Cited by 626Prenatal Screening and DiagnosticsMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ISUOG Practice Guidelines: performance of first‐trimester fetal ultrasound scan

Open access

Laurent Julien Salomon, Z Alfirevic, Caterina Maddalena Bilardo, G. E. Chalouhi, Tullio Ghi, K. O. Kagan, Tze Kin Lau, Aris T. Papageorghiou, Nick Raine‐Fenning, J. Stirnemann, S Suresh, Ann Tabor, Ilan E. Timor‐Tritsch, Ants Toi, G. S. H. Yeo·2013·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

DOI 10.1002/uog.12342

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan Clinical Standards CommitteeThe International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) is a scientific organization that encourages safe clinical practice and high-quality teaching and research related to diagnostic imaging in women's healthcare.The ISUOG Clinical Standards Committee (CSC) has a remit to develop Practice Guidelines and Consensus Statements that provide healthcare practitioners with a consensus-based approach for diagnostic imaging.They are intended to reflect what is considered by ISUOG to be the best practice at the time at which they are issued.Although ISUOG has made every effort to ensure that Guidelines are accurate when issued, neither the Society nor any of its employees or members accept any liability for the consequences of any inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements issued by the CSC.The ISUOG CSC documents are not intended to establish a legal standard of care because interpretation of the evidence that underpins the Guidelines may be influenced by individual circumstances, local protocol and available resources.Approved Guidelines can be distributed freely with the permission of ISUOG (info@isuog.org). When should a first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan be performed?There is no reason to offer routine ultrasound simply to confirm an ongoing early pregnancy in the absence of any clinical concerns, pathological symptoms or specific indications.It is advisable to offer the first ultrasound scan when gestational age is thought to be between 11 and 13 + 6 weeks' gestation, as this provides an opportunity to achieve the aims outlined above, i.e. confirm viability, establish gestational age accurately, determine the number of viable fetuses and, if requested, evaluate fetal gross anatomy and risk of aneuploidy 4 -20 .Before starting the examination, a healthcare provider should counsel the woman/couple regarding the potential benefits and limitations of the first-trimester ultrasound scan. (GOOD PRACTICE POINT)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.12342

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

1 retracted

Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term
Crowley, P. (1997) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000170 · Cited by 145
Retracted
A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF SONAR “CROWN‐RUMP LENGTH” MEASUREMENTS
Robinson, H. P., & Fleming, J. E. E. (1975) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00710.x · Cited by 1,413
Fetal nuchal translucency: ultrasound screening for chromosomal defects in first trimester of pregnancy.
Nicolaides, K. H., Azar, G. B., Byrne, D. L., Mansur, C. A., & Marks, K. (1992) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.304.6831.867 · Cited by 1,051
Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan
Salomon, L. J., Alfirevic, Z., Berghella, V., Bilardo, C., Hernandez‐Andrade, E., Johnsen, S. L., Kalache, K., Leung, K. ‐., Malinger, G., Munoz, H., et al. (2011) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.8831 · Cited by 1,006
Self-citation
Screening for fetal aneuploidies at 11 to 13 weeks
Nicolaides, K. H. (2011) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.2637 · Cited by 644
Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review
Timor‐Tritsch, I. E., & Monteagudo, A. (2012) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.007 · Cited by 608
Self-citation
The outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twin gestations in the era of invasive fetal therapy: a prospective cohort study
Lewi, L., Jani, J. C., Blickstein, I., Huber, A. M., Gucciardo, L., Mieghem, T. V., Doné, E., Boes, A., Hecher, K., Gratacós, E., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.050 · Cited by 550
New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population‐based cohort study
Verburg, B. O., Steegers, E. A. P., de Ridder, M. A. J., Snijders, R. J. M., Smith, E. A., Albert Hofman, D., Moll, H. A., Jaddoe, V. W. V., & Witteman, J. C. M. (2008) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.5225 · Cited by 505
Challenges in the diagnosis of fetal non‐chromosomal abnormalities at 11–13 weeks
Syngelaki, A., Chelemen, T., Dagklis, T., Allan, L. D., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2011) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.2642 · Cited by 497
Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy
Whitworth, M. K., Bricker, L., & Mullan, C. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007058.pub3 · Cited by 497
The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy
Timor‐Tritsch, I. E., Monteagudo, A., Santos, R., Tsymbal, T., Pineda, G. U., & Arslan, A. A. (2012) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.018 · Cited by 457
Self-citation
Fetal crown-rump length: reevaluation of relation to menstrual age (5-18 weeks) with high-resolution real-time US.
Hadlock, F. P., Shah, Y. P., Kanon, D. J., & Lindsey, J. V. (1992) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.182.2.1732970 · Cited by 455
Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination
Savitz, D. A., Terry, J. W., Dole, N., Thorp, J. M., Siega-Riz, A. M., & Herring, A. H. (2002) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1067/mob.2002.127601 · Cited by 437
Sonar measurement of fetal crown-rump length as means of assessing maturity in first trimester of pregnancy
Robinson, H. P. (1973) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.4.5883.28 · Cited by 392
Ultrasonographically detectable markers of fetal chromosomal abnormalities
Nicolaides, K. H., Snijders, R. J. M., Campbell, S. C., Gosden, C. M., & Berry, C. (1992) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(92)92240-g · Cited by 388
Screening for trisomy 21 by maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency thickness, free beta‐human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy‐associated plasma protein‐A
Kagan, K. O., Wright, D. E., Baker, A., Sahota, D. S., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2008) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.5331 · Cited by 377
Self-citation
Safety of ultrasonography in pregnancy: WHO systematic review of the literature and meta‐analysis
Torloni, M. R., Vedmedovska, N., Merialdi, M., Betrán, A. P., Allen, T., González, R., & Platt, L. D. (2009) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.6328 · Cited by 222
Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation
Taipale, P. (2001) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01131-5 · Cited by 216
First trimester ultrasound screening is effective in reducing postterm labor induction rates: A randomized controlled trial
Bennett, K., Crane, J. M. G., O'Shea, P. G., Lacelle, J., Hutchens, D., & Copel, J. A. (2004) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.065 · Cited by 210
Fetal biparietal diameter: a critical re-evaluation of the relation to menstrual age by means of real-time ultrasound.
Hadlock, F. P., Deter, R. L., Harrist, R. B., & Park, S. K. (1982) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.7863/jum.1982.1.3.97 · Cited by 210
Fetal Size and Dating: Charts Recommended for Clinical Obstetric Practice
Loughna, P., Chitty, L. S., Evans, T., & Chudleigh, T. (2009) · Ultrasound · doi:10.1179/174313409x448543 · Cited by 209
Ductus venosus Doppler in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 and Turner syndrome at 11–13 weeks of gestation
Maiz, N., Valencia, C., Kagan, K. O., Wright, D., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2009) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.6330 · Cited by 206
Self-citation
New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy
Altman, D. G., & Chitty, L. S. (1997) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10030174.x · Cited by 182
First‐trimester ultrasound screening for chromosomal defects
Snijders, R. J. M., Johnson, S. W., Sebire, N. J., Noble, P. L., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1996) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.07030216.x · Cited by 179
Tricuspid regurgitation in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 and Turner syndrome at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks of gestation
Kagan, K. O., Valencia, C., Livanos, P., Wright, D., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2009) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.6264 · Cited by 175
Self-citation
Comparison of gestational age at birth based on last menstrual period and ultrasound during the first trimester
Hoffman, C. S., Messer, L. C., Mendola, P., Savitz, D. A., Herring, A. H., & Hartmann, K. E. (2008) · Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.00965.x · Cited by 174
Fetal nasal bone in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 and Turner syndrome at 11–13 weeks of gestation
Kagan, K. O., Cicero, S., Staboulidou, I., Wright, D., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2009) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.6318 · Cited by 172
Self-citation
First- vs second-trimester ultrasound: the effect on pregnancy dating and perinatal outcomes
Caughey, A. B., Nicholson, J. M., & Washington, A. E. (2008) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.034 · Cited by 169
Estimating fetal age: effect of head shape on BPD
Hadlock, F., Deter, R., Carpenter, R., & Park, S. (1981) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.137.1.83 · Cited by 160
Estimation of gestational age by transvaginal sonographic measurement of greatest embryonic length in dated human embryos
Wisser, J., Dirschedl, P., & Krone, S. (1994) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1994.04060457.x · Cited by 141
Retronasal triangle: a sonographic landmark for the screening of cleft palate in the first trimester
Sepúlveda, W., Wong, A. E., Martínez-Ten, P., & Pérez-Pedregosa, J. (2009) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.7484 · Cited by 136
From nuchal translucency to intracranial translucency: towards the early detection of spina bifida
Chaoui, R., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2010) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.7552 · Cited by 135
Detection of malformations in chromosomally normal fetuses by routine ultrasound at 12 or 18 weeks of gestation—a randomised controlled trial in 39 572 pregnancies
Saltvedt, S., Almström, H., Kublickas, M., Valentin, L., & Grünewald, C. (2006) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00953.x · Cited by 130
Detection of Fetal Structural Abnormalities with US during Early Pregnancy
Fong, K. W., Toi, A., Salem, S., Hornberger, L. K., Chitayat, D. A., Keating, S. J., McAuliffe, F. M., & Johnson, J.-A. M. (2004) · Radiographics · doi:10.1148/rg.241035027 · Cited by 127
Self-citation
First‐trimester ultrasound determination of chorionicity in twin pregnancy
Dias, T., Arcangeli, T., Bhide, A., Napolitano, R., Mahsud‐Dornan, S., & Thilaganathan, B. (2011) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.8956 · Cited by 127
ISUOG statement on the safe use of Doppler in the 11 to 13 +6‐week fetal ultrasound examination
Salvesen, K. Å., Lees, C. C., Abramowicz, J. S., Brezinka, C., ter Haar, G., Maršál, K., & on behalf of the Board of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) (2011) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.9026 · Cited by 116
Accuracy of gestational age estimation by means of fetal crown-rump length measurement
Daya, S. (1993) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(12)90842-x · Cited by 114
Endovaginal US: demonstration of cardiac activity in embryos of less than 5.0 mm in crown-rump length.
Levi, C. S., Lyons, E. A., Zheng, X., Lindsay, D. J., & Holt, S. C. (1990) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.176.1.2191372 · Cited by 113
Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy
Whitworth, M. K., Bricker, L., Neilson, J. P., & Dowswell, T. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007058.pub2 · Cited by 108
Ultrasound dating at 12–14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross‐validation of established dating formulae in in‐vitro fertilized pregnancies
Sladkevicius, P., Saltvedt, S., Almström, H., Kublickas, M., Grünewald, C., & Valentin, L. (2005) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.1993 · Cited by 107
Learning Curve in Ultrasonographic Screening for Selected Fetal Structural Anomalies in Early Pregnancy
Taipale, P., Ämmälä, M., Salonen, R., & Hiilesmaa, V. K. (2003) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02590-5 · Cited by 101
Dating and growth in the first trimester
Bottomley, C., & Bourne, T. (2009) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.011 · Cited by 98
Stillbirths and neonatal deaths in appropriate, small and large birthweight for gestational age fetuses
Stas, V., Walker, S. P., & Permezel, M. (2007) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1479-828x.2007.00742.x · Cited by 95
“GESTATION SAC” VOLUMES AS DETERMINED BY SONAR IN THE FIRST TRIMESTER OF PREGNANCY
Robinson, H. P. (1975) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1975.tb02205.x · Cited by 95
Gestational age in pregnancies conceived after in vitro fertilization: a comparison between age assessed from oocyte retrieval, crown‐rump length and biparietal diameter
Tunón, K., Eik‐Nes, S. H., Grøttum, P., von Dûring, V., & Kahn, J. A. (2000) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00004.x · Cited by 94
Safety Statement, 2000 (reconfirmed 2003)
Abramowicz, J. S., KOSSOFF, G., Maršál, K., & ter Haar, G. (2003) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.36 · Cited by 91
THE ACCURACY OF RADIOLOGICAL ESTIMATES OF GESTATIONAL AGE USING EARLY FETAL CROWN‐RUMP LENGTH MEASUREMENTS BY ULTRASOUND AS A BASIS FOR COMPARISON
Robinson, H. P., Sweet, E. M., & Adam, A. H. (1979) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1979.tb10804.x · Cited by 90
Comparison of nuchal and detailed morphology ultrasound examinations in early pregnancy for fetal structural abnormality screening: a randomized controlled trial
Chen, M., Lee, C. P., Lam, Y. H., Tang, R. Y. K., Chan, B. C. P., Wong, S. F., Tse, L. H. Y., & Tang, M. H. Y. (2008) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.5232 · Cited by 84
Significance of cardiac activity on endovaginal ultrasound in very early embryos.
Goldstein, S. R. (1992) · PubMed · Cited by 83
STRATEGIES AND OUTCOMES OF PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS FOR OSTEOGENESIS IMPERFECTA: A REVIEW OF BIOCHEMICAL AND MOLECULAR STUDIES COMPLETED IN 129 PREGNANCIES
Pepin, M. G., Atkinson, M., Starman, B. J., & Byers, P. H. (1997) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(199706)17:6 · Cited by 82
The outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twin gestations in the era of invasive fetal therapy: a prospective cohort study
Dungan, J. S. (2009) · Yearbook of Obstetrics Gynecology and Women s Health · doi:10.1016/s1090-798x(09)79038-1 · Cited by 78
Transvaginal ultrasonography in predicting placenta previa at delivery: a longitudinal study
Mustafá, S. A., Brizot, M. L., Carvalho, M. H. B., Watanabe, L., Kahhale, S., & Zugaib, M. (2002) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00814.x · Cited by 77
First‐trimester ultrasound dating of twin pregnancy: are singleton charts reliable?
Dias, T., Mahsud-Dornan, S., Thilaganathan, B., Papageorghiou, A. T., & Bhide, A. (2010) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02592.x · Cited by 76
Self-citation
First trimester ultrasonography in screening and detection of fetal anomalies
Sonek, J. (2007) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C Seminars in Medical Genetics · doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.30120 · Cited by 76
Ultrasound in obstetrics: a review of safety
Hershkovitz, R., Sheiner, E., & Mazor, M. (2002) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00469-9 · Cited by 73
Screening for fetal spina bifida by ultrasound examination in the first trimester of pregnancy using fetal biparietal diameter
Bernard, J. P., Cuckle, H., Stirnemann, J., Salomon, L. J., & Ville, Y. G. (2012) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.05.014 · Cited by 71
Self-citation
Revisiting first-trimester fetal biometry
Salomon, L. J., Bernard, J. P., Duyme, M., Dorion, A., & Ville, Y. (2003) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.162 · Cited by 68
Self-citation
Qualified and trained sonographers in the US can perform early fetal anatomy scans between 11 and 14 weeks
Timor‐Tritsch, I. E., Bashiri, A., Monteagudo, A., & Arslan, A. A. (2004) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.007 · Cited by 65
Self-citation
Performing a Fetal Anatomy Scan at the Time of First-Trimester Screening
Timor‐Tritsch, I. E., Fuchs, K. M., Monteagudo, A., & D’Alton, M. E. (2009) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181954b23 · Cited by 65
Self-citation
Gestational sac diameter in very early pregnancy as a predictor of fetal outcome
Oh, J. S., Wright, G., & Coulam, C. B. (2002) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00774.x · Cited by 64
Diagnosis of early embryonic demise by endovaginal sonography.
Brown, D., Emerson, D. S., Felker, R. E., Cartier, M. S., & Smith, W. C. (1990) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.7863/jum.1990.9.11.631 · Cited by 64
Screening for placenta accreta at 11-14 weeks of gestation
Stirnemann, J., Mousty, E., Chalouhi, G. E., Salomon, L. J., Bernard, J. P., & Ville, Y. G. (2011) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.021 · Cited by 63
Self-citation
Biometry of early pregnancy with transvaginal sonography
Grisolia, G., Milano, K., Pilu, G., Banzi, C., David, C., Gabrielli, S., Rizzo, N., Morandi, R., & Bovicelli, L. (1993) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1993.03060403.x · Cited by 63
Ultrasound detection of fetal anomalies in conjunction with first-trimester nuchal translucency screening: A feasibility study
McAuliffe, F. M., Fong, K. W., Toi, A., Chitayat, D. A., Keating, S. J., & Johnson, J.-A. M. (2005) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.075 · Cited by 61
Self-citation
Expected day of delivery from ultrasound dating versus last menstrual period—obstetric outcome when dates mismatch
Thorsell, M., Kaijser, M., Almström, H., & Andolf, E. G. (2008) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01678.x · Cited by 57
Ultrasound features of normal early pregnancy development Davor Jurkovic, Katharina Gruboeck, and Stuart Campbell
Jurkovic, D., Gruboeck, K., & Campbell, S. C. (1995) · Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/00001703-199512000-00017 · Cited by 57
Detection of fetal structural abnormalities by an 11–14‐week ultrasound dating scan in an unselected Swedish population
Cedergren, M. I., & Selbing, A. (2006) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1080/00016340500448438 · Cited by 55
Individual growth patterns in the first trimester: evidence for difference in embryonic and fetal growth rates
Deter, R. L., Buster, J. E., Casson, P. R., & Carson, S. A. (1999) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.13020090.x · Cited by 54
The impact of crown–rump length measurement error on combined Down syndrome screening: a simulation study
Salomon, L. J., Bernard, M., Amarsy, R., Bernard, J. P., & Ville, Y. G. (2009) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.6371 · Cited by 51
Self-citation
Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term
Crowley, P. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000170.pub2 · Cited by 50
First and early second trimester fetal heart screening
Yagel, S., Cohen, S. M., & Messing, B. (2007) · Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/gco.0b013e3280895de6 · Cited by 48
Embryonic Heart Rates: Development in Early First Trimester and Clinical Evaluation
Tezuka, N., Sato, S., Kanasugi, H., & Hiroi, M. (2010) · Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation · doi:10.1159/000293033 · Cited by 47
Reference intervals of gestational sac, yolk sac and embryo volumes using three‐dimensional ultrasound
Bagratee, J. S., Regan, L., Khullar, V., Connolly, C., & Moodley, J. (2009) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.7348 · Cited by 46
A comparison of first trimester measurements for prediction of delivery date
Chalouhi, G. E., Bernard, J. P., Benoist, G., Nasr, B., Ville, Y. G., & Salomon, L. J. (2010) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.3109/14767051003728229 · Cited by 46
Self-citation
Role of First-Trimester Sonography in the Diagnosis of Aneuploidy and Structural Fetal Anomalies
Abu-Rustum, R., Daou, L., & Abu-Rustum, S. E. (2010) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.7863/jum.2010.29.10.1445 · Cited by 44
Ultrasound features of normal early pregnancy development.
Jurkovic, D., Gruboeck, K., & Campbell, S. C. (1995) · PubMed · Cited by 41
Dating biometry during the first trimester: accuracy of an every-day practice
Grangé, G., Pannier, E., Goffinet, F., CABROL, D., & Zorn, J.-R. (2000) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/s0301-2115(99)00127-x · Cited by 38
Ultrasound Pregnancy Dating Leads to Biased Perinatal Morbidity and Neonatal Mortality Among Post-term-born Girls
Skalkidou, A., Kieler, H., Stephansson, O., Roos, N., Cnattingius, S., & Haglund, B. (2010) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e3181f3a660 · Cited by 37
‘Ceci n’est pas une échographie': a plea for quality assessment in prenatal ultrasound
Ville, Y. G. (2007) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.5248 · Cited by 34
Fetal transabdominal anatomy scanning using standard views at 11 to 14 weeks' gestation
von Kaisenberg, C. S., Kaisenberg, H. K.-V., Fritzer, E., Schemm, S., Meinhold-Heerlein, I. M., & Jonat, W. (2005) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.08.034 · Cited by 34
First-trimester uterine scar assessment by transvaginal ultrasound
Stirnemann, J., Chalouhi, G. E., Forner, S., Saidji, Y., Salomon, L. J., Bernard, J. P., & Ville, Y. G. (2011) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.104 · Cited by 33
Self-citation
First‐trimester fetal echocardiography: is the future now?
DeVore, G. R. (2002) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00764.x · Cited by 31
Prediction of the date of delivery based on first trimester ultrasound measurements: An independent method from estimated date of conception
Salomon, L. J., Pizzi, C., Gasparrini, A., Bernard, J. P., & Ville, Y. G. (2009) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.3109/14767050903078672 · Cited by 31
Self-citation
The examination of the embryo and early fetus: how and by whom?
Blaas, H. K. (1999) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.14030153.x · Cited by 28
Does a first trimester dating scan using crown rump length measurement reduce the rate of induction of labour for prolonged pregnancy? An uncompleted randomised controlled trial of 463 women
Harrington, D. J., MacKenzie, I., Thompson, K., Fleminger, M., & Greenwood, C. E. L. (2006) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00833.x · Cited by 27
Construction of modern Australian first trimester ultrasound dating and growth charts
Mclennan, A., & Schlüter, P. J. (2008) · Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1673.2008.01992.x · Cited by 26
Accurate Gestational Dating: Revisited
Ott, W. (1994) · American Journal of Perinatology · doi:10.1055/s-2007-994606 · Cited by 24
Transvaginal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal clubfeet at 13 weeks, menstrual age
Bronshtein, M., & Zimmer, E. Z. (1989) · Journal of Clinical Ultrasound · doi:10.1002/jcu.1870170711 · Cited by 24
First‐trimester screening: dealing with the fall‐out
Fisher, J. (2011) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.2687 · Cited by 22
Fetal anatomic survey using three‐dimensional ultrasound in conjunction with first‐trimester nuchal translucency screening
Bhaduri, M., Fong, K. W., Toi, A., TOMLINSON, G. A., & Okun, N. B. (2010) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.2446 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
Induction policy and missed post‐term pregnancies: a mathematical model
Mongelli, M., Wong, Y. C., Annapoorna, V., & Chua, T. M. (2001) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1479-828x.2001.tb01291.x · Cited by 12

Research works printed but not linked: 1

10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.00965.x · DOI

Sorted by citations

ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth
Salomon, L. J., Alfirevic, Z., Da Silva Costa, F., Deter, R. L., Figueras, F., Ghi, T., Glanc, P., Khalil, A., Lee, W., Napolitano, R., et al. (2019) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.20272 · Cited by 704
Self-citation
ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy
Khalil, A., Rodgers, M., Baschat, A., Bhide, A., Gratacos, E., Hecher, K., Kilby, M. D., Lewi, L., Nicolaides, K. H., Oepkes, D., et al. (2016) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.15821 · Cited by 645
Self-citation
ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of the routine mid‐trimester fetal ultrasound scan
Salomon, L. J., Alfirevic, Z., Berghella, V., Bilardo, C. M., Chalouhi, G. E., Da Silva Costa, F., Hernandez‐Andrade, E., Malinger, G., Munoz, H., Paladini, D., et al. (2022) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.24888 · Cited by 436
Self-citation
ISUOG Interim Guidance on ultrasound for Zika virus infection in pregnancy: information for healthcare professionals
Papageorghiou, A. T., Thilaganathan, B., Bilardo, C. M., Ngu, A., Malinger, G., Herrera, M., Salomon, L. J., Riley, L. E., & Copel, J. A. (2016) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.15896 · Cited by 323
Self-citation
Systematic review of first-trimester ultrasound screening for detection of fetal structural anomalies and factors that affect screening performance
Karim, J. N., Roberts, N. W., Salomon, L. J., & Papageorghiou, A. T. (2017) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.17246 · Cited by 266
Self-citation

See all 626

Authors: Salomon, L. J., Alfirevic, Z., Bilardo, C. M., Chalouhi, G. E., Ghi, T., Kagan, K. O., Lau, T. K., Papageorghiou, A. T., Raine‐Fenning, N., Stirnemann, J., Suresh, S., Tabor, A., Timor‐Tritsch, I. E., Toi, A., & Yeo, G. S. H.
Affiliations: University of Copenhagen (DK)
ORCID: Laurent Julien Salomon
Caterina Maddalena Bilardo
G. E. Chalouhi
Tullio Ghi
K. O. Kagan
Tze Kin Lau
Aris T. Papageorghiou
Nick Raine‐Fenning
J. Stirnemann
Ann Tabor
Ilan E. Timor‐Tritsch
Ants Toi
G. S. H. Yeo
Venue: Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2012-12-25
Volume: 41
Issue: 1
Pages: 102-113
ISSN: 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
1469-0705
DOI: 10.1002/uog.12342
OpenAlex: W1221682153
Cited by: 621
References: 91
Citations by year: 2026: 30 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 12
FWCI: 19.07
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: bronze
doi.org
Licence: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations: Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
Topics: Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Keywords: nuchal translucency, gestational age estimation, fetal viability, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, fetal anatomy, patient counseling
MeSH terms: Female, Fetal Diseases, Fetus, Gestational Age, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Prenatal Care, Time Factors, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Chromosome Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

ISUOG Practice Guidelines: performance of first‐trimester fetal ultrasound scan

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks