Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,552

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Institutional Theory in the Study of Multinational Corporations: A Critique and New Directions

Kostova, Tatiana, Roth, Kendall, Dacin, M. Tina·2008·Academy of Management Review
DOI 10.5465/amr.2008.34422026
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper was motivated by the growing interest of scholars of multinational corporations (MNCs) in the institutional perspective. Our review of the literature suggests that international management applications of this perspective have been dominated by a narrow set of neoinstitutional ideas. We develop a set of provocations that challenge the validity of traditional neoinstitutionalism in the context of MNCs. We then offer ideas for more novel theory building in the study of MNCs, based on integrating “old” and “new” institutionalism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amr.2008.34422026

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. Alvarez J., 2005, Organization, 12, 863, 10.1177/1350508405057474 · DOI
  2. Busenitz L. W., 2000, Academy of Management Journal, 43, 994, 10.2307/1556423 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Casper S., 2004, Research Policy, 33, 89, 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00100-8 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Child J., 2005, Journal of Management Studies, 42, 95, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00490.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. Dacin M. T., 2002, Academy of Management Journal, 45, 45, 10.5465/amj.2002.6283388 · doi:10.5465/amj.2002.6283388 · Paper page
  6. Dacin M. T., Strategic Management Journal
  7. Davis P., 2000, Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 239, 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490904 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490904
  8. DiMaggio P., 1988, Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment, 3
  9. DiMaggio P., 1983, American Sociological Review, 48, 147, 10.2307/2095101 · DOI · Paper page
  10. DiMaggio P. J., 1991, The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, 1
  11. Djelic M.-L., 2005, Organization Studies, 26, 1733, 10.1177/0170840605059148 · doi:10.1177/0170840605059148
  12. Djelic M.-L., 2003, Globalization and institutions: Redefining the rules of the economic game, 1, 10.4337/9781781950012 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Doz Y., 1991, Strategic Management Journal, 12, 145, 10.1002/smj.4250120911 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Eden L., 2001, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26, 1, 10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00062-8 · DOI
  15. Eden L., 2004, Advances in international management, 187
  16. Flier B., 2003, Journal of Management Studies, 40, 2163, 10.1046/j.1467-6486.2003.00416.x · DOI
  17. Friedland R., 1991, The new institutionalism in organizational analysis:, 232
  18. Giddens A., 1979, Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis., 10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Gooderham P., 1999, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 507, 10.2307/2666960 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Guler I., 2002, Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 207, 10.2307/3094804 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Henisz W., 2001, Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 443, 10.2307/3094871 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Hill C., 1995, Organization Science, 6, 119, 10.1287/orsc.6.1.119 · DOI
  23. Hirsch P., 1997, American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 406, 10.1177/0002764297040004004 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Hitt M., 2004, Organization Science, 15, 173, 10.1287/orsc.1030.0045 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Hoffman A., 2001, Organization and Environment, 14, 133, 10.1177/1086026601142001 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Kilduff M., 2000, Academy of Management Review, 25, 777, 10.5465/amr.2000.3707717 · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.3707717
  27. Kogut B., 1991, Strategic Management Journal, 12, 33, 10.1002/smj.4250120905 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Kogut B., 2002, Organization Science, 13, 162, 10.1287/orsc.13.2.162.533 · DOI
  29. Kostova T., 1997, Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 180, 10.5465/AMBPP.1997.4981338 · DOI
  30. Kostova T., 1999, Academy of Management Review, 24, 308, 10.5465/amr.1999.1893938 · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.1893938 · Paper page
  31. Kostova T., 2002, Academy of Management Journal, 45, 215, 10.2307/3069293 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Kostova T., 1999, Academy of Management Review, 24, 64, 10.5465/amr.1999.1580441 · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.1580441 · Paper page
  33. Lawrence T., 2002, Academy of Management Journal, 45, 281, 10.2307/3069297 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Lawrence T., 2004, Organization, 11, 689, 10.1177/1350508404046457 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Levy D., 2003, Journal of Management Studies, 40, 803, 10.1111/1467-6486.00361 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Lounsbury M., 2003, Organization, 10, 457, 10.1177/13505084030103007 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Lu J. W., 2002, Journal of International Business Studies, 33, 19, 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491003 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Meyer J. W., 1977, American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340, 10.1086/226550 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Mezias J., 2002, Journal of International Management, 8, 265, 10.1016/S1075-4253(02)00069-8 · DOI
  40. Miller S., 2002, Journal of International Management, 8, 323, 10.1016/S1075-4253(02)00071-6 · doi:10.1016/s1075-4253(02)00071-6
  41. Morgan G., 2003, Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, B1
  42. Morgan G., 2005, Organization Studies, 26, 1765, 10.1177/0170840605059156 · DOI
  43. Morgan G., 2003, Journal of Management Studies, 40, 609, 10.1111/1467-6486.00353 · DOI
  44. Newman K., 2000, Academy of Management Review, 25, 602, 10.5465/amr.2000.3363525 · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.3363525 · Paper page
  45. Orru M., 1991, The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, 361
  46. Peng M., 2000, Business strategies in transition economies, 10.4135/9781452231358 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Peng M., 2002, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19, 251, 10.1023/A:1016291702714 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Peng M., 2003, Academy of Management Review, 28, 275, 10.5465/amr.2003.9416341 · doi:10.5465/amr.2003.9416341 · Paper page
  49. Phillips N., 2004, Academy of Management Review, 29, 635, 10.5465/amr.2004.14497617 · doi:10.5465/amr.2004.14497617 · Paper page
  50. Powell W.W., 1991, The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, 10.7208/chicago/9780226185941.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Quack S., 2000, National capitalisms, global competition and economic performance., 10.1075/aios.3 · doi:10.1075/aios.3
  52. Quack S., 1995, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 6, 759, 10.1080/09585199500000047 · doi:10.1080/09585199500000047
  53. Roth K., 2003, Journal of World Business, 38, 314, 10.1016/j.jwb.2003.08.018 · DOI
  54. Scott R., 1995, Institutions and organizations
  55. Selznick P., 1996, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 270, 10.2307/2393719 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Seo M.-G., 2002, Academy of Management Review, 2, 222, 10.5465/amr.2002.6588004 · doi:10.5465/amr.2002.6588004 · Paper page
  57. Smircich L., 1985, Academy of Management Review, 10, 724, 10.5465/amr.1985.4279096 · doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4279096 · Paper page
  58. Stinchcombe A., 1997, Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 1, 10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Suddaby R., 2005, Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 35, 10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Sutton R., 1995, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 371, 10.2307/2393788 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Van de Ven A., 1993, Evolutionary dynamics of organizations, 425
  62. Washington M., 2005, The third wave of institutional analysis: A conflict view of organizational fields.
  63. Westney E., 1993, Organizational theory and the multinational corporation, 53, 10.1007/978-1-349-22557-6_3 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Westney E., 2001, The Oxford handbook of international business:, 349, 10.1093/0199241821.003.0013 · DOI
  65. Whetten D., 1989, Academy of Management Review, 14, 490, 10.2307/258554 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Whitley R., 1999, International Studies of Management and Organization, 29, 113, 10.1080/00208825.1999.11656766 · DOI
  67. Whitley R., 2000, Organization Studies, 21, 855, 10.1177/0170840600215002 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Whitley R., 2003, Organization, 10, 481, 10.1177/13505084030103008 · DOI
  69. Whitley R., 1998, Organization Studies, 19, 259, 10.1177/017084069801900205 · DOI
  70. Xu D., 2002, Academy of Management Review, 27, 608, 10.2307/4134406 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Yiu D., 2002, Organization Science, 13, 667, 10.1287/orsc.13.6.667.494 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Zaheer S., 1995, Academy of Management Journal, 38, 341, 10.2307/256683 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Zaheer S., 1997, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 439, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199706)18:6<439::AID-SMJ884>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,552

Metadata

Authors
Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. T.
Venue
Academy of Management Review
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
2008-10
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
994-1006
ISSN
  • 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-3807
DOI
10.5465/amr.2008.34422026
OpenAlex
W1964953479
Cited by
1,552
References
3
FWCI
76.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.