Cited by 7,733Education, sociology, and vocational trainingManagement and Organizational StudiesEducational Practices and Policies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor

Abbott, Andrew·1988·University of Chicago Press eBooks

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Abbott, A.
Corresponding author
Abbott, Andrew
Venue
University of Chicago Press eBooks
Published
1988
OpenAlex
W4240671868
Cited by
7,733
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 521 · 2025: 447 · 2024: 362 · 2023: 335 · 2022: 336 · 2021: 420 · 2020: 364 · 2019: 410 · 2018: 423 · 2017: 431 · 2016: 334 · 2015: 283 · 2014: 303 · 2013: 264 · 2012: 276
FWCI
42.06
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of Chicago Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education, sociology, and vocational training
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Practices and Policies
Keywords
professions, professional systems, professionalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review