The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The concept of power
Abstract
What is “power”? Most people have an intuitive notion of what it means. But scientists have not yet formulated a statement of the concept of power that is rigorous enough to be of use in the systematic study of this important social phenomenon. Power is here defined in terms of a relation between people, and is expressed in simple symbolic notation. From this definition is developed a statement of power comparability, or the relative degree of power held by two or more persons. With these concepts it is possible for example, to rank members of the United States Senate according to their “power” over legislation on foreign policy and on tax and fiscal policy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- French, 1956, A formal theory of social power, Psychol. Rev., 63, 181, 10.1037/h0046123 · DOI · Paper page
- Lasswell, 1950, Power and society
- Luce, 1956, A game theoretic analysis of Congressional power distributions for a stable two-party system, Behav. Sci., 1, 83, 10.1002/bs.3830010202 · DOI
- March, 1955, An introduction to the theory and measurement of influence, Amer. pol. Sci. Rev., 59, 431, 10.2307/1951813 · DOI · Paper page
- March, 1956, Influence measurement in experimental and semi-experimental groups, Sociometry, 19, 260, 10.2307/2785767 · DOI
- Shapley, 1954, A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system, Amer. pol. Sci. Rev., 48, 787, 10.2307/1951053 · DOI · Paper page
- Simon, 1953, Notes on the observation and measurement of political power, J. Politics, 15, 500, 10.2307/2126538 · DOI
- Weber, 1925, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 2
Cited by
Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics
Wendt, A. (1992) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300027764 · Cited by 5,885
Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics
Moravcsik, A. (1997) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081897550447 · Cited by 2,814
The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions
Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005 · Cited by 2,238
Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy
Rose, G. (1998) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887100007814 · Cited by 1,793
8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520802211628 · Cited by 2,385
Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature.
Anderson, C., Hildreth, J. A. D., & Howland, L. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0038781 · Cited by 1,133
Diversified Mentoring Relationships in Organizations: A Power Perspective
Ragins, B. R. (1997) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9707154067 · Cited by 724
Power and political institutions
Moe, T. M. (2005) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592705050176 · Cited by 550
(2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511491207 · Cited by 461
Leviathan’s Latent Dimensions: Measuring State Capacity for Comparative Political Research
Hanson, J. K., & Sigman, R. (2021) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/715066 · Cited by 414
Working for an Algorithm: Power Asymmetries and Agency in Online Work Settings
Curchod, C., Patriotta, G., Cohen, L., & Neysen, N. (2020) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839219867024 · Cited by 364
Dallas, M. P., Ponte, S., & Sturgeon, T. J. (2019) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2019.1608284 · Cited by 320
Revisiting the corporate and commercial determinants of health
McKee, M., & Stuckler, D. (2018) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2018.304510 · Cited by 281
The evolution of power in the global coffee value chain and production network
Grabs, J., & Ponte, S. (2019) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/lbz008 · Cited by 202
Caine, K. J., & Krogman, N. (2010) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026609358969 · Cited by 198
2. Is it lonely at the top?: The independence and interdependence of power holders
Lee, F., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2001) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(01)23003-2 · Cited by 174
Decentralized network governance: blockchain technology and the future of regulation
Zwitter, A., & Hazenberg, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Blockchain · doi:10.3389/fbloc.2020.00012 · Cited by 163
Imaginary politics: Climate change and making the future
Milkoreit, M. (2017) · Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.1525/elementa.249 · Cited by 135
The Iron Law of What Again? Conceptualizing Oligarchy Across Organizational Forms
Leach, D. K. (2005) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00256.x · Cited by 126
Health inequalities, fundamental causes and power: towards the practice of good theory
McCartney, G., Dickie, E., Escobar, O., & Collins, C. (2021) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.13181 · Cited by 110
Engendering Political Science: An Immodest Proposal
Hawkesworth, M. (2005) · Politics & Gender · doi:10.1017/s1743923x0523101x · Cited by 101
Norvoll, R., & Pedersen, R. (2016) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.033 · Cited by 87
Bastos Lima, M. G., & Persson, U. M. (2020) · Frontiers in Forests and Global Change · doi:10.3389/ffgc.2020.00027 · Cited by 70
Power imbalance and the dark side of the captive agri-food supplier–buyer relationship
Glavee-Geo, R., Engelseth, P., & Buvik, A. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-021-04791-7 · Cited by 64
Ouma, M., & Adésínà, J. (2019) · Critical Social Policy · doi:10.1177/0261018318817482 · Cited by 64
Barking up the right tree? NGOs and corporate power for deforestation-free supply chains
Weber, A.-K., & Partzsch, L. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10113869 · Cited by 22
Investigating global mental health: contributions from political science
Patterson, A. S., Boadu, N. Y., Clark, M., Janes, C., Monteiro, N., Roberts, J. H., Shiffman, J., Thomas, D., & Wipfli, H. (2020) · Global Public Health · doi:10.1080/17441692.2020.1724315 · Cited by 15
Formation of Insurgent Groups: MEND and Boko Haram in Nigeria
Ajala, O. (2018) · Small Wars & Insurgencies · doi:10.1080/09592318.2018.1403744 · Cited by 11
Power on": Googlecracy, privatisation and the standardisation of sources
Souto-Otero, M., & Beneito-Montagut, R. (2013) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/02680939.2013.775347 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Dahl, R. A.
- Venue
- Behavioral Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01-17
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 201-215
- ISSN
- 1092-7026 (ISSN-L)
- 0005-7940
- 1099-1743
- OpenAlex
- W1965349186
- Cited by
- 3,863
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 388.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 3149 d)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.