Cited by 51Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Heritability of aggression following social evaluation in middle childhood: An fMRI study

Open access
Achterberg, Michelle, van Duijvenvoorde, Anna C. K., van der Meulen, Mara, Bakermans‐Kranenburg, Marian J., Crone, Eveline A.·2018·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Middle childhood marks an important phase for developing and maintaining social relations. At the same time, this phase is marked by a gap in our knowledge of the genetic and environmental influences on brain responses to social feedback and their relation to behavioral aggression. In a large developmental twin sample (509 7‐ to 9‐year‐olds), the heritability and neural underpinnings of behavioral aggression following social evaluation were investigated, using the Social Network Aggression Task (SNAT). Participants viewed pictures of peers that gave positive, neutral, or negative feedback to the participant's profile. Next, participants could blast a loud noise toward the peer as an index of aggression. Genetic modeling revealed that aggression following negative feedback was influenced by both genetics and environmental (shared as well as unique environment). On a neural level (n = 385), the anterior insula and anterior cingulate cortex gyrus (ACCg) responded to both positive and negative feedback, suggesting they signal for social salience cues. The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) were specifically activated during negative feedback, whereas positive feedback resulted in increased activation in caudate, supplementary motor cortex (SMA), and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Decreased SMA and DLPFC activation during negative feedback was associated with more aggressive behavior after negative feedback. Moreover, genetic modeling showed that 13%–14% of the variance in dorsolateral PFC activity was explained by genetics. Our results suggest that the processing of social feedback is partly explained by genetic factors, whereas shared environmental influences play a role in behavioral aggression following feedback.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.24043

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies have demonstrated a significant heritability for aggressive behaviors of up to 60%.

    “Studies have demonstrated a significant heritability for aggressive behaviors of up to 60% [36–38].”

    From Genetics of child aggression, a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Introduction reports substantial heritability of behavioral aggression, but gives an estimate of up to 48%, not 60%. The Discussion reports genetic influences of 10–20% in this study and describes prior estimates as around 50%. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The influence of genes on aggressive behaviors can be augmented by the environment such that it decreases with decreasing positive social feedback or increasing parental negativity.

    “However the influence of genes can be augmented by the environment such that it decreases with decreasing positive social feedback [37] or increasing parental negativity [38].”

    From Genetics of child aggression, a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Results (Behavioral analyses; page unavailable) estimate genetic influences on aggression at 20% for negative-versus-positive feedback and 10% for negative-versus-neutral feedback. These estimates are consistent with the stated direction, but they are for different feedback contrasts; the paper does not establish that decreasing positive feedback causes genetic influence to decline or demonstrate gene–environment moderation. The parental-negativity clause is attached to a different citation and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Brett, M., Anton, J. L., Valabregue, R., & Poline, J. B. (2002). Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox [abstract] Presented at the 8th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, June 2–6, Available on CD‐ROM in NeuroImage, 16(2).
  2. van Duijvenvoorde, A. C., Achterberg, M., Braams, B. R., Peters, S., & Crone, E. A. (2016). Testing a dual‐systems model of adolescent brain development using resting‐state connectivity analyses. NeuroImage, 124(Pt A), 409– 420. 25969399
  3. Wechsler, D. (1991). The Wechsler intelligence scale for children–third edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Achterberg, M., van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K., van der Meulen, M., Bakermans‐Kranenburg, M. J., & Crone, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Leiden Consortium on Individual Development Leiden University AK Leiden 2333 The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Achterberg, Michelle
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03-12
Volume
39
Issue
7
Pages
2828-2841
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2793499754
Cited by
51
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
6.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (024.001.003)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
aggression, heritability, social evaluation, social feedback, middle childhood, genetic factors, shared environment, anterior insula, anterior cingulate cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, supplementary motor area, inferior frontal gyrus, caudate nucleus, social salience
MeSH terms
Aggression, Caudate Nucleus, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Child Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Cortex, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Prefrontal Cortex, Feedback, Psychological, Gene-Environment Interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review