The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 4,692
Hande, A., Puranik, K., Yasaswini, K., Priyadharshini, R., Thavareesan, S., Anbukkarasi, S., Shanmugavadivel, K., Thenmozhi, D., & Chakravarthi, B. R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.12177 · Cited by 47
Saha, S., Junaed, J. A., Saleki, M., Sharma, A. S., Rifat, M. R., Rahouti, M., Ahmed, S. I., Mohammed, N., & Amin, M. R. (2023) · Workshop on Bangla Language Processing (BLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.banglalp-1.9 · Cited by 25
Ghosh, K., & Senapati, A. (2024) · Natural language processing. · doi:10.1017/nlp.2024.28 · Cited by 25
Gaber, M., Ahmed, M., & Janicke, H. (2024) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2024.104167 · Cited by 27
BERT-PhishFinder: A Robust Model for Accurate Phishing URL Detection With Optimized DistilBERT
Aljofey, A., Bello, S. A., Lu, J. J., & Xu, C. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2025.3545771 · Cited by 33
Detecting signs of depression on social media: A machine learning analysis and evaluation
Ta, P., Tran, N., Nguyen, H. T., & Nguyen, H. D. (2025) · Sustainable Futures · doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100827 · Cited by 27
Evaluating Multilingual Text Encoders for Unsupervised Cross-Lingual Retrieval
Litschko, R., Vulić, I., Ponzetto, S. P., & Glavaš, G. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72113-8_23 · Cited by 24
Positional Artefacts Propagate Through Masked Language Model Embeddings
Luo, Z., Kulmizev, A., & Mao, X. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.413 · Cited by 25
Weak Supervision and Black-Litterman for Automated ESG Portfolio Construction
Sokolov, A., Caverly, K., Mostovoy, J., Fahoum, T., & Seco, L. (2021) · The Journal of Financial Data Science · doi:10.3905/jfds.2021.1.070 · Cited by 27
Unsupervised Sentiment Analysis by Transferring Multi-source Knowledge
Dai, Y., Liu, J., Zhang, J., Fu, H., & Xu, Z. (2021) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-020-09792-8 · Cited by 24
Perturbing Inputs for Fragile Interpretations in Deep Natural Language Processing
Sinha, S., Chen, H., Sekhon, A., Ji, Y., & Qi, Y. (2021) · BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.blackboxnlp-1.33 · Cited by 30
Leveraging DistilBERT for Summarizing Arabic Text: An Extractive Dual-Stage Approach
Alshanqiti, A. M., Namoun, A., Alsughayyir, A., Mashraqi, A. M., Gilal, A. R., & Albouq, S. S. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3113256 · Cited by 27
Czert – Czech BERT-like Model for Language Representation
Sido, J., Pražák, O., Přibáň, P., Pašek, J., Seják, M., & Konopík, M. (2021) · International conference Recent advances in natural language processing · doi:10.26615/978-954-452-072-4_149 · Cited by 37
SeqAttack: On Adversarial Attacks for Named Entity Recognition
Simoncini, W., & Spanakis, G. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-demo.35 · Cited by 23
DQ-BART: Efficient Sequence-to-Sequence Model via Joint Distillation and Quantization
Li, Z., Wang, Z., Tan, M., Nallapati, R. M., Bhatia, P., Arnold, A., Xiang, B., & Roth, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-short.22 · Cited by 23
Marreddy, M., Oota, S. R., Vakada, L. S., Chinni, V. C., & Mamidi, R. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing · doi:10.1145/3531535 · Cited by 28
DocEE: A Large-Scale and Fine-grained Benchmark for Document-level Event Extraction
Tong, M., Xu, B., Wang, S., Han, M., Cao, Y., Zhu, J., Chen, S., Hou, L., & Li, J. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.291 · Cited by 26
Measuring and mitigating language model biases in abusive language detection
Song, R., Giunchiglia, F., Li, Y., Shi, L., & Xu, H. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103277 · Cited by 23
White, B. M., Melton, C. A., Zareie, P., Davis, R. L., Bednarczyk, R. A., & Shaban‐Nejad, A. (2023) · BMJ Health & Care Informatics · doi:10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100665 · Cited by 23
Reviewer Assignment Problem: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Aksoy, M., Yanık, S., & Amasyalı, M. F. (2023) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.14318 · Cited by 30
Extensive evaluation of transformer-based architectures for adverse drug events extraction
Scaboro, S., Portelli, B., Chersoni, E., Santus, E., & Serra, G. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110675 · Cited by 27
Stammbach, D., Webersinke, N., Bingler, J., Kraus, M., & Leippold, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-short.91 · Cited by 27
Yu, Y., Xiong, C., Sun, S., Zhang, C., & Overwijk, A. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.95 · Cited by 58
Zhao, R., Yu, J., Zhao, H., & Ngai, E. C. ‐. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3610873 · Cited by 24
Findings of the TSAR-2022 Shared Task on Multilingual Lexical Simplification
Saggion, H., Štajner, S., Ferrés, D., Sheang, K. C., Shardlow, M., North, K., & Zampieri, M. (2022) · Workshop on Text Simplification, Accessibility and Readability (TSAR) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.tsar-1.31 · Cited by 23
How Good Is ChatGPT For Detecting Hate Speech In Portuguese?
de Oliveira, A. S., Cecote, T. C., Silva, P., Gertrudes, J. C., Freitas, V. L. S., & Luz, E. J. D. S. (2023) · Simpósio Brasileiro de Tecnologia da Informação e da Linguagem Humana (STIL) · doi:10.5753/stil.2023.233943 · Cited by 26
Extractive social media text summarization based on MFMMR-BertSum
Fan, J., Tian, X., Lv, C., Zhang, S., Wang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2023) · Array · doi:10.1016/j.array.2023.100322 · Cited by 28
ToxiSpanSE: An Explainable Toxicity Detection in Code Review Comments
Sarker, J., Sultana, S., Wilson, S. R., & Bosu, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the ... ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement/International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement · doi:10.1109/esem56168.2023.10304855 · Cited by 31
Generative Table Pre-training Empowers Models for Tabular Prediction
Zhang, T., Wang, S., Yan, S., Li, J., & Liu, Q. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.917 · Cited by 49
How crowd accidents are reported in the news media: Lexical and sentiment analysis
Feliciani, C., Corbetta, A., Haghani, M., et al. (2024) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106423 · Cited by 23
Calibrating Structured Output Predictors for Natural Language Processing
Jagannatha, A., & Yu, H. Q. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.188 · Cited by 26
Wang, S., Zhao, R., Chen, X., Zheng, Y., & Liu, B. (2021) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3442381.3449948 · Cited by 23
AlBERTo: Modeling Italian Social Media Language with BERT
Polignano, M., Basile, V., Basile, P., de Gemmis, M., & Semeraro, G. M. (2019) · Italian Journal of Computational Linguistics · doi:10.4000/ijcol.472 · Cited by 25
Know what you don't need: Single-Shot Meta-Pruning for attention heads
Zhang, Z., Qi, F., Liu, Z., Liu, Q., & Sun, M. (2021) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.05.003 · Cited by 23
InfoLM: A New Metric to Evaluate Summarization & Data2Text Generation
Colombo, P., Clavel, C., & Piantanida, P. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i10.21299 · Cited by 30
Is Retriever Merely an Approximator of Reader?Preprint
Yang, S., & Seo, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.10999 · Cited by 50
Cortiz, D. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.02041 · Cited by 42
Suresh, A., Jacobs, J., Lai, V., Tan, C., Ward, W., Martin, J., & Sumner, T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.07949 · Cited by 48
Digital Resilience: How Work-From-Home Readiness Affects Firm PerformancePreprint
Bai, J. J., Brynjolfsson, E., Jin, W., Steffen, S., & Wan, C. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3616893 · Cited by 27
Balasubramanian, P., Seby, J., & Kostakos, P. (2023) · 2023 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata59044.2023.10386976 · Cited by 22
Sentiment Knowledge Enhanced Self-supervised Learning for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis
Fan, Q., Han, J., He, Y., Zheng, T., & Zheng, G. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.821 · Cited by 23
Semantic Embeddings for Arabic Retrieval Augmented Generation (ARAG)
Abdelazim, H., Waheed, M. T., & Mohamed, A. (2023) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2023.01411135 · Cited by 28
Knowledge-Augmented Visual Question Answering With Natural Language Explanation
Xie, J., Cai, Y., Chen, J., Xu, R., Wang, J., & Li, Q. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2024.3379900 · Cited by 23
RoBERTa, ResNeXt and BiLSTM with self-attention: The ultimate trio for customer sentiment analysis
Lak, A. J., Boostani, R., Alenizi, F. A., Mohammed, A. S., & Fakhrahmad, S. M. (2024) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112018 · Cited by 28
Ren, M. (2024) · Applied and Computational Engineering · doi:10.54254/2755-2721/97/20241406 · Cited by 30
Towards a Decomposable Metric for Explainable Evaluation of Text Generation from AMR
Opitz, J., & Frank, A. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.129 · Cited by 28
Batanović, V., Cvetanović, M., & Nikolić, B. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242050 · Cited by 29
GhostBERT: Generate More Features with Cheap Operations for BERT
Huang, Z., Hou, L., Shang, L., Jiang, X., Chen, X. D., & Liu, Q. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.509 · Cited by 23
Learning to Explain: Generating Stable Explanations Fast
Situ, X., Ingrid Zukerman, A., Paris, C. L., Maruf, S., & Haffari, G. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.415 · Cited by 27
BERT Model-Based Approach For Detecting Categories of Tweets in the Field of Eating Disorders (ED)
Benítez‐Andrades, J. A., Alija-Pérez, J.-M., García-Rodríguez, I., Benavides, C., Aláiz‐Moretón, H., Vargas, R., & García-Ordás, M. T. (2021) · Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems · doi:10.1109/cbms52027.2021.00105 · Cited by 26
Providing a greater precision of Situational Awareness of urban floods through Multimodal Fusion
da Costa, T. A. G., Meneguette, R. I., & Ueyama, J. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115923 · Cited by 22
From Dense to Sparse: Contrastive Pruning for Better Pre-trained Language Model Compression
Xu, R., Luo, F., Wang, C., Chang, B., Huang, J. G., Huang, S., & Huang, F. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i10.21408 · Cited by 29
Detecting Propaganda Techniques in English News Articles using Pre-trained Transformers
Abdullah, M., Altiti, O., & Obiedat, R. (2022) · International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS) · doi:10.1109/icics55353.2022.9811117 · Cited by 25
Densely connected convolutional transformer for single image dehazing
Parihar, A. S., & Java, A. (2022) · Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation · doi:10.1016/j.jvcir.2022.103722 · Cited by 24
MedBERT: A Pre-trained Language Model for Biomedical Named Entity Recognition
Vasantharajan, C., Tun, K. Z., Ho, T.-N., Jain, S., Rong, T., & Siong, C. E. (2022) · Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC) · doi:10.23919/apsipaasc55919.2022.9980157 · Cited by 22
Mask and Cloze: Automatic Open Cloze Question Generation Using a Masked Language Model
Matsumori, S., Okuoka, K., Shibata, R., Inoue, M., Fukuchi, Y., & Imai, M. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3239005 · Cited by 27
Mohankumar, P., Kamal, A., Singh, V. K., et al. (2023) · International Conference on Communication Systems & Networks (COMSNETS) · doi:10.1109/comsnets56262.2023.10041329 · Cited by 22
pNLP-Mixer: an Efficient all-MLP Architecture for Language
Fusco, F., Pascual, D., Staar, P., & Antognini, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-industry.6 · Cited by 36
Zhang, Q., Naradowsky, J., & Miyao, Y. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.417 · Cited by 36
ReGen: Zero-Shot Text Classification via Training Data Generation with Progressive Dense Retrieval
Yu, Y., Zhuang, Y., Zhang, R., Yu, M., Shen, J., & Zhang, C. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.748 · Cited by 28
Measuring the Mixing of Contextual Information in the Transformer
Ferrando, J., Gállego, G. I., & Costa‐jussà, M. R. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.595 · Cited by 40
Seeking an optimal approach for Computer-aided Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism
Islam, N. U., Zhou, Z., Gehlot, S., Gotway, M. B., & Liang, J. (2023) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2023.102988 · Cited by 24
Timiryasov, I., & Tastet, J. (2023) · BabyLM Challenge · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.conll-babylm.24 · Cited by 70
Sparsity-Guided Holistic Explanation for LLMs with Interpretable Inference-Time Intervention
Tan, Z., Chen, T., Zhang, Z., & Liu, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i19.30160 · Cited by 24
Pan, R., García-Díaz, J. A., Rodríguez‐García, M. Á., & Valencia‐García, R. (2024) · Computer Standards & Interfaces · doi:10.1016/j.csi.2024.103856 · Cited by 26
Zero-Shot Video Moment Retrieval from Frozen Vision-Language Models
Luo, D., Huang, J., Gong, S., Jin, H., & Liu, Y. (2024) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv57701.2024.00538 · Cited by 23
Bahaa, A., Kamal, A. E.-R., Fahmy, H., & Ghoneim, A. S. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3396410 · Cited by 34
Alqurashi, F. A., & Ahmad, I. (2024) · Alexandria Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.aej.2024.07.044 · Cited by 28
Cloze Distillation: Improving Neural Language Models with Human Next-Word Prediction
Eisape, T., Zaslavsky, N., & Lévy, R. (2020) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.conll-1.49 · Cited by 26
Self-Supervised Test-Time Learning for Reading Comprehension
Banerjee, P., Gokhale, T., & Baral, C. R. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.95 · Cited by 30
Shrinking Bigfoot: Reducing wav2vec 2.0 footprint
Peng, Z., Budhkar, A., Tuil, I., Levy, J., Sobhani, P., Cohen, R., & Nassour, J. (2021) · Workshop on Simple and Efficient Natural Language Processing (SustaiNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.sustainlp-1.14 · Cited by 31
Towards Representative Web Performance Measurements with Google Lighthouse
Heričko, T., Šumak, B., & Brdnik, S. (2021) · doi:10.18690/978-961-286-516-0.9 · Cited by 30
DeLighT: Very Deep and Light-weight TransformerPreprint
Mehta, S., Ghazvininejad, M., Iyer, S. V., Zettlemoyer, L., & Hajishirzi, H. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 21
Optimal Subarchitecture Extraction For BERTPreprint
de Wynter, A., & Perry, D. J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.10499 · Cited by 30
Scalable Visual Transformers with Hierarchical PoolingPreprint
Pan, Z., Zhuang, B., Liu, J., He, H., & Cai, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 22
FedKD: Communication Efficient Federated Learning via Knowledge DistillationPreprint
Wu, C., Wu, F., Lyu, L., Huang, Y., & Xie, X. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.13323 · Cited by 22
Recent Advances in Named Entity Recognition: A Comprehensive Survey and Comparative StudyPreprint
Keraghel, I., Morbieu, S., & Nadif, M. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.10825 · Cited by 144
Shin, J., Yoon, H. S., Lee, S., Park, S., Liu, Y., Choi, J. D., & Lee, S.-J. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.734 · Cited by 33
Multilevel Semantic Interaction Alignment for Video–Text Cross-Modal Retrieval
Chen, L., Deng, Z., Liu, L., & Yin, S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2024.3360530 · Cited by 24
Causal keyword driven reliable text classification with large language model feedback
Song, R. F., Li, Y., Tian, M., Wang, H., Giunchiglia, F., & Xu, H. (2024) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103964 · Cited by 25
Gökçimen, T., & Daş, B. (2025) · Alexandria Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.aej.2025.03.030 · Cited by 25
Chen, S., Wan, H., Peng, B., Quan, R., Chang, Y., & Derigent, W. J. E. (2025) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.112832 · Cited by 27
GPU Accelerated Feature Engineering and Training for Recommender Systems
Schifferer, B., Titericz, G., Deotte, C., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1145/3415959.3415996 · Cited by 21
GNEM: A Generic One-to-Set Neural Entity Matching Framework
Chen, R., Shen, Y., & Zhang, D. (2021) · doi:10.1145/3442381.3450119 · Cited by 21
García, M., Vieira, T. K., Scarton, C., Idiart, M., & Villavicencio, A. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.212 · Cited by 21
Armengol-Estapé, J., Carrino, C. P., Rodriguez-Penagos, C. G., Bonet, O. D. G., Armentano-Oller, C., González-Agirre, A., Melero, M., & Villegas, M. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.437 · Cited by 24
Avoiding Inference Heuristics in Few-shot Prompt-based Finetuning
Utama, P. A., Moosavi, N. S., Sanh, V., & Gurevych, I. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.713 · Cited by 23
Self-citationTransforming Fake News: Robust Generalisable News Classification Using Transformers
Blackledge, C., & Atapour–Abarghouei, A. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata52589.2021.9671970 · Cited by 31
Kronecker Decomposition for GPT Compression
Edalati, A., Tahaei, M. S., Rashid, A., Nia, V. P., Clark, J. J., & Rezagholizadeh, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-short.24 · Cited by 28
Deng, K., Cao, S., Zhang, Y., & Ma, L. (2021) · IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding (ASRU) · doi:10.1109/asru51503.2021.9688009 · Cited by 30
Block-Skim: Efficient Question Answering for Transformer
Guan, Y., Li, Z., Lin, Z., Zhu, Y., Leng, J., & Guo, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i10.21316 · Cited by 27
A domain-adaptive pre-training approach for language bias detection in news
Krieger, J.-D., Spinde, T., Ruas, T., Kulshrestha, J., & Gipp, B. (2022) · ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries · doi:10.1145/3529372.3530932 · Cited by 32
Cross-Lingual Retrieval Augmented Prompt for Low-Resource Languages
Nie, E., liang, S. M., Schmid, H., & Schütze, H. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.528 · Cited by 33
NOTABLE: Transferable Backdoor Attacks Against Prompt-based NLP Models
Mei, K., Li, Z., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., & Ma, S. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.867 · Cited by 41
Opportunities and challenges in the application of large artificial intelligence models in radiology
Pan, L., Zhao, Z., Lu, Y., Tang, K., Fu, L., Liang, Q., & Peng, S. (2024) · Meta-Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.metrad.2024.100080 · Cited by 22
The New Agronomists: Language Models are Experts in Crop Management
Wu, J., Lai, Z., Chen, S., Tao, R., Pan, Z., & Hovakimyan, N. (2024) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw63382.2024.00543 · Cited by 35
Edge and Terminal Cooperation Enabled LLM Deployment Optimization in Wireless Network
Zhao, W., Jing, W., Lu, Z., & Wen, X. (2024) · IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC) · doi:10.1109/icccworkshops62562.2024.10693742 · Cited by 21
End-to-End Architectures for ASR-Free Spoken Language Understanding
Palogiannidi, E., Gkinis, I., Mastrapas, G., Mizera, P., & Stafylakis, T. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp40776.2020.9054314 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
