Cited by 325Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal and Macular SurgeryRetinal Imaging and Analysis

Relationship of Drusen and Abnormalities of the Retinal Pigment Epithelium to the Prognosis of Neovascular Macular Degeneration

Bressler, Susan B.·1990·Archives of Ophthalmology

Abstract

We graded macular features of 127 fellow eyes of participants in the Macular Photocoagulation Study who had an extrafoveal choroidal neovascular membrane secondary to age-related macular degeneration in the first eye and no initial evidence of the neovascular form of age-related macular degeneration in the fellow eye. Our aims were to determine the relationship of drusen characteristics and retinal pigment epithelial abnormalities to the risk of subsequent development of neovascularization in the fellow eye and the risk of subsequent development of recurrent neovascular membranes after photocoagulation in the first eye. Regression analysis demonstrated that the presence of large drusen and focal hyperpigmentation of the retinal pigment epithelium were independent risk factors for the subsequent development of neovascularization in the fellow eye (relative risk, 2.4 and 2.5, respectively). Only 10% of eyes with no large drusen or any retinal pigment epithelial hyperpigmentation compared with 58% of eyes with both large drusen and retinal pigment epithelial hyperpigmentation developed neovascularization in the fellow eye within 5 years. Using multivariate Cox regression analysis, we noted that the risk of developing recurrent neovascular membranes in the first eye was significantly increased when large drusen (relative risk, 2.8) were noted in the fellow eye at the time of laser treatment in the first eye. Fundus features in the fellow eye appear to help identify patients at hi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archopht.1990.01070120090035

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bressler, S. B.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Bressler, Susan B.
Venue
Archives of Ophthalmology
Published
1990-10-01
Volume
108
Issue
10
Pages
1442
ISSN
0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984481064
Cited by
325
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
9.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (EY2548, EY2553, EY2549)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
drusen, retinal pigment epithelium, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, choroidal neovascularization, fellow eye, photocoagulation, risk factors, prognosis
MeSH terms
Aging, Choroid, Follow-Up Studies, Fundus Oculi, Humans, Light Coagulation, Macular Degeneration, Neovascularization, Pathologic, Pigment Epithelium of Eye, Prognosis, Recurrence, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Retinal Drusen, Chi-Square Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review