The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Procedural justice fosters a belief in the legitimacy of police (Sunshine & Tyler, 2003) and inspires greater compliance with the law (Lind & Tyler, 1988;McCluskey, Mastrofski, & Parks, 1999).”
From Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner‐City Young Men’s Perceptions of Police Legitimacy (2010) · cites this paper as Lind & Tyler, 1988
In the citing paper
“Any system of law or government that wishes to be seen by its masses as legitimate must obey its own laws (Lind & Tyler, 1988), and the police, therefore, must adhere to the law if they expect citizens to do likewise.”
From Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner‐City Young Men’s Perceptions of Police Legitimacy (2010) · cites this paper as Lind & Tyler, 1988
In the citing paper
“and in the public's compliance with the criminal law in general (Bouffard & Piquero, in press;Lind & Tyler, 1988;Paternoster et al., 1997;Sherman, 1993;Tyler, 1990).”
From Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner‐City Young Men’s Perceptions of Police Legitimacy (2010) · cites this paper as Lind & Tyler, 1988
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,032
Herold, D. M., Fedor, D. B., Caldwell, S. D., & Liu, Y. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.346 · Cited by 728
Mishra, A. K., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1998) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926627 · Cited by 745
The Nature of Job Insecurity: Understanding Employment Uncertainty on the Brink of a New Millennium
Sverke, M., & Hellgren, J. (2002) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/1464-0597.0077z · Cited by 728
A Model of Customer Satisfaction with Service Encounters Involving Failure and Recovery
Smith, A. K., Bolton, R. N., & Wagner, J. (1999) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3152082 · Cited by 2,058
JUSTICE IN TEAMS: ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE CLIMATE
Colquitt, J. A., Noe, R. A., & JACKSON, C. L. (2002) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00104.x · Cited by 703
Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions.
Weiss, H. M., Suckow, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.786 · Cited by 732
A SOCIAL IDENTITY MODEL OF LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS IN ORGANIZATIONS
van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2003) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(03)25006-1 · Cited by 733
A multi‐theoretic perspective on trust and power in strategic supply chains
Ireland, R. D., & Webb, J. W. (2006) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.004 · Cited by 697
Nadi̇ri̇, H., & Tanova, C. (2009) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.05.001 · Cited by 693
Nishii, L. H., & Mayer, D. M. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017190 · Cited by 689
Employee Cynicism: An Examination Using a Contract Violation Framework
Andersson, L. M. (1996) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872679604901102 · Cited by 699
Hershcovis, M., & Barling, J. (2010) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.621 · Cited by 686
Chebat, J., & Slusarczyk, W. (2003) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.09.005 · Cited by 686
Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances
Major, B., Quinton, W. J., & McCoy, S. K. (2002) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(02)80007-7 · Cited by 706
Being Independent is a Great Thing: Subjective Evaluations of Self‐Employment and Hierarchy
BENZ, M., & Frey, B. S. (2007) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00594.x · Cited by 703
Pettit, P. N. (1999) · doi:10.1093/0198296428.001.0001 · Cited by 681
The Handbook of Organizational Economics
Gibbons, R. S., & Roberts, J. (2012) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400845354 · Cited by 720
'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage': Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions
Binns, R., Van Kleek, M., Veale, M., Lyngs, U., Zhao, J., & Shadbolt, N. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173951 · Cited by 691
“A significant body of research in legal and organisational psychology suggests that people do not only care about whether the outcome of a decision benefits them, but also whether it meets standards of justice [71, 40, 11].”
Backgroundvan den Bos, K. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.931 · Cited by 673
Fair adaptation to climate change
Paavola, J., & Adger, W. N. (2005) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.015 · Cited by 636
Maxham, J. G., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2003) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.1.46.18591 · Cited by 649
Colquitt, J. A., & Rodell, J. B. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.0572 · Cited by 687
“These include social exchange theory (Blau, 1964), the relational model (Lind & Tyler, 1988; Tyler & Lind, 1992), and fairness heuristic theory (Lind, 2001; Van den Bos, 2001).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMotivation Crowding Theory: A Survey of Empirical EvidencePreprint
Frey, B. S., & Jegen, R. (2000) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.203330 · Cited by 637
Restorative Justice: Assessing Optimistic and Pessimistic Accounts
Braithwaite, J. B. (1999) · Crime and Justice · doi:10.1086/449287 · Cited by 643
Moorman, R. H., Niehoff, B. P., & Organ, D. W. (1993) · Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal · doi:10.1007/bf01419445 · Cited by 623
Tyler, T. R. (2001) · Behavioral Sciences & the Law · doi:10.1002/bsl.438 · Cited by 616
Self-citationHow Much Information?: Effects of Transparency on Trust in an Algorithmic Interface
Kizilcec, R. F. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858402 · Cited by 615
“Consistent with procedural justice theory [15], a procedural explanation re-instilled trust in those whose expectations were violated.”
BackgroundLord, R. G., Brown, D. J., & Freiberg, S. J. (1999) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2832 · Cited by 613
Introducing Procedural Utility: Not Only What, but Also How Matters
Frey, B. S., Benz, M., & Stutzer, A. (2004) · Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE · doi:10.1628/0932456041960560 · Cited by 661
Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Muir, C. P., & Rich, B. L. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025208 · Cited by 651
Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2006) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.409 · Cited by 595
Do Fair Procedures Matter? The Effect of Procedural Justice on Spouse Assault
Paternoster, R., Bachman, R., Brame, R., & Sherman, L. W. (1997) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.2307/3054098 · Cited by 588
Experimental Research on Just-World Theory: Problems, Developments, and Future Challenges.
Hafer, C. L., & Bègue, L. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.128 · Cited by 808
Gau, J. M., & Brunson, R. K. (2010) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418820902763889 · Cited by 582
The Role of Trust in Nurturing Compliance: A Study of Accused Tax Avoiders.
Murphy, K. (2004) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1023/b:lahu.0000022322.94776.ca · Cited by 601
Major, B. (1994) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60156-2 · Cited by 583
VOICE AND JUSTIFICATION: THEIR INFLUENCE ON PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS JUDGMENTS.
Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1988) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256465 · Cited by 579
Institutions and environmental governance: A reconceptualization
Paavola, J. (2006) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.026 · Cited by 614
What is Procedural Justice?: Criteria Used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures
Tyler, T. R. (1988) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.2307/3053563 · Cited by 912
Self-citationCulture and Procedural Justice: The Influence of Power Distance on Reactions to Voice
Brockner, J., Ackerman, G., Greenberg, J., Gelfand, M. J., Francesco, A. M., Chen, Z. X., Leung, K. Y., Bierbrauer, G., Gomez, C. B., Kirkman, B. L., et al. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.2000.1451 · Cited by 607
How fairness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressful
Janssen, O. (2004) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.238 · Cited by 568
Graebner, M. E., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2004) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4131440 · Cited by 566
Korsgaard, M. A., & Roberson, L. (1995) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639502100404 · Cited by 562
Views from Inside and Outside: Integrating Emic and Etic Insights about Culture and Justice Judgment
Morris, M. W., Leung, K. Y., Ames, D. R., & Lickel, B. A. (1999) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553253 · Cited by 561
Paré, G., & Tremblay, M. (2007) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601106286875 · Cited by 567
Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance
Bosse, D. A., Phillips, R. A., & Harrison, J. S. (2009) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.743 · Cited by 558
Foley, S., & Powell, G. N. (1999) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(199912)20:7 · Cited by 47
The Psychology of Legitimacy: A Relational Perspective on Voluntary Deference to Authorities
Tyler, T. R. (1997) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0104_4 · Cited by 755
Self-citationNazaretsky, T., Ariely, M., Cukurova, M., & Alexandron, G. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13232 · Cited by 589
“This recommendation is consistent with procedural justice theory (Lind & Tyler, 1988), which states that providing procedural transparency (in our case, the knowledge of what rubrics were used for grading, and how ML systems learn based on graded examples) makes people more tolerant to possible…”
BackgroundNewman, D. T., Fast, N. J., & Harmon, D. J. (2020) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.03.008 · Cited by 550
Griffith, D. A., Harvey, M. G., & Lusch, R. F. (2005) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.03.003 · Cited by 553
Agency Theory and Bounded Self-Interest
Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2014) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2013.0420 · Cited by 607
The Role of Injustice in the Elicitation of Differential Emotional Reactions
Mikula, G., Scherer, K. R., & Athenstaedt, U. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167298247009 · Cited by 548
A Motivated Action Theory Account of Goal Orientation.
DeShon, R. P., & Gillespie, J. Z. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1096 · Cited by 786
von Schnitzler, A. (2016) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.23943/princeton/9780691170770.001.0001 · Cited by 656
Patterson, P. G., Cowley, E., & Prasongsukarn, K. (2006) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.02.004 · Cited by 525
Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. J. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.295 · Cited by 550
When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority.
van den Bos, K., Wilke, H., & Lind, E. A. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1449 · Cited by 535
Self-citationThree Strikes and You Are Out, but Why? The Psychology of Public Support for Punishing Rule Breakers
Tyler, T. R., & Boeckmann, R. J. (1997) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.2307/3053926 · Cited by 512
Self-citationKim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. (1993) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256590 · Cited by 513
Why Education Predicts Decreased Belief in Conspiracy Theories
van Prooijen, J. (2016) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3301 · Cited by 577
“Procedural justice is empirically and theoretically grounded in feelings of (process and decision) control (e.g., Thibaut & Walker, 1975; Lind & Tyler, 1988; Van Prooijen, Van den Bos, & Wilke, 2004).”
BackgroundA Four-Component Model of Procedural Justice: Defining the Meaning of a “Fair” Process
Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167203029006007 · Cited by 511
Self-citationContact and confidence: revisiting the impact of public encounters with the police
Bradford, B., Jackson, J., & Stanko, E. A. (2009) · Policing & Society · doi:10.1080/10439460802457594 · Cited by 544
Negotiating with Yourself and Losing: Making Decisions with Competing Internal Preferences
Bazerman, M. H., Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Wade-Benzoni, K. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259372 · Cited by 510
What do people value when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation.
Curhan, J. R., Elfenbein, H. A., & Xu, H. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.493 · Cited by 534
Political Consequences of the Carceral State
WEAVER, V. M., & LERMAN, A. E. (2010) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055410000456 · Cited by 506
Who Wants To Deliberate—And Why?
Neblo, M. A., Esterling, K., Kennedy, R., Lazer, D. M. J., & Sokhey, A. E. (2010) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055410000298 · Cited by 520
Theories of Fairness and Reciprocity: Evidence and Economic Applications
Fehr, E. (2008) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/ccol0521818729.007 · Cited by 506
Emotion expression in human punishment behavior
Xiao, E., & Houser, D. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0502399102 · Cited by 505
Social contracts and marketing ethics
Dunfee, T. W., Smith, N. C., & Ross, W. T. (1999) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299906300302 · Cited by 370
To Share or Not to Share: Modeling Tacit Knowledge Sharing, Its Mediators and Antecedents
Lin, C. (2006) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9119-0 · Cited by 502
Behfar, K. J., Peterson, R. S., Mannix, E. A., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.170 · Cited by 527
Kuvaas, B. (2007) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00710.x · Cited by 515
Butts, M. M., Casper, W. J., & Yang, T. S. (2012) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0030389 · Cited by 494
Bradford, B. (2012) · Policing & Society · doi:10.1080/10439463.2012.724068 · Cited by 518
“…developed a robust empirically grounded understanding of the relationship between individuals and authorities that revolves around process fairness (Lind and Tyler 1988, Tyler and Huo 2002, Tyler 2007, Tyler and Fagan 2008, see also Murphy et al. 2008, Tankebe 2008, Hough et al. 2010, Jackson et…”
BackgroundRyan, A. M., & Ployhart, R. E. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630002600308 · Cited by 507
Beyond Deterrence: An Expanded View of Employee Computer Abuse1
Willison, R., & Warkentin, M. E. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.1.01 · Cited by 481
“However, could this not also be the case with regard to policy compliance by employees? In a similar vein, a number of management studies have examined how compliance is influenced by perceptions of organizational justice/injustice (Lind and Tyler 1988; Tyler 1990; Tyler and Huo 2002; Wenzel 2006).”
BackgroundMoorman, R. H. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.76.6.845 · Cited by 3,422
A Meta-Analysis of Organizational Complaint Handling and Customer Responses
Gelbrich, K., & Roschk, H. (2011) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670510387914 · Cited by 481
Simons, T. L., & Roberson, Q. M. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.432 · Cited by 474
Interfirm Monitoring, Social Contracts, and Relationship Outcomes
Heide, J. B., Wathne, K. H., & Rokkan, A. I. (2007) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.44.3.425 · Cited by 474
Dreu, C. K. W. D., & Nauta, A. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0014494 · Cited by 485
Relationships between Bases of Power and Work Reactions: The Mediational Role of Procedural Justice
Mossholder, K. W., Bennett, N., Kemery, E. R., & Wesolowski, M. A. (1998) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(99)80072-5 · Cited by 475
Direct Democracy and Local Public Goods: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia
Olken, B. (2010) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055410000079 · Cited by 468
Differential Learning and Interaction in Alliance Dynamics: A Process and Outcome Discrepancy Model
Kumar, R., & Nti, K. O. (1998) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.9.3.356 · Cited by 463
Three roads to organizational justice
Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D. E., Mohler, C. J., & Schminke, M. J. (2004) · Research in personnel and human resources management · doi:10.1016/s0742-7301(01)20001-2 · Cited by 492
Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.482 · Cited by 528
Self-citationRetributive and restorative justice.
Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., Feather, N. T., & Platow, M. J. (2007) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10979-007-9116-6 · Cited by 455
Due Process in Performance Appraisal: A Quasi-Experiment in Procedural Justice
Taylor, M. S., Tracy, K. B., Renard, M. K., Harrison, J. K., & Carroll, S. J. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393795 · Cited by 447
The effects of relationship quality on customer retaliation
Grégoire, Y., & Fisher, R. J. (2006) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11002-006-3796-4 · Cited by 453
van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R. C., & Wilke, H. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.95 · Cited by 454
A Longitudinal Study of Team Conflict, Conflict Management, Cohesion, and Team Effectiveness
Tekleab, A. G., Quigley, N. R., & Tesluk, P. E. (2009) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601108331218 · Cited by 491
To justify or excuse?: A meta-analytic review of the effects of explanations.
Shaw, J. C., Wild, E., & Colquitt, J. A. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.444 · Cited by 446
Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. L., & Griffin, M. L. (2007) · Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2007.09.001 · Cited by 482
Individual and Corporate Dispute Resolution: Using Procedural Fairness as a Decision Heuristic
Lind, E. A., Kulik, C. T., Ambrose, M. L., & Park, M. V. D. V. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393412 · Cited by 452
Self-citationLaw, R., Dollard, M. F., Tuckey, M. R., & Dormann, C. (2011) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.010 · Cited by 457
“Procedural justice refers o perceived fairness of procedural decisions, such as pay selecion, performance evaluation, promotion (Lind and Tyler, 1988) nd employee perceptions of how organizations allocate resources Cohen-Charash and Spector, 2001).”
BackgroundForgiveness and Justice: A Research Agenda for Social and Personality Psychology
Exline, J. J., Worthington, E. L., Hill, P. C., & McCullough, M. E. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0704_06 · Cited by 446
Way, S. A. (2002) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630202800604 · Cited by 444
Cohen‐Charash, Y., & Mueller, J. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.666 · Cited by 462
Guanxi Practices and Trust in Management: A Procedural Justice Perspective
Chen, C. C., Chen, Y., & Xin, K. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1030.0047 · Cited by 450
Metadata
- Authors
- Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R.
- Affiliations
- RAND Corporation (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- Critical Issues in Social Justice
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 1988
- ISSN
- 1572-1906 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009260120
- Semantic Scholar
- e6a535e6b4da7cac2af5d41bfcccaf5f23548785
- Cited by
- 6,585
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 210 · 2025: 161 · 2024: 190 · 2023: 203 · 2022: 197 · 2021: 207 · 2020: 220 · 2019: 214 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 246 · 2016: 263 · 2015: 286 · 2014: 296 · 2013: 278 · 2012: 272
- FWCI
- 281.11
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Critical issues in social justice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- procedural justice, social psychology, perceived fairness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review