Cited by 15Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchNerve injury and regeneration

Biosafety Assessment of an Intra-Neural Electrode (TIME) following Sub-Chronic Implantation in the Median Nerve of Göttingen Minipigs

Kundu, Aritra, Wirenfeldt, Martin, Harreby, Kristian R., Jensen, Winnie·2014·The International Journal of Artificial Organs

Abstract

Before a novel peripheral nerve interface can be applied in a neural prosthesis for human use, it is important to determine the biocompatibility of the device. The aim of the present study was to assess the biosafety of the recently developed transverse intrafascicular multi-channel electrode (TIME) in a large nerve animal model. Six TIMEs were implanted (33-38 days) into the median nerves of Göttingen minipigs, and nerve specimens were harvested for histological analysis. We analyzed samples from the area of the implant and from control regions. We found an expected layer of fibrosis around the implant and fibroblasts in both the implant and control region, however, we found no significant presence of inflammatory cells or necrosis. Our results indicated that the TIME may be an attractive, biocompatible neural interface for future neuroprosthesis applications in the clinic setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5301/ijao.5000342

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study of TIME implantation in the median nerve of pigs during a 38-day follow up, there was no necrosis, formation of fibrotic capsule was limited, and all electrodes were stable.

    “A different study evaluated the outcomes of TIME implantation in the median nerve of pigs during a follow up of 38 days. There was no necrosis, the formation of fibrotic capsule was limited, and all the electrodes were stable [189].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kundu, A., Wirenfeldt, M., Harreby, K. R., & Jensen, W.
Affiliations
  • Aalborg University (DK)
  • Aalborg University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Kundu, Aritra
Venue
The International Journal of Artificial Organs
Published
2014-06
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
466-476
ISSN
  • 0391-3988 (ISSN-L)
  • 1724-6040
OpenAlex
W2123405986
Cited by
15
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Artificial Organs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
Keywords
peripheral nerve interfaces, neural prosthesis, biocompatibility, biosafety, median nerve, nerve fibrosis, fibroblasts, inflammation, necrosis, Göttingen minipig
MeSH terms
Animals, Electrodes, Implanted, Equipment Design, Equipment Safety, Median Nerve, Swine, Swine, Miniature, Equipment Failure Analysis, Neural Prostheses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review