CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 341

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protospacer recognition motifs: Mixed identities and functional diversity

Shah, Shiraz A., Erdmann, Susanne, Mojica, Francisco J.M., Garrett, Roger A.·2013·RNA Biology
DOI 10.4161/rna.23764PMC PMC3737346
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4161/rna.23764

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PAMs seem to participate in the interference phase and in self/non-self distinction.

    “Furthermore, PAMs seem to participate in the interference phase and in self/non-self distinction as well [26].”

    From CRISPR-Cas: Converting A Bacterial Defence Mechanism into A State-of-the-Art Genetic Manipulation Tool (2019) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Conclusions and Perspectives section says that interference depends to some extent on PAM sequences, supporting their proposed role in the interference phase. The passages found do not say that PAMs participate in self/non-self distinction; a work with that phrase in its title appears in the References, but that alone does not establish the claim. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Cas9 systems from different bacteria recognise other PAM sites.

    “the fact that Cas9 systems from different bacteria recognise other PAM sites [26]”

    From CRISPR-Cas: Converting A Bacterial Defence Mechanism into A State-of-the-Art Genetic Manipulation Tool (2019) · cites this paper as [26]

  • SpCas9 can recognize a 5′-NGG protospacer adjacent motif (PAM), which is part of the non-self-sequence recognized by the CRISPR bacterial adaptive immune system.

    “SpCas9 can recognize a 5′-NGG protospacer adjacent motif (PAM), which is part of the non-self-sequence recognized by the CRISPR bacterial adaptive immune system.”

    From Viral Delivery Systems for CRISPR (2019) · cites this paper as [68]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. 10.1126/science.1179555 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.mib.2011.03.005 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nrmicro2577 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.tim.2011.08.002 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1007/s00239-004-0046-3 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1099/mic.0.27437-0 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1099/mic.0.28048-0 · DOI
  8. 10.1128/JB.01415-07 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.1138140 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1128/JB.01412-07 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/nar/gks216 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1371/journal.pone.0035888 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08171.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1073/pnas.112047299 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04428.x · DOI
  16. 10.1155/2006/542818 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06641.x · DOI
  18. 10.1126/science.1159689 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.10.023 · DOI
  20. 10.1099/mic.0.023960-0 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1042/BST0370023 · DOI
  22. 10.1073/pnas.1104144108 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07452.x · DOI
  24. 10.1093/nar/gkr606 · DOI
  25. 10.1074/jbc.M112.377002 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08172.x · DOI
  27. 10.1371/journal.pone.0050797 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.020 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07586.x · DOI
  30. 10.1073/pnas.1102716108 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/ncomms1937 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.018 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02266.x · DOI
  34. 10.1186/gb-2007-8-4-r61 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.str.2009.03.019 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07465.x · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1074/jbc.M112.382598 · DOI
  38. 10.1074/jbc.M803225200 · DOI
  39. 10.1186/1745-6150-7-40 · DOI
  40. 10.1371/journal.pone.0047232 · DOI
  41. Díez-Villaseñor C, RNA Biol
  42. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08170.x · DOI
  43. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07073.x · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07315.x · DOI
  45. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07265.x · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.06.037 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.resmic.2010.09.001 · DOI
  48. Charbonnier F, 1994, J Bacteriol, 176, 1251, 10.1128/jb.176.5.1251-1259.1994 · DOI
  49. 10.1099/mic.0.027508-0 · DOI
  50. 10.1371/journal.pone.0049549 · DOI
  51. 10.1099/mic.0.036046-0 · DOI
  52. 10.1128/JB.01487-10 · DOI
  53. 10.1038/4361101a · DOI
  54. 10.1038/nature09523 · DOI
  55. 10.1371/journal.pone.0033802 · DOI
  56. Tyson GW, 2008, Environ Microbiol, 10, 200, 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01444.x · DOI
  57. 10.1128/JB.01184-12 · DOI
  58. 10.1093/nar/gkr1111 · DOI
  59. 10.1111/mmi.12152 · DOI
  60. 10.1126/science.1165771 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1038/nature08703 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.040 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.12.013 · DOI
  64. 10.1074/jbc.M111.238485 · DOI
  65. 10.1073/pnas.1112832108 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155447 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shah, S. A., Erdmann, S., Mojica, F. J. M., & Garrett, R. A.
Venue
RNA Biology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2013-02-12
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
891-899
ISSN
  • 1547-6286
  • 1555-8584
DOI
10.4161/rna.23764
PMC
PMC3737346
Cited by
341
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review