CDK8 fine-tunes IL-6 transcriptional activities by limiting STAT3 resident time at the gene loci
Open accessAbstract
Cytokines are highly pleiotropic ligands that critically contribute to a balanced immune response. We have an incomplete understanding of how cytokines elicit their functional pleiotropy, which has limited their therapeutic use. Here, using Interleukin-6 (IL-6) as a model system, we have performed detailed phosphoproteomic and transcriptomic studies in human Th-1 cells to address the molecular bases defining cytokine functional pleiotropy. We have identified CDK8 as a new negative regulator of STAT3 transcriptional activities that contributes to the diversification of IL-6 responses. We found that CDK8 is a major regulator of the IL-6 phosphoproteome and interacts with STAT3 in the nucleus upon IL-6 stimulation. Inhibition of CDK8 activity, using specific small molecules inhibitors, reduced the IL-6-induced phosphoproteome by 23% in Th-1 cells, including STAT3 Ser727 phosphorylation. This, in turn, resulted in retention of tyrosine phosphorylated STAT3 in the nucleus, which increased the binding of STAT3 to target DNA sites in the genome with a concomitant increase in STAT3 mediated transcriptional activity. Importantly, inhibition of CDK8 activity under Th-17 polarizing conditions resulted in an enhancement of Th-17 differentiation. Our results support a model where CDK8 regulates STAT3 transcriptional processivity via modulation of its gene loci resident time, critically contributing to tuning STAT3 mediated responses.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Using IL-6 as a model cytokine in human primary Th-1 cells, this study identifies CDK8 (with an accessory role for CDK9) as a negative regulator of STAT3 transcriptional activity that phosphorylates STAT3 Ser727 in the nucleus and limits its chromatin resident time. Inhibiting CDK8 prolongs STAT3 chromatin binding, amplifies STAT3-dependent gene expression, and enhances Th-17 differentiation in vitro.
Key findings
- IL-6 (delivered as Hyper-IL-6) preferentially activates JAK/STAT1/STAT3 in resting and activated human CD4+ and CD8+ T cells; activated T cells showed 2–3-fold higher STAT1/3 phosphorylation amplitudes than resting cells, and STAT3 Ser727 phosphorylation was delayed relative to Tyr705 and occurred after nuclear translocation.
- Phosphoproteomics in Th-1 cells identified 17,935 phosphosites on 4,196 proteins, with 304 increased and 245 decreased by HyIL-6; nearly 40% of IL-6-induced phosphoproteomic changes were nuclear. A second SILAC experiment (11,035 phosphosites in 3,500 proteins) found 162 upregulated and 160 downregulated sites, of which 88 (63 up, 25 down) were CDK8-sensitive; CDK8 inhibition reduced the IL-6-induced phosphoproteome by 23%.
- CDK8 inhibitors (CBI-2347, MSC2530818) reduced HyIL-6-induced STAT3 Ser727 phosphorylation by ~70%, whereas CDK9 or CDK12/13 inhibitors reduced it by only ~20%; none affected STAT3 Tyr705. PLA showed a 2–4-fold increase in nuclear STAT3/CDK8 and STAT3/CDK9 complexes peaking at 30 min, and CDK inhibition increased these complexes even without IL-6.
- RNA-Seq: HyIL-6 alone dysregulated 27 genes, CDK8 inhibitor alone 111 genes (84 up), and combined treatment 176 genes; ChIP-Seq showed STAT3 binding intensity was synergistically increased with HyIL-6 + CDK8 inhibitor (2,585 shared bound regions vs 540 with HyIL-6 alone). CDK8 inhibition produced an average ~3-fold increase in IL-17-positive cells after 10 days under Th-17 polarizing conditions (baseline ~2–3% IL-17+), with increased secreted IL-17 but no change in RORγt, IFNγ, or IL-4.
Methods
- Primary human CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from healthy donor buffy coats were stimulated with Hyper-IL-6 (HyIL-6); signaling was profiled by phospho-flow with a 28-marker antibody array, dose-response and kinetic experiments, and Western blotting of cytoplasmic/nuclear fractions.
- SILAC-based quantitative phosphoproteomics (light/medium/heavy labeling, HILIC fractionation, Ti-IMAC enrichment, Q Exactive Plus MS, MaxQuant) in Th-1-polarized cells stimulated with HyIL-6 ± the CDK8 inhibitor MSC2530818; six biological replicates in the first experiment.
- Proximity ligation assays for STAT3/CDK8 and STAT3/CDK9 complexes (including STAT3 WT-GFP vs Ser727Ala-GFP reconstitution in CRISPR STAT3-knockdown Hut78 cells), STAT3 ChIP-Seq with motif analysis (MEME/TOMTOM), RNA-Seq with GSEA, and in vitro human Th-17 differentiation assays with flow cytometry and ELISA.
Limitations
- The paper states no dedicated limitations section. It notes that HyIL-6 was used to overcome variable IL-6 receptor expression across T cell populations, and that STAT3 overexpression in reconstituted Hut78 cells produced higher baseline STAT3/CDK9 complexes than in primary Th-1 cells.
- The text makes evident that Torin1's inhibition of STAT1/STAT3 Ser phosphorylation is a previously unknown off-target effect (other mTOR inhibitors and ATM/DNA-PK inhibitors failed to reproduce it), and that in vitro Th-17 differentiation was inefficient (only ~2–3% IL-17-positive cells at baseline).
- This is a bioRxiv preprint explicitly marked as not certified by peer review.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
19 of 34 cited sources checked · 9 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Flavopiridol completely abolished the serine phosphorylation of STAT3 induced by HyIL-6.
“Flavopiridol, a well-described pan-CDK inhibitor (Luke et al., 2012), completely abolished the Ser phosphorylation of STAT3 induced by HyIL-6”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Luke et al., 2012 source
- Premisecitation§ These authors share senior authorship
IL-6 receptor expression varies significantly among different T cell populations and environmental contexts.
“IL-6 receptor expression varies significantly among different T cell populations and environmental contexts”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Betz and Muller, 1998 source
- cites Jones et al., 2010 source
- cites Ridgley et al., 2019 source
The Results section reports significantly different surface IL-6R expression among naïve, central-memory, and effector-memory CD4+ T cells, with the highest expression on central-memory cells. The paper discusses how conditions affect IL-6 responses, but the passages do not show that environmental context changes receptor expression. Page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Inhibition of CDK8 activity under Th-17 polarizing conditions resulted in an enhancement of Th-17 differentiation.
“Importantly, inhibition of CDK8 activity under Th-17 polarizing conditions resulted in an enhancement of Th-17 differentiation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
The majority of phosphopeptides modified by IL-6 treatment belonged to nuclear proteins.
“This study revealed that the majority of phosphopeptides modified by IL-6 treatment belonged to nuclear proteins”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ These authors share senior authorship
Inhibition of CDK8 activity increased the binding of STAT3 to target DNA sites in the genome.
“This, in turn, resulted in retention of tyrosine phosphorylated STAT3 in the nucleus, which increased the binding of STAT3 to target DNA sites in the genome with a concomitant increase in STAT3 mediated transcriptional activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Resting and activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells respond to HyIL-6 treatment by tyrosine phosphorylating STAT1 and STAT3 transcription factors.
“resting and activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells respond to HyIL-6 treatment by Tyr phosphorylating STAT1 and STAT3 transcription factors”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
CDK8 interacts with STAT3 in the nucleus upon IL-6 stimulation.
“We found that CDK8 is a major regulator of the IL-6 phosphoproteome and interacts with STAT3 in the nucleus upon IL-6 stimulation.”
- Also stated in: § These authors share senior authorship · boosted
“Using proximity ligation studies, we confirmed the increased interaction between STAT3 and CDK8 and CDK9 in the nucleus upon IL-6 stimulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § These authors share senior authorship · boosted
- Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
In Hut78 cells, only Flavopiridol treatment inhibited STAT3 Ser phosphorylation induced by HyIL-6.
“only Flavopiridol treatment resulted in an inhibition of STAT3 Ser phosphorylation by HyIL-6 in Hut78 cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
IL-6 preferentially engages the JAK/STAT1/STAT3 pathway in T cells.
“we found that IL-6 preferentially engages the JAK/STAT1/STAT3 pathway in T cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ These authors share senior authorship
Inhibition of CDK8 activity increased STAT3 mediated transcriptional activity.
“This, in turn, resulted in retention of tyrosine phosphorylated STAT3 in the nucleus, which increased the binding of STAT3 to target DNA sites in the genome with a concomitant increase in STAT3 mediated transcriptional activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq studies revealed a global increase in STAT3 chromatin binding upon inhibition of CDK8.
“ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq studies revealed a global increase in STAT3 chromatin binding upon inhibition of CDK8, resulting in the induction of a larger gene expression program by IL-6.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
HyIL-6 treatment preferentially induced the tyrosine and serine phosphorylation of both STAT1 and STAT3, and to a lower extent STAT4.
“HyIL-6 treatment on the other hand preferentially induced the tyrosine and serine phosphorylation of both STAT1 and STAT3, and to a lower extent STAT4”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Alternative mTOR inhibitors (AZD8055 and KU0063794) failed to restrict STAT1 and STAT3 serine phosphorylation by HyIL-6.
“alternative mTOR inhibitors (i.e. AZD8055 and KU0063794) failed to restrict STAT1 and STAT3 Ser phosphorylation by HyIL-6”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Inhibition of CDK8 resulted in the induction of a larger gene expression program by IL-6.
“ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq studies revealed a global increase in STAT3 chromatin binding upon inhibition of CDK8, resulting in the induction of a larger gene expression program by IL-6.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
CDK8 specific inhibitors (CBI-2347 and MSC2530818) inhibited HyIL-6 induced STAT3 serine phosphorylation by 70% in both human CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.
“CDK8 specific inhibitors (i.e. CBI-2347 and MSC2530818) inhibited HyIL-6 induced STAT3 Ser phosphorylation by 70% in both human CD4+ and CD8+ T cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Rapamycin failed to inhibit STAT1 and STAT3 serine phosphorylation by HyIL-6.
“Rapamycin, an mTORC1-only complex inhibitor (Laplante and Sabatini, 2012) failed to do so”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Laplante and Sabatini, 2012 source
- Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Inhibition of CDK8 activity using specific small molecule inhibitors reduced the IL-6-induced phosphoproteome by 23% in Th-1 cells.
“Inhibition of CDK8 activity, using specific small molecules inhibitors, reduced the IL-6-induced phosphoproteome by 23% in Th-1 cells, including STAT3 Ser727 phosphorylation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
None of the CDK inhibitors tested affected the STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation levels.
“None of the inhibitors affected the STAT3 Tyr phosphorylation levels”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
CDK8 and CDK9 are the kinases driving serine phosphorylation of STAT3 upon IL-6 stimulation in T cells.
“we identified CDK8 and CDK9 as the kinases driving serine phosphorylation of STAT3 upon IL-6 stimulation in T cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
CDK9 or CDK12/CDK13 inhibitors only reduced the STAT3 serine phosphorylation by 20%.
“CDK9 (i.e. NVP2 and CDK inhibitor II) or CDK12/CDK13 (i.e. THZ531 and MFH-2-90-1) inhibitors only reduced the STAT3 Ser phosphorylation by 20%”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Flavopiridol or MSC2530818 treatment alone led to an increase in the number of STAT3/CDK8 and STAT3/CDK9 complexes.
“Flavopiridol (panCDK inh.) or MSC2530818 (CDK8 inh.) treatment alone led to an increase in the number of STAT3/CDK8 and STAT3/CDK9 complexes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
28 kinases were regulated by HyIL-6 treatment.
“Our phosphoproteomic study identified 288 kinases (Figure 2D and Sup. Table S1). Of those 28 were regulated by HyIL-6 treatment”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Inhibition of CDK8/CDK9 activity resulted in a more robust interaction with STAT3, even in the absence of IL-6 stimulation.
“Inhibition of the activity of these two kinases resulted in a more robust interaction with STAT3, even in the absence of IL-6 stimulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Nearly 40% of the phosphoproteomic changes induced by HyIL-6 took place in the nucleus.
“nearly 40% of the phosphoproteomic changes induced by HyIL-6 took place in the nucleus”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
STAT3 serine phosphorylation exhibits a delayed activation in response to IL-6 stimulation.
“We could detect both STAT3 tyrosine and serine phosphorylation in response to IL-6 stimulation, with STAT3 serine phosphorylation exhibiting a delayed activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
CDK8 is a major regulator of the IL-6 phosphoproteome.
“We found that CDK8 is a major regulator of the IL-6 phosphoproteome and interacts with STAT3 in the nucleus upon IL-6 stimulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
STAT1 and STAT3 tyrosine and serine phosphorylation in response to HyIL-6 treatment were inhibited by the JAK inhibitor Tofacitinib.
“STAT1 and STAT3 Tyr and Ser phosphorylation in response to HyIL-6 treatment were inhibited by the JAK inhibitor Tofacitinib, confirming the dependency of these two modifications on JAK activity”
- Also stated in: § These authors share senior authorship · boosted
“Tofacitinib, a JAK inhibitor, blocked both STAT1/STAT3 Tyr and Ser phosphorylation by HyIL-6 treatment (Figure 4A and 4B) confirming previous observations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § These authors share senior authorship · boosted
- Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells trigger between 2-3 folds higher STAT1/3 phosphorylation amplitudes than resting CD4+/CD8+ T cells in response to HyIL-6 treatment.
“with activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells triggering between 2-3 folds higher STAT1/3 phosphorylation amplitudes than resting CD4+/CD8+ T cells in response to HyIL-6 treatment”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ These authors share senior authorship
IL-6 induced a more robust differentiation of Th-17 cells upon CDK8 inhibition in vitro.
“IL-6 induced a more robust differentiation of Th-17 cells upon CDK8 inhibition in vitro.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
The combined analysis from six independent biological replicates of unstimulated vs HyIL-6 stimulated Th-1 cells identified 17,935 phosphosites on 4,196 proteins.
“The combined analysis from six independent biological replicates of unstimulated vs HyIL-6 stimulated Th-1 cells identified 17,935 phosphosites on 4,196 proteins”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Addition of Flavopiridol or MSC2530818 resulted in an enhancement in the number of STAT3/CDK8 and STAT3/CDK9 complexes.
“Addition of Flavopiridol (panCDK inh.) or MSC2530818 (CDK8 inh.) inhibitors resulted in an enhancement in the number of STAT3/CDK8 and STAT3/CDK9 complexes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
The interaction between STAT3 and CDK8/CDK9 increases in the nucleus upon IL-6 stimulation.
“Using proximity ligation studies, we confirmed the increased interaction between STAT3 and CDK8 and CDK9 in the nucleus upon IL-6 stimulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
CDK activity regulates STAT1/3 nuclear residency time.
“Our data showed that CDKs activity regulated STAT1/3 nuclear residency time”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Activated CD4+ T cells triggered higher levels of STAT1 phosphorylation than activated CD8+ T cells upon HyIL-6 stimulation.
“activated CD4+ T cells triggered higher levels of STAT1 phosphorylation than activated CD8+ T cells upon HyIL-6 stimulation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
In Hut78 cells, HyIL-6 treatment induces STAT3 Ser727 phosphorylation in a CDK-dependent manner.
“where HyIL-6 treatment also induced STAT3 Ser727 phosphorylation in a CDK dependent manner (Sup. Figure 7 A-C)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Inhibition of CDK8 activity reduced IL-6-induced STAT3 Ser727 phosphorylation in Th-1 cells.
“Inhibition of CDK8 activity, using specific small molecules inhibitors, reduced the IL-6-induced phosphoproteome by 23% in Th-1 cells, including STAT3 Ser727 phosphorylation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Inhibition of CDK8 activity resulted in retention of tyrosine phosphorylated STAT3 in the nucleus.
“This, in turn, resulted in retention of tyrosine phosphorylated STAT3 in the nucleus, which increased the binding of STAT3 to target DNA sites in the genome with a concomitant increase in STAT3 mediated transcriptional activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
CDK8-mediated phosphorylation of different transcription factors (e.g. CREM, RelB and FLI1) was detected in an IL-6-dependent manner.
“we could detect CDK8-mediated phosphorylation of different transcription factors in an IL-6-dependent manner (e.g. CREM, RelB and FLI1)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Genes up-regulated by CDK8 inhibition alone or in combination with Hy-IL6 were also highly enriched in known STAT3 targets.
“genes up-regulated by CDK8 inhibition alone (Figure 7D-middle panel) or in combination with Hy-IL6 (Figure 7D-bottom panel) were also highly enriched in known STAT3 targets”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
At late stimulation times, higher levels of STAT3 Ser727Ala/CDK9 complexes were observed compared to STAT3 wt.
“at late stimulation times we observed higher levels of STAT3 Ser727Ala/CDK9 complexes when compared to STAT3 wt”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The STAT3 Ser727Ala mutant is not phosphorylated at Ser727 and faithfully mimics the absence of STAT3 Ser727 phosphorylation.
- Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
No changes in RORgt, IFNg or IL-4 expression were seen in T cells stimulated in the presence of the CDK8 inhibitor.
“we did not see changes in RORgt, IFNg or IL-4 expression by the T cells stimulated in the presence of the CDK8 inhibitor (Figure 8E-I)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Genes upregulated upon stimulation were highly enriched in genes harboring STAT3-binding sites in their vicinity.
“genes that were upregulated upon stimulation, were highly enriched in genes that harbor STAT3-binding site in their vicinity (Figure 7G)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
No phosphorylation of CDK8 and CDK9 by IL-6 treatment was detected.
“we did not detect phosphorylation of these two kinases by IL-6 treatment”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Inhibition of CDK8 activity resulted in the loss of a significant percentage of the IL-6-induced nuclear phosphoproteome.
“Inhibition of CDK8 activity resulted in the loss of a significant percentage of the IL-6-induced nuclear phosphoproteome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
In all conditions tested, STAT3 bound to a canonical STAT3 GAS sequence motif.
“in all conditions tested, STAT3 was binding to a canonical STAT3 GAS sequence motif (Sup. Figure 9C)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Nearly forty percent of the phosphosites induced by IL-6 treatment belonged to nuclear proteins.
“we found that nearly forty percent of the phosphosites induced by IL-6 treatment belonged to nuclear proteins”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
The phosphoproteome study identified phosphosite changes induced by IL-6 in proteins localized in endo-membranes, cytoskeleton and cytoplasm.
“our phosphoproteome study also identified phosphosites changes induced by IL-6 in proteins localized in endo-membranes (Golgi Apparatus, Endosomes, Lysosome, etc), cytoskeleton and cytoplasm”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
HyIL6 stimulation induces phosphosites that are upregulated in a CDK8-dependent manner.
“CDK8-dependent HyIL6 upregulated phosphosites”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
HyIL-6 stimulation alone dysregulated a small number of genes (n=27), including classical STAT3 targets, in Th-1 cells.
“HyIL-6 stimulation alone resulted in dysregulation of small number of genes (n=27) including classical STAT3 targets in Th-1 cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Most phosphoproteomic changes induced by HyIL-6 took place in the nuclei of the cells.
“most phosphoproteomic changes induced by HyIL-6 took place in the nuclei of the cells (Figure 6C)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Combined HyIL-6/MSC2530818 treatment exhibited a synergistic effect with 176 dysregulated genes.
“The combined HyIL-6/MSC2530818 treatment exhibited a synergistic effect with 176 dysregulated genes upon treatment”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
STAT3 Ser727Ala mutation stabilizes the CDK/STAT3 interaction upon IL-6 stimulation.
“we have shown that STAT3 Ser727Ala mutation stabilizes the CDK/STAT3 interaction upon IL-6 stimulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The STAT3 Ser727Ala mutant is not phosphorylated at Ser727 and faithfully mimics the absence of STAT3 Ser727 phosphorylation.
- Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
CDK8 inhibition led to an average 3-fold increase in the number of IL-17 positive cells after 10 days expansion.
“CDK8 inhibition led to an average of a 3-fold increase in the number of IL-17 positive cells after 10 days expansion (Figure 8C and 8D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
In Th-1 cells treated with CDK8 inhibitor alone, STAT3 binding levels resembled those in unstimulated cells.
“In Th-1 cells treated with the CDK8 inhibitor alone, we observed levels of STAT3 binding that resembled those obtained in unstimulated cells (Figure 7E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Combined HyIL-6/CDK8 inhibitor treatment produced a synergistic increase in STAT3 binding intensity across target sites compared to HyIL-6 treatment alone.
“we observed a synergistic increase in binding intensity of STAT3 across target sites in cells stimulated with the combined HyIL-6/CDK8 inhibitor treatment when compared to HyIL-6 treatment alone”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
The IL-6-induced nuclear phosphosites were in the majority Ser/Thr phosphorylation events.
“These phosphosites were in the majority Ser/Thr phosphorylation events”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
Genes up-regulated by HyIL6 stimulation were highly enriched in genes known to be upregulated by STAT3 (GEO: GSE21670).
“genes up-regulated by HyIL6 stimulation were highly enriched in genes known to be upregulated by STAT3 (GEO: GSE21670)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
About 2-3% of the T cells at the end of the polarization protocol were positive for IL-17 and RORgt expression.
“About 2-3% of the T cells at the end of the polarization protocol were positive for IL-17 (Figure 8B and 8D) and RORgt expression (Figure 8F and 8H).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
HyIL-6 stimulation regulated proteins involved in transcription, specifically RNA pol II mediated transcription, histone (de)acetylation, and DNA methylation.
“GO analysis studies indicated that HyIL-6 stimulation regulated proteins involved in transcription, specifically RNA pol II mediated transcription and other cellular processes such as histone (de)acetylation, and DNA methylation (Figure 6D and 6E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
STAT3 knock-down Hut78 cells exhibited a clear reduction in STAT3 Tyr phosphorylation upon HyIL-6 stimulation.
“These cells exhibited a clear reduction in the STAT3 Tyr phosphorylation upon HyIL-6 stimulation (Sup. Figure 7E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship
A closer look at the IL-6-induced kinome did not reveal an obvious signaling pathway induced by IL-6 that would account for its nuclear regulation.
“a closer look to the IL-6-induced kinome did not reveal an obvious signaling pathway induced by IL-6 that would account for its nuclear regulation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorship
The inhibition of STAT1 and STAT3 serine phosphorylation is a previously unknown off-target effect of Torin1.
“This indicates that the inhibition of STAT1 and STA3 Ser phosphorylation is a previously unknown off-target effect of Torin1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorship
CDK8 regulates STAT3 transcriptional processivity via modulation of its gene loci resident time.
“Our results support a model where CDK8 regulates STAT3 transcriptional processivity via modulation of its gene loci resident time, critically contributing to tuning STAT3 mediated responses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorship
IL-6 functional pleiotropy emanates from activation of a few signaling intermediaries.
“Overall our signaling data support a dynamic and exclusive activation of the JAK/STAT pathway by IL-6 in T cells, suggesting that IL-6 functional pleiotropy emanates from activation of a few signaling intermediaries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorship
CDKs control STAT3 nuclear dynamics by modulating its serine phosphorylation levels.
“our data suggest that CDKs control STAT3 nuclear dynamics by modulating its Ser phosphorylation levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorship
CDK activities regulate STAT3 nuclear resident time and thus chromatin binding.
“suggesting a role for CDKs activities in regulating STAT3 nuclear resident time and thus chromatin binding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorship
In Hut78 cells, CDK9 is the main CDK driving STAT3 phosphorylation.
“suggesting that in these cells CDK9 is the main CDK driving STAT3 phosphorylation (Sup. Figure 4A and 4B)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorship
CDK8 fine-tunes STAT3 binding dwell-time to chromatin via its Ser phosphorylation.
“Collectively, our data confirm that CDK8 fine-tunes STAT3 binding dwell-time to chromatin via its Ser phosphorylation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ These authors share senior authorship
Cells can regulate their CDK8 levels to establish different thresholds of cytokine sensitivity.
“These observations suggest that cells can regulate their CDK8 levels to establish different thresholds of cytokine sensitivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorship
CDK8 elicits a broader regulation of the transcription machinery.
“indicating that CDK8 elicits a broader regulation of transcription machinery”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorship
CDK8 inhibition induced transcriptional programs by promoting HyIL-6/STAT3 mediated transcription.
“suggesting that CDK8 inhibition induced transcriptional programs by promoting HyIL-6/STAT3 mediated transcription”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorship
CDK8 fine-tunes the STAT3 transcriptional program.
“CDK8 fine-tunes STAT3 transcriptional program”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorship
CDK8 plays a negative role in STAT3 mediated transcription.
“Our results suggest a negative role of CDK8 in STAT3 mediated transcription.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorship
IL-6 might regulate CDK8/CDK9 activity by altering their localization.
“suggesting that IL-6 might regulate their activity by altering their localization”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorship
CDK8 is a master regulator of the IL-6-induced signalosome and STAT3-dependent transcriptional activities.
“We have identified CDK8 as a master regulator of the IL-6-induced signalosome and STAT3-dependent transcriptional activities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorship
CDK8 critically contributes to shaping the IL-6 phosphoproteome by regulating processes associated with RNA-Pol II mediated transcription.
“Overall, our data highlight a critical contribution of CDK8 in shaping the IL-6 phosphoproteome by regulating processes associated with RNA-Pol II mediated transcription.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ These authors share senior authorship
In previous studies using STAT Ser mutants, the activity of CDK8 remained intact, unlike in the present approach.
“An important difference between our approach and previous studies using STAT Ser mutants is that in the latter the activity of CDK8 remained intact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorship
The CDK8 inhibitor specifically regulates STAT3-mediated Th-17 differentiation.
“suggesting a specific regulation of STAT3-mediated Th-17 differentiation by the CDK8 inhibitor”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ These authors share senior authorship
JAKs were not the kinases involved in regulating the IL-6-induced nuclear phosphosites.
“suggesting that JAKs were not the kinases involved in their regulation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorship
CDK8 is a master regulator of STAT3 transcriptional activities.
“Overall, our study provides new molecular evidences that establish CDK8 as a master regulator of STAT3 transcriptional activities”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ These authors share senior authorship
Interaction between nuclear STAT3 and different kinases and/or transcription factors ultimately defines the STAT3 transcriptional program.
“These observations suggest a model where interaction between nuclear STAT3 and different kinases and/or transcription factors ultimately defines the STAT3 transcriptional program.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ These authors share senior authorship
The longer-lived CDK8/STAT3 complex formed in the context of the STAT3 Ser mutant brings signaling-active CDK8 to STAT3-dependent genes, resulting in transcriptional repression.
“All together these observations suggest that the longer-lived CDK8/STAT3 complex formed in the context of the STAT3 Ser mutant, brings signaling active CDK8 to STAT3-dependent genes, resulting in transcriptional repression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The STAT3 Ser727Ala mutant is not phosphorylated at Ser727 and faithfully mimics the absence of STAT3 Ser727 phosphorylation.
- Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorship
CDK8 and CDK9 fine-tune STAT3 nuclear dynamics via Ser phosphorylation.
“Overall, our studies show that CDK8 and CDK9 fine-tune STAT3 nuclear dynamics via Ser phosphorylation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorship
STAT3/CDK9 interaction is stabilized in the absence of STAT3 Ser phosphorylation.
“suggesting that STAT3/CDK9 interaction is stabilized in the absence of STAT3 Ser phosphorylation (Figure 5E)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The STAT3 Ser727Ala mutant is not phosphorylated at Ser727 and faithfully mimics the absence of STAT3 Ser727 phosphorylation.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 27
- May combine two claims. 27
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ These authors share senior authorshipCDKs are regulators of STAT1 serine phosphorylation in different systems.
“Previous studies have described CDKs as regulators of STAT1 Ser phosphorylation in different systems”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorshipTorin 1 inhibited the serine phosphorylation induced by HyIL-6 in both STAT1 and STAT3, without affecting their tyrosine phosphorylation.
“only Torin 1, an mTOR inhibitor targeting both mTORC1 and mTORC2 complexes (Thoreen et al., 2009), inhibited the Ser phosphorylation induced by HyIL-6 in both STAT1 and STAT3, without affecting their Tyr phosphorylation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Thoreen et al., 2009 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ These authors share senior authorshipIn macrophages, CDK8 is the main kinase driving STAT1 serine phosphorylation in response to IFN gamma stimulation.
“In macrophages, CDK8 appears to be the main kinase driving STAT1 serine phosphorylation in response to IFN gamma stimulation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Bancerek et al., 2013 source
The Results section ('CDK8 Phosphorylates S727') shows that CDK8 silencing reduced IFN-γ-induced STAT1 S727 phosphorylation more than CDK9 silencing, but those experiments were in fibroblasts. In bone-marrow-derived macrophages, the Results section ('A Nuclear CDK Mediates Canonical TAD Serine Phosphorylation') shows inhibition by flavopiridol, which is not specific to CDK8. The paper therefore supports CDK8 as a key kinase in this response, but does not establish that it is the main kinase specifically in macrophages. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ These authors share senior authorshipHyIL-6 triggers signaling in all cells expressing gp130, producing a more robust and homogenous signaling output.
“HyIL-6 triggers signaling in all cells expressing gp130, producing a more robust and homogenous signaling output”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Rose-John, 2012 source
The Introduction (page not provided) says that gp130-expressing cells can be stimulated through IL-6 trans-signaling even without membrane IL-6R. The section “Protein tools to study IL-6 trans-signaling” reports that Hyper-IL-6 is 100–1,000 times more active than separate IL-6 and sIL-6R on gp130-expressing cells, supporting a more robust response. It does not establish that the signaling output is homogeneous across those cells. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ These authors share senior authorshipMutation of STAT3 Ser727 to Ala modulates STAT3 transcriptional activity.
“Previous studies have reported that mutation of Ser727 in STAT3 to Ala modulates its transcriptional activity (Chung et al., 1997; Kim and Baumann, 1997; Lim and Cao, 1999; Wen et al., 1995; Yokogami et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Chung et al., 1997 source
The Results section (page not available) reports that the STAT3 S727A mutation increased tyrosine phosphorylation, a step relevant to transcriptional activity. The Discussion proposes an effect on transcription but explicitly says future studies are needed to determine it; this paper does not establish that the mutation modulates transcriptional activity. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Kim and Baumann, 1997 source
- cites Lim and Cao, 1999 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitation§ These authors share senior authorshipTCR+IL-2 treatment of resting and activated human CD4+ and CD8+ T cells activated a vast array of signaling intermediaries detected by the antibody array, serving as a positive control.
“In both resting and activated human CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, TCR+IL-2 treatment led to the activation of a vast array of signaling intermediaries, including STAT1, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5, STAT6, ERK, AKT, S6R, CREB”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Ross et al., 2016 source
The Results section (‘The IL-2-Regulated Phosphoproteome’; page unavailable) reports that IL-2 stimulation changed many phosphorylations in CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, including STAT5 and ERK. It does not establish the claimed response to combined TCR+IL-2 treatment in resting and activated human CD4+ and CD8+ cells; the study used mass spectrometry rather than an antibody array and does not support the full list of intermediaries. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Smith-Garvin et al., 2009 source
The DAG-Mediated Signaling Pathways section says TCR signaling activates ERK and STAT3, supporting part of the signaling claim. The review does not report TCR+IL-2 treatment of resting and activated human CD4+ and CD8+ cells, an antibody-array positive control, or activation of the full listed set of intermediaries. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ These authors share senior authorshipSTAT3 can engage different gene expression programs in a cell-dependent and stimulating condition-dependent manner.
“several studies have reported that STAT3 can engage different gene expression programs in a cell-dependent and stimulating condition-dependent manner (Hutchins et al., 2013)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Hutchins et al., 2013 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ These authors share senior authorshipSTAT3 Ser phosphorylation plays a negative role in STAT3 nuclear dynamics and transcriptional activities.
“our study and others (Chung et al., 1997; Decker and Kovarik, 2000; Kim and Baumann, 1997) highlight a negative role of STAT3 Ser phosphorylation in STAT3 nuclear dynamics and transcriptional activities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Chung et al., 1997 source
The Abstract and the section on STAT3 serine 727 phosphorylation report that serine phosphorylation negatively modulates tyrosine phosphorylation, which is required for nuclear translocation and subsequent transcriptional activity. But the Discussion says its effects on nuclear translocation and transcriptional activity still require study and proposes that serine phosphorylation can also stimulate transcription. The source therefore supports a possible negative effect, not the unqualified claim about both outcomes. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Decker and Kovarik, 2000 source
- cites Kim and Baumann, 1997 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ These authors share senior authorshipSmall molecule inhibitors targeting CDK8 promote the differentiation of T regulatory cells and Th-17 cells under their respective polarizing conditions.
“small molecule inhibitors targeting CDK8 promote the differentiation of T regulatory (reg) cells, and Th-17 cells when T cells were placed under T reg polarizing conditions (Akamatsu et al., 2019; Guo et al., 2019), or Th-17 polarizing conditions (Figure 8) respectively”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ These authors share senior authorshipSer727Ala mutation impairs transcriptional activity by different STATs.
“several studies have shown that Ser727Ala mutation impairs transcriptional activity by different STATs (Levy and Darnell, 2002; Lim and Cao, 1999; Sadzak et al., 2008; Wen et al., 1995)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ These authors share senior authorshipCDK8 inhibition by MSC2530818 did not alter the phosphorylation profile of RBP1, indicating the treatment did not affect basal transcriptional programs.
“CDK8 inhibition by MSC2530818 did not alter the phosphorylation profile of RBP1, suggesting that our treatment did not affect basal transcriptional programs (Sup. Figure 9B)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Czodrowski et al., 2016 source
The Supporting Information summary (p. 1) identifies MSC2530818 as a CDK8 inhibitor, and the compound-characterization passage (p. 8) reports cellular CDK8 activity. Neither passage reports an RBP1 phosphorylation profile or shows that basal transcriptional programs were unaffected; the citing sentence points to its own Supplementary Figure 9B for that observation. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Harlen and Churchman, 2017 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ These authors share senior authorshipNaïve T cells express non-detectable levels of CDK8, which are upregulated upon T cell activation and differentiation.
“Naïve T cells express non-detectable levels of CDK8, which are upregulated upon T cells activation and differentiation (Howden et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Howden et al., 2019 source
The Results section on cell-context effects of mTORC1 inhibition describes undetectable cyclin D3 and low CDK4/6 in naïve T cells, followed by increases after activation. Searches for CDK8 and cyclin-dependent kinase 8 found no passage in our copy stating that CDK8 is undetectable in naïve cells or upregulated with activation and differentiation. The available passages have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorshipAnnotating the shared STAT3 bound regions with the nearest gene yielded 475 unique genes.
“The shared STAT3 bound regions were annotated with the nearest gene by 'annotatePeaks' from HOMER v4.10 (Gupta et al., 2007), yielding 475 unique genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Gupta et al., 2007 source
The Abstract and Discussion describe Tomtom as a tool for comparing motifs, not for annotating genomic regions to nearby genes. Searches for STAT3, HOMER, annotatePeaks, nearest-gene annotation, and 475 unique genes found no passage addressing the claimed analysis. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship304 phosphosites were increased and 245 were decreased in response to HyIL-6 stimulation in human primary Th-1 cells.
“Among those 304 were increased and 245 were decreased in response to HyIL-6 stimulation in human primary Th-1 cells”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorshipInhibition of CDK activity using Flavopiridol produced a prolonged STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation and the retention of tyrosine phosphorylated and total STAT3 in the nuclear fraction.
“inhibition of CDKs activity using Flavopiridol produced a prolonged STAT3 Tyr phosphorylation and the retention of Tyr phosphorylated and total STAT3 in the nuclear fraction”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorshipInhibition of CDK8 and CDK9 produced a more sustained STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation and a longer STAT3 nuclear retention upon IL-6 stimulation.
“inhibition of these kinases produced a more sustained STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation and a longer STAT3 nuclear retention upon IL-6 stimulation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorshipSTAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation is fast and takes place in the cytoplasm, while STAT3 serine phosphorylation is delayed and occurs after STAT3 nuclear translocation.
“nuclear fractionation studies revealed that while STAT3 Tyr phosphorylation is fast and takes place in the cytoplasm, STAT3 Ser phosphorylation is delayed and occurs after STAT3 nuclear translocation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorshipUpon HyIL-6 stimulation, a 2-4 fold increase in the number of STAT3/CDK8 and STAT3/CDK9 complexes was detected, which peak at 30 min stimulation and return to basal levels after 3 hours.
“Upon HyIL-6 stimulation, we detected a 2-4 fold increase in the number of STAT3/CDK8 and STAT3/CDK9 complexes, which peak at 30 min stimulation and return to basal levels after 3 hours”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorshipThe phosphoproteomic study identified 288 kinases.
“Our phosphoproteomic study identified 288 kinases (Figure 2D and Sup. Table S1). Of those 28 were regulated by HyIL-6 treatment”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorshipGO analysis showed an enrichment of the JAK/STAT pathway upon stimulation of Th-1 cells with HyIL-6.
“GO analysis (KEGG pathways and molecular function analyses) showed an enrichment of the JAK/STAT pathway as expected upon stimulation of Th-1 cells with HyIL-6”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorshipHyIL-6 treatment induced upregulation of 162 and downregulation of 160 phosphosites, of which 88 (63 upregulated and 25 downregulated) were sensitive to CDK8 inhibition.
“HyIL-6 treatment induced the upregulation of 162 and downregulation of 160 phosphosites, where 88 of them (63 of the upregulated and 25 of the downregulated) were sensitive to CDK8 inhibition”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorshipThe phosphoproteomics study identified 11,035 phosphosites in 3,500 proteins.
“The combined analysis of our phosphoproteomics study showed the identification of 11,035 phosphosites in 3,500 proteins (Figure 6A and 6B and Sup. table S2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorshipIn STAT3-reconstituted Hut78 cells, unstimulated cells had significantly higher levels of STAT3/CDK9 complex than human Th-1 cells, due to STAT3 over-expression.
“Due to STAT3 over-expression in these cells, we detected significantly higher levels of STAT3/CDK9 complex in unstimulated cells than those detected in human Th-1 cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorship27% of proteins involved in transcription and 40% of proteins involved in RNA Pol II transcription were affected by CDK8 inhibition.
“27% of proteins involved in transcription and 40% of proteins involved in RNA Pol II transcription were affected by CDK8 inhibition (Figure 6F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorshipThese non-nuclear phosphosites were also enriched in Ser/Thr phosphorylation.
“These phosphosites were also enriched in Ser/Thr phosphorylation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorshipIn unstimulated Th-1 cells, STAT3 DNA binding was very poor and was significantly enhanced upon HyIL-6 treatment.
“in unstimulated Th-1 cells, we detected very poor STAT3 DNA binding, which was significantly enhanced upon HyIL-6 treatment (Figure 7E)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorshipCDK8 inhibition increased secreted IL-17 levels as measured by ELISA, but not IFNg.
“CDK8 inhibition resulted in an increase in the levels of secreted IL-17 as measured by ELISA (Figure 8J), but not IFNg (Figure 8K).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorshipSTAT3 Ser727A mutant exhibited a similar nuclear translocation profile to STAT3 wt but a delayed association kinetic with CDK9.
“STAT3 Ser727A mutant exhibited a similar nuclear translocation profile to STAT3 wt, but it showed a delayed association kinetic with CDK9 (Figure 5E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The STAT3 Ser727Ala mutant is not phosphorylated at Ser727 and faithfully mimics the absence of STAT3 Ser727 phosphorylation.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ These authors share senior authorshipHyIL-6 treatment induced a minor increase in the number of human Th-17 cells.
“HyIL-6 treatment induced a minor increase in the number of human Th-17 cells, highlighting the difficulty of working with these cells in vitro”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorshipUpon HyIL-6 stimulation, the number of STAT3 wt/CDK9 complexes in the nucleus significantly increased, peaked at 30 min, and returned to basal levels by two hours of treatment.
“upon HyIL-6 stimulation we observed a significant increase in the number of STAT3 wt/CDK9 complexes in the nucleus, which peaked at 30 min and went back to basal levels by two hours treatment (Figure 5E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorshipHyIL6 stimulation induces phosphosites that are downregulated in a CDK8-dependent manner.
“CDK8-dependent HyIL6 downregulated phosphosites”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ These authors share senior authorshipThere are 475 STAT3 binding genes.
“STAT3 Binding genes (N=475)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ These authors share senior authorshipBlockage of STAT1 serine phosphorylation significantly altered the IFN gamma transcriptional response and its ability to clear Listeria monocytogenes infection.
“Blockage of STAT1 serine phosphorylation, using STAT1 serine mutants, significantly altered the IFN gamma transcriptional response and its ability to clear Listeria monocytogenes infection”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Varinou et al., 2003 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorshipCDK8 plays a critical role in regulating STAT3 serine phosphorylation by HyIL-6, with an accessory role of other CDK members.
“These data highlight a critical role of CDK8 in regulating STAT3 Ser phosphorylation by HyIL-6, with an accessory role of other CDK members.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorshipCDK8 is a new negative regulator of STAT3 transcriptional activities that contributes to the diversification of IL-6 responses.
“We have identified CDK8 as a new negative regulator of STAT3 transcriptional activities that contributes to the diversification of IL-6 responses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ These authors share senior authorshipSILAC labelling incorporation greater than 97% was confirmed by mass spectrometry.
“Labelling incorporation greater than 97% was confirmed by Mass Spectrometry.”
- Also stated in: § These authors share senior authorship · plain
“Labelling incorporation greater than 97% was confirmed by Mass Spectrometry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § These authors share senior authorship · plain
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorshipIL-6 strongly regulates the nuclear phosphoproteome, which could contribute to fine-tune its immuno-modulatory activities.
“Overall our phosphoproteomic revealed a strong regulation of the nuclear phosphoproteome by IL-6 that could contribute to fine-tune its immuno-modulatory activities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ These authors share senior authorshipSTAT1 Ser727Ala knock-in mice elicited a poor immune response against Listeria monocytogenes infection.
“STAT1 Ser727Ala Knock-in mice elicited a poor immune response against Listeria monocytogenes infection (Varinou et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Varinou et al., 2003 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone given§ These authors share senior authorshipThe quality of the sequencing libraries was inspected using FastQC v0.11.8.
“The quality of libraries was inspected using FastQC v0.11.8.”
- Also stated in: § These authors share senior authorship · plain
“The quality of libraries was inspected by FastQC v0.11.8.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § These authors share senior authorship · plain
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ These authors share senior authorshipCDK8 Ser phosphorylates STAT3, triggering its dissociation from chromatin and terminating STAT3-mediated transcription.
“CDK8 Ser phosphorylates STAT3 triggering its dissociation from chromatin and terminating STAT3-mediated transcription.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ These authors share senior authorshipCD4+ T cells were isolated by MACS to a purity of at least 99%.
“isolated by magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS, Miltenyi) using anti-FiTC microbeads (Miltenyi, #130-048-701) according to manufacturer's instructions to a purity ≥99%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorshipCDK8 is recruited to STAT3 binding gene loci upon IL-6 stimulation, where it triggers STAT3 Ser phosphorylation and limits STAT3 chromatin resident time.
“CDK8 is recruited to STAT3 binding gene loci upon IL-6 stimulation, where it triggers STAT3 Ser phosphorylation, and limits STAT3 chromatin resident time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitation§ These authors share senior authorshipp-values were determined by Student's t test and corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.
“the p-values were determined by Student´s t test and corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ These authors share senior authorshipRecombinant HyIL-6 was purified to greater than 98% homogeneity.
“Recombinant HyIL-6 was purified to greater than 98% homogeneity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorshipCDK8 modulates STAT3 transcriptional processivity by fine-tuning its gene loci binding dwell-time, leading to negative regulation of IL-6-mediated activities.
“Overall, our data agree with a model where CDK8 modulates STAT3 transcriptional processivity by fine-tuning its gene loci binding dwell-time, leading to a negative regulation of IL-6-mediated activities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ These authors share senior authorshipSpecific deletion of CDK8 in NK cells results in enhancement of their anti-tumor responses.
“Specific deletion of CDK8 in NK cells results in an enhancement of their anti-tumor responses (Witalisz-Siepracka et al., 2018)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Witalisz-Siepracka et al., 2018 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone given§ These authors share senior authorshipPeptide and protein ratios were only considered when quantified in at least two out of the three replicates.
“Peptide and protein ratios only quantified in at least two out of the three replicates were considered”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ These authors share senior authorshipIdentified ChIP-seq peaks were screened against hg19 blacklisted genomic regions, mitochondrial DNA, and pseudo-chromosomes.
“The identified peaks were further screened against 'hg19 blacklisted' genomic regions, mitochondrial DNA, and pseudo-chromosomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone given§ These authors share senior authorshipStatistical analyses were performed using two-tailed parametric and non-parametric tests as appropriate.
“Statistical analyses were performed using the Two-tailed parametric and non-parametric tests as appropriate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ These authors share senior authorshipSTAT3 binds CDK8 and CDK9 in the nucleus, where these two kinases drive its Ser phosphorylation.
“Our data showed that STAT3 binds CDK8 and CDK9 in the nucleus, where these two kinases drive its Ser phosphorylation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ These authors share senior authorshipA set of 199 STAT3-upregulated genes is available from GSE21670.
“STAT3 up-regulated genes (N=199; GSE21670)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites GSE21670
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
The molecular bases governing the large functional pleiotropy of cytokines remain poorly defined.
“the molecular bases governing their large functional pleiotropy remains poorly defined”
The paper relies on this without support.
The molecular bases that allow IL-6 to elicit its vast array of immune-modulatory activities are not known.
“The molecular bases that allow IL-6 to elicit its vast array of immune-modulatory activities are not known.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The signaling networks engaged by IL-6 in T cells, and their role in shaping IL-6 immune activities, are poorly understood.
“we have a poor understanding of the signaling networks engaged by IL-6 in T cells, and their role in shaping IL-6 immune activities”
The paper relies on this without support.
The kinase responsible for STAT1/3 serine phosphorylation in T cells is not known.
“the kinase responsible for STAT1/3 serine phosphorylation in T cells is currently not known”
The paper relies on this without support.
The STAT3 Ser727Ala mutant is not phosphorylated at Ser727 and faithfully mimics the absence of STAT3 Ser727 phosphorylation.
“STAT3 KnD cells were reconstituted with wt STAT3-GFP or Ser727A STAT3-GFP mutant and the levels of STAT3/CDK9 complex formation were measured by PLA (Figure 5E and Sup. Figure 7F).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Figure 1 legend gives the wrong STAT3 tyrosine site
MinorThe Figure 1 legend labels the STAT3 measurement as Tyr701, while the paper identifies the measured STAT3 site as Tyr705.
“E-F) Effect of JAK inhibition by 2μM Tofacitinib on the phosphorylation of STAT1 (E) and STAT3 (F) Tyr701 and Ser727 in resting and activated primary human CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.”
“anti-pSTAT3- Tyr705AF488 (Biolegend, #651006) and anti-pSTAT3-Ser727AF647 (Biolegend, #698914).”
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482 · see citing works
The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools
Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., Marth, G., Abecasis, G., Durbin, R., & 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · Cited by 62,041 · see citing works
Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., Paulovich, A., Pomeroy, S. L., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 · Cited by 53,625 · see citing works
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J., & Smyth, G. K. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 · Cited by 41,364 · see citing works
Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources
Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T., & Lempicki, R. A. (2009) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.211 · Cited by 35,890 · see citing works
BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features
Quinlan, A. R., & Hall, I. M. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 · Cited by 27,437 · see citing works
RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome
Li, B., & Dewey, C. N. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-323 · Cited by 22,179 · see citing works
Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome.
Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M., & Salzberg, S. L. (2009) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 · Cited by 21,849 · see citing works
Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS)
Zhang, Y., Liu, T., Meyer, C. A., Eeckhoute, J., Johnson, D. S., Bernstein, B. E., Nusbaum, C., Myers, R. M., Brown, M., Li, W., et al. (2008) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137 · Cited by 18,386 · see citing works
Robinson, J. T., Thorvaldsdóttir, H., Winckler, W., Guttman, M., Lander, E. S., Getz, G., & Mesirov, J. P. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1754 · Cited by 15,390 · see citing works
Cox, J., & Mann, M. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1511 · Cited by 14,855 · see citing works
Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets
Zhou, Y., Zhou, B., Pache, L., Chang, M., Khodabakhshi, A. H., Tanaseichuk, O., Benner, C., & Chanda, S. K. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09234-6 · Cited by 14,611 · see citing works
MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching
Bailey, T. L., Boden, M., Buske, F. A., Frith, M., Grant, C. E., Clementi, L., Ren, J., Li, W. W., & Noble, W. S. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp335 · Cited by 10,648 · see citing works
Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods
Johnson, W. E., Li, C., & Rabinovic, A. (2007) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxj037 · Cited by 8,658 · see citing works
mTOR Signaling in Growth Control and Disease
Laplante, M., & Sabatini, D. M. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.017 · Cited by 8,509 · see citing works
deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis
Ramírez, F., Ryan, D. P., Grüning, B., Bhardwaj, V., Kilpert, F., Richter, A. S., Heyne, S., Dündar, F., & Manke, T. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw257 · Cited by 8,096 · see citing works
Andromeda: A Peptide Search Engine Integrated into the MaxQuant Environment
Cox, J., Neuhauser, N., Michalski, A., Scheltema, R. A., Olsen, J. V., & Mann, M. (2011) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr101065j · Cited by 5,349 · see citing works
IL‐6 in inflammation, immunity, and disease
Tanaka, T., Narazaki, M., & Kishimoto, T. (2014) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a016295 · Cited by 5,046 · see citing works
The pro- and anti-inflammatory properties of the cytokine interleukin-6
Scheller, J., Chalaris, A., Schmidt-Arras, D., & Rose-John, S. (2011) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.01.034 · Cited by 3,212 · see citing works
STATs: transcriptional control and biological impact
Levy, D. E., & Darnell, J. E. (2002) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm909 · Cited by 3,201 · see citing works
MAPK signal pathways in the regulation of cell proliferation in mammalian cells
ZHANG, W., & LIU, H. T. (2002) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/sj.cr.7290105 · Cited by 2,845 · see citing works
IL-6 as a keystone cytokine in health and disease
Hunter, C. A., & Jones, S. A. (2015) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.3153 · Cited by 2,511 · see citing works
Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T., Tan, Q., Collins, J., Alvord, W. G., Roayaei, J., Stephens, R. D., Baseler, M., Lane, H. C., & Lempicki, R. A. (2007) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-9-r183 · Cited by 2,482 · see citing works
Smith-Garvin, J. E., Koretzky, G. A., & Jordan, M. S. (2009) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132706 · Cited by 2,144 · see citing works
Interleukin-6-type cytokine signalling through the gp130/Jak/STAT pathway
HEINRICH, P. C., BEHRMANN, I., MÜLLER-NEWEN, G., SCHAPER, F., & GRAEVE, L. (1998) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj3340297 · Cited by 2,130 · see citing works
Quantifying similarity between motifs
Gupta, S., Stamatoyannopoulos, J. A., Bailey, T. L., & Noble, W. S. (2007) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r24 · Cited by 2,058 · see citing works
Wen, Z., Zhong, Z., & Darnell, J. E. (1995) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90311-9 · Cited by 1,974 · see citing works
Thoreen, C. C., Kang, S. A., Chang, J. W., Liu, Q., Zhang, J., Gao, Y., Reichling, L. J., Sim, T., Sabatini, D. M., & Gray, N. S. (2009) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m900301200 · Cited by 1,803 · see citing works
Protein detection using proximity-dependent DNA ligation assays
Fredriksson, S., Gullberg, M. T., Jarvius, J., Olsson, C., Pietras, K., Gustafsdottir, S., Östman, A., & Landegren, U. D. (2002) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0502-473 · Cited by 1,511 · see citing works
Interleukin-6 and chronic inflammation
Gabay, C. (2006) · Arthritis Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/ar1917 · Cited by 1,468 · see citing works
Targeted disruption of the mouse <i>Stat3</i> gene leads to early embryonic lethality
Takeda, K., Noguchi, K., Shi, W., Tanaka, T., Matsumoto, M., Yoshida, N., Kishimoto, T., & Akira, S. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.8.3801 · Cited by 1,323 · see citing works
CYTOKINES: COORDINATORS OF IMMUNE AND INFLAMMATORY RESPONSES
Arai, K., Lee, F., Miyajima, A., Miyatake, S., Arai, N., & Yokota, T. (1990) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.59.070190.004031 · Cited by 1,318 · see citing works
JAK-STAT Signaling: From Interferons to Cytokines
Schindler, C., Levy, D. E., & Decker, T. (2007) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.r700016200 · Cited by 1,263 · see citing works
Recent insights into targeting the IL-6 cytokine family in inflammatory diseases and cancer
Jones, S. A., & Jenkins, B. J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-018-0066-7 · Cited by 1,102 · see citing works
Rose-John, S. (2012) · International Journal of Biological Sciences · doi:10.7150/ijbs.4989 · Cited by 1,040 · see citing works
Serine phosphorylation of STATs
Decker, T., & Kovarik, P. (2000) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1203481 · Cited by 887 · see citing works
Cytokine Signaling Modules in Inflammatory Responses
O’Shea, J. J., & Murray, P. J. (2008) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2008.03.002 · Cited by 819 · see citing works
Interleukin-6 Family CytokinesPreprint
Rose‐John, S. (2017) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a028415 · Cited by 801 · see citing works
Chung, J., Uchida, E., Grammer, T. C., & Blenis, J. (1997) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.17.11.6508 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
A bioactive designer cytokine for human hematopoietic progenitor cell expansion
Fischer, M., Goldschmitt, J., Peschel, C., Brakenhoff, J. P. J., Kallen, K., Wollmer, A., Grötzinger, J., & Rose‐John, S. (1997) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0297-142 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
Krutzik, P. O., & Nolan, G. P. (2006) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth872 · Cited by 525 · see citing works
Molecular and Structural Basis of Cytokine Receptor Pleiotropy in the Interleukin-4/13 System
LaPorte, S. L., Juo, Z. S., Václavíková, J., Colf, L. A., Qi, X., Heller, N. M., Keegan, A. D., & García, K. C. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.030 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Korn, T., Mitsdoerffer, M., Croxford, A. L., Awasthi, A., Dardalhon, V., Galileos, G., Vollmar, P., Stritesky, G. L., Kaplan, M. H., Waisman, A., et al. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0809850105 · Cited by 510 · see citing works
The code and beyond: transcription regulation by the RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain
Harlen, K. M., & Churchman, L. S. (2017) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.10 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Yokogami, K., Wakisaka, S., Avruch, J., & Reeves, S. A. (2000) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(99)00268-7 · Cited by 468 · see citing works
Structural Biology of Shared Cytokine Receptors
Wang, X., Lupardus, P. J., LaPorte, S. L., & García, K. C. (2007) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.24.021605.090616 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Versatile functions for IL-6 in metabolism and cancer
Mauer, J., Denson, J. L., & Brüning, J. C. (2015) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2014.12.008 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
IL-6 Regulates Neutrophil Trafficking during Acute Inflammation via STAT3
Fielding, C. A., McLoughlin, R. M., McLeod, L., Colmont, C. S., Najdovska, M., Grail, D., Ernst, M., Jones, S. A., Topley, N., & Jenkins, B. J. (2008) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.181.3.2189 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Role of STATs as downstream signal transducers in Src family kinase-mediated tumorigenesis
Silva, C. M. (2004) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1208159 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Cancer Immunotherapy Based on Natural Killer Cells: Current Progress and New Opportunities
Hu, W., Wang, G., Huang, D., Sui, M., & Xu, Y. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.01205 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
CDK8 is a positive regulator of transcriptional elongation within the serum response network
Donner, A. J., Ebmeier, C. C., Taatjes, D. J., & Espinosa, J. M. (2010) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.1752 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
The human CDK8 subcomplex is a molecular switch that controls Mediator coactivator functionPreprint
Knuesel, M. T., Meyer, K. D., Bernecky, C., & Taatjes, D. J. (2009) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1767009 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Bancerek, J., Poss, Z. C., Steinparzer, I., Sedlyarov, V., Pfaffenwimmer, T., Mikulic, I., Dölken, L., Strobl, B., Müller, M., Taatjes, D. J., et al. (2013) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2012.10.017 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Varinou, L., Ramsauer, K., Karaghiosoff, M., Kolbe, T., Pfeffer, K., Müller, M., & Decker, T. (2003) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00322-4 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Generation and regulation of human CD4 <sup>+</sup> IL-17-producing T cells in ovarian cancer
Miyahara, Y., Odunsi, K., Chen, W., Peng, G., Matsuzaki, J., & Wang, R.-F. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0710686105 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Stat3 regulates microtubules by antagonizing the depolymerization activity of stathmin
Ng, D. C. H., Li-n, B., Lim, C. P., Huang, G., Zhang, T., Poli, V., & Cao, X. (2006) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200503021 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
CDK8 Is a Stimulus-Specific Positive Coregulator of p53 Target Genes
Donner, A. J., Szostek, S. A., Hoover, J. M., & Espinosa, J. M. (2007) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.05.026 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Quantitative analysis of T cell proteomes and environmental sensors during T cell differentiation
Howden, A. J. M., Hukelmann, J. L., Brenes, A., Spinelli, L., Sinclair, L. V., Lamond, A. I., & Cantrell, D. A. (2019) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-019-0495-x · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Serine Phosphorylation and Negative Regulation of Stat3 by JNK
Lim, C. P., & Cao, X. (1999) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.274.43.31055 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Cytokine receptor signaling pathways
Leonard, W. J., & Lin, J. (2000) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1067/mai.2000.106899 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Jones, G. W., McLoughlin, R. M., Hammond, V. J., Parker, C. R., Williams, J. D., Malhotra, R., Scheller, J., Williams, A. S., Rose-John, S., Topley, N., et al. (2010) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0901528 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
The Mediator Complex: At the Nexus of RNA Polymerase II Transcription
Jerónimo, C., & Robert, F. (2017) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2017.07.001 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Mechanism of homodimeric cytokine receptor activation and dysregulation by oncogenic mutations
Wilmes, S., Hafer, M., Vuorio, J., Tucker, J. A., Winkelmann, H., Löchte, S., Stanly, T. A., Prieto, K. D. P., Poojari, C., Sharma, V., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw3242 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Self-citationSadzak, I., Schiff, M., Gattermeier, I., Glinitzer, R., Sauer, I., Saalmüller, A., Yang, E., Schaljo, B., & Kovarik, P. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0801794105 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Akamatsu, M., Mikami, N., Ohkura, N., Kawakami, R., Kitagawa, Y., Sugimoto, A., Hirota, K., Nakamura, N., Ujihara, S., Kurosaki, T., et al. (2019) · Science Immunology · doi:10.1126/sciimmunol.aaw2707 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
IL-15–PI3K–AKT–mTOR: A Critical Pathway in the Life Journey of Natural Killer Cells
Ali, A. K., Nandagopal, N., & Lee, S. (2015) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2015.00355 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
A Role of STAT3 in Rho GTPase-regulated Cell Migration and Proliferation
Debidda, M., Wang, L., Zang, H., Poli, V., & Zheng, Y. (2005) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m413187200 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Self-citationLin, J., & Leonard, W. J. (2019) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-042718-041447 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
CDK8/19 Mediator kinases potentiate induction of transcription by NFκB
Chen, M., Liang, J., Ji, H., Yang, Z., Altilia, S., Hu, B., Schronce, A., McDermott, M. S. J., Schools, G. P., Lim, C., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1710467114 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Poli, V., & Camporeale, A. (2015) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2015.00121 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
CDK8-Mediated STAT1-S727 Phosphorylation Restrains NK Cell Cytotoxicity and Tumor Surveillance
Putz, E. M., Gotthardt, D., Hoermann, G., Csiszar, A., Wirth, S., Berger, A., Straka, E., Rigler, D., Wallner, B., Jamieson, A. M., et al. (2013) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2013.07.012 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Czodrowski, P., Mallinger, A., Wienke, D., Esdar, C., Pöschke, O., Busch, M., Rohdich, F., Eccles, S. A., Ortiz-Ruiz, M.-J., Schneider, R., et al. (2016) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00597 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
The Role of the PI3K Signaling Pathway in CD4+ T Cell Differentiation and Function
Han, J. M., Patterson, S. J., & Levings, M. K. (2012) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2012.00245 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Rhee, S. H., Jones, B. W., Toshchakov, V. Y., Vogel, S. N., & Fenton, M. J. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m208633200 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Liu, Q., Kirubakaran, S., Hur, W., Niepel, M., Westover, K. D., Thoreen, C. C., Wang, J., Ni, J., Patricelli, M. P., Vogel, K. W., et al. (2012) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111.304485 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
STAT3 associates with vacuolar H+-ATPase and regulates cytosolic and lysosomal pH
Liu, B., Palmfeldt, J., Lin, L., Colaço, A., Clemmensen, K. K. B., Huang, J., Xu, F., Liu, X., Maeda, K., Luo, Y., et al. (2018) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/s41422-018-0080-0 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Mechanistic Diversity of Cytokine Receptor Signaling Across Cell Membranes
Stroud, R. M., & Wells, J. A. (2004) · Science s STKE · doi:10.1126/stke.2312004re7 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Stat3 promotes directional cell migration by regulating Rac1 activity via its activator βPIX
Teng, T., Lin, B., Manser, E., Ng, D. C. H., & Cao, X. (2009) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.057109 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Luke, J. J., D'Adamo, D. R., Dickson, M. A., Keohan, M. L., Carvajal, R. D., Maki, R. G., de Stanchina, E., Musi, E., Singer, S., & Schwartz, G. K. (2012) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-3203 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Ross, S. H., Rollings, C., Anderson, K. E., Hawkins, P. T., Stephens, L. R., & Cantrell, D. A. (2016) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2016.07.022 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Martínez‐Fábregas, J., Prescott, A. R., van Kasteren, S. I., Pedrioli, D. M. L., McLean, W. H. I., Moles, A., Reinheckel, T., Poli, V., & Watts, C. K. W. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07741-6 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Cytokines: Coordinators Of Immune And Inflammatory Responses
Arai, K. (1990) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.59.1.783 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Pilz, A., Ramsauer, K., Heidari, H., Leitges, M., Kovarik, P., & Decker, T. (2003) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/sj.embor.embor802 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Membrane-associated STAT3 and PY-STAT3 in the Cytoplasm
Shah, M., Patel, K., Mukhopadhyay, S., Xu, F., Guo, G. G., & Sehgal, P. B. (2006) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m508527200 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Src as the link between inflammation and cancer
Liu, S. T., Pham, H., Pandol, S. J., & Ptasznik, A. (2014) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00416 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Regulated expression of gp130 and IL-6 receptor alpha chain in T cell maturation and activation.
Betz, U. (1998) · International Immunology · doi:10.1093/intimm/10.8.1175 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
In Vitro Th Differentiation Protocol
Sekiya, T., & Yoshimura, A. (2015) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2966-5_10 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
The Carboxyl-terminal Region of STAT3 Controls Gene Induction by the Mouse Haptoglobin Promoter
Kim, H., & Baumann, H. (1997) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.272.23.14571 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Chen, M., Li, J., Liang, J., Thompson, Z. S., Kathrein, K., Broude, E. V., & Roninson, I. B. (2019) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells8111413 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Guo, Z., Wang, G., Lv, Y., Wan, Y. Y., & Zheng, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.01988 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Kinetics of cytokine receptor trafficking determine signaling and functional selectivity
Martínez‐Fábregas, J., Wilmes, S., Wang, L., Hafer, M., Pöhler, E., Lokau, J., Garbers, C., Cozzani, A., Fyfe, P. K., Piehler, J., et al. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.49314 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationSTAT3 as a new autophagy regulator
Jonchère, B., Bélanger, A., Guette, C., Barré, B., & Coqueret, O. (2013) · JAK-STAT · doi:10.4161/jkst.24353 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
NK Cell–Specific CDK8 Deletion Enhances Antitumor Responses
Witalisz-Siepracka, A., Gotthardt, D., Prchal-Murphy, M., Didara, Z., Menzl, I., Prinz, D., Edlinger, L., Putz, E. M., & Sexl, V. (2018) · Cancer Immunology Research · doi:10.1158/2326-6066.cir-17-0183 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Kościuczuk, E. M., Mehrotra, S., Saleiro, D., Kroczyńska, B., Majchrzak-Kita, B., Lisowski, P., Driehaus, C., Rogalska, A., Turner, A. E., Lienhoop, T., et al. (2018) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra118.005956 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Servais, F., Kirchmeyer, M., Hamdorf, M., Minoungou, N., Rose‐John, S., Kreis, S., Haan, C., & Behrmann, I. (2019) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2019.03.007 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Optimization of human Th17 cell differentiation in vitro: evaluating different polarizing factors
Ganjalıkhani-Hakemi, M., Ghaedi, K., Andalib, A., Hosseini, M., & Rezaei, A. (2011) · In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal · doi:10.1007/s11626-011-9444-1 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Stat3-mediated alterations in lysosomal membrane protein composition
Lloyd‐Lewis, B., Krueger, C. C., Sargeant, T. J., D’Angelo, M. E., Deery, M. J., Feret, R., Howard, J. A., Lilley, K. S., & Watson, C. J. (2018) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra118.001777 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Hutchins, A. P., Diez, D., & Miranda-Saavedra, D. (2013) · JAK-STAT · doi:10.4161/jkst.25097 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Ridgley, L. A., Anderson, A. E., Maney, N. J., Naamane, N., Skelton, A. J., Lawson, C. A., Emery, P., Isaacs, J. D., Carmody, R. J., & Pratt, A. G. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.01535 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Yang, J., Kunimoto, H., Katayama, B., Zhao, H., Shiromizu, T., Wang, L., Ozawa, T., Tomonaga, T., Tsuruta, D., & Nakajima, K. (2019) · International Immunology · doi:10.1093/intimm/dxz061 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationMapping Determinants of Cytokine Signaling via Protein Engineering
Gorby, C., Martínez‐Fábregas, J., Wilmes, S., & Moraga, I. (2018) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.02143 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationPhosphorylation of STAT2 on serine-734 negatively regulates the IFN-α-induced antiviral response
Steen, H. C., Kotredes, K. P., Nogusa, S., Harris, M. Y., Balachandran, S., & Gamero, A. M. (2016) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.185421 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Kinetics of cytokine receptor trafficking determine signaling and functional selectivityPreprint
Martínez‐Fábregas, J., Wilmes, S., Wang, L., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/638031 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationMartínez‐Fábregas, J., Wilmes, S., Wang, L., et al. (2019) · doi:10.7554/elife.49314.sa2 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationCDK8-mediated STAT1-S727 phosphorylation restrains NK cell cytotoxicity and tumor surveillance
Putz, E. M. (2013) · Intrinsic Activity · doi:10.25006/ia.1.s1-a3.4 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Sadzak, I., Schiff, M., Yang, E., et al. (2008) · Cytokine · doi:10.1016/j.cyto.2008.07.242
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
CDK8 maintains stemness and tumorigenicity of glioma stem cells by regulating the c-MYC pathway
Fukasawa, K., Kadota, T., Horie, T., Tokumura, K., Terada, R., Kitaguchi, Y., Park, G., Ochiai, S., Iwahashi, S., Okayama, Y., et al. (2021) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/s41388-021-01745-1 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Arnett, A., Moo, K. G., Flynn, K. J., Sundberg, T. B., Johannessen, L. H., Shamji, A. F., Gray, N. S., Decker, T., Zheng, Y., Gersuk, V. H., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/855429
- Authors
- Martinez-Fabregas, J., Wang, L., Pohler, E., Cozzani, A., Kazemian, M., Mitra, S., & Moraga, I.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Inserm (FR)
- University of Dundee (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kazemian, M.
- Mitra, S.
- Moraga, I.
- Venue
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2020-03-20
- OpenAlex
- W3010843802
- Semantic Scholar
- 53c0e67e80c6d6141880cfaed7dcd89fd8c632eb
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 102
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- LillOA (Université de Lille (University Of Lille)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- CDK8, STAT3, interleukin-6, STAT3 phosphorylation, CDK8 inhibitors, phosphoproteome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-23.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-23.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review