Cited by 270Stress Responses and CortisolNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and Testing

Cold pressor stress impairs performance on working memory tasks requiring executive functions in healthy young men.

Schoofs, Daniela, Wolf, Oliver T., Smeets, Tom·2009·Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

The current study investigated the effects of cold pressor stress (CPS) on 2 working memory (WM) tasks differing in the demand they put on maintenance and executive processing. For this purpose 72 healthy young men were exposed either to a stress group or a nonstressful control group. Subsequently, WM performance on the O-Span task (Turner & Engle, 1989) and the digit span task was assessed. Salivary cortisol was measured before and 2 times after the treatment as a marker of hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity. Results revealed a significant performance impairment of the O-Span and the digit span task backward in stressed subjects that correlated negatively with CPS-induced cortisol increases. Digit span forward was neither affected by CPS nor related to the ensuing cortisol increases. These results indicate that acute stress impairs WM performance for tasks requiring executive functions that operate on the stored material but not for WM tasks that only require maintenance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0016980

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In humans experimental or pharmacological stress studies have reported inconsistent effects with impairments as well as enhancements.

    “In humans experimental or pharmacological stress studies have reported inconsistent effects with impairments as well as enhancements being reported [42], [46], [47].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schoofs, D., Wolf, O. T., & Smeets, T.
Affiliations
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Venue
Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2009
Volume
123
Issue
5
Pages
1066-1075
ISSN
  • 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0084
OpenAlex
W2108185849
Cited by
269
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 15
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
German Research Foundation (WO 733/6 –2)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
cold pressor stress, acute stress, working memory, executive function, digit span, salivary cortisol, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, stress-induced cognitive impairment, memory maintenance
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Cold Temperature, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Pain Measurement, Saliva, Stress, Physiological, Area Under Curve, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review