CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,656Management and Organizational StudiesPublic Policy and Administration ResearchCorporate Social Responsibility Reporting

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 136 of the 136 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World

Bromley, Patricia, Powell, Walter W.·2012·Academy of Management Annals
DOI 10.5465/19416520.2012.684462
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The pervasive spread of rationalizing trends in society, such as the growing influence of managerial sciences and increasing emphases on accountability and transparency, has created significant changes in organizations’ external environments. As a result, there is growing pressure on organizations to align their policies and practices, and to conform to pressures in an expanding array of domains, from protecting the natural world to promoting employee morale. In this context, we reconsider the concept of decoupling as it applies to organizations. Through a review and critique of existing research, we argue that the common understanding of decoupling—as a gap between policy and practice—obscures the rise of a more prevalent and consequential form of decoupling—a gap between means and ends. We describe when to expect both policy–practice and means–ends decoupling, and we indicate promising areas for research. The major consequences of this overlooked form of decoupling are that in an effort to monitor and evaluate activities where the relationship between means and ends is opaque, (a) internal organizational structures become increasingly complex, (b) organizations persist in a state of perpetual reform, and (c) resources are often diverted away from core goals.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/19416520.2012.684462

Cites

136 of 136 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Brubaker R, 1992, The limits of rationality
  2. David P. A., 1985, American Economic Review, 75, 332
  3. Espeland W. N., 1998, The struggle for water
  4. Fiske S. T., 2004, Social beings
  5. Greve H. R., 2010, Academy of Management Annals, 4, 53, 10.1080/19416521003654186 · DOI
  6. Haack P., Organization Studies, 33
  7. Meyer, J.W. & Rowan, B. (1978). The structure of educational organizations. In M. Meyer (Ed.), Environments and organizations (pp. 78–109). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons.
  8. Power M., 1994, The audit explosion
  9. Power M., 1997, The audit society
  10. Pressman J. L., 1973, Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland
  11. Selznick P., 1949, TVA and the grass roots
  12. Thomas D. C., 2001, The Helsinki effect: International norms, human rights, and the demise of communism, 10.1515/9780691187228 · DOI
  13. Thompson J. D., 1967, Organizations in action
  14. Weber M., 1921, Economy and society

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,656

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bromley, P., & Powell, W. W.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
ORCID
Venue
Academy of Management Annals
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
2012-06
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
483-530
ISSN
  • 1941-6067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-6520
DOI
10.5465/19416520.2012.684462
OpenAlex
W4241062781
Cited by
1,656
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 416 · 2025: 200 · 2024: 139 · 2023: 127 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 138 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 85 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 5
FWCI
71.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Annals (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Keywords
decoupling, means-ends decoupling, policy-practice gap, organizational rationalization, managerialism, accountability, transparency, organizational complexity, organizational reform, resource allocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review