The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Engagement with one side of the tension may set the stage, or even create the conditions necessary, for the other's existence; in addition, over time there is often a mutual influence between the opposing forces, with swings from one side to the other (Poole & van de Ven, 1989).”
From Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox (2021) · cites this paper as Poole & van de Ven, 1989
In the citing paper
“Resolution involves seeking responses to paradoxical tensions through a combination of differentiation and integration practices (Poole & van de Ven, 1989).”
From Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox (2021) · cites this paper as Poole & van de Ven, 1989
Citations
Cites
Barley, S. R. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392767 · Cited by 2,315
Glick, W. H. (1985) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4279045 · Cited by 1,286
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0072 · Cited by 2,755
What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: an interdisciplinary conceptual typology
McKnight, D. H., & Chervany, N. L. (2001) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2001.11044235 · Cited by 2,282
Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation
Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0406 · Cited by 2,195
Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective
Geels, F. W. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022 · Cited by 1,718
Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic equilibrium Model of Organizing
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0223 · Cited by 1,631
Research Commentary —Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda
Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sørensen, C. (2010) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0318 · Cited by 1,366
Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward
Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1162422 · Cited by 1,385
Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building
Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1990.4310758 · Cited by 1,426
Theories in sustainable supply chain management: A structured literature review
Touboulic, A., & Walker, H. (2015) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-05-2013-0106 · Cited by 688
Management paradoxes: A relational view
Clegg, S. R., da Cunha, J. V., & e Cunha, M. P. (2002) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726702555001 · Cited by 498
Complex Thinking, Complex Practice: The Case for a Narrative Approach to Organizational Complexity
Tsoukas, H., & Hatch, M. J. (2001) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726701548001 · Cited by 489
Tallon, P. P., Queiroz, M., Coltman, T., & Sharma, R. (2019) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2018.12.002 · Cited by 453
Perceived Proximity in Virtual Work: Explaining the Paradox of Far-but-Close
Wilson, J. M., Boyer O'Leary, M., Metiu, A., & Jett, Q. R. (2008) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607083105 · Cited by 366
Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions.
Putnam, L. L., Myers, K. K., & Gailliard, B. M. (2014) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726713495704 · Cited by 341
A unified model of IT continuance: Three complementary perspectives and crossover effects
Bhattacherjee, A., & Lin, C.-P. (2015) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2013.36 · Cited by 336
The Interplay between Intuition and Rationality in Strategic Decision Making: A Paradox Perspective
Calabretta, G., Gemser, G., & Wijnberg, N. M. (2017) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840616655483 · Cited by 324
“In paradox literature, acceptance is regarded as the fundamental step for learning to live with a paradox and enabling a virtuous cycle of paradoxical resolution (Lewis, 2000; Poole & Van de Ven, 1989; Smith & Lewis, 2011).”
Seeing the Forest and the Trees: How a Systems Perspective Informs Paradox Research
Schad, J., & Bansal, P. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12398 · Cited by 266
Stakeholder marketing: theoretical foundations and required capabilities
Hillebrand, B., Driessen, P. H., & Koll, O. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-015-0424-y · Cited by 257
The role of HRM in developing sustainable organizations: Contemporary challenges and contradictions
Podgorodnichenko, N., Edgar, F., & McAndrew, I. (2020) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.04.001 · Cited by 160
The Learning Spiral: A Process Perspective on Paradox
Raisch, S., Hargrave, T. J., & van de Ven, A. H. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12397 · Cited by 131
Self-citationD’Adderio, L., & Pollock, N. (2014) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840614538962 · Cited by 129
Toward a Meta-Theory of Creativity Forms: How Novelty and Usefulness Shape Creativity
Harvey, S., & Berry, J. W. (2023) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2020.0110 · Cited by 125
Paradox as a Lens for Theorizing Sustainable HRM: Mapping and Coping with Paradoxes and Tensions
Ehnert, I. (2014) · CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37524-8_11 · Cited by 73
Managing Tensions and Divergent Institutional Logics in Firm–NPO Partnerships
Ahmadsimab, A., & Chowdhury, I. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04265-x · Cited by 63
A Figure is Worth a Thousand Words: The role of visualization in paradox theorizing
Pradies, C., Berti, M., Pina e Cunha, M., Rego, A., Tunarosa, A., & Clegg, S. (2023) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/01708406231161998 · Cited by 26
Interdisciplinary organization as a basic academic unit?
Yang, L., Albats, E., & Etzkowitz, H. (2021) · Industry and Higher Education · doi:10.1177/0950422220956951 · Cited by 19
The role of paradoxical logic in innovation: The case of Intel
Norman, P. M., Palich, L. E., Livingstone, L. P., & Carini, G. R. (2004) · The Journal of High Technology Management Research · doi:10.1016/j.hitech.2003.09.004 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Poole, M. S., & van de Ven, A. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1989-10
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 562
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989354996
- Cited by
- 1,905
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 104 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 106 · 2021: 140 · 2020: 112 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 91 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 50
- FWCI
- 10.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Management Research
- Keywords
- paradox, management theory, organizational theory, paradoxical thinking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
