Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 380

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and validation of the sociocultural attitudes towards appearance questionnaire‐4‐revised (SATAQ‐4R)

Schaefer, Lauren M., Harriger, Jennifer A., Heinberg, Leslie J., Soderberg, Taylor, Kevin Thompson, J.·2017·International Journal of Eating Disorders
DOI 10.1002/eat.22590
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective: The Sociocultural Attitudes Toward Appearance Questionnaire‐4 (SATAQ‐4) is a measure of internalization of appearance ideals (i.e., personal acceptance of societal ideals) and appearance pressures (i.e., pressures to achieve the societal ideal). The current study sought to address limitations of the scale in order to increase precision in the measurement of muscular ideal internalization, include an assessment of one's desire for attractiveness, and broaden the measurement of appearance‐related pressures. Method: The factor structure, reliability and construct validity of the SATAQ‐4‐Revised were examined among college women (N = 1,114) in Study 1, adolescent girls (N = 275) in Study 2, and college men (N = 290) in Study 3. Results: Factor analysis among college women indicated a 7‐factor 31‐item scale, labeled the SATAQ‐4R‐Female: (1) Internalization: Thin/Low Body Fat, (2) Internalization: Muscular, (3) Internalization: General Attractiveness, (4) Pressures: Family, (5) Pressures: Media, (6) Pressures: Peers, and (7) Pressures: Significant Others. SATAQ‐4R‐Female subscales demonstrated good reliability and construct validity among college women. Examination of the SATAQ‐4R‐Female among adolescent girls suggested a six‐factor scale in which peer and significant others items comprised a single subscale. The scale demonstrated good reliability and construct validity in adolescent girls. Examination of the SATAQ‐4R among men produced a 28‐item scale with seven factors paralleling the factors identified among college women. This scale, labeled the SATAQ‐4R‐Male, demonstrated good reliability and construct validity. Discussion: Results support the reliability and validity of SATAQ‐4R‐Female in college women and adolescent girls, and the SATAQ‐4R‐Male in college men. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.(Int J Eat Disord 2017; 50:104–117)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.22590

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. 10.1016/B978-0-12-384925-0.00079-1 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/1098-108X(199501)17:1<81::AID-EAT2260170111>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI
  3. 10.1002/eat.10257 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1037/a0037917 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Thompson JK, 1999, Exacting Beauty
  6. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2004.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1002/eat.22263 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.03.002 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/1467-8721.00144 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.250 · DOI
  11. Garner DM., 2004, Eating Disorder Inventory‐3
  12. Cafri G, 2005, The influence of sociocultural factors on body image: A meta‐analysis, Clin Psychol 2005, 12, 421
  13. 10.1016/j.cpr.2004.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.09.006 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/10640269908249289 · DOI
  16. 10.4278/ajhp.120120-QUAN-57 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.12.003 · DOI
  18. 10.1037/a0031762 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/10640269508249168 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2004.08.008 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/s11199-010-9868-1 · DOI
  22. 10.1054/bjps.2001.3550 · DOI
  23. 10.1037/0021-843X.106.1.117 · DOI
  24. Jones JM, 2001, Disordered eating attitudes and behaviours in teenaged girls: A school‐based study, Can Med Assoc J, 165, 547
  25. Fairburn CG, 2008, Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Eating Disorders
  26. 10.1207/s15327752jpa5501&2_13 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Cash TF., 2000, User's Manual for the Multidimensional Body‐Self Relations Questionnaire
  28. 10.1037/a0018398 · DOI
  29. Tabachnick BG, 2007, Using Multivariate Statistics
  30. 10.1177/001316446002000116 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1007/BF02289447 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Zwick WR, 1986, Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain, Psychol Bull, 99, 432442, 10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1080/00273171.2012.710386 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1177/0272431699019003003 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1037/a0019913 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00583.x · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1080/10705519909540118 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Browne MW, 1993, Testing Structural Equation Models, 136
  40. Byrne BM., 1998, Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming
  41. Muthén LK, 2010, MPlus User's Guide
  42. George D, 2003, SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 11.0 update
  43. Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
  44. Crocker L, 2008, Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory
  45. 10.1037/11581-000 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.08.004 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2010.06.004 · DOI
  48. Stice E, An effectiveness trial of a selected dissonance‐based eating disorder prevention program for female high school students: Long‐term effects, J Consult Clin Psych, 79, 500, 10.1037/a0024351 · DOI
  49. 10.1037/0022-006X.74.2.263 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Haines J, 2006, Prevention of obesity and eating disorders: A consideration of shared risk factors, Health Educ Res 2006, 21, 770, 10.1093/her/cyl094 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1080/10640260600796184 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Schaefer, L. M., Harriger, J. A., Heinberg, L. J., Soderberg, T., & Kevin Thompson, J.
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-08-19
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
104-117
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
DOI
10.1002/eat.22590
OpenAlex
W2512673278
Cited by
380
References
10
FWCI
15.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.