The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Procedural justice fosters a belief in the legitimacy of police (Sunshine & Tyler, 2003) and inspires greater compliance with the law (Lind & Tyler, 1988;McCluskey, Mastrofski, & Parks, 1999).”
From Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner‐City Young Men’s Perceptions of Police Legitimacy (2010) · cites this paper as Lind & Tyler, 1988
In the citing paper
“Any system of law or government that wishes to be seen by its masses as legitimate must obey its own laws (Lind & Tyler, 1988), and the police, therefore, must adhere to the law if they expect citizens to do likewise.”
From Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner‐City Young Men’s Perceptions of Police Legitimacy (2010) · cites this paper as Lind & Tyler, 1988
In the citing paper
“and in the public's compliance with the criminal law in general (Bouffard & Piquero, in press;Lind & Tyler, 1988;Paternoster et al., 1997;Sherman, 1993;Tyler, 1990).”
From Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner‐City Young Men’s Perceptions of Police Legitimacy (2010) · cites this paper as Lind & Tyler, 1988
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,032
Moon, H. K., Kamdar, D., Mayer, D. M., & Takeuchi, R. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.84 · Cited by 211
The nature of an apology: An experimental study on how to apologize after a service failure
Roschk, H., & Kaiser, S. (2012) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11002-012-9218-x · Cited by 221
“, timely) by which decisions about outcomes are made (Lind and Tyler 1988; Tax et al. 1998).”
BackgroundOrganizational justice and turnover in public accounting firms: a research note
Parker, R. J., & Kohlmeyer, J. M. (2004) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2004.05.001 · Cited by 207
Antecedents and Consequences of Merit Pay Fairness for Industrial Salespeople
Ramaswami, S. N., & Singh, J. (2003) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.4.46.18690 · Cited by 205
Busenitz, L. W., Fiet, J. O., & Moesel, D. D. (2003) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.06.005 · Cited by 209
Toward general principles of managerial fairness
Sheppard, B. H., & Lewicki, R. J. (1987) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/bf01048014 · Cited by 204
Simon, B. C., & Stürmer, S. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167202239043 · Cited by 200
The Role of Leader-Member Exchange in the Performance Appraisal Process
Elicker, J. D., Levy, P. E., & Hall, R. J. (2006) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206306286622 · Cited by 203
Skitka, L. J., Winquist, J. R., & Hutchinson, S. R. (2003) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/a:1026336131206 · Cited by 208
The Impact of Negative Publicity on Police Self-legitimacy
Nix, J., & Wolfe, S. E. (2015) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418825.2015.1102954 · Cited by 205
Lewicki, R. J., & Brinsfield, C. (2017) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113147 · Cited by 202
Being independent raises happiness at work
Benz, M., & Frey, B. S. (2004) · Cited by 198
Organizational Perception Management
Elsbach, K. D. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315740379 · Cited by 202
Factors influencing job performance of nursing staff
Sharma, J., & Dhar, R. L. (2016) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-01-2014-0007 · Cited by 240
The critical role of customer forgiveness in successful service recovery
Harrison‐Walker, L. J. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.049 · Cited by 223
Self-uncertainty and responsiveness to procedural justice
Cremer, D. D., & Sedikides, C. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.06.010 · Cited by 206
Unfairness by Design? The Perceived Fairness of Digital Labor on Crowdworking Platforms
Fieseler, C., Bucher, E. L., & Hoffmann, C. P. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3607-2 · Cited by 206
“Perceived workplace fairness is held to satisfy workers’ socio-emotional needs (Lind and Tyler 1988).”
BackgroundAllen, T. D., Eby, L. T. D. T., & Lentz, E. (2006) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00747.x · Cited by 199
Research Companion to Emotion in Organizations
(2008) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781848443778 · Cited by 202
Skitka, L. J., & Mullen, E. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/014616702236873 · Cited by 204
Mechanisms underlying responses to inequitable outcomes in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes
Brosnan, S. F., Talbot, C. F., AHLGREN, M., Lambeth, S. P., & Schapiro, S. J. (2010) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.019 · Cited by 197
Incentive mechanisms, fairness and participation in online group-buying auctions
Kauffman, R. J., Lai, H., & Ho, C.-T. (2008) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2008.11.009 · Cited by 203
Developing European indicators of trust in justice
Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Kuha, J., Stares, S., Widdop, S., Fitzgerald, R., Yordanova, M., & Galev, T. (2011) · European Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/1477370811411458 · Cited by 205
“Tyler’s notion of motive-based trust is particularly relevant here (Lind and Tyler, 1988; Tyler, 2006a; Tyler and Huo, 2002).”
Price fairness perceptions and customer loyalty in a retail context
Martin, W. C., Ponder, N., & Lueg, J. E. (2008) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.05.017 · Cited by 202
Public Perceptions of the Legitimacy of the Law and Legal Authorities: Evidence from the Caribbean
Johnson, D., Maguire, E. R., & Kuhns, J. B. (2014) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.1111/lasr.12102 · Cited by 194
Interpersonal Injustice and Workplace Deviance
Ferris, D. L., Spence, J. R., Brown, D. J., & Heller, D. A. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310372259 · Cited by 211
Social Exchange Implications of Own and CoWorkers' Experiences of Supervisory Abuse
Peng, A. C., Schaubroeck, J. M., & Li, Y. (2013) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0080 · Cited by 204
Building Police—Youth Relationships: The Importance of Procedural Justice
Hinds, L. (2007) · Youth Justice · doi:10.1177/1473225407082510 · Cited by 192
Hafer, C. L., & Sutton, R. M. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_8 · Cited by 195
Daly, J. P., & Geyer, P. D. (1994) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.4030150706 · Cited by 193
Justice-based opposition to social policies: Is it genuine?
Bobocel, D. R., Hing, L. S. S., Davey, L. M., Stanley, D. J., & Zanna, M. P. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.653 · Cited by 194
Procedural Fairness and Compliance with the Law
Tyler, T. R. (1997) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 194
Self-citationStahlberg, D., Petersen, L., & Dauenheimer, D. (1999) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199906)29:4 · Cited by 31
The end of shared governance: Looking ahead or looking back
Birnbaum, R. (2004) · New Directions for Higher Education · doi:10.1002/he.152 · Cited by 191
E-tailer׳s return policy, consumer׳s perception of return policy fairness and purchase intention
Pei, Z., Paswan, A. K., & Yan, R. (2014) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.01.004 · Cited by 214
Mikula, G. (1986) · Critical issues in social justice · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-5059-0_6 · Cited by 193
Bradford, B., Quinton, P., Myhill, A., & Porter, G. (2013) · European Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/1477370813491898 · Cited by 195
“This model of the relationship between citizens and authorities such as the police resonates with, and is indeed partly based on, research that has looked at why people comply and cooperate within organizations and other more closely defined groups (Blader and Tyler, 2009; Lind and Tyler, 1988; Tyler and Blader, 2000).”
BackgroundJones, C. R., & Eiser, J. R. (2009) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.015 · Cited by 202
Tyler, T. R., Casper, J. D., & Fisher, B. S. (1989) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111066 · Cited by 192
Self-citationThe Impacts of Service Failure and Recovery Efforts on Airline Customers’ Emotions and Satisfaction
Xu, X., Liu, W., & Gürsoy, D. (2018) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287518789285 · Cited by 191
“The perceived justice theory suggests that justice has three dimensions: distributive (Deutsch 1985), procedural (Lind and Tyler 1988), and interactional (Bies and Shapiro 1987).”
BackgroundDellmuth, L., Scholte, J. A., & Tallberg, J. (2019) · Review of International Studies · doi:10.1017/s026021051900007x · Cited by 200
Ashworth, L., & Free, C. W. (2006) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9007-7 · Cited by 202
Organizational Behavior: Where We'Ve Been, Where Were Going
O’Reilly, C. A. (1991) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.42.020191.002235 · Cited by 200
Quaquebeke, N. V., & Eckloff, T. (2009) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0087-z · Cited by 195
Esaiasson, P., Gilljam, M., & Persson, M. (2012) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02052.x · Cited by 198
Ethnicity, trust and cooperation with police: Testing the dominance of the process-based model
Sargeant, E., Murphy, K., & Cherney, A. (2013) · European Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/1477370813511386 · Cited by 193
Echoes of Silence: Employee Silence as a Mediator Between Overall Justice and Employee Outcomes
Whiteside, D. B., & Barclay, L. J. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1467-3 · Cited by 202
“belief that employees can influence their organization by expressing their ideas and opinions (Lind and Tyler 1988).”
BackgroundInfluentialFairness and organizational citizenship behavior: What are the connections?
Organ, D. W., & Moorman, R. H. (1993) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/bf01048730 · Cited by 189
Chan, S. H. J., & Lai, H. Y. I. (2016) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.017 · Cited by 205
Perceived Injustice: A Risk Factor for Problematic Pain Outcomes
Sullivan, M. J. L., Scott, W., & Trost, Z. (2012) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0b013e3182527d13 · Cited by 187
Measuring Procedural Justice in Police-Citizen Encounters
Jonathan-Zamir, T., Mastrofski, S. D., & Moyal, S. (2015) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418825.2013.845677 · Cited by 189
“A decade later, in response to growing criticisms, Lind and Tyler (1988) developed the “group value” model of procedural justice and subsequently the “relational” model of authority relevant to hierarchical settings (Tyler & Lind, 1992).”
BackgroundPrimacy Effects in Justice Judgments: Testing Predictions from Fairness Heuristic Theory
Lind, E. A., Kray, L. J., & Thompson, L. (2001) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2937 · Cited by 195
Self-citationWhat is Alive and What is Dead in the Theory of Corporatism
Baccaro, L. (2003) · British Journal of Industrial Relations · doi:10.1046/j.1467-8543.2003.00294.x · Cited by 188
Arnesen, S., & Peters, Y. (2017) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414017720702 · Cited by 209
The Role of Trust in Salesperson—Sales Manager Relationships
Flaherty, K. E., & Pappas, J. M. (2000) · Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management · doi:10.1080/08853134.2000.10754247 · Cited by 187
Price, K. H., Harrison, D. A., & Gavin, J. H. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1375 · Cited by 190
Saunders, D. M., Sheppard, B. H., Knight, V., & Roth, J. (1992) · Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal · doi:10.1007/bf01385051 · Cited by 187
Leadership and fairness: The state of the art
van Knippenberg, D., David De Cremer, A., & van Knippenberg, B. (2007) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594320701275833 · Cited by 191
Goldman, B. M. (2001) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00096.x · Cited by 207
Winners, Losers, and Election Context: Voter Responses to the 2000 Presidential Election
Craig, S. C., Martinez, M. D., Gainous, J., & Kane, J. G. (2006) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/106591290605900407 · Cited by 194
A glimpse through the veil of ignorance: Equality of opportunity and support for redistribution
Krawczyk, M. W. (2009) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.10.003 · Cited by 186
Shapiro, D. L., & Brett, J. M. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1167 · Cited by 186
Consequences of perception gaps in the headquarters–subsidiary relationship
Birkinshaw, J., Holm, U., Thilenius, P., & Arvidsson, N. (2000) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/s0969-5931(00)00004-4 · Cited by 189
Ambrose, M. L., Hess, R. L., & Ganesan, S. (2007) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.01.001 · Cited by 186
Fair Process, Trust, and Cooperation: Moving Toward an Integrated Framework of Police Legitimacy
Hamm, J. A., Trinkner, R. J., & Carr, J. D. (2017) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854817710058 · Cited by 204
“Rooted in classic procedural fairness theory (Lind & Tyler, 1988), the process-based model hypothesizes a weaker role for outcome-focused, instrumental concerns than for the evaluations of the processes that determine those outcomes (see Pryce et al., 2016).”
MethodWorkplace discrimination: A meta‐analytic extension, critique, and future research agenda
Dhanani, L. Y., Beus, J. M., & Joseph, D. L. (2017) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12254 · Cited by 206
The consequences of emerging HRM practices for employees' trust in their managers
Tzafrir, S. S., Baruch, Y., & Dolan, S. L. (2004) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/00483480410561529 · Cited by 184
Avery, D. R., & Quiñones, M. A. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.81 · Cited by 185
Scientists' Perceptions of Organizational Justice and Self-Reported Misbehaviors
Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., Crain, A. L., & De Vries, R. (2006) · Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics · doi:10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.51 · Cited by 180
Fair today, fair tomorrow? A longitudinal investigation of overall justice perceptions.
Holtz, B. C., & Harold, C. M. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015900 · Cited by 184
Contagious Justice: Exploring The Social Construction of Justice in Organizations
Degoey, P. (2000) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(00)22003-0 · Cited by 187
Managing conflict with a subordinate or a superior: Effectiveness of conglomerated behavior.
de Vliert, E. V., Euwema, M., & Huismans, S. E. (1995) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.2.271 · Cited by 184
An integrated anti-opportunism system in international exchange
Luo, Y.-D. (2007) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400300 · Cited by 178
WORKPLACE JUSTICE AND JOB SATISFACTION AS PREDICTORS OF SATISFACTION WITH UNION AND MANAGEMENT.
Fryxell, G. E., & GORDON, M. E. (1989) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256571 · Cited by 183
The production of trust during organizational change
Lines, R., Selart, M., Espedal, B., & Johansen, S. T. (2005) · Journal of Change Management · doi:10.1080/14697010500143555 · Cited by 197
Leach, C. W., & Spears, R. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0012629 · Cited by 182
IS MORE FAIRNESS ALWAYS PREFERRED? SELF-ESTEEM MODERATES REACTIONS TO PROCEDURAL JUSTICE.
Wiesenfeld, B. M., Swann, W. B., Brockner, J., & Bartel, C. A. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159922 · Cited by 184
Fassina, N. E., Jones, D. A., & Uggerslev, K. L. (2007) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206307309260 · Cited by 183
In the Eye of the Beholder: Procedural Justice in Social Exchange
Molm, L. D., Takahashi, N., & Peterson, G. (2003) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3088905 · Cited by 181
Behavioral Operations Management
Loch, C. H., & Wu, Y. (2007) · Foundations and Trends® in Technology Information and Operations Management · doi:10.1561/0200000009 · Cited by 184
Ko, J., & Hur, S. (2013) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12160 · Cited by 180
van den Bos, K., Poortvliet, P. M., Maas, M., Miedema, J., & van den Ham, E.-J. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.06.001 · Cited by 259
The moderating effect of self-esteem in reaction to voice: Converging evidence from five studies.
Brockner, J., Heuer, L. B., Siegel, P. A., Wiesenfeld, B. M., Martin, C. L., Grover, S. L., Reed, T. F., & Bjorgvinsson, S. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.75.2.394 · Cited by 194
Contemporary justice research: A new look at familiar questions
Ambrose, M. L. (2002) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00030-4 · Cited by 180
The social construction of fairness: social influence and sense making in organizations
Lamertz, K. (2001) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.128 · Cited by 182
Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: The Benefits of Self-Regulation
Tyler, T. R. (2009) · bepress Legal Repository · Cited by 175
Self-citationNewig, J., Pahl‐Wostl, C., & Sigel, K. (2005) · European Environment · doi:10.1002/eet.398 · Cited by 176
Customer engagement behavior in individualistic and collectivistic markets
Roy, S. K., Balaji, M. S., Soutar, G. N., Lassar, W. M., & Roy, R. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.06.001 · Cited by 190
“A number of fairness theorists have suggested people care about fairness because it serves their need to belong and validates their social standing in groups they deem important (Lind & Tyler, 1988; Tyler & Lind, 1992).”
BackgroundJob insecurity A literature review
Sverke, M., Hellgren, J., & Näswall, K. (2006) · Cited by 175
Mentoring and Organizational Justice: An Empirical Investigation
Scandura, T. A. (1997) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1006/jvbe.1997.1588 · Cited by 178
Organizational justice and organizational commitment among South Korean police officers
Crow, M. S., Lee, C., & joo, J. J. (2012) · Policing An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13639511211230156 · Cited by 187
Can trust in politicians explain individuals' support for climate policy? The case of CO2tax
Hammar, H., & Jagers, S. C. (2006) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2006.9685582 · Cited by 176
Elovainio, M. J., van den Bos, K., Linna, A., Mika Kivimaki, B., Ala‐Mursula, L., Pentti, J., & Vahtera, J. (2005) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.046 · Cited by 189
Aryee, S., & Chay, Y. W. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.154 · Cited by 177
Justice and organizational citizenship behavior: What is the relationship?
Tansky, J. W. (1993) · Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal · doi:10.1007/bf01419444 · Cited by 177
Supervisory Responsiveness and Employee Self-Perceived Status and Voice Behavior
Janssen, O., & Gao, L. (2013) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206312471386 · Cited by 176
“The basic notion is that an employee derives status from supervisory responsiveness because fair and trustworthy treatment by the authority figure of the group indicates that the group values and respects this particular employee (cf. Lind & Tyler, 1988; Tyler & Lind, 1992).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialOrganizational Justice and Employee Work Attitudes: The Federal Case
Choi, S. (2010) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/0275074010373275 · Cited by 179
“…maintain that perception of organizational justice can help employees feel satisfied with their jobs and evaluate their organization positively, consequently encouraging employees to be more strongly committed to the interests of the organization (Cohen-Charash & Spector, 2001; Lind & Tyler, 1988).”
BackgroundInfluentialAriel, B. (2012) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00256.x · Cited by 178
Negative Reviews, Positive Impact: Consumer Empathetic Responding to Unfair Word of Mouth
Allard, T., Dunn, L., & White, K. (2020) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242920924389 · Cited by 177
“…social comparisons in price fairness (Cox 2001; Ho and Su 2009; Kahneman, Knetsch, and Thaler 1986, 1990) and fair treatment in service recovery (e.g., Bies and Shapiro 1988; Clemmer 1993; Folger 1977; Leventhal 1980; Lind and Tyler 1988; Sparks and McColl-Kennedy 2001; Thibaut and Walker 1975).”
BackgroundCorruption and Police Legitimacy in Lahore, Pakistan
Jackson, J., Asif, M. U., Bradford, B., & Zakar, M. Z. (2014) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azu069 · Cited by 187
Metadata
- Authors
- Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R.
- Affiliations
- RAND Corporation (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- Critical Issues in Social Justice
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 1988
- ISSN
- 1572-1906 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009260120
- Semantic Scholar
- e6a535e6b4da7cac2af5d41bfcccaf5f23548785
- Cited by
- 6,585
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 210 · 2025: 161 · 2024: 190 · 2023: 203 · 2022: 197 · 2021: 207 · 2020: 220 · 2019: 214 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 246 · 2016: 263 · 2015: 286 · 2014: 296 · 2013: 278 · 2012: 272
- FWCI
- 281.11
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Critical issues in social justice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- procedural justice, social psychology, perceived fairness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review