Cited by 236Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Cognitive deficits in Parkinson's disease: A cognitive neuroscience perspective

Robbins, Trevor W., Cools, Roshan·2014·Movement Disorders

Abstract

Progress in characterization of the nature, neural basis, and treatment of cognitive deficits in Parkinson's disease is reviewed from the perspective of cognitive neuroscience. An initial emphasis on fronto‐striatal executive deficits is surveyed along with the discoveries of disruption as well as remediation of certain impairments by dopaminergic mediation and their association with theories of reinforcement learning. Subsequent focus on large cohorts has revealed considerable heterogeneity in the cognitive impairments as well as a suggestion of at least two distinct syndromes, with the dopamine‐dependent fronto‐striatal deficits being somewhat independent of other signs commonly associated with Parkinson's disease dementia. The utility is proposed of a new, integrated cognitive neuroscience approach based on combining genetic and neuroimaging methodologies with neuropsychological and, ultimately, psychopharmacological approaches. © 2014 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mds.25853

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Flexibility deficits in Parkinson disease may result from dysfunction of frontostriatal loops due to dopamine depletion.

    “Flexibility deficits observed in Parkinson disease may result from dysfunction of frontostriatal loops resulting from dopamine depletion102.”
  • In Parkinson disease, cognitive impairments such as slowed thinking and cognitive inflexibility parallel motor impairments, suggesting reduced flexibility might be an appropriate reaction to a world experienced as more stationary.

    “In Parkinson disease, cognitive impairments such as slowed thinking and cognitive inflexibility parallel motor impairments102, suggesting that reduced flexibility might be an appropriate reaction to a world that is experienced as more stationary.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robbins, T. W., & Cools, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Robbins, Trevor W.
Venue
Movement Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04-15
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
597-607
ISSN
  • 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8257
OpenAlex
W2149431833
Cited by
235
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 4
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Movement Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, cognitive impairment, executive function, frontostriatal circuits, dopaminergic modulation, reinforcement learning, Parkinson's disease dementia, cognitive heterogeneity, neuropsychological assessment, psychopharmacological treatment
MeSH terms
Animals, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Dementia, Humans, Memory, Parkinson Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review