Cited by 125Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesBullying, Victimization, and AggressionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Control your anger! The neural basis of aggression regulation in response to negative social feedback

Open access
Achterberg, Michelle, van Duijvenvoorde, Anna C. K., Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J., Crone, Eveline A.·2016·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

Negative social feedback often generates aggressive feelings and behavior. Prior studies have investigated the neural basis of negative social feedback, but the underlying neural mechanisms of aggression regulation following negative social feedback remain largely undiscovered. In the current study, participants viewed pictures of peers with feedback (positive, neutral or negative) to the participant's personal profile. Next, participants responded to the peer feedback by pressing a button, thereby producing a loud noise toward the peer, as an index of aggression. Behavioral analyses showed that negative feedback led to more aggression (longer noise blasts). Conjunction neuroimaging analyses revealed that both positive and negative feedback were associated with increased activity in the medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) and bilateral insula. In addition, more activation in the right dorsal lateral PFC (dlPFC) during negative feedback vs neutral feedback was associated with shorter noise blasts in response to negative social feedback, suggesting a potential role of dlPFC in aggression regulation, or top-down control over affective impulsive actions. This study demonstrates a role of the dlPFC in the regulation of aggressive social behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsv154

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adults show antagonistic or retaliatory behavior toward others following negative feedback.

    “and show antagonistic or retaliatory behavior toward others following negative feedback (11).”
  • Adults tend to rate accepting peers more favorably, respond to negative feedback by denigrating others, and engage in retaliatory impression updating, consistent with previous work.

    “The tendency for adults to rate accepting peers more favorably (36), respond to negative feedback by denigrating others (5, 9, 10), and engage in retaliatory impression updating (11) aligns with previous work.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Brett, M., Anton, J.L., Valabregue, R., Poline, J.B. (2002) Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox [abstract], Presented at the 8th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, June 2-6. Available on CD-ROM in NeuroImage, 16(2).
  2. Dale, A.M. (1999). Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 8(2-3), 109-14.
  3. Williams, K.D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425-52.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Achterberg, M., van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Crone, E. A.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2016-01-10
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
712-720
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2283899969
Cited by
125
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3
FWCI
8.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (024‐001‐003)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
aggression management, anger, medial prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, insula, top-down control, impulsive behavior, social rejection
MeSH terms
Self-Control, Adolescent, Adult, Aggression, Anger, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Peer Group, Feedback, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review