The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,101–1,200 of 4,692
An Argumentative Dialogue System for COVID-19 Vaccine Information
Fazzinga, B., Galassi, A., & Torroni, P. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_27 · Cited by 17
RAIL-KD: RAndom Intermediate Layer Mapping for Knowledge Distillation
Haidar, M. A., Anchuri, N., Rezagholizadeh, M., Ghaddar, A., Langlais, P., & Poupart, P. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-naacl.103 · Cited by 24
DiLBERT: Cheap Embeddings for Disease Related Medical NLP
Roitero, K., Portelli, B., Popescu, M. H., & Mea, V. D. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3131386 · Cited by 19
Ye, C., Jiang, S., Zhang, H., Wu, Y., Shi, J., Wang, H., & Dai, G. (2022) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109033 · Cited by 20
SkipBERT: Efficient Inference with Shallow Layer Skipping
Wang, J., Chen, K., Chen, G., Shou, L., & McAuley, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.503 · Cited by 20
Context Matters: A Pragmatic Study of PLMs’ Negation Understanding
Gubelmann, R., & Handschuh, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.315 · Cited by 21
Towards an open-domain chatbot for language practice
Tyen, G., Brenchley, M., Caines, A., & Buttery, P. J. (2022) · Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.bea-1.28 · Cited by 23
DIRECT: Toward Dialogue-Based Reading Comprehension Tutoring
Huang, J., Lee, Y., & Kwon, O. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3233224 · Cited by 18
Guided Adversarial Contrastive Distillation for Robust Students
Bai, T., Zhao, J., & Wen, B. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2023.3237371 · Cited by 18
Knowledge Amalgamation for Object Detection With Transformers
Zhang, H., Mao, F., Xue, M., Fang, G., Feng, Z., Song, J., & Song, M. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2023.3263105 · Cited by 19
COCO: an annotated Twitter dataset of COVID-19 conspiracy theories
Langguth, J., Schroeder, D. T., Filkuková, P., Brenner, S., Phillips, J., & Pogorelov, K. (2023) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-023-00200-3 · Cited by 23
A Review on BERT and Its Implementation in Various NLP Tasks
Chakkarwar, V. A., Tamane, S., & Thombre, A. (2023) · Advances in computer science research · doi:10.2991/978-94-6463-136-4_12 · Cited by 25
Evaluation of transformer models for financial targeted sentiment analysis in Spanish
Pan, R., García-Díaz, J. A., García‐Sánchez, F., & Valencia‐García, R. (2023) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.1377 · Cited by 21
Nissa, N. K., & Yulianti, E. (2023) · International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems/International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · doi:10.11591/ijece.v13i5.pp5641-5652 · Cited by 37
Fly-Swat or Cannon? Cost-Effective Language Model Choice via Meta-Modeling
Šakota, M., Peyrard, M., & West, R. (2024) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3616855.3635825 · Cited by 49
Lu, J., Li, J., Wallace, B., He, Y., & Pergola, G. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-eacl.80 · Cited by 20
Deconfounding Causal Inference for Zero-Shot Action Recognition
Wang, J., Jiang, Y., Long, Y., Sun, X., Pagnucco, M., & Song, Y. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2023.3318300 · Cited by 18
Incivility Detection in Open Source Code Review and Issue Discussions
Ferreira, I., Rafiq, A., & Cheng, J. (2022) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2023.111935 · Cited by 28
Too Large; Data Reduction for Vision-Language Pre-Training
Wang, A. J., Lin, K. Q., Zhang, D. J., Lei, S. W., & Shou, M. Z. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00292 · Cited by 28
Enhancing Cyber Threat Intelligence with Named Entity Recognition Using BERT-CRF
Chen, S.-S., Hwang, R., Sun, C., Lin, Y., & Pai, T. (2023) · Globecom · doi:10.1109/globecom54140.2023.10436853 · Cited by 24
Kim, S., Cho, J., Yu, J., Yoo, Y., & Choi, J. Y. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i3.28059 · Cited by 18
Guardrails for trust, safety, and ethical development and deployment of Large Language Models (LLM)
Biswas, A., & Talukdar, W. (2023) · Journal of Science & Technology · doi:10.55662/jst.2023.4605 · Cited by 25
CALLM: Enhancing Clinical Interview Analysis Through Data Augmentation With Large Language Models
Wu, Y., Mao, K., Zhang, Y., & Chen, J. (2024) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2024.3435085 · Cited by 23
Mea, V. D., Popescu, M. H., & Roitero, K. (2020) · Informatics in Medicine Unlocked · doi:10.1016/j.imu.2020.100456 · Cited by 19
Modeling Content Importance for Summarization with Pre-trained Language Models
Xiao, L., Wang, L., He, H., & Jin, Y. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.293 · Cited by 17
Event-Driven News Stream Clustering using Entity-Aware Contextual Embeddings
Saravanakumar, K. K., Ballesteros, M., Chandrasekaran, M. K., & McKeown, K. R. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.198 · Cited by 18
Sparse Progressive Distillation: Resolving Overfitting under Pretrain-and-Finetune Paradigm
Huang, S., Xu, D., Yen, I. E.-H., Wang, Y., Chang, S.-E., Li, B., Chen, S., Xie, M., Rajasekaran, S., Liu, H., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.16 · Cited by 18
Sentiment Analysis of StockTwits Using Transformer Models
Bozanta, A., Angco, S., Çevik, M., & Bener, A. (2021) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla52953.2021.00204 · Cited by 20
Firdaus, M., Thangavelu, N., Ekbal, A., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2022.3155105 · Cited by 20
Exploring Representation-level Augmentation for Code Search
HaoChen, L., Miao, C., Leung, C., Huang, Y., Huang, Y., Zhang, H., & Wang, Y. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.327 · Cited by 18
TweetFinSent: A Dataset of Stock Sentiments on Twitter
Pei, Y., Mbakwe, A. B., Gupta, A., Alamir, S., Lin, H., Liu, X., & Shah, S. (2022) · Workshop on Financial Technology and Natural Language Processing (FinNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.finnlp-1.5 · Cited by 19
A Survey on Dynamic Neural Networks for Natural Language Processing
Xu, C., & McAuley, J. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-eacl.180 · Cited by 33
MKD: a Multi-Task Knowledge Distillation Approach for Pretrained Language ModelsPreprint
Liu, L., Wang, H., Lin, J., Socher, R., & Xiong, C. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.03588 · Cited by 33
Fast, Structured Clinical Documentation via Contextual AutocompletePreprint
Gopinath, D., Agrawal, M., Murray, L., Horng, S., Karger, D. R., & Sontag, D. A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.15153 · Cited by 20
Discriminative Nearest Neighbor Few-Shot Intent Detection by Transferring Natural Language InferencePreprint
Zhang, J., Hashimoto, K., Liu, W.-H., Wu, C.-S., Wan, Y., Yu, P. S., Socher, R., & Xiong, C. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.13009 · Cited by 100
EstBERT: A Pretrained Language-Specific BERT for EstonianPreprint
Tanvir, H., Kittask, C., Eiche, S., & Sirts, K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.04784 · Cited by 28
Polyjuice: Automated, General-purpose Counterfactual Generation.Preprint
Wu, T., Ribeiro, M. T., Heer, J., & Weld, D. S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 18
An Overview on Language Models: Recent Developments and OutlookPreprint
Wei, C., Wang, Y.-C., Wang, B., & Kuo, C. ‐. J. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.05759 · Cited by 15
Foundation Models for Video Understanding: A SurveyPreprint
Madan, N., Møgelmose, A., Modi, R., Rawat, Y. S., & Moeslund, T. B. (2024) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.171769139.99464428/v1 · Cited by 24
throttLL’eM: Predictive GPU Throttling for Energy Efficient LLM Inference Serving
Kakolyris, A. K., Masouros, D., Vavaroutsos, P., Xydis, S., & Soudris, D. (2025) · IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) · doi:10.1109/hpca61900.2025.00103 · Cited by 44
Wang, X., Xu, Z., & Sui, X. (2025) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2025.1538277 · Cited by 24
Fully automatic extraction of morphological traits from the web: Utopia or reality?
Marcos, D., van de Vlasakker, R., Athanasiadis, I. N., Bonnet, P., Goëau, H., Joly, A., Kissling, W. D., Leblanc, C., van Proosdij, A. S. J., & Panousis, K. P. (2025) · Applications in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1002/aps3.70005 · Cited by 19
Building hybrid AI models in chemical engineering: A tutorial review
Chakraborty, A., Taskiran, N. P., Kottooru, R., Mann, V., & Venkatasubramanian, V. (2025) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109236 · Cited by 20
ABERT: Adapting BERT model for efficient detection of human and AI-generated fake news
Alghamdi, J., Lin, Y., & Luo, S. (2025) · International Journal of Information Management Data Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jjimei.2025.100353 · Cited by 20
Putri, C. A. (2020) · JATISI (Jurnal Teknik Informatika dan Sistem Informasi) · doi:10.35957/jatisi.v6i2.206 · Cited by 21
Aggression Identification in English, Hindi and Bangla Text using BERT, RoBERTa and SVM.
Baruah, A., Das, K., Barbhuiya, F. A., & Dey, K. (2020) · Cited by 17
Ranasinghe, T., & Hettiarachchi, H. (2020) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.semeval-1.251 · Cited by 20
Elbert: Fast Albert with Confidence-Window Based Early Exit
Xie, K., Lu, S., Wang, M., & Wang, Z. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp39728.2021.9414572 · Cited by 20
Dogra, V. (2021) · Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT) · doi:10.17762/turcomat.v12i10.4954 · Cited by 16
Demon: Improved Neural Network Training With Momentum Decay
Chen, J., Wolfe, C., Zhao, L., & Kyrillidis, A. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp43922.2022.9746839 · Cited by 20
Pre-training a BERT with Curriculum Learning by Increasing Block-Size of Input Text
Nagatsuka, K., Broni-Bediako, C., & Atsumi, M. (2021) · International conference Recent advances in natural language processing · doi:10.26615/978-954-452-072-4_112 · Cited by 19
Dancing along Battery: Enabling Transformer with Run-time Reconfigurability on Mobile Devices
Song, Y., Jiang, W., Li, B., Qi, P., Zhuge, Q., Sha, E. H. ‐., Dasgupta, S., Shi, Y., & Ding, C. (2021) · ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) · doi:10.1109/dac18074.2021.9586295 · Cited by 19
Williamson, A. J., Battisti, M., & Pollack, J. M. (2021) · Journal of Business Venturing Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jbvi.2021.e00295 · Cited by 17
Alleviating ASR Long-Tailed Problem by Decoupling the Learning of Representation and Classification
Deng, K., Cheng, G., Yang, R., & Yan, Y. (2021) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2021.3138707 · Cited by 17
Security Requirements Classification into Groups Using NLP Transformers
Varenov, V., & Gabdrahmanov, A. (2021) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW) · doi:10.1109/rew53955.2021.9714713 · Cited by 23
Towards Textual Out-of-Domain Detection Without In-Domain Labels
Jin, D., Gao, S., Kim, S., Liu, Y., & Hakkani-Tür, D. Z. (2022) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2022.3162081 · Cited by 18
FrugalScore: Learning Cheaper, Lighter and Faster Evaluation Metrics for Automatic Text Generation
Eddine, M. K., Shang, G., Tixier, A. J. ‐., & Vazirgiannis, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.93 · Cited by 30
Sequence-aware Knowledge Distillation for a Lightweight Event Representation
Zheng, J., Cai, F., Ling, Y., & Chen, H. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3545798 · Cited by 17
Ahn, J., Lee, H., Kim, J., & Oh, A. (2022) · Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.gebnlp-1.27 · Cited by 18
Izquierdo-Domenech, J., Linares-Pellicer, J., & Orta-López, J. (2022) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-022-13803-1 · Cited by 19
Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning With Guidance for Multi-Domain Dialogue Policy
Rohmatillah, M., & Chien, J. (2023) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2023.3235202 · Cited by 21
A Dense Representation Framework for Lexical and Semantic Matching
Lin, S.-C., & Lin, J. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3582426 · Cited by 23
Calderón-Suárez, R., Ortega-Mendoza, R. M., Montes-y-Gómez, M., Toxqui‐Quitl, C., & Márquez-Vera, M. A. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3242965 · Cited by 17
Full-Stack Optimizing Transformer Inference on ARM Many-Core CPU
Jiang, J., Du, J., Huang, D., Chen, Z., Lu, Y., & Liao, X. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2023.3280805 · Cited by 18
Sametoğlu, S., Pelt, D. H. M., Eichstaedt, J. C., Ungar, L., & Bartels, M. (2023) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2023.2218341 · Cited by 31
TDRLM: Stylometric learning for authorship verification by Topic-Debiasing
Hu, X., Ou, W., Acharya, S., Ding, S. H. H., D’Gama, R., & Yu, H. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120745 · Cited by 19
Phrase-Level Temporal Relationship Mining for Temporal Sentence Localization
Zheng, M., Li, S., Chen, Q., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i3.25478 · Cited by 17
Sentiment Analysis of Russia-Ukraine Conflict Tweets Using RoBERTa
Ramos, L., & Chang, O. (2023) · Uniciencia · doi:10.15359/ru.37-1.23 · Cited by 17
Prompt-Guided Level Generation
Sudhakaran, S., González-Duque, M., Glanois, C., Freiberger, M., Najarro, E., & Risi, S. (2023) · Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion (GECCO Companion) · doi:10.1145/3583133.3590656 · Cited by 17
Bajaj, A., & Vishwakarma, D. K. (2023) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106815 · Cited by 19
A Causal Framework to Quantify the Robustness of Mathematical Reasoning with Language Models
Stolfo, A., Jin, Z., Shridhar, K., Schoelkopf, B., & Sachan, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.32 · Cited by 17
Probing for Constituency Structure in Neural Language Models
Arps, D., Samih, Y., Kallmeyer, L., & Sajjad, H. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.502 · Cited by 28
Leveraging Social Media as a Source of Mobility Intelligence: An NLP-Based Approach
Fontes, T., Murços, F., Carneiro, E., Ribeiro, J., & Rossetti, R. J. F. (2023) · IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/ojits.2023.3308210 · Cited by 21
Style-Aware Contrastive Learning for Multi-Style Image Captioning
Zhou, Y., & Long, G. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-eacl.169 · Cited by 17
How to Detect AI-Generated Texts?
Nguyen, T. T., Hatua, A., & Sung, A. H. (2023) · IEEE Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON) · doi:10.1109/uemcon59035.2023.10316132 · Cited by 20
Li, X., Chen, K., Yang, J., et al. (2023) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107808 · Cited by 17
Zhu, R., Tang, D., Tang, S., Wang, X., & Tang, H. (2023) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp46215.2023.10351028 · Cited by 20
Yang, B., Liu, F., Zou, Y., Wu, X., Wang, Y., & Clifton, D. A. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3371376 · Cited by 22
Khanduja, N., Kumar, N., & Chauhan, A. (2024) · Systems and Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.sasc.2024.200112 · Cited by 22
Yang, L., Guofan, J., Yixin, Z., Qianze, W., Jian, Z., Alizadehsani, R., & Pławiak, P. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3473296 · Cited by 17
Enhancing rumor detection with data augmentation and generative pre-trained transformer
Askarizade, M. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125649 · Cited by 18
Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Source Code Vulnerability Detection
Mahyari, A. (2024) · IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM) · doi:10.1109/milcom61039.2024.10774025 · Cited by 22
Unified Static and Dynamic Network: Efficient Temporal Filtering for Video Grounding
Hu, J., Guo, D., Li, K., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2025.3558854 · Cited by 17
A multi-level neural network for implicit causality detection in web texts
Liang, S., Zuo, W., Shi, Z., Wang, S., Wang, J., & Zuo, X. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.01.076 · Cited by 19
Sources of Transfer in Multilingual Named Entity Recognition
Mueller, D., Andrews, N., & Dredze, M. H. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.720 · Cited by 21
Unsupervised Natural Language Inference via Decoupled Multimodal Contrastive Learning
Cui, W., Zheng, G., & Wang, W. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.444 · Cited by 17
Autoregressive Knowledge Distillation through Imitation Learning
Lin, A., Wohlwend, J., Chen, H., & Lei, T. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.494 · Cited by 70
Using BERT for Qualitative Content Analysis in Psychosocial Online Counseling
Grandeit, P., Haberkern, C., Lang, M., Albrecht, J., & Lehmann, R. (2020) · Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science (NLP+CSS) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.nlpcss-1.2 · Cited by 18
TextGraphs 2020 Shared Task on Multi-Hop Inference for Explanation Regeneration
Jansen, P. A., & Ustalov, D. (2020) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.textgraphs-1.10 · Cited by 19
Multi-Class Network Traffic Generators and Classifiers Based on Neural Networks
Bikmukhamedov, R., & Nadeev, A. (2021) · Systems of Signals Generating and Processing in the Field of on Board Communications · doi:10.1109/ieeeconf51389.2021.9416067 · Cited by 17
BERTtoCNN: Similarity-preserving enhanced knowledge distillation for stance detection
Li, Y., Sun, Y., & Zhu, N. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0257130 · Cited by 18
Matero, M., Soni, N., Balasubramanian, N., & Schwartz, H. A. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.253 · Cited by 19
Garg, S., & Moschitti, A. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.583 · Cited by 18
Bansal, D., Grover, R., Saini, N., & Saha, S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2021.3131516 · Cited by 18
Am I Being Bullied on Social Media? An Ensemble Approach to Categorize Cyberbullying
Ahmed, T., Kabir, M., Ivan, S., Mahmud, H., & Hasan, K. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata52589.2021.9671594 · Cited by 20
Predicting Job Titles from Job Descriptions with Multi-label Text Classification
Tran, H., Vo, H. H.-P., & Luu, S. T. (2021) · NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science (NICS) · doi:10.1109/nics54270.2021.9701541 · Cited by 20
SEASum: Syntax-Enriched Abstractive Summarization
Liu, S., Yang, L., & Cai, X. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116819 · Cited by 17
Weller, O., Seppi, K. D., & Gardner, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-short.30 · Cited by 24
Sauer, A., Asaadi, S., & Kuech, F. (2022) · Workshop on NLP for Conversational AI (NLP4ConvAI) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.nlp4convai-1.10 · Cited by 17
Si, S., Wang, R., Wosik, J., Zhang, H., Dov, D., Wang, G., Henao, R., & Carin, L. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.11991 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
