The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 4,692
An Efficient and Lightweight Approach for Intrusion Detection based on Knowledge Distillation
Zhao, R., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Shi, Y., & Xue, Z. (2021) · International Conference on Communications · doi:10.1109/icc42927.2021.9500574 · Cited by 27
Detecting Cross-Geographic Biases in Toxicity Modeling on Social Media
Ghosh, S., Baker, D., Jurgens, D., & Prabhakaran, V. (2021) · Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.wnut-1.35 · Cited by 35
ZeroBERTo: Leveraging Zero-Shot Text Classification by Topic Modeling
Alcoforado, A., Ferraz, T. P., Gerber, R., Bustos, E., Oliveira, A. S., Veloso, B., Siqueira, F. L., & Costa, A. H. R. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-98305-5_12 · Cited by 36
Comparison of Transfer Learning and Traditional Machine Learning Approach for Text Classification
Taneja, K. K., & Vashishtha, J. (2022) · International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development · doi:10.23919/indiacom54597.2022.9763279 · Cited by 30
Rodrigues, F. B., Giozza, W. F., Albuquerque, R. D. O., & Villalba, L. J. G. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2022.3159677 · Cited by 29
Multi-modal fusion transformer for visual question answering in remote sensing
Siebert, T., Clasen, K. N., Ravanbakhsh, M., & Demir, B. (2022) · Image and signal processing for remote sensing. Conference · doi:10.1117/12.2636276 · Cited by 31
DeepEmotionNet: Emotion mining for corporate performance analysis and prediction
Wang, Q., Su, T., Lau, R. Y. K., & Xie, H. (2022) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103151 · Cited by 29
Stress Detection from Social Media Articles: New Dataset Benchmark and Analytical Study
Rastogi, A., Liu, Q., & Cambria, E. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9892889 · Cited by 29
Deep Ensemble Network for Sentiment Analysis in Bi-lingual Low-resource Languages
Roy, P. K. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing · doi:10.1145/3600229 · Cited by 30
SafeAeroBERT: Towards a Safety-Informed Aerospace-Specific Language Model
Andrade, S. R., & Walsh, H. S. (2023) · AIAA AVIATION Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2023-3437 · Cited by 32
Adaptive Ensembles of Fine-Tuned Transformers for LLM-Generated Text Detection
Lai, Z., Zhang, X., & Chen, S. (2024) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn60899.2024.10651296 · Cited by 52
Events Matter: Extraction of Events from Court Decisions
Filtz, E., Navas-Loro, M., Santos, C. T., Axel Polleres, A., & Kirrane, S. (2020) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/faia200847 · Cited by 28
Customizing Contextualized Language Models for Legal Document Reviews
Shaghaghian, S., Feng, L. Y., Jafarpour, B., & Pogrebnyakov, N. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata50022.2020.9378201 · Cited by 30
SemEval-2023 Task 9: Multilingual Tweet Intimacy Analysis
Pei, J., Silva, V., Bos, M. W., Liu, Y., Neves, L., Jurgens, D., & Barbieri, F. (2023) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.309 · Cited by 29
Gao, D., Kong, M. C., Zhao, Y., Huang, J.-Z. J., Huang, Z., Kuang, K., Wu, F. Q., & Zhu, Q. (2023) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2023.102982 · Cited by 31
Quevedo, E., Cerny, T., Rodríguez, A., Rivas, P., Yero, J., Sooksatra, K., Zhakubayev, A., & Taibi, D. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3333946 · Cited by 43
Knowledge Distillation-Based Semantic Communications for Multiple Users
Liu, C., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y., & Yang, S. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2023.3336941 · Cited by 31
D3G: Exploring Gaussian Prior for Temporal Sentence Grounding with Glance Annotation
Li, H., Shu, X., He, S., et al. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01263 · Cited by 26
One-Shot Sensitivity-Aware Mixed Sparsity Pruning for Large Language Models
Shao, H., Liu, B., & Qian, Y. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp48485.2024.10445737 · Cited by 36
DetectVul: A statement-level code vulnerability detection for Python
Tran, H.-C., Tran, A.-D., & Le, K.-H. (2024) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2024.107504 · Cited by 30
schuBERT: Optimizing Elements of BERT
Khetan, A., & Karnin, Z. S. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.250 · Cited by 28
Sentiment Classification in Bangla Textual Content: A Comparative Study
Hasan, M. A., Tajrin, J., Chowdhury, S. A., & Alam, F. (2020) · International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccit51783.2020.9392681 · Cited by 28
Finetuning Pretrained Transformers into RNNs
Kasai, J., Peng, H., Zhang, Y., Yogatama, D., Ilharco, G., Pappas, N., Mao, Y., Chen, W., & Smith, N. A. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.830 · Cited by 79
Disfluency Detection with Unlabeled Data and Small BERT Models
Rocholl, J. C., Zayats, V., Walker, D. D., Murad, N. B., Schneider, A., & Liebling, D. J. (2021) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2021-351 · Cited by 27
QAConv: Question Answering on Informative Conversations
Wu, C.-S., Madotto, A., Liu, W., Fung, P., & Xiong, C. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.370 · Cited by 32
Spoon, K., Tsai, H., Chen, A., Rasch, M. J., Ambrogio, S., Mackin, C., Fasoli, A., Friz, A. M., Narayanan, P., Stanisavljevic, M., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2021.675741 · Cited by 26
Xie, Z., Liu, L., Wu, Y., Zhong, L., & Li, L. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3490519 · Cited by 28
“That Is a Suspicious Reaction!”: Interpreting Logits Variation to Detect NLP Adversarial Attacks
Mosca, E., Agarwal, S., Rando, J., & Groh, G. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.538 · Cited by 29
LaPraDoR: Unsupervised Pretrained Dense Retriever for Zero-Shot Text Retrieval
Xu, C., Guo, D., Duan, N., & McAuley, J. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.281 · Cited by 36
Learning to Answer Visual Questions From Web Videos
Yang, A., Miech, A., Šivic, J., Laptev, I., & Schmid, C. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2022.3173208 · Cited by 36
A Shoulder to Cry on: Towards A Motivational Virtual Assistant for Assuaging Mental Agony
Saha, T., Reddy, S. M., Das, A., Saha, S., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.174 · Cited by 27
Arevalillo‐Herráez, M., Arnau‐González, P., & Ramzan, N. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3213061 · Cited by 29
Improving the performance of automatic short answer grading using transfer learning and augmentation
Bonthu, S., Sree, S. R., & Prasad, M. H. M. K. (2023) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106292 · Cited by 31
Sequential Integrated Gradients: a simple but effective method for explaining language models
Enguehard, J. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.477 · Cited by 58
Test of Time: Instilling Video-Language Models with a Sense of Time
Bagad, P., Tapaswi, M., & Snoek, C. G. M. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00247 · Cited by 31
Exploit Multilingual Language Model at Scale for ICD-10 Clinical Text Classification
Silvestri, S., Gargiulo, F., Ciampi, M., & Pietro, G. D. (2020) · IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC) · doi:10.1109/iscc50000.2020.9219640 · Cited by 30
Simplified TinyBERT: Knowledge Distillation for Document Retrieval
Chen, X., He, B., Hui, K., Sun, L., & Sun, Y. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72240-1_21 · Cited by 28
MalBERT: Using Transformers for Cybersecurity and Malicious Software DetectionPreprint
Rahali, A., & Akhloufi, M. A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.03806 · Cited by 57
A Review of Bangla Natural Language Processing Tasks and the Utility of Transformer ModelsPreprint
Alam, F., Hasan, M. A., Alam, T., Khan, A., Tajrin, J., Khan, N., & Chowdhury, S. A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.03844 · Cited by 51
SalesBot: Transitioning from Chit-Chat to Task-Oriented Dialogues
Chiu, S., Li, M., Lin, Y.-T. R., & Chen, Y.-N. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.425 · Cited by 28
KGA: A General Machine Unlearning Framework Based on Knowledge Gap Alignment
Wang, L., Chen, T., Yuan, W., Zeng, X., Wong, K.-F., & Yin, H. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.740 · Cited by 25
Gradient-based Constrained Sampling from Language Models
Kumar, S., Paria, B., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.144 · Cited by 57
A Hybrid BERT-CNN Approach for Depression Detection on Social Media Using Multimodal Data
Beniwal, R., & Saraswat, P. (2024) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxae018 · Cited by 25
Panchendrarajan, R., & Zubiaga, A. (2024) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2024.100066 · Cited by 34
Gamage, G., Silva, D. D., Mills, N., Alahakoon, D., & Manic, M. (2024) · Journal Of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-024-00953-2 · Cited by 32
Fine-Tuned Understanding: Enhancing Social Bot Detection With Transformer-Based Classification
Sallah, A., Alaoui, E. A. A., Agoujil, S., Wani, M. A., Hammad, M. A., Maleh, Y., & El‐Latif, A. A. A. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3440657 · Cited by 28
Wang, Z. Q., Wang, H., & Saddik, A. E. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3482988 · Cited by 28
Unlearning Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning
Wu, C., Zhu, S., Mitra, P., & Wang, W. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security · doi:10.1109/cns62487.2024.10735680 · Cited by 29
Davoodi, L., Mezei, J., & Heikkilä, M. (2025) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-025-09948-4 · Cited by 53
From heat to high-tech: How innovation responds to climate change
Long, X., & Wang, Z. (2025) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2025.103525 · Cited by 28
DiPair: Fast and Accurate Distillation for Trillion-Scale Text Matching and Pair Modeling
Chen, J., Liu, Y., Raman, K., Bendersky, M., Yeh, J.-J., Zhou, Y., Najork, M., Cai, D., & Emadzadeh, E. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.264 · Cited by 29
Abadeer, M. (2020) · Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop (ClinicalNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.clinicalnlp-1.18 · Cited by 28
Improved biomedical word embeddings in the transformer era
Noh, J., & Kavuluru, R. (2021) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103867 · Cited by 29
Multi-label Classification of Commit Messages using Transfer Learning
Sarwar, M. U., Zafar, S., Mkaouer, M. W., Walia, G., & Malik, M. Z. (2020) · IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW) · doi:10.1109/issrew51248.2020.00034 · Cited by 30
Generative transformer framework for network traffic generation and classification
Bikmukhamedo, R. F., Factory5", & Nadeev, A. F. (2020) · T-Comm - Телекоммуникации и Транспорт · doi:10.36724/2072-8735-2020-14-11-64-71 · Cited by 25
Towards Zero-Shot Knowledge Distillation for Natural Language Processing
Rashid, A., Lioutas, V., Ghaddar, A., & Rezagholizadeh, M. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.526 · Cited by 29
Relative Importance in Sentence Processing
Hollenstein, N., & Beinborn, L. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-short.19 · Cited by 23
Adapt-and-Distill: Developing Small, Fast and Effective Pretrained Language Models for Domains
Yao, Y., Huang, S., Wang, W., Dong, L., & Wei, F. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.40 · Cited by 43
Ramírez‐Cifuentes, D., Largeron, C., Tissier, J., Baeza-Yates, R. A., & Freire, A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3112102 · Cited by 25
Distilling Linguistic Context for Language Model Compression
Park, G., Kim, G., & Yang, E. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.30 · Cited by 35
Exploiting Transformer-Based Multitask Learning for the Detection of Media Bias in News Articles
Spinde, T., Krieger, J.-D., Ruas, T., Mitrović, J., Götz-Hahn, F., Aizawa, A., & Gipp, B. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96957-8_20 · Cited by 27
PCEE-BERT: Accelerating BERT Inference via Patient and Confident Early Exiting
Zhang, Z., Zhu, W., Zhang, J., Wang, P., Jin, R., & Chung, T. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-naacl.25 · Cited by 35
DR.BENCH: Diagnostic Reasoning Benchmark for Clinical Natural Language Processing
Gao, Y., Dligach, D., Miller, T. A., Caskey, J., Sharma, B., Churpek, M. M., & Afshar, M. (2023) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104286 · Cited by 32
Unified benchmark for zero-shot Turkish text classification
Çelik, E., & Dalyan, T. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103298 · Cited by 27
Embeddings for Automatic Short Answer Grading: A Scoping Review
Putnikovic, M., & Jovanović, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2023.3253071 · Cited by 32
Pearce, K., Alghowinem, S., & Breazeal, C. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i13.26903 · Cited by 25
Evading text based emotion detection mechanism via adversarial attacks
Bajaj, A., & Vishwakarma, D. K. (2023) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126787 · Cited by 26
A Benchmark for Lease Contract ReviewPreprint
Leivaditi, S., Rossi, J., & Kanoulas, E. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.10386 · Cited by 44
Towards Interpretable Natural Language Understanding with Explanations as Latent VariablesPreprint
Zhou, W., Hu, J., Zhang, H., Liang, X., Sun, M., Xiong, C., & Tang, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.05268 · Cited by 26
Multi-class Text Classification using BERT-based Active LearningPreprint
Prabhu, S., Mohamed, M., & Misra, H. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.14289 · Cited by 49
Deep learning for report generation on chest X-ray images
Ouis, M. Y., & A. Akhloufi, M. (2024) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2023.102320 · Cited by 25
IterDE: An Iterative Knowledge Distillation Framework for Knowledge Graph Embeddings
Liu, J., Wang, P., Shang, Z., & Wu, C. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i4.25570 · Cited by 24
EXIF as Language: Learning Cross-Modal Associations between Images and Camera Metadata
Zheng, C., Shrivastava, A., & Owens, A. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00671 · Cited by 25
Zhao, C., Hsiao, J. H., & Chan, A. B. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3380604 · Cited by 34
Multi-modal transform-based fusion model for new product sales forecasting
Li, X., Shen, J., Wang, D., Lu, W., & Chen, Y. (2024) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108606 · Cited by 27
Designing a deep learning-based application for detecting fake online reviews
Thảo, L. Q., Kien, D. T., Thuy, D. T. T., Thuy, L. T. M., Bach, N. C., Duc, T. X., Bach, H. G., & Cuong, D. D. (2024) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108708 · Cited by 26
Marshan, A., Almutairi, A. N., Ioannou, A., Bell, D., Monaghan, A., & Arzoky, M. (2024) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2024.1371680 · Cited by 29
Shafikuzzaman, M., Islam, M. R., Rolli, A. C., Akhter, S., & Seliya, N. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3439450 · Cited by 29
An Adaptive Multimodal Learning Model for Financial Market Price Prediction
Farimani, S. A., Jahan, M. V., & Fard, A. M. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3441029 · Cited by 26
Jbene, M., Chehri, A., Saadane, R., Tigani, S., & Jeon, G. (2024) · Expert Systems · doi:10.1111/exsy.13712 · Cited by 27
Maazallahi, A., Asadpour, M., & Bazmi, P. (2024) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103974 · Cited by 27
Deep Learning Models for Representing Out-of-Vocabulary Words
Lochter, J. V., Silva, R. M., & Almeida, T. A. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61377-8_29 · Cited by 25
Exploring MMSE Score Prediction Using Verbal and Non-Verbal Cues
Farzana, S., & Parde, N. (2020) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2020-3085 · Cited by 26
New Benchmark Corpus and Models for Fine-grained Event Classification: To BERT or not to BERT?
Jakub Piskorski, B., Haneczok, J., & Jacquet, G. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.584 · Cited by 24
Highly Efficient Knowledge Graph Embedding Learning with Orthogonal Procrustes Analysis
Peng, X., Chen, G., Lin, C., & Stevenson, M. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.187 · Cited by 28
HULK: An Energy Efficiency Benchmark Platform for Responsible Natural Language Processing
Zhou, X., Chen, Z., Jin, X., & Wang, W. Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-demos.39 · Cited by 24
Accelerating BERT Inference for Sequence Labeling via Early-Exit
Li, X., Shao, Y., Sun, T., Yan, H. R., Qiu, X., & Huang, X. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.16 · Cited by 32
AutoTinyBERT: Automatic Hyper-parameter Optimization for Efficient Pre-trained Language Models
Yin, Y., Chen, C., Shang, L., Jiang, X., Chen, X., & Liu, Q. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.400 · Cited by 24
Kucherenko, T., Nagy, R., Jonell, P., Neff, M., Kjellström, H., & Henter, G. E. (2021) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA) · doi:10.1145/3472306.3478333 · Cited by 24
New Insights Into Drug Repurposing for COVID-19 Using Deep Learning
Lee, C. Y., & Chen, Y. P. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3111745 · Cited by 24
Which design decisions in AI-enabled mobile applications contribute to greener AI?
Castanyer, R. C., Martínez‐Fernández, S., & Franch, X. (2023) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-023-10407-7 · Cited by 29
Multi-view informed attention-based model for Irony and Satire detection in Spanish variants
Bueno, R. O., Rosso, P., & Pagóla, J. E. M. (2021) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107597 · Cited by 28
Adversarial Robustness of Neural-Statistical Features in Detection of Generative Transformers
Crothers, E., Japkowicz, N., Viktor, H. L., & Branco, P. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9892269 · Cited by 36
Huang, R., Liu, J., Wan, T. K., Siriwanna, D., Woo, P. Y. M., Vodenčarević, A., Wong, C. W., & Chan, K. H. K. (2022) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106176 · Cited by 27
Yuan, K., Haddad, Y. K., Law, R., Shakya, I., Haileyesus, T., Navon, L., Zhang, L., Liu, Y., & Bergen, G. (2023) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.04.013 · Cited by 23
An Empirical Comparison of LM-based Question and Answer Generation Methods
Ushio, A., Alva-Manchego, F. E., & Camacho-Collados, J. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.899 · Cited by 30
Event Causality Identification with Causal News Corpus - Shared Task 3, CASE 2022
Tan, F. A., Hettiarachchi, H., Hürriyetoğlu, A., Caselli, T., Uca, O., Liza, F. F., & Oostdijk, N. H. J. (2022) · Workshop on Challenges and Applications of Automated Extraction of Socio-political Events from Text (CASE) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.case-1.28 · Cited by 24
Shahinmoghadam, M., Kahou, S. E., & Motamedi, A. (2023) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2023.104063 · Cited by 24
Deng, L., Xing, B., & Liu, X. (2024) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2024.3396656 · Cited by 24
Automated Identification of Climate Risk Disclosures in Annual Corporate ReportsPreprint
Friederich, D., Kaack, L. H., Luccioni, A. S., & Steffen, B. (2021) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.01415 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
