The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 4 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Open accessAbstract
As Transfer Learning from large-scale pre-trained models becomes more prevalent in Natural Language Processing (NLP), operating these large models in on-the-edge and/or under constrained computational training or inference budgets remains challenging. In this work, we propose a method to pre-train a smaller general-purpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be fine-tuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts. While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster. To leverage the inductive biases learned by larger models during pre-training, we introduce a triple loss combining language modeling, distillation and cosine-distance losses. Our smaller, faster and lighter model is cheaper to pre-train and we demonstrate its capabilities for on-device computations in a proof-of-concept experiment and a comparative on-device study.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
DistilBERT is a distilled version of BERT pre-trained with knowledge distillation, reducing parameters by 40% while retaining 97% of BERT’s GLUE performance and running 60% faster at inference. It is presented as a general-purpose, lighter model suitable for constrained and on-device NLP applications.
Key findings
- DistilBERT has 66M parameters vs. BERT-base’s 110M and takes 410s vs. 668s for a CPU inference pass on STS-B, i.e. 40% smaller and 60% faster.
- On GLUE dev sets, DistilBERT scores 77.0 macro-score vs. BERT-base’s 79.5, retaining 97% of performance; it is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline.
- On IMDb test accuracy, DistilBERT reaches 92.82 vs. BERT-base’s 93.46; on SQuAD v1.1, DistilBERT reaches 77.7/85.8 EM/F1 vs. BERT-base’s 81.2/88.5.
- Ablations show removing the cosine loss costs -2.96 GLUE macro-score, removing distillation loss costs -1.46, removing MLM loss costs -0.31, and random initialization costs -3.69.
Methods
- Knowledge distillation during pre-training: a student with BERT’s architecture but half the layers, no token-type embeddings and no pooler, initialized from every other teacher layer.
- Training objective is a triple loss combining distillation loss \(L_{ce}\), masked language modeling loss \(L_{mlm}\), and cosine embedding loss \(L_{cos}\), using softmax-temperature.
- Trained on English Wikipedia + Toronto Book Corpus with large batches up to 4K examples, dynamic masking, no next-sentence prediction, on 8 16GB V100 GPUs for approximately 90 hours; evaluated on GLUE, IMDb, SQuAD v1.1, CPU inference, and an iPhone 7 Plus on-device proof-of-concept.
Limitations
- The paper does not state an explicit limitations section.
- Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to English benchmarks and a small set of downstream tasks, and the on-device study is described as a proof-of-concept; the model could be further reduced with quantization.
- Evident from the text: the SQuAD second-distillation result is reported inconsistently—the prose says 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, while Table 2 lists DistilBERT (D) as 79.1/86.9.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
15 Own result · 6 Own interpretation · 2 Own method · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT, which can then be finetuned with good performances on a wide range of tasks like its larger counterparts.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Our general-purpose pre-trained models can be fine-tuned with good performances on several downstream tasks, keeping the flexibility of larger models.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further ablation studies indicate that all the components of the triple loss are important for best performances.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the tokenization step, DistilBERT is 71% faster than BERT, and the whole model weighs 207 MB (which could be further reduced with quantization).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
- Also stated in: § Size and inference speed · p. 4 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose a method to pre-train a smaller generalpurpose language representation model, called DistilBERT”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found it beneficial to add a cosine embedding loss ( L cos ) which will tend to align the directions of the student and teacher hidden states vectors.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On SQuAD, DistilBERT is within 3.9 points of the full BERT.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase and show that it is possible to reduce the size of a BERT model by 40%, while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and being 60% faster.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
“DistilBERT also compares surprisingly well to BERT, retaining 97% of the performance with 40% fewer parameters.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion and future work · p. 5 · plain
“We introduced DistilBERT, a general-purpose pre-trained version of BERT, 40% smaller, 60% faster, that retains 97% of the language understanding capabilities.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Experiments · p. 3 · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“removing the Masked Language Modeling loss has little impact while the two distillation losses account for a large portion of the performance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 7
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“environmental cost of exponentially scaling these models' computational requirements as mentioned in Schwartz et al. [2019], Strubell et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schwartz et al., 2019 source
The Abstract (p. 1) says the computations required for deep learning research have been doubling every few months and have a large carbon footprint. Section 2, “Red AI” (p. 4), likewise warns that the environmental cost of increasingly large models will not decrease soon. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites Strubell et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that computationally hungry NLP models require considerable energy and have associated environmental costs. It also says model development can multiply those costs thousands of times, but it does not establish that the models’ computational requirements are scaling exponentially. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We applied best practices for training BERT model recently proposed in Liu et al. [2019].”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Liu et al., 2019 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says Liu et al. propose an improved recipe for training BERT, and Section 4 (p. 4) evaluates which choices matter for BERT pretraining. The citing authors’ statement that they applied those practices to DistilBERT describes their own work, not a finding attributed to Liu et al. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among the 9 tasks, DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We further demonstrated that DistilBERT is a compelling option for edge applications.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“BERT and DistilBERT results are the medians of 5 runs with different seeds.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“current research 1 on pre-trained models indicates that training even larger models still leads to better performances on downstream tasks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MegatronLM
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report scores on the development sets for each task by fine-tuning DistilBERT without the use of ensembling or multi-tasking scheme for fine-tuning (which are mostly orthogonal to the present work).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While most prior work investigated the use of distillation for building task-specific models, we leverage knowledge distillation during the pre-training phase”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Operating large pre-trained models on-device in real-time is hampered by their growing computational and memory requirements.
“the growing computational and memory requirements of these models may hamper wide adoption.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-zero probabilities in a trained model's output distribution reflect its generalization capabilities.
“some of these”
The paper relies on this without support.
Inference speed measured on a single GLUE task (STS-B) on CPU is representative of DistilBERT's speed advantage generally.
“Inference time of a full pass of GLUE task STS-B (sentiment analysis) on CPU with a batch size of 1.”
“DistilBERT has 40% fewer parameters than BERT and is 60% faster than BERT.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been successfully applied to LLMs, where distilled students approximate the generation patterns of larger teachers while retaining much of their performance (Sanh et al., 2019).”
From Vision-Guided Iterative Refinement for Frontend Code Generation (2026) · cites this paper as Sanh et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“even benchmarking is not a reliable estimator of parameter count [12], [15], [28], [29]”
From Hollow-LLM Attack: Computationally Trivial Weights in Zero-Knowledge Verification of LLM Inference (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It achieves similar performance to the original BERT model while using fewer resources. The approach leveraged knowledge distillation during the pretraining phase and reduced the size of general BERT by 40%, yet it retained a language understanding capability of 97%.”
From A Review on Deep-Learning-Based Cyberbullying Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [53]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike in many similar circumstances, we do not employ knowledge distillation [56], because we discovered that for our sizes of the models, this technique does not provide any quality improvement.”
From Full Line Code Completion: Bringing AI to Desktop (2024) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ 4.1 Downstream task benchmark · p. 3
“In this case, we were able to reach interesting performances given the size of the model: 79.8 F1 and 70.4 EM, i.e. within 3 points of the full model.”
§ 3 DistilBERT: a distilled version of BERT · p. 3
“| DistilBERT (D) | - | 79.1/86.9 |”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“DistilBERT is always on par or improving over the ELMo baseline (up to 19 points of accuracy on STS-B).”
Reported 19 · recomputed 16.5
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011) · Cited by 3,710
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP
Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1355 · Cited by 3,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cristian Bucila, Rich Caruana, and Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil. Model compression. In KDD , 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 4,692
Efficient Automatic Punctuation Restoration Using Bidirectional Transformers with Robust Inference
Courtland, M., Faulkner, A., & McElvain, G. (2020) · International Conference on Spoken Language Translation (IWSLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.iwslt-1.33 · Cited by 48
Deep Learning-Based Natural Language Processing for Screening Psychiatric Patients
Dai, H.-J., Su, C.-H., Lee, Y.-Q., Zhang, Y.-C., Wang, C.-K., Kuo, C., & Wu, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.533949 · Cited by 54
Ganesan, A. V., Matero, M., Ravula, A. R., Vu, H., & Schwartz, H. A. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.357 · Cited by 50
A Simple and Effective Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning Framework for Aspect Detection
Shi, T., Li, L., Wang, P., & Reddy, C. K. A. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i15.17628 · Cited by 46
Quasi-Global Momentum: Accelerating Decentralized Deep Learning on Heterogeneous DataPreprint
Lin, T., Karimireddy, S. P., Stich, S. U., & Jaggi, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.04761 · Cited by 56
Geffen, Y., Ofran, Y., & Unger, R. (2022) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btac474 · Cited by 40
Lin, B. Y., Lee, S., Qiao, X., & Ren, X. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.102 · Cited by 68
Detecting Pain Points from User-Generated Social Media Posts Using Machine Learning
Salminen, J. O., Mustak, M., Corporan, J., Jung, S., & Jansen, B. J. J. (2022) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1177/10949968221095556 · Cited by 50
Predicting CVSS Metric via Description Interpretation
Costa, J. C., Roxo, T., Sequeiros, J. B. F., Proença, H. P. M. C., & Inácio, P. R. M. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3179692 · Cited by 54
Niksirat, K. S., Goswami, L., Rao, P. S. B., Tyler, J., Silacci, A., Aliyu, S., Aebli, A., Wacharamanotham, C., & Cherubini, M. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580848 · Cited by 64
Dynamic Contrastive Distillation for Image-Text Retrieval
Rao, J., Ding, L., Qi, S., Fang, M., Liu, Y., Shen, L., & Tao, D. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2023.3236837 · Cited by 46
Relationship between journal impact factor and the thoroughness and helpfulness of peer reviews
Severin, A., Strinzel, M., Egger, M., Barros, T. F., Sokolov, A., Vilstrup, J. T., & Müller, S. (2023) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002238 · Cited by 46
Le, D.-V.-T., Bigo, L., Herremans, D., & Mikaela Keller, A. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3714457 · Cited by 65
Multimodal Emotion Recognition Using Feature Fusion: An LLM-Based Approach
Chandraumakantham, O., Gowtham, N., Zakariah, M., & Almazyad, A. S. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3425953 · Cited by 43
Survey of Transformer-Based Malicious Software Detection Systems
Al-Shomrani, M. M., Albeshri, A. A., Alturki, B., Alallah, F. S., & Alsulami, A. A. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13234677 · Cited by 58
Large language model applications in disaster management: An interdisciplinary review
Xu, F., Ma, J., Li, N., & Cheng, J. C. P. (2025) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105642 · Cited by 60
Energy-efficient deep learning inference on edge devices
Daghero, F., Pagliari, D. J., & Poncino, M. (2020) · Advances in computers · doi:10.1016/bs.adcom.2020.07.002 · Cited by 48
Embed2Detect : temporally clustered embedded words for event detection in social media
Hettiarachchi, H., Adedoyin-Olowe, M., Bhogal, J., & Gaber, M. M. (2022) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · Cited by 43
Multi-Label Few-Shot Learning for Aspect Category Detection
Hu, M., Zhao, S., Guo, H., Xue, C., Gao, H., Gao, T., Cheng, R., & Su, Z. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.495 · Cited by 50
Communication-Efficient Federated DistillationPreprint
Sattler, F., Marbán, A., Rischke, R., & Samek, W. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.00632 · Cited by 43
Natural language understanding for argumentative dialogue systems in the opinion building domain
Abro, W. A., Aicher, A. B., Rach, N., Ultes, S., Minker, W., & Qi, G. (2022) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108318 · Cited by 50
BERT-ERC: Fine-Tuning BERT Is Enough for Emotion Recognition in Conversation
Qin, X., Wu, Z., Zhang, T., Li, Y., Luan, J., Wang, B., Wang, L., & Cui, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i11.26582 · Cited by 47
DECOR: Degree-Corrected Social Graph Refinement for Fake News Detection
Wu, J., & Hooi, B. (2023) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3580305.3599298 · Cited by 48
Knowledge distillation for BERT unsupervised domain adaptation
Ryu, M., Lee, G., & Lee, K. (2022) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-022-01736-y · Cited by 51
Multi-label Classification of Indonesian Hate Speech on Twitter Using Support Vector Machines
Hana, K. M., Adiwijaya, A., Faraby, S. A., et al. (2020) · International Conference on Data Science and Its Applications (ICoDSA) · doi:10.1109/icodsa50139.2020.9212992 · Cited by 42
Topic classification of electric vehicle consumer experiences with transformer-based deep learning
Ha, S., Marchetto, D. J., Dharur, S., & Asensio, O. I. (2021) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2020.100195 · Cited by 50
Sector-level sentiment analysis with deep learning
Almalis, I., Kouloumpris, E., & Vlahavas, I. P. (2022) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109954 · Cited by 44
Accelerating Training of Transformer-Based Language Models with Progressive Layer Dropping
Zhang, M., & He, Y. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.13369 · Cited by 50
Chen, Q., Du, J., Allot, A., & Lu, Z. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2022.3173562 · Cited by 44
Improving Conversational Recommendation Systems’ Quality with Context-Aware Item Meta-Information
Yang, B., Han, C., Li, Y., Zuo, L., & Yu, Z. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-naacl.4 · Cited by 50
Diet code is healthy: simplifying programs for pre-trained models of code
Zhang, Z., Zhang, H., Shen, B., & Gu, X. (2022) · Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3540250.3549094 · Cited by 41
Comparison of biomedical relationship extraction methods and models for knowledge graph creation
Milošević, N., & Thielemann, W. (2022) · Journal of Web Semantics · doi:10.1016/j.websem.2022.100756 · Cited by 49
Annotation Error Detection: Analyzing the Past and Present for a More Coherent Future
Klie, J.-C., Webber, B., & Gurevych, I. (2022) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00464 · Cited by 57
Zheng, C., Wu, Y., Shi, C., Ma, S., Luo, J., & Ma, X. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581131 · Cited by 53
Zolnoori, M., Zolnour, A., & Topaz, M. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102624 · Cited by 43
Active Learning for Sequence Tagging with Deep Pre-trained Models and Bayesian Uncertainty Estimates
Shelmanov, A., Puzyrev, D., Kupriyanova, L., Belyakov, D., Larionov, D., Khromov, N., Kozlova, O., Artemova, E., Dylov, D. V., & Panchenko, A. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.145 · Cited by 52
Automatic Fake News Detection with Pre-trained Transformer Models
Schütz, M., Schindler, A., Siegel, M., & Nazemi, K. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68787-8_45 · Cited by 44
Transformers-sklearn: a toolkit for medical language understanding with transformer-based models
Yang, F., Wang, X., Ma, H., & Li, J. (2021) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-021-01459-0 · Cited by 42
Comprehensive analysis of embeddings and pre-training in NLP
Tripathy, J. K., Sethuraman, S. C., Cruz, M. V., Namburu, A., Mangalraj, P., Nandha Kumar, R., Sudhakar Ilango, S., & Vijayakumar, V. (2021) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100433 · Cited by 46
Opinion mining for app reviews: an analysis of textual representation and predictive models
Araújo, A. F. D., Gôlo, M. P. S., & Marcacini, R. M. (2021) · Automated Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10515-021-00301-1 · Cited by 45
Hu, W., & Wang, S. Y. (2022) · Translational Vision Science & Technology · doi:10.1167/tvst.11.3.37 · Cited by 45
exBERT: A Visual Analysis Tool to Explore Learned Representations in Transformers ModelsPreprint
Hoover, B., Strobelt, H., & Gehrmann, S. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.05276 · Cited by 78
Fashion Image Retrieval with Text Feedback by Additive Attention Compositional Learning
Tian, Y., Newsam, S. D., & Boakye, K. (2023) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv56688.2023.00107 · Cited by 44
Transformer-based language models for mental health issues: A survey
Greco, C. M., Simeri, A., Tagarelli, A., & Zumpano, E. (2023) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2023.02.016 · Cited by 47
Beyond Words: ESC‐Net Revolutionizes VQA by Elevating Visual Features and Defying Language Priors
Chowdhury, S., & Soni, B. (2024) · Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1111/coin.70010 · Cited by 43
MaViLa: Unlocking new potentials in smart manufacturing through vision language models
Fan, H., Liu, C., Janvisloo, N. E., Bian, S., Fuh, J. Y. H., Lu, W. F., & Li, B. (2025) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2025.02.017 · Cited by 47
Vogelsang, A., & Fischbach, J. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73143-3_16 · Cited by 52
Analyzing ELMo and DistilBERT on Socio-political News Classification
Buyukoz, B., Hürriyetoğlu, A., & Özgür, A. (2020) · Cited by 40
Topic recommendation for software repositories using multi-label classification algorithms
Izadi, M., Heydarnoori, A., & Gousios, G. (2021) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-021-09976-2 · Cited by 53
Language Model is all You Need: Natural Language Understanding as Question Answering
Namazifar, M., Papangelis, A., Tür, G., & Hakkani-Tür, D. Z. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp39728.2021.9413810 · Cited by 41
Guiding the Growth: Difficulty-Controllable Question Generation through Step-by-Step Rewriting
Cheng, Y. D., Li, S., Liu, B., Zhao, R., Li, S., Lin, C., & Zheng, Y. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.465 · Cited by 55
Dynamic Knowledge Distillation for Pre-trained Language Models
Li, L., Lin, Y., Ren, S., Li, P., Zhou, J., & Sun, X. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.31 · Cited by 42
Temporal Effects on Pre-trained Models for Language Processing Tasks
Agarwal, O., & Nenkova, A. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00497 · Cited by 46
A Supervised Word Alignment Method based on Cross-Language Span Prediction using Multilingual BERT
Nagata, M., Chousa, K., & Nishino, M. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.41 · Cited by 44
Generate, Annotate, and Learn: NLP with Synthetic Text
He, X., Nassar, I., Kiros, J., Haffari, G., & Norouzi, M. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00492 · Cited by 55
DualGCN: Exploring Syntactic and Semantic Information for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis
Li, R., Chen, H., Feng, F., Ma, Z., Wang, X., & Hovy, E. H. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2022.3219615 · Cited by 43
Depression Classification From Tweets Using Small Deep Transfer Learning Language Models
Rizwan, M., Mushtaq, M. F., Akram, U., Mehmood, A., Ashraf, I., & Sahelices, B. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3223049 · Cited by 40
Bansal, S., Gowda, K., & Kumar, N. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121188 · Cited by 42
Detection of Turkish Fake News From Tweets With BERT Models
KORU, G. K., & Uluyol, Ç. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3354165 · Cited by 47
Review of neural network model acceleration techniques based on FPGA platforms
Liu, F., Li, H., Hu, W., & He, Y. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128511 · Cited by 41
Grand challenges in industrial and systems engineering
Karwowski, W., Salvendy, G., Albert, L. A., Kim, W. C., Denton, B. T., Dessouky, M. M., Dolgui, A. B., Duffy, V. G., Kumara, S. R. T., Li, J., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2024.2432463 · Cited by 46
Li, B., Kong, Z., Zhang, T., Li, J., Li, Z., Liu, H., & Ding, C. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.286 · Cited by 61
Aithal, S. G., Rao, A. B., & Singh, S. (2021) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-021-02348-9 · Cited by 40
Identifying Machine-Paraphrased Plagiarism
Wahle, J. P., Ruas, T., Foltýnek, T., Meuschke, N., & Gipp, B. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-96957-8_34 · Cited by 65
Fu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2022) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108649 · Cited by 42
Multi-Granularity Structural Knowledge Distillation for Language Model Compression
Liu, C., Tao, C., Feng, J., & Zhao, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.71 · Cited by 43
Kauf, C., Tuckute, G., Lévy, R., Andreas, J., & Fedorenko, E. G. (2023) · Neurobiology of Language · doi:10.1162/nol_a_00116 · Cited by 48
UBAR: Towards Fully End-to-End Task-Oriented Dialog Systems with GPT-2Preprint
Yang, Y., Li, Y., & Quan, X. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.03539 · Cited by 39
Local-Global Knowledge Distillation in Heterogeneous Federated Learning with Non-IID DataPreprint
Yao, D., Pan, W., Dai, Y., Wan, Y., Ding, X., Jin, H., Xu, Z., & Sun, L. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.00051 · Cited by 39
An Explainable Transformer-Based Model for Phishing Email Detection: A Large Language Model ApproachPreprint
Uddin, M. A., & Sarker, I. H. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4785953 · Cited by 42
Natural Language Processing in Marketing
Hartmann, J., & Netzer, O. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence in Marketing · doi:10.1108/s1548-643520230000020011 · Cited by 38
Automatic classification of literature in systematic reviews on food safety using machine learning
van den Bulk, L. M., Bouzembrak, Y., Gavai, A., Liu, N., van den Heuvel, L. J., & Marvin, H. J. P. (2022) · Current Research in Food Science · doi:10.1016/j.crfs.2021.12.010 · Cited by 38
“BERT was initialized with the DistilBERT parameters (Sanh et al., 2019), which is a smaller pretrained BERT model more suitable for small data sets, consisting of 6 encoder blocks and 12 attention heads.”
MethodWang, R., Bai, Q., Ao, J., Zhou, L., Xiong, Z., Wei, Z., Zhang, Y., Ko, T., & Li, H. (2022) · Interspeech 2022 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2022-10269 · Cited by 40
Probing for idiomaticity in vector space models
García, M., Vieira, T. K., Scarton, C., Idiart, M., & Villavicencio, A. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.310 · Cited by 41
A Model of Semantic Completion in Generative Episodic Memory
Fayyaz, Z., Altamimi, A., Zoellner, C., Klein, N., Wolf, O. T., Cheng, S., & Wiskott, L. (2022) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_01520 · Cited by 43
Lee, J., & Kim, M. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119726 · Cited by 42
Structured Pruning of Self-Supervised Pre-Trained Models for Speech Recognition and Understanding
Peng, Y., Kim, K., Wu, F., Sridhar, P., & Watanabe, S. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49357.2023.10095780 · Cited by 38
Jiang, J., Ren, X., & Ferrara, E. (2023) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22160 · Cited by 44
Huang, X., Liu, Z. Y., Zhang, M., 桂, 韬., 韩, 先., 户, 保., 黄, 民., 黄, 萱., 刘, 康., 刘, 挺., et al. (2023) · Scientia Sinica Informationis · doi:10.1360/ssi-2023-0113 · Cited by 42
Towards Generalisable Video Moment Retrieval: Visual-Dynamic Injection to Image-Text Pre-Training
Luo, D., Huang, J., Gong, S., Jin, H., & Liu, Y. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.02207 · Cited by 42
RIFormer: Keep Your Vision Backbone Effective But Removing Token Mixer
Wang, J., Zhang, S., Liu, Y., Wu, T., Yang, Y., Liu, X., Chen, K., Luo, P., & Lin, D. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01388 · Cited by 40
Tawil, A. A., Almazaydeh, L. H., Qawasmeh, D., Qawasmeh, B., Alshinwan, M., & Elleithy, K. M. (2024) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2024.057279 · Cited by 61
HyperText: Endowing FastText with Hyperbolic Geometry
Zhu, Y., Zhou, D., Xiao, J., Jiang, X., Chen, X., & Liu, Q. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.104 · Cited by 49
Compressing Pre-trained Language Models by Matrix Decomposition
Noach, M. B., & Goldberg, Y. (2020) · Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (AACL-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.aacl-main.88 · Cited by 46
The linked legal data landscape: linking legal data across different countries
Filtz, E., Kirrane, S., & Axel Polleres, A. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-021-09282-8 · Cited by 38
Meghanani, A., Anoop, C. S., & Ramakrishnan, A. G. (2021) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2021.624558 · Cited by 39
A Sentiment-Aware Contextual Model for Real-Time Disaster Prediction Using Twitter Data
Song, G., & Huang, D. (2021) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi13070163 · Cited by 38
LeeBERT: Learned Early Exit for BERT with cross-level optimization
Zhu, W. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.231 · Cited by 41
Discretized Integrated Gradients for Explaining Language Models
Sanyal, S., & Ren, X. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.805 · Cited by 61
Nimmi, K., Janet, B., selvan, A. K., & Sivakumaran, N. (2022) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108842 · Cited by 46
Natural Language Interfaces to Data
Quamar, A., Efthymiou, V., Lei, C., & Lei, C. (2022) · Foundations and Trends in Databases · doi:10.1561/1900000078 · Cited by 54
Open-Domain Conversational Agents: Current Progress, Open Problems, and Future Directions
Roller, S., Boureau, Y.-L., Weston, J., Bordes, A., Dinan, E., Fan, A., Gunning, D., Ju, D., Li, M., Poff, S., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.12442 · Cited by 38
Kaur, N., & Mittal, A. (2022) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104220 · Cited by 37
I Know What You Are Searching for: Code Snippet Recommendation from Stack Overflow Posts
Gao, Z., Xia, X., Lo, D., Grundy, J., Zhang, X., & Xing, Z. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3550150 · Cited by 38
Is my stance the same as your stance? A cross validation study of stance detection datasets
Ng, L. H. X., & Carley, K. M. (2022) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103070 · Cited by 39
Automatic software vulnerability assessment by extracting vulnerability elements
Sun, X., Ye, Z., Bo, L., Wu, X., Wei, Y., Zhang, T., & Li, B. (2023) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2023.111790 · Cited by 37
Generative Language Models for Paragraph-Level Question Generation
Ushio, A., Alva-Manchego, F. E., & Camacho-Collados, J. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.42 · Cited by 41
Learning Emotion Representations from Verbal and Nonverbal Communication
Zhang, S., Pan, Y., & Wang, J. Z. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01821 · Cited by 42
Masud, G. H. A., Shanto, R. I., Sakin, I., & Kabir, M. R. (2025) · Array · doi:10.1016/j.array.2025.100375 · Cited by 46
Evaluating Saliency Methods for Neural Language Models
Ding, S., & Koehn, P. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.399 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.01108
- OpenAlex
- W2978017171
- Cited by
- 4,653
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 443 · 2024: 801 · 2023: 1136 · 2022: 736 · 2021: 968 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- DistilBERT, knowledge distillation, BERT, pre-training, model compression, on-device computation, language modeling, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-23, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
