The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 4,692
Advancing bioinformatics with language models: components, applications, and perspectives
Liu, J., Yang, M., Yu, Y., Xu, H., Wang, T., Li, K., & Zhou, X. (2026) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbag367 · Cited by 66
Münster, M., Reichenbach, F., & Walther, M. (2024) · Journal of financial markets · doi:10.1016/j.finmar.2024.100929 · Cited by 29
Detection and classification of ChatGPT-generated content using deep transformer models
Oghaz, M. M., Saheer, L. B., Dhame, K., & Singaram, G. (2025) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2025.1458707 · Cited by 38
Distilling Knowledge for Fast Retrieval-based Chat-bots
Tahami, A. V., Ghajar, K., & Shakery, A. (2020) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3397271.3401296 · Cited by 32
The Microsoft Toolkit of Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks for Natural Language Understanding
Liu, X., Wang, Y., Ji, J., Cheng, H., Zhu, X., Awa, E., He, P., Chen, W., Poon, H., Cao, G., et al. (2020) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations (ACL Demo) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-demos.16 · Cited by 45
Pretrained Language Model Embryology: The Birth of ALBERT
Chiang, C.-H., Huang, S.-F., & Lee, H.-Y. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.553 · Cited by 42
Investigating Annotator Bias with a Graph-Based Approach
Wich, M., Kuwatly, H. A., & Groh, G. (2020) · Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.alw-1.22 · Cited by 32
Ruiz-Dolz, R., Alemany, J., Barberá, S. M. H., & García‐Fornes, A. (2021) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2021.3073993 · Cited by 35
Survey on Automatic Text Summarization and Transformer Models Applicability
Guan, W., Smetannikov, I., & Tianxing, M. (2020) · International Conference on Control, Robotics and Intelligent System (CCRIS) · doi:10.1145/3437802.3437832 · Cited by 32
Zero-shot Generalization in Dialog State Tracking through Generative Question Answering
Li, S., Cao, J. L., Sridhar, M., Zhu, H., Li, S.-W. D., Hamza, W., & McAuley, J. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.91 · Cited by 38
MATE-KD: Masked Adversarial TExt, a Companion to Knowledge Distillation
Rashid, A., Lioutas, V., & Rezagholizadeh, M. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.86 · Cited by 36
Evaluating Pretrained Transformer-based Models for COVID-19 Fake News Detection
Hande, A., Puranik, K., Priyadharshini, R., Thavareesan, S., & Chakravarthi, B. R. (2021) · International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC) · doi:10.1109/iccmc51019.2021.9418446 · Cited by 32
EBERT: Efficient BERT Inference with Dynamic Structured Pruning
Liu, Z., Li, F., Li, G., & Cheng, J. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.425 · Cited by 35
JuriBERT: A Masked-Language Model Adaptation for French Legal Text
Douka, S., Abdine, H., Vazirgiannis, M., Hamdani, R. E., & Amariles, D. R. (2021) · Natural Legal Language Processing Workshop (NLLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.nllp-1.9 · Cited by 32
ValueNet: A New Dataset for Human Value Driven Dialogue System
Qiu, L., Zhao, Y., Li, J., Lu, P., Peng, B., Gao, J., & Zhu, S. C. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i10.21368 · Cited by 41
Thakker, M., Eskimez, Ş. E., Yoshioka, T., et al. (2022) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2022-10962 · Cited by 31
Supporting Developers in Addressing Human-Centric Issues in Mobile Apps
Khalajzadeh, H., Shahin, M., Obie, H. O., Agrawal, P., & Grundy, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2022.3212329 · Cited by 39
Mr.BiQ: Post-Training Non-Uniform Quantization based on Minimizing the Reconstruction Error
Jeon, Y., Lee, C., Cho, E., & Ro, Y. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01201 · Cited by 35
A Comprehensive Evaluation of Novel AI Accelerators for Deep Learning Workloads
Emani, M. K., Xie, Z., Raskar, S., Sastry, V. K., Arnold, W., Wilson, B., Thakur, R., Vishwanath, V., Liu, Z., Papka, M. E., et al. (2022) · IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Performance Modeling, Benchmarking and Simulation of High Performance Computer Systems (PMBS) · doi:10.1109/pmbs56514.2022.00007 · Cited by 35
AI-based Question Answering Assistance for Analyzing Natural-language Requirements
Ezzini, S., Abualhaija, S., Arora, C., & Sabetzadeh, M. (2023) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1109/icse48619.2023.00113 · Cited by 39
Establishing Baselines for Text Classification in Low-Resource LanguagesPreprint
Cruz, J. C. B., & Cheng, C. K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.02068 · Cited by 57
An Overview of Neural Network CompressionPreprint
O’Neill, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.03669 · Cited by 149
Mengzi: Towards Lightweight yet Ingenious Pre-trained Models for ChinesePreprint
Zhang, Z., Zhang, H., Chen, K., Guo, Y., Hua, J., Wang, Y., & Zhou, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.06696 · Cited by 89
Language models for materials discovery and sustainability: Progress, challenges, and opportunities
Pei, Z., Yin, J., & Zhang, J. (2025) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2025.101495 · Cited by 30
Digital forgetting in large language models: a survey of unlearning methods
Blanco-Justicia, A., Jebreel, N., Manzanares-Salor, B., Sánchez, D., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Collell, G., & Eeik Tan, K. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-11078-6 · Cited by 31
Disengagement Cause-and-Effect Relationships Extraction Using an NLP Pipeline
Zhang, Y., Yang, X. J., & Zhou, F. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2022.3186248 · Cited by 32
Data augmentation for sentiment classification with semantic preservation and diversity
Chao, G., Liu, J., Wang, M., & Chu, D. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.111038 · Cited by 30
Askari, A., Verberne, S., Abolghasemi, A., Kraaij, W., & Pasi, G. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3631938 · Cited by 39
Stoltz, D. S., & Taylor, M. A. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197756874.001.0001 · Cited by 31
Mazumdar, H., Sathvik, M., Chakraborty, C., Unhelkar, B., & Mahmoudi, S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.1109/tce.2024.3364169 · Cited by 32
Liang, Z., Mu, Y., Ma, H., Tomizuka, M., Ding, M., & Luo, P. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01558 · Cited by 50
Strategic Deductive Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Dual-Agent Approach
Li, S., Zhou, X., Wu, Z., Long, Y., & Shen, Y. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Power, Intelligent Computing and Systems (ICPICS) · doi:10.1109/icpics62053.2024.10797012 · Cited by 30
Diagnosing BERT with Retrieval Heuristics
Câmara, A., & Hauff, C. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-45439-5_40 · Cited by 35
Towards Accurate and Reliable Energy Measurement of NLP Models
Cao, Q., Balasubramanian, A., & Balasubramanian, N. (2020) · Workshop on Simple and Efficient Natural Language Processing (SustaiNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.sustainlp-1.19 · Cited by 41
MASKER: Masked Keyword Regularization for Reliable Text Classification
Moon, S. J., Mo, S., Lee, K., Lee, J., & Shin, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i15.17601 · Cited by 33
Extremely Small BERT Models from Mixed-Vocabulary Training
Zhao, S., Gupta, R., Song, Y., & Zhou, D. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.238 · Cited by 41
A Global Past-Future Early Exit Method for Accelerating Inference of Pre-trained Language Models
Liao, K., Zhang, Y., Ren, X., Su, Q., Sun, X., & He, B. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.162 · Cited by 31
ConvFiT: Conversational Fine-Tuning of Pretrained Language Models
Vulić, I., Su, P.-H., Coope, S., Gerz, D., Budzianowski, P., Casanueva, I., Mrkšić, N., & Wen, T.-H. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.88 · Cited by 34
Jentzsch, S. F., & Turan, C. (2022) · Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.gebnlp-1.20 · Cited by 37
Multimodal large language models for inclusive collaboration learning tasks
Lewis, A. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies: Student Research Workshop · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-srw.26 · Cited by 30
PolyHope: Two-level hope speech detection from tweets
Balouchzahi, F., Sidorov, G., & Gelbukh, A. F. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120078 · Cited by 39
BERTScore is Unfair: On Social Bias in Language Model-Based Metrics for Text Generation
Sun, T., He, J., Qiu, X., & Huang, X. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.245 · Cited by 44
Transfer Learning from Transformers to Fake News Challenge Stance Detection (FNC-1) TaskPreprint
Slovikovskaya, V. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.14353 · Cited by 46
Learning Spatiotemporal Features via Video and Text Pair DiscriminationPreprint
Li, T., & Wang, L. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.05691 · Cited by 43
Transferring Inductive Biases through Knowledge Distillation
Abnar, S., Dehghani, M., & Zuidema, W. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.00555 · Cited by 30
ANLIzing the Adversarial Natural Language Inference DatasetPreprint
Williams, A., Thrush, T., & Kiela, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.12729 · Cited by 40
Indic-Transformers: An Analysis of Transformer Language Models for Indian LanguagesPreprint
Jain, K., Deshpande, A., Shridhar, K., Laumann, F., & Dash, A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.02323 · Cited by 55
Gender Bias in Masked Language Models for Multiple Languages
Kaneko, M., Imankulova, A., Bollegala, D., & Okazaki, N. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.197 · Cited by 35
TopoBERT: a plug and play toponym recognition module harnessing fine-tuned BERT
Zhou, B., Zou, L., Hu, Y., Qiang, Y., & Goldberg, D. W. (2023) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2023.2239794 · Cited by 35
A Comprehensive Review on Transformers Models For Text Classification
Kora, R., & Mohammed, A. (2023) · International Mobile, Intelligent, and Ubiquitous Computing Conference (MIUCC) · doi:10.1109/miucc58832.2023.10278387 · Cited by 37
Automatically identifying customer needs in user-generated content using token classification
Ettrich, O., Stahlmann, S., Leopold, H., & Barrot, C. (2023) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2023.114107 · Cited by 30
Deep Representation Learning: Fundamentals, Technologies, Applications, and Open Challenges
Payandeh, A., Baghaei, K. T., Fayyazsanavi, P., Ramezani, S. B., Chen, Z., & Rahimi, S. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3335196 · Cited by 49
A Survey of Cross-Modal Visual Content Generation
Nazarieh, F., Feng, Z., Awais, M., Wang, W., & Kittler, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2024.3351601 · Cited by 32
Haruna, A., Yang, M., Jiang, P., & Ren, H. (2024) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2024.102364 · Cited by 32
Exploring Gen-AI applications in building research and industry: A review
Wan, H., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Xu, W., & Feng, F. (2025) · Building Simulation · doi:10.1007/s12273-025-1279-x · Cited by 42
HABERTOR: An Efficient and Effective Deep Hatespeech Detector
Tran, T., Hu, Y., Hu, C., Yen, K., Tan, F., Lee, K., & Park, S. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.606 · Cited by 32
Domain Divergences: A Survey and Empirical Analysis
Kashyap, A. R., Hazarika, D., Kan, M., & Zimmermann, R. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.147 · Cited by 33
TopicBERT for Energy Efficient Document Classification
Chaudhary, Y., Gupta, P., Saxena, K., Kulkarni, V., Runkler, T. A., & Schütze, H. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.152 · Cited by 34
Adaptive Adapters: An Efficient Way to Incorporate BERT Into Neural Machine Translation
Guo, J., Zhang, Z., Xu, L., Chen, B., & Chen, E. (2021) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2021.3076863 · Cited by 34
A Framework for Accelerating Transformer-Based Language Model on ReRAM-Based Architecture
Kang, M., Shin, H., & Kim, L. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tcad.2021.3121264 · Cited by 31
Schneider, J. M., Rehm, G., Montiel-Ponsoda, E., Rodrı́guez-Doncel, V., Martín-Chozas, P., Navas-Loro, M., Kaltenböck, M., Revenko, A., Karampatakis, S., Sageder, C., et al. (2021) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2021.101966 · Cited by 35
MoEBERT: from BERT to Mixture-of-Experts via Importance-Guided Adaptation
Zuo, S., Zhang, Q., Chen, L., He, P., Zhao, T., & Chen, W. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.116 · Cited by 32
Araújo, A. F. D., Gôlo, M. P. S., Viana, B. M. F., Sanches, F., Romero, R. A. F., & Marcacini, R. M. (2020) · doi:10.5753/eniac.2020.12144 · Cited by 30
Naseem, U., Lee, B. C., Khushi, M., Kim, J., & Dunn, A. G. (2022) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.nlppower-1.3 · Cited by 34
Pretrained Models for Multilingual Federated Learning
Weller, O., Marone, M., Braverman, V., Lawrie, D., & Durme, B. V. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.101 · Cited by 46
Over-the-Air Ensemble Inference with Model Privacy
Yilmaz, S. F., Hasırcıoglu, B., & Gündüz, D. (2022) · IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) · doi:10.1109/isit50566.2022.9834591 · Cited by 29
Federated Few-Shot Learning for Mobile NLP
Cai, D., Wang, S., Wu, Y., Lin, F. X., & Xu, M. (2023) · ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom) · doi:10.1145/3570361.3613277 · Cited by 33
Uto, M., Aomi, I., Tsutsumi, E., & Ueno, M. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2023.3253215 · Cited by 33
Towards sentiment and Temporal Aided Stance Detection of climate change tweets
Upadhyaya, A., Fisichella, M., & Nejdl, W. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103325 · Cited by 30
Lin, S.-C., Li, M., & Lin, J. (2023) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00556 · Cited by 35
Wang, T., Zhou, W., Zeng, Y., & Zhang, X. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.873 · Cited by 67
MiniVLM: A Smaller and Faster Vision-Language ModelPreprint
Wang, J., Hu, X., Zhang, P., Li, X., Wang, L., Zhang, L., Gao, J., & Liu, Z. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.06946 · Cited by 59
PADA: A Prompt-based Autoregressive Approach for Adaptation to Unseen Domains.Preprint
Ben‐David, E., Oved, N., & Reichart, R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 30
Beyond Preserved Accuracy: Evaluating Loyalty and Robustness of BERT Compression
Xu, C., Zhou, W., Ge, T., Xu, K., McAuley, J., & Wei, F. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.832 · Cited by 39
Online News Sentiment Classification Using DistilBERT
Akpatsa, S. K., Lei, H., Li, X., Obeng, V.-H. K. S., Martey, E. M., Addo, P. C., & Fiawoo, D. D. (2022) · Journal of quantum computing · doi:10.32604/jqc.2022.026658 · Cited by 38
Personalized and privacy-enhanced federated learning framework via knowledge distillation
Yu, F., Wang, L., Zeng, B., Zhao, K., & Yu, R. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.127290 · Cited by 28
SPEC5G: A Dataset for 5G Cellular Network Protocol Analysis
Karim, I., Mubasshir, K. S., Rahman, M. M., & Bertino, E. (2023) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-ijcnlp.3 · Cited by 47
A review of university chatbots for student support: FAQs and beyond
Peyton, K., Unnikrishnan, S., & Mulligan, B. (2025) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00397-7 · Cited by 44
Multi-label Patent Classification using Attention-Aware Deep Learning Model
Roudsari, A. H., Afshar, J., Lee, C. C., & Lee, W. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp) · doi:10.1109/bigcomp48618.2020.000-2 · Cited by 29
Unsupervised WhatsApp Fake News Detection using Semantic Search
Gaglani, J., Gandhi, Y., Gogate, S., & Halbe, A. (2020) · International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS) · doi:10.1109/iciccs48265.2020.9120902 · Cited by 30
Retrieval-Free Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue Response Generation with Adapters
Xu, Y., Ishii, E., Cahyawijaya, S., Liu, Z., Winata, G. I., Madotto, A., Su, D., & Fung, P. (2022) · DialDoc Workshop on Document-grounded Dialogue and Conversational Question Answering (DialDoc) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.dialdoc-1.10 · Cited by 29
A Statutory Article Retrieval Dataset in French
Louis, A., & Spanakis, G. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.468 · Cited by 52
Temporal Relation Extraction in Clinical Texts
Gumiel, Y. B., Oliveira, L. E. S. E., Claveau, V., Grabar, N., Paraíso, E. C., Moro, C. M. C., & Carvalho, D. R. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3462475 · Cited by 27
Transkimmer: Transformer Learns to Layer-wise Skim
Guan, Y., Li, Z., Leng, J., Lin, Z., & Guo, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.502 · Cited by 38
Tell Me Where To Go: Voice-Controlled Hands-Free Locomotion for Virtual Reality Systems
Hombeck, J., Voigt, H., Heggemann, T., Datta, R. R., & Lawonn, K. (2023) · IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) · doi:10.1109/vr55154.2023.00028 · Cited by 30
CE-BERT: Concise and Efficient BERT-Based Model for Detecting Rumors on Twitter
Anggrainingsih, R., Hassan, G. M., & Datta, A. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3299858 · Cited by 32
Iterative Proposal Refinement for Weakly-Supervised Video Grounding
Cao, M., Wei, F., Xu, C., Geng, X., Chen, L., Zhang, C., Zou, Y., Shen, T., & Jiang, D. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00631 · Cited by 28
TRANS-BLSTM: Transformer with Bidirectional LSTM for Language UnderstandingPreprint
Huang, Z., Xu, P., Liang, D., Mishra, A., & Xiang, B. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.07000 · Cited by 45
ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing
Liu, R., & Shah, N. B. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.00622 · Cited by 23
Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lens
Belrose, N., Ostrovsky, I., McKinney, L., Furman, Z., Smith, L., Halawi, D., Biderman, S., & Steinhardt, J. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.08112 · Cited by 27
“This can be viewed as a distillation loss, using the final layer distribution as a soft label (Sanh et al., 2019).”
MethodArAIEval Shared Task: Persuasion Techniques and Disinformation Detection in Arabic Text
Hasanain, M., Alam, F., Mubarak, H., Abdaljalil, S., Zaghouani, W., Nakov, P., Martino, G. D. S., & Freihat, A. A. (2023) · Arabic Natural Language Processing Conference (ArabicNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.arabicnlp-1.44 · Cited by 34
Pan, R., García-Díaz, J. A., & Valencia‐García, R. (2024) · Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences · doi:10.32604/cmes.2024.049631 · Cited by 34
Taneja, K. K., Vashishtha, J., & Ratnoo, S. (2024) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.04.220 · Cited by 32
Motevalli, M. M., Sohrabi, M. K., & Yaghmaee, F. (2024) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2024.121449 · Cited by 27
BalancerGNN: Balancer Graph Neural Networks for imbalanced datasets: A case study on fraud detection
Boyapati, M., & Aygün, R. S. (2024) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106926 · Cited by 27
Responding to Climate Change Crises: Firms' Trade‐Offs
Fritsch, F., ZHANG, Q., & Xiang, Z. (2025) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1475-679x.12625 · Cited by 28
Sentimental LIAR: Extended Corpus and Deep Learning Models for Fake Claim Classification
Upadhayay, B., & Behzadan, V. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI) · doi:10.1109/isi49825.2020.9280528 · Cited by 28
Developing a New Classifier for Automated Identification of Incivility in Social Media
Davidson, S. R., Sun, Q., & Wojcieszak, M. (2020) · Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.alw-1.12 · Cited by 33
Comparison of Pretrained Embeddings to Identify Hate Speech in Indian Code-Mixed Text
Banerjee, S., Chakravarthi, B. R., & McCrae, J. P. (2020) · International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICAC3N) · doi:10.1109/icacccn51052.2020.9362731 · Cited by 27
Giarelis, N., Kanakaris, N., & Karacapilidis, N. I. (2021) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79150-6_50 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
