Cited by 459Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Acetylcholine contributes through muscarinic receptors to attentional modulation in V1

Open access
Herrero, J. L., Roberts, M. J., Delicato, L. S., Gieselmann, M. A., Dayan, P., Thiele, A.·2008·Nature

Abstract

Attention exerts a strong influence over neuronal processing in cortical areas. It selectively increases firing rates and affects tuning properties, including changing receptive field locations and sizes. Although these effects are well studied, their cellular mechanisms are poorly understood. To study the cellular mechanisms, we combined iontophoretic pharmacological analysis of cholinergic receptors with single cell recordings in V1 while rhesus macaque monkeys (Macaca mulatta) performed a task that demanded top-down spatial attention. Attending to the receptive field of the V1 neuron under study caused an increase in firing rates. Here we show that this attentional modulation was enhanced by low doses of acetylcholine. Furthermore, applying the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine reduced attentional modulation, whereas the nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine had no systematic effect. These results demonstrate that muscarinic cholinergic mechanisms play a central part in mediating the effects of attention in V1.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature07141

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In primates, locally applied ACh enhances the attentional modulation of neuronal activity in the primary visual cortex.

    “In primates, locally applied ACh enhances the attentional modulation of neuronal activity in the primary visual cortex, while the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine reduces the effects of attention (Herrero et al., 2008).”
  • In primates, the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine reduces the effects of attention.

    “while the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine reduces the effects of attention (Herrero et al., 2008).”
  • In the primary visual cortex, blockade of muscarinic but not nicotinic AChRs impairs the attentional modulation of V1 neurons.

    “Herrero et al. demonstrated that in the primary visual cortex, blockade of muscarinic but not nicotinic AChRs impaired the attentional modulation of V1 neurons (Herrero et al, 2008; see also Deco and Thiele, 2009).”

    From Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition (2011) · cites this paper as Herrero et al, 2008

  • Activation of muscarinic ACh receptors, but not nicotinic ACh receptors, may in part mediate attentional modulation of neural response gain in non-human-primate cortex.

    “Other work in non-human-primate cortex suggests that activation of muscarinic ACh receptors (mAChRs), but not nAChRs, may in part mediate the attentional modulation of neural response gain174.”

    From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [174]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herrero, J. L., Roberts, M. J., Delicato, L. S., Gieselmann, M. A., Dayan, P., & Thiele, A.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit (GB)
Corresponding author
Thiele, A.
Venue
Nature
Published
2008-07-16
Volume
454
Issue
7208
Pages
1110-1114
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2162056177
Cited by
459
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 30
FWCI
12.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Sunderland Repository (University of Sunderland) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (070380)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/F021399/1, BBS/B/09325)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
acetylcholine, muscarinic receptors, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, primary visual cortex, attentional modulation, cholinergic modulation, scopolamine, mecamylamine, rhesus monkeys, neuronal firing rate
MeSH terms
Acetylcholine, Animals, Attention, Macaca mulatta, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mecamylamine, Receptors, Cholinergic, Receptors, Muscarinic, Scopolamine, Cholinergic Antagonists, Muscarinic Antagonists, Nicotinic Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review