The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,201–1,300 of 4,692
EarlyBERT: Efficient BERT Training via Early-bird Lottery TicketsPreprint
Chen, X., Cheng, Y., Wang, S., Gan, Z., Wang, Z., & Liu, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.00063 · Cited by 17
Transformer-Based Models for Question Answering on COVID19Preprint
Ngai, H., Park, Y., Chen, J., & Parsapoor, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.11432 · Cited by 33
PLOVER and POLECAT: A New Political Event Ontology and DatasetPreprint
Halterman, A., Bagozzi, B. E., Beger, A., Schrodt, P., & Scraborough, G. (2023) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/rm5dw · Cited by 42
Ahmed, T., Ivan, S., Munir, A., & Ahmed, S. (2024) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2024.100079 · Cited by 24
An adaptive auto fusion with hierarchical attention for multimodal fake news detection
Luvembe, A. M., Li, W., Li, S., et al. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127930 · Cited by 16
Towards an Automated Islamic Fatwa System: Survey, Dataset and Benchmarks
Munshi, A., Alsabban, W. H., Farag, A. T., Rakha, O. E., Sallab, A. A. A., & Alotaibi, M. (2021) · International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing · doi:10.47760/ijcsmc.2021.v10i04.017 · Cited by 21
Zhou, H., Li, J., Peng, J., Zhang, S., & Zhang, S. (2021) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3447548.3467241 · Cited by 16
BESA: BERT-based Simulated Annealing for Adversarial Text Attacks
Yang, X., Liu, W., Tao, D., & Liu, W. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2021/453 · Cited by 16
FLiText: A Faster and Lighter Semi-Supervised Text Classification with Convolution Networks
Liu, C., Mengchao, Z., Zhi-bing, F., Hou, P., & Li, Y. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.192 · Cited by 16
Context-Based Question Answering System with Suggested Questions
Kumari, V., Keshari, S., Sharma, Y., & Goel, L. (2022) · International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence) · doi:10.1109/confluence52989.2022.9734207 · Cited by 16
Multi-level out-of-vocabulary words handling approach
Lochter, J. V., Silva, R. M., & de Almeida, T. D. (2022) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108911 · Cited by 17
ILDAE: Instance-Level Difficulty Analysis of Evaluation Data
Varshney, N., Mishra, S. R., & Baral, C. R. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.240 · Cited by 19
Eye Gaze and Self-attention: How Humans and Transformers Attend Words in Sentences
Bensemann, J., Peng, A. Y., Benavides‐Prado, D., Chen, Y., Tan, N. Ö., Corballis, P. M., Riddle, P., & Witbrock, M. (2022) · Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (CMCL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.cmcl-1.9 · Cited by 17
A Survey of Text Representation Methods and Their Genealogy
Siebers, P., Janiesch, C., & Zschech, P. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3205719 · Cited by 21
Design a sustainable micro-mobility future: trends and challenges in the US and EU
Avetisyan, L., Zhang, C., Bai, S., Moradi‐Pari, E., Feng, F., Bao, S., & Zhou, F. (2022) · Journal of Engineering Design · doi:10.1080/09544828.2022.2142904 · Cited by 18
A review on abusive content automatic detection: approaches, challenges and opportunities
Alrashidi, B., Jamal, A. T., Khan, I., & Alkhathlan, A. (2022) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.1142 · Cited by 20
Caines, A., Yannakoudakis, H., Allen, H., Pérez-Paredes, P., Byrne, B., & Buttery, P. J. (2022) · Linköping electronic conference proceedings · doi:10.3384/ecp190003 · Cited by 17
Knowledge Distillation of Russian Language Models with Reduction of Vocabulary
Kolesnikova, A., Kuratov, Y., Konovalov, V., & Mikhail, M. (2022) · Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies · doi:10.28995/2075-7182-2022-21-295-310 · Cited by 23
BBVD: A BERT-based Method for Vulnerability Detection
Huang, W., Lin, S., & Li, C. (2022) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2022.01312103 · Cited by 16
Annotation of uORFs in the OMIM genes allows to reveal pathogenic variants in 5′UTRs
Filatova, A. Y., Reveguk, I., Piatkova, M. A., Bessonova, D., Kuziakova, O., Demakova, V., Romanishin, A. O., Fishman, V., Imanmalik, Y., Chekanov, N., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1247 · Cited by 16
Revealing Media Bias in News Articles
Hamborg, F. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-17693-7 · Cited by 21
Kanaparthi, S. D., Patle, A., & Naik, K. J. (2023) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-023-15316-x · Cited by 17
Mayil, V. V., & Jeyalakshmi, T. R. (2023) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing (AISP) · doi:10.1109/aisp57993.2023.10134937 · Cited by 16
Quantum Artificial Hummingbird Algorithm for Feature Selection of Social IoT
Elaziz, M. A., Dahou, A., Al‐Betar, M. A., et al. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3290895 · Cited by 16
Cracking double-blind review: Authorship attribution with deep learning
Bauersfeld, L., Romero, Á., Muglikar, M., & Scaramuzza, D. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0287611 · Cited by 20
PERSONALITY CLASSIFICATION OF TEXT THROUGH MACHINE LEARNING AND DEEP LEARNING: A REVIEW (2023)
Perera, H., & Costa, L. (2023) · International Journal For Research In Advanced Computer Science And Engineering · doi:10.53555/cse.v9i4.2266 · Cited by 22
TencentPretrain: A Scalable and Flexible Toolkit for Pre-training Models of Different Modalities
Zhao, Z., Li, Y., Hou, C., Zhao, J., Tian, R., Liu, W., Chen, Y., Sun, N., Liu, H., Mao, W., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-demo.20 · Cited by 16
Neural Architecture Search for Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuning of Large Pre-trained Language Models
Lawton, N., Kumar, A., Thattai, G., Galstyan, A., & Steeg, G. V. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.539 · Cited by 34
Li, Y., Du, M., Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.797 · Cited by 18
EasyNLP: A Comprehensive and Easy-to-use Toolkit for Natural Language Processing
Wang, C., Qiu, M., Zhang, T., Liu, T., Li, L., Wang, J., Wang, M., Huang, J. G., & Lin, W. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-demos.3 · Cited by 16
Venkit, P. N., Srinath, M., & Wilson, S. (2023) · Workshop on Trustworthy Natural Language Processing (TrustNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.trustnlp-1.3 · Cited by 33
Misra, K., Rayz, J. T., & Ettinger, A. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.213 · Cited by 32
SenseMap: Urban Performance Visualization and Analytics Via Semantic Textual Similarity
Chen, J., Huang, Q., Wang, C., et al. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2023.3333356 · Cited by 16
Extracting goal models from natural language requirement specifications
Das, S., Deb, N., Cortesi, A., & Chaki, N. (2024) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2024.111981 · Cited by 23
VisTFC: Vision-guided target-side future context learning for neural machine translation
Zhu, S., Li, S., & Xiong, D. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123411 · Cited by 16
The Impact of Knowledge Distillation on the Energy Consumption and Runtime Efficiency of NLP Models
Yuan, Y., Shi, J., Zhang, Z., et al. (2024) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on AI Engineering – Software Engineering for AI (CAIN) · doi:10.1145/3644815.3644966 · Cited by 16
PhraseAug: An Augmented Medical Report Generation Model With Phrasebook
Mei, X., Yang, L., Gao, D., Cai, X., Han, J., & Liu, T. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2024.3416190 · Cited by 18
Metadata and Review-Based Hybrid Apparel Recommendation System Using Cascaded Large Language Models
Roy, S. S., Kumar, A., & Kumar, R. S. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3462793 · Cited by 20
PythonPal: Enhancing Online Programming Education Through Chatbot-Driven Personalized Feedback
Palahan, S. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2025.3545084 · Cited by 23
Legal Knowledge and Information Systems
Saarbrücken, J. (. 2., Francesconi, E., Borges, G., & Sorge, C. (2022) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/faia362 · Cited by 16
Telling BERT’s Full Story: from Local Attention to Global Aggregation
Pascual, D., Brunner, G., & Wattenhofer, R. P. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.9 · Cited by 19
Predicting user emotional tone in mental disorder online communities
Silveira, B., Assumpção, H. S., Murai, F., & da Silva, A. P. C. (2021) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2021.07.014 · Cited by 19
Bhattacharjee, K., Ballesteros, M., Anubhai, R., Muresan, S., Ma, J., Ladhak, F., & Al-Onaizan, Y. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.636 · Cited by 17
A little goes a long way: Improving toxic language classification despite data scarcity
Juuti, M., Gröndahl, T., Flanagan, A., & Asokan, N. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.269 · Cited by 22
Evaluating Unsupervised Representation Learning for Detecting Stances of Fake News
Guderlei, M., & Aßenmacher, M. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.558 · Cited by 16
Maros, M. E., Cho, C. G., Junge, A. G., Kämpgen, B., Saase, V., Siegel, F. P., Trinkmann, F., Ganslandt, T., Groden, C., & Wenz, H. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-85016-9 · Cited by 17
HowDIY: Towards Meta-Design Tools to Support Anyone to 3D Print Anywhere
Berman, A., Thakare, K., Howell, J., Quek, F. K. H., & Kim, J. (2021) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3397481.3450638 · Cited by 19
Weight Distillation: Transferring the Knowledge in Neural Network Parameters
Lin, Y., Li, Y., Wang, Z., Li, B., Du, Q., Xiao, T., & Zhu, J. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.162 · Cited by 24
Zhang, D., Li, Z., Cao, T., Luo, C., Wu, T., Lu, H., Song, Y., Yin, B., Zhao, T., & Yang, Q. (2021) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3459637.3481946 · Cited by 19
Explainable Abusive Language Classification Leveraging User and Network Data
Wich, M., Mosca, E., Gorniak, A., Hingerl, J., & Groh, G. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86517-7_30 · Cited by 16
Qiu, M., Li, P., Wang, C., Fang, T., Wang, A., Chen, C., Jia, X., Li, Y., Huang, J., Cai, D., et al. (2021) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3459637.3481911 · Cited by 21
Automatic Misogyny Detection in Social Media Platforms using Attention-based Bidirectional-LSTM
Rahali, A., Akhloufi, M. A., Therien-Daniel, A.-M., & Brassard-Gourdeau, É. (2021) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc52423.2021.9659158 · Cited by 16
Waheeb, S. A., Khan, N. A., & Shang, X. (2022) · Malaysian Journal of Computer Science · doi:10.22452/mjcs.vol35no1.1 · Cited by 17
Quiz Design Task: Helping Teachers Create Quizzes with Automated Question Generation
Laban, P., Wu, C.-S., Murakhovs’ka, L., Liu, W., & Xiong, C. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-naacl.9 · Cited by 20
MuCoT: Multilingual Contrastive Training for Question-Answering in Low-resource Languages
Kumar, G. K., Gehlot, A., Mullappilly, S. S., & Nandakumar, K. (2022) · Workshop on Speech, Vision, and Language Technologies for Dravidian Languages (DravidianLangTech) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.dravidianlangtech-1.3 · Cited by 18
Xu, H., Chen, Y., Liu, Z., Wen, Y., & Yuan, X. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2022/615 · Cited by 16
Detection of Web-Attack using DistilBERT, RNN, and LSTM
Bokolo, B. G., Chen, L., & Liu, Q. (2023) · International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS) · doi:10.1109/isdfs58141.2023.10131822 · Cited by 16
How Hate Speech Varies by Target Identity: A Computational Analysis
Yoder, M. M., Ng, L. H. X., Brown, D. W., & Carley, K. M. (2022) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.conll-1.3 · Cited by 20
Textual Backdoor Attacks Can Be More Harmful via Two Simple Tricks
Chen, Y., Qi, F., Gao, H., Liu, Z., & Sun, M. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.770 · Cited by 21
SMYRF: Efficient Attention using Asymmetric ClusteringPreprint
Daras, G., Kitaev, N., Odena, A., & Dimakis, A. G. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.05315 · Cited by 22
TextFlint: Unified Multilingual Robustness Evaluation Toolkit for Natural Language ProcessingPreprint
Gui, T., Wang, X., Zhang, Q., Liu, Q., Zou, Y., Zhou, X., Zheng, R., Zhang, C., Wu, Q., Ye, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.11441 · Cited by 31
Do language models learn typicality judgments from text?Preprint
Misra, K., Ettinger, A., & Rayz, J. T. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.02987 · Cited by 28
Early Exiting with Ensemble Internal ClassifiersPreprint
Sun, T., Zhou, Y., Liu, X., Zhang, X., Jiang, H., Cao, Z., Huang, X., & Qiu, X. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.13792 · Cited by 26
Identification, Categorisation and Forecasting of Court Decisions
Medvedeva, M. (2022) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · doi:10.33612/diss.236807643 · Cited by 15
Measuring and Mitigating Gender Bias in Legal Contextualized Language Models
Bozdag, M., Sevim, N., & Koç, A. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3628602 · Cited by 15
Zhang, Z., Wang, T., Hu, Z., Yang, L.-Z., & Li, H. (2025) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2024.3509620 · Cited by 17
BEBERT: Efficient and robust binary ensemble BERT
Tian, J., Fang, C., Wang, H., & Wang, Z. (2023) · ICASSP 2023 - 2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp49357.2023.10096223 · Cited by 18
Li, H., Yue, P., Wu, H., Teng, B., Zhao, Y., & Liu, C. (2025) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2025.2510566 · Cited by 20
Representation learning of writing style
Hay, J., Doan, B.-L., Popineau, F., & Elhara, O. A. (2020) · Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.wnut-1.30 · Cited by 15
Kristiansen, L.-M., Agarwal, V., Franke, K., & Shah, R. S. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata50022.2020.9378393 · Cited by 16
Not Far Away, Not So Close: Sample Efficient Nearest Neighbour Data Augmentation via MiniMax
Kamalloo, E., Rezagholizadeh, M., Passban, P., & Ghodsi, A. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.309 · Cited by 16
Sentence Segmentation from Unformatted Text using Language Modeling and Sequence Labeling Approaches
Iosifov, I., Iosifova, O., & Sokolov, V. Y. (2020) · International Scientific-Practical Conference Problems of Infocommunications Science and Technology · doi:10.1109/picst51311.2020.9468084 · Cited by 19
Low Resource Causal Event Detection from Biomedical Literature
Liang, Z., Noriega-Atala, E., Morrison, C. T., & Surdeanu, M. (2022) · Workshop on Biomedical Language Processing (BioNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.bionlp-1.24 · Cited by 15
Wang, J., Li, Y., Hirota, W., & Kandogan, E. (2022) · International Workshop on Exploiting Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Data Management (aiDM) · doi:10.1145/3533702.3534910 · Cited by 16
Wang, X., Xu, X., Tong, W., Liu, Q., & Liu, Z. (2022) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2022.999289 · Cited by 16
Narratives: the Unforeseen Influencer of Privacy Concerns
Li, Z. S., Sihag, M., Arony, N. N., Junior, J. B., Phan, T., Ernst, N., & Damian, D. (2022) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) · doi:10.1109/re54965.2022.00018 · Cited by 17
Self-Supervised Distilled Learning for Multi-modal Misinformation Identification
Mu, M., Bhattacharjee, S. D., & Yuan, J. (2023) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv56688.2023.00284 · Cited by 17
Chiu, M., Wei, C.-J., Wang, Y.-C., & Kao, M. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136669 · Cited by 18
Uncertainty-Driven Knowledge Distillation for Language Model Compression
Huang, T., Dong, W., Wu, F., Li, X., & Shi, G. (2023) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2023.3289303 · Cited by 17
Client-Customized Adaptation for Parameter-Efficient Federated Learning
Kim, Y., Kim, J., Mok, W.-L., Park, J.-H., & Lee, S. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.75 · Cited by 16
Direct Fact Retrieval from Knowledge Graphs without Entity Linking
Baek, J., Aji, A. F., Lehmann, J., & Hwang, S. J. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.558 · Cited by 35
FineD-Eval: Fine-grained Automatic Dialogue-Level Evaluation
Zhang, C., D’Haro, L. F., Zhang, Q., Friedrichs, T., & Li, H. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.220 · Cited by 16
Wang, Z., Wang, G., Jiang, H., Xu, N., & He, G. (2023) · ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) · doi:10.1109/dac56929.2023.10247678 · Cited by 17
Transformers and their application to medical image processing: A review
Zhu, D., & Wang, D. (2023) · Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jrras.2023.100680 · Cited by 17
Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Huo, L., Wu, J., & Guizani, M. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2023.3330514 · Cited by 16
Enhancing text classification with attention matrices based on BERT
Yu, Z., Li, H., & Feng, J. (2023) · Expert Systems · doi:10.1111/exsy.13512 · Cited by 16
Park, K., Sohn, H., Min, W., Mott, B., Glazewski, K. D., Hmelo‐Silver, C. E., & Lester, J. C. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.sigdial-1.47 · Cited by 15
BLP-2023 Task 1: Violence Inciting Text Detection (VITD)
Saha, S., Junaed, J. A., Saleki, M., Rahouti, M., Mohammed, N., & Amin, M. R. (2023) · Workshop on Bangla Language Processing (BLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.banglalp-1.33 · Cited by 15
BERT based Blended approach for Fake News Detection
Mahadevan, S., & Ahmad, S. (2024) · Journal of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.54116/jbdai.v2i1.27 · Cited by 17
Parcollet, T., Nguyen, H., Evain, S. V., Boito, M. Z., Pupier, A., Mdhaffar, S., Le, H., Alisamir, S., Tomashenko, N., Dinarelli, M., et al. (2024) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2024.101622 · Cited by 37
Wang, J., Zeng, Z., Chen, B., Wang, Y., Liao, D., Li, G., Wang, Y., & Xia, S. (2024) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-024-02009-7 · Cited by 18
Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis Techniques: A Comparative Study
Jayakody, D., Isuranda, K., Malkith, A. V. A., de Silva, N., Ponnamperuma, S. R., Sandamali, G. G. N., & Sudheera, K. L. K. (2024) · Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon) · doi:10.1109/mercon63886.2024.10688631 · Cited by 21
Le, T.-T.-H., Kim, J., Lee, S., & Kim, H. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3482389 · Cited by 20
Wang, Z., Duan, J., Yuan, C., Chen, Q., Chen, T., Zhang, Y., Wang, R., Shi, X., & Xu, K. (2024) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109553 · Cited by 25
SAMR: Symmetric masked multimodal modeling for general multi-modal 3D motion retrieval
Li, Y., Wu, S., Zhu, Y., Sun, W., Zhang, Z., Song, S., & Zhai, G. (2025) · Displays · doi:10.1016/j.displa.2025.102987 · Cited by 17
From Hotel Reviews to City Similarities: A Unified Latent-Space Model
Cagliero, L., Quatra, M. L., & Apiletti, D. (2020) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics9010197 · Cited by 16
Effective Loop Fusion in Polyhedral Compilation Using Fusion Conflict Graphs
Acharya, A., Bondhugula, U. K. R., & Cohen, A. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization · doi:10.1145/3416510 · Cited by 16
hinglishNorm - A Corpus of Hindi-English Code Mixed Sentences for Text Normalization
Makhija, P., Kumar, A., & Gupta, A. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-industry.13 · Cited by 17
Barua, A., Thara, S., Premjith, B., & Soman, K. P. (2021) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-0401-0_14 · Cited by 17
Real-Time Social Media Analytics with Deep Transformer Language Models: A Big Data Approach
Ahmet, A., & Abdullah, T. (2020) · International Conference on Big Data Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/bigdatase50710.2020.00014 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
