programming' established and sustained in the offspring? This review discusses a novel mechanism to explain how maternal licking/grooming behavior in the rat can alter the hippocampal glucocorticoid receptor (GR) expression in the offspring, which concomitantly alters the HPA axis and the stress responsiveness of these animals. Both in vivo and in vitro studies show that maternal behavior increases GR expression in the offspring via increased hippocampal serotonergic tone accompanied by increased histone acetylase transferase activity, histone acetylation and DNA demethylation mediated by the transcription factor NGFI-A. In summary, this research demonstrates that an epigenetic state of a gene can be established through early-in-life experience, and is potentially reversible in adulthood. Accordingly, epigenetic modifications of specific genomic regions in response to variations in environmental conditions might serve as a major source of variation in biological and behavioral phenotypes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4161/epi.2.1.3881

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In rats, maternal licking and grooming, which is central to HPA stress response development, acts through molecular mechanisms that change the epigenetic state of the hippocampal gene coding for glucocorticoid receptor density.

    “Remarkably, research has shown that the maternal licking and grooming behavior in the rat that is so central to the development of the HPA stress response system produces its effect through molecular mechanisms that alter the epigenetic state of the gene that codes for GR receptor density in the hippocampus (Meaney & Szyf, 2005; Weaver, 2007; Weaver et al., 2004).”

    From Stress and the development of self-regulation in context (2010) · cites this paper as Weaver, 2007

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. L A N D E S B I O S C I E N C E . D O N O T D I S T R I B U T E . 28 Epigenetics 2007; Vol. 2 Issue 1
  2. Stern JM. Offspring-induced nurturance: animal-human parallels. Dev Psychobiol 1997; 31:19-37.
  3. Liu D, Diorio J, Tannenbaum B, Caldji C, Francis D, Freedman A, Sharma S, Pearson D, Plotsky PM, Meaney MJ. Maternal care, hippocampal glucocorticoid receptors, and hypo- thalamic-pituitary-adrenal responses to stress [see comments]. Science 1997; 277:1659- 62.
  4. Caruncho HJ, Dopeso-Reyes IG, Loza MI, Rodriguez MA. A GABA, reelin, and the neu- rodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia. Crit Rev Neurobiol 2004; 16:25-32.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weaver, I. C. G.
Affiliations
Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
Corresponding author
Weaver, Ian C.G.
Venue
Epigenetics
Published
2007-01-10
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
22-28
ISSN
  • 1559-2294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-2308
OpenAlex
W2131820654
Cited by
239
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 23
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epigenetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
maternal behavior, epigenetic programming, glucocorticoid receptor, hippocampus, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, stress responsiveness, histone acetylation, DNA methylation, NGFI-A, environmental programming, nature versus nurture
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Female, Glucocorticoids, Humans, Hypothalamus, Maternal Behavior, Models, Psychological, Mother-Child Relations, Epigenesis, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review