Cited by 216Personal Information Management and User BehaviorHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyMedia and Digital Communication

Multitasking on a Single Device: Arousal and the Frequency, Anticipation, and Prediction of Switching Between Media Content on a Computer: Multitasking and Arousal

Yeykelis, Leo, Cummings, James J., Reeves, Byron·2014·Journal of Communication

Abstract

This study measured arousal responses to multitasking by recording switches between content on personal computers over a day. Results showed that switches occurred every 19 seconds, more often than has been reported in previous research. Arousal was highest at the point of a switch with declines in skin conductance afterward. Switches were also preceded by a 12-second period of increasing skin conductance. 2 new methods were used, one an original application that recorded screen shots, and another that measured changes in skin conductance during the day using a wrist sensor. Results are discussed in light of increasing use of single devices displaying multiple types of content, rather than multitasking that occurs when attention is divided between content on multiple devices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcom.12070

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interruption science established three-minute working spheres and content switching about every 19 s with 75% of segments under a minute.

    “Interruption science established the fragmentation our compiler measures, three-minute working spheres [23] and content switching about every 19 s with 75% of segments under a minute [24]”

    From Activity Frames: Deterministic Screen-Activity Compilation for Agent Memory and Replay (2026) · cites this paper as [24]

  • The active-duration distribution is consistent with interruption science measurements: three-minute working spheres and 75% of laptop content segments under one minute.

    “Read this way, the distribution is consistent with what interruption science has measured with dedicated instrumentation: three-minute working spheres [23] and 75% of laptop content segments under one minute [24].”

    From Activity Frames: Deterministic Screen-Activity Compilation for Agent Memory and Replay (2026) · cites this paper as [24]

  • Previous work on media multitasking and task switching has largely examined impacts on cognitive or attentional capacity.

    “Previous work on media multitasking (changing across devices) and task switching (changing channels or task within the same device) has been explored quite extensively in the literature, but largely in respect of how this impacts on cognitive or attentional capacity [42].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yeykelis, L., Cummings, J. J., & Reeves, B.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Journal of Communication
Published
2014-01-07
Volume
64
Issue
1
Pages
167-192
ISSN
0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134540188
Cited by
216
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
34.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
multitasking, media switching, arousal, skin conductance, personal computers, attention, wrist-worn sensors, anticipation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review