The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Procedural justice fosters a belief in the legitimacy of police (Sunshine & Tyler, 2003) and inspires greater compliance with the law (Lind & Tyler, 1988;McCluskey, Mastrofski, & Parks, 1999).”
From Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner‐City Young Men’s Perceptions of Police Legitimacy (2010) · cites this paper as Lind & Tyler, 1988
In the citing paper
“Any system of law or government that wishes to be seen by its masses as legitimate must obey its own laws (Lind & Tyler, 1988), and the police, therefore, must adhere to the law if they expect citizens to do likewise.”
From Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner‐City Young Men’s Perceptions of Police Legitimacy (2010) · cites this paper as Lind & Tyler, 1988
In the citing paper
“and in the public's compliance with the criminal law in general (Bouffard & Piquero, in press;Lind & Tyler, 1988;Paternoster et al., 1997;Sherman, 1993;Tyler, 1990).”
From Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner‐City Young Men’s Perceptions of Police Legitimacy (2010) · cites this paper as Lind & Tyler, 1988
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,032
van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672012710008 · Cited by 148
Self-citationJournal of Behavioral Studies in Business
Baker, P. D. R. (2014) · ADVANCED SCIENCES INDEX · Cited by 149
Galinsky, A. D., Seiden, V. L., Kim, P. H., & Medvec, V. H. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167202282012 · Cited by 143
Fortin, M. (2008) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00231.x · Cited by 149
Balancing Multiple Competing Objectives with a Balanced Scorecard
Sundin, H., Granlund, M., & Brown, D. A. (2009) · European Accounting Review · doi:10.1080/09638180903118736 · Cited by 147
“Thus the design and use of the scorecard can play a significant role in achieving procedural fairness (Lind and Tyler, 1988 ; Phillips, 2003 ) because it makes a more comprehensive set of data available to consider all objectives and systematically weigh up outcomes of different decision alternatives.”
BackgroundInfluentialStewart, M. M., & Johnson, O. E. (2009) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601108331220 · Cited by 135
Sensitivity to the Ferguson Effect: The role of managerial organizational justice
Nix, J., & Wolfe, S. E. (2016) · Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.06.002 · Cited by 150
“Organizational Justice Organizational justice theory has a long history in the business management literature (see, e.g., Lind & Tyler, 1988).”
BackgroundAdvancing procedural justice in conservation
Ruano‐Chamorro, C., Gurney, G. G., & Cinner, J. E. (2021) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12861 · Cited by 180
Allying with AI? Reactions toward human-based, AI/ML-based, and augmented hiring processes
Gonzalez, M. F., Liu, W., Shirase, L., Tomczak, D. L., Lobbe, C. E., Justenhoven, R. T., & Martin, N. R. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107179 · Cited by 180
Transformational Relationship Events
Harmeling, C. M., Palmatier, R. W., Houston, M. B., Arnold, M. J., & Samaha, S. A. (2015) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.15.0105 · Cited by 149
“They violate social processes and involve evaluations of emotionladen procedural and interactional fairness (Lind and Tyler 1988).”
BackgroundWatson, A. C., Angell, B., Morabito, M. S., & Robinson, N. (2008) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-008-0188-5 · Cited by 159
Correlates of satisfaction with performance appraisal feedback
Jawahar, I. M. “. (2006) · Journal of Labor Research · doi:10.1007/s12122-006-1004-1 · Cited by 159
Barclay, L. J., & Kiefer, T. (2012) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206312441833 · Cited by 155
“Drawing upon fairness theory (Folger & Cropanzano, 1998, 2001) and relational models of justice (e.g., Lind & Tyler, 1988; Tyler & Lind, 1992), we argue that distributive, procedural, and interactional justice should each contribute to overall justice, with procedural and interactional justice…”
BackgroundMethodEconomic Evaluations, Procedural Fairness, and Satisfaction with Democracy
Magalhães, P. C. (2016) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912916652238 · Cited by 153
Trust and Law Abidingness: A Proactive Model of Social Regulation
Tyler, T. R. (2001) · bepress Legal Repository · Cited by 145
Self-citationProcedural Fairness and Tax Compliance
Hartner, M., Rechberger, S., Kirchler, E. M., & Schabmann, A. (2008) · Economic Analysis and Policy · doi:10.1016/s0313-5926(08)50010-5 · Cited by 152
Procedural and distributive justice effects moderated by organizational identification
David De Cremer, A. (2005) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940510571603 · Cited by 148
HOW THE PACKAGING OF DECISION EXPLANATIONS AFFECTS PERCEPTIONS OF TRUSTWORTHINESS.
Elsbach, K. D., & Elofson, G. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556387 · Cited by 147
Succession in family business: multi-source perspectives
Bozer, G., Levin, L., & Santora, J. C. (2017) · Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development · doi:10.1108/jsbed-10-2016-0163 · Cited by 183
The Effects of Procedures, Social Accounts, and Benefits Level on Victims' Layoff Reactions
Konovsky, M. A., & Folger, R. G. (1991) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00540.x · Cited by 145
Li, A., & Cropanzano, R. (2009) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00825.x · Cited by 147
The impact of choice on fairness in the context of service recovery
Mattila, A. S., & Cranage, D. (2005) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/08876040510609899 · Cited by 194
Satisfaction with performance appraisal systems
Cook, J., & Crossman, A. (2004) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940410543605 · Cited by 147
Berry, L. L., & Seiders, K. (2008) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2007.09.002 · Cited by 144
Organizational Fairness and Diversity Management in Public Organizations
Choi, S., & Rainey, H. (2014) · Review of Public Personnel Administration · doi:10.1177/0734371x13486489 · Cited by 144
“Previous research has shown that perception of procedural justice has been “a source of both job satisfaction and positive evaluations of the organization” (CohenCharash & Spector, 2001; Lind & Tyler, 1988, p. 191).”
BackgroundProcess-based leadership: Fair procedures and reactions to organizational change
Tyler, T. R., & Cremer, D. D. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.001 · Cited by 142
Self-citationvan Knippenberg, B., Martin, L., & Tyler, T. R. (2006) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.391 · Cited by 144
Self-citationAPPLYING UNCERTAINTY MANAGEMENT THEORY TO EMPLOYEE VOICE BEHAVIOR: AN INTEGRATIVE INVESTIGATION
TAKEUCHI, R., CHEN, Z., & CHEUNG, S. Y. (2012) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01247.x · Cited by 143
“Furthermore, a lower level of felt uncertainty may enhance an employee’s identification with the organizational goals (Olkkonen & Lipponen, 2006) and their motivation to display a cooperative attitude at work (Lind & Tyler, 1988; Lind & Van den Bos, 2002; Tyler & Lind, 1992).”
BackgroundThe impact of using algorithms for managerial decisions on public employees' procedural justice
Nagtegaal, R. (2021) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101536 · Cited by 166
Effects of Explanations on Applicant Reactions: A meta‐analytic review
Truxillo, D. M., Bodner, T., Bertolino, M., Bauer, T. N., & Yonce, C. A. (2009) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00478.x · Cited by 155
Fairness of prices, user fee policy and willingness to pay among visitors to a national forest
Chung, J. Y., Kyle, G. T., Petrick, J. F., & Absher, J. D. (2010) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2010.08.016 · Cited by 143
Organizational Justice and Behavioral Ethics: Promises and Prospects
Cropanzano, R., & Stein, J. H. (2009) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq200919211 · Cited by 154
Desktop Videoconferencing: Experiences of Complete Users, Wary Users, and Non-Users1
Webster, J. (1998) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249666 · Cited by 140
Mansour-Cole, D., & Scott, S. G. (1998) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00715.x · Cited by 143
MANAGERS HANDLING DISPUTES: THIRD-PARTY ROLES AND PERCEPTIONS OF FAIRNESS.
Karambayya, R., & Brett, J. (1989) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256564 · Cited by 143
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. (1995) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.6.1.44 · Cited by 143
Hollander-Blumoff, R. E., & Tyler, T. R. (2008) · Law & Social Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00110.x · Cited by 144
Self-citationJustice in teams: The activation and role of sensemaking in the emergence of justice climates
Roberson, Q. M. (2006) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.02.006 · Cited by 145
A Bayesian Network Model of the Consumer Complaint Process
Blodgett, J. G., & Anderson, R. D. (2000) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/109467050024002 · Cited by 203
THE ROLE OF INFLUENCE TACTICS IN PERCEPTIONS OF PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS' FAIRNESS.
Dulebohn, J. H., & Ferris, G. R. (1999) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256920 · Cited by 141
Cremer, D. D., & Blader, S. L. (2005) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.290 · Cited by 136
Drazkiewicz, A., Challies, E., & Newig, J. (2015) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.010 · Cited by 141
Sometimes unfair procedures have nice aspects: On the psychology of the fair process effect.
van den Bos, K., Bruins, J., Wilke, H., & Dronkert, E. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.324 · Cited by 141
Procedural Justice and Managers' In-Role and Extra-Role Behavior: The Case of the Multinational
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. (1996) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.4.499 · Cited by 141
Justice and organizational citizenship: A commentary on the state of the science
Greenberg, J. (1993) · Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal · doi:10.1007/bf01419448 · Cited by 140
Morrison, B. (2006) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00455.x · Cited by 150
The Objective Value of Subjective Value: A Multi‐Round Negotiation Study
Curhan, J. R., Elfenbein, H. A., & Eisenkraft, N. (2010) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00593.x · Cited by 140
Husted, B. W., & Folger, R. G. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0088 · Cited by 142
Equity and repurchase intention following service failure
Palmer, A., Beggs, R., & Keown‐McMullan, C. (2000) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/08876040010347624 · Cited by 218
Procedural justice and the mental health court judge's role in reducing recidivism
Wales, H. W., Hiday, V. A., & Ray, B. R. (2010) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.06.009 · Cited by 139
Chi, N., & Han, T. (2008) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317907x262314 · Cited by 138
Talent Management and Employee Retention: An Integrative Research Framework
Narayanan, A., Rajithakumar, S., & Menon, M. (2018) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484318812159 · Cited by 207
Rewarding Leadership and Fair Procedures as Determinants of Self-Esteem.
Cremer, D. D., van Knippenberg, B., van Knippenberg, D., Mullenders, D., & Stinglhamber, F. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.3 · Cited by 140
Race, Conceptions of Crime and Justice, and Support for the Death Penalty
Young, R. L. (1991) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2786789 · Cited by 139
Procedural justice and public involvement in natural resource decision making
Lawrence, R. L., Daniels, S. E., & Stankey, G. H. (1997) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941929709381054 · Cited by 139
Encouraging Tax Compliance With Positive Incentives: A Conceptual Framework and Research Directions*
Smith, K. W., & Stalans, L. J. (1991) · Law & Policy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.1991.tb00056.x · Cited by 137
Goldman, B. M. (2002) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.341000 · Cited by 139
Youth, Police Legitimacy and Informal Contact
Hinds, L. (2008) · Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11896-008-9031-x · Cited by 137
Can Police Legitimacy Promote Collective Efficacy?
Kochel, T. R. (2011) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418825.2011.561805 · Cited by 138
“They are willing to take action in support of the values and laws promoted by police (Fagan & Tyler, 2005; Lind & Tyler, 1988; Sunshine & Tyler, 2003; Tyler, 1990).”
BackgroundBehavioral Effects of Nonfinancial Performance Measures: The Role of Procedural Fairness
Lau, C. M., & Moser, A. (2008) · Behavioral Research in Accounting · doi:10.2308/bria.2008.20.2.55 · Cited by 138
Crane, L., Maras, K., Hawken, T., Mulcahy, S., & Memon, A. (2016) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-016-2729-1 · Cited by 138
“Procedural justice theory (Lind and Tyler 1988) provides a framework for considering how individuals with ASD perceive their encounters with the police; suggesting that perceptions of the police are not shaped by the outcome of an encounter (e.”
Narrowing the Legitimacy Gap: Turnovers as a Cause of Democratic Consolidation
Moehler, D. C., & Lindberg, S. I. (2009) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381609990120 · Cited by 138
Zarzycki, M., Morrison, V., Bei, E., & Seddon, D. (2022) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2022.2032259 · Cited by 165
“…or sociobiological motivations to provide care as discussed mainly in the Reciprocal Altruism Model and Kin Selection Model (Barber, 2010; Humphrey, 1997) and to a lesser extent in the Empathy Induced Altruism Hypothesis and Self-Interest Model (Bateson, 1991; Greenberg, 1990; Lind & Tyler, 1988).”
BackgroundNorris, P. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197530108.001.0001 · Cited by 160
Hogg, M. A. (2010) · Handbook of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002031 · Cited by 138
Wang, W., Mao, J., Wu, W., & Liu, J. (2012) · Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7941.2011.00004.x · Cited by 168
Organizational justice and employee engagement
Ghosh, P., Rai, A., & Sinha, A. (2014) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-08-2013-0148 · Cited by 169
Examining Applicant Reactions to the Use of Social Networking Websites in Pre-Employment Screening
Stoughton, J. W., Thompson, L. F., & Meade, A. W. (2013) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9333-6 · Cited by 158
Cheating More for Less: Upward Social Comparisons Motivate the Poorly Compensated to Cheat
John, L. K., Loewenstein, G. F., & Rick, S. I. (2013) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.08.002 · Cited by 137
Procedural justice and status: Status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects.
van Prooijen, J., van den Bos, K., & Wilke, H. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1353 · Cited by 136
Sharma, S., Bottom, W. P., & Elfenbein, H. A. (2013) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/2041386613505857 · Cited by 154
“…research literatures have focused on perceptions of justice and fairness (Brockner & Wiesenfeld, 1996; Colquitt, Conlon, Wesson, Porter, & Ng, 2001; Lind & Tyler, 1988), interpersonal trust, respect, and liking for the counterparty (e.g., Kong, Dirks, & Ferrin, in press; Lewicki, McAllister, &…”
Choi, J. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.513 · Cited by 136
Commuting by car or public transportation? A social dilemma analysis of travel mode judgements
van Vugt, M., Lange, P. A. M. V., & Meertens, R. M. (1996) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199605)26:3 · Cited by 180
`I'm Out of the Loop': Ostracism Through Information Exclusion
Jones, E. E., Carter‐Sowell, A. R., Kelly, J. R., & Williams, K. D. (2009) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430208101054 · Cited by 139
Rubin, E. V. (2007) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mum035 · Cited by 135
A Social Psychological Perspective
von Hippel, W. (1994) · Ethics & Behavior · doi:10.1207/s15327019eb0404_8 · Cited by 137
Roberts, S. J., Scherer, L. L., & Bowyer, C. (2011) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/1548051811409044 · Cited by 135
“One may argue that this is a conservative test of the hypothesis that PsyCap moderates the stress to incivility relationship, as researchers typically find that people attach more importance and react more strongly to real-world situations (Lind & Tyler, 1988).”
BackgroundPeer evaluation in self-managing work groups.
Saavedra, R., & Kwun, S. K. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.3.450 · Cited by 140
Predicting the perceived fairness of parental leave policies.
Grover, S. L. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.76.2.247 · Cited by 135
Correia, I. F., & Dalbert, C. (2008) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.248 · Cited by 135
van Prooijen, J., van den Bos, K., & Wilke, H. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.66 · Cited by 140
Do Fairness and Equity Matter?
Taxman, F. S., & Gordon, J. A. (2009) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854809335039 · Cited by 134
Theories of Fairness and Reciprocity - Evidence and Economic ApplicationsPreprint
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2001) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.255223 · Cited by 135
The Role of Perceived Control in Customer Value Cocreation and Service Recovery Evaluation
Guo, L., Lotz, S. L., Tang, C., & Gruen, T. W. (2015) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670515597213 · Cited by 134
Psychological and Environmental Factors Associated with Partner Violence
Foa, E. B., Cascardi, M. A., Zoellner, L. A., & Feeny, N. C. (2000) · Trauma Violence & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838000001001005 · Cited by 132
Social Trust: Fairness Matters More Than Homogeneity
You, J. (2012) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00893.x · Cited by 146
Keep it local and fish-friendly: Social acceptance of hydropower projects in Switzerland
Tabi, A., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.006 · Cited by 134
“Lind and Tyler [31] identified a number of principles that constitute procedural justice.”
BackgroundOrganizational interventions: facing the limits of the natural science paradigm
Griffiths, A. (1999) · Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.485 · Cited by 131
Fischer, R. D., & Smith, P. B. (2006) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00243.x · Cited by 135
Job decision latitude, organizational justice and health: multilevel covariance structure analysis
Elovainio, M. J., Mika Kivimaki, B., Steen, N., & Vahtera, J. (2003) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00366-6 · Cited by 139
Intention and Stochastic Outcomes: An Experimental study
Charness, G. B., & Levine, D. I. (2007) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02066.x · Cited by 134
Status and distrust: The relevance of inequality and betrayal aversion
Hong, K., & Bohnet, I. (2006) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2006.06.003 · Cited by 135
The impact of criminal justice involvement on victims' mental health
Parsons, J., & Bergin, T. (2010) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.20505 · Cited by 133
Association as a Psychological Justification for Ownership
Beggan, J. K., & Brown, E. M. (1994) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980.1994.9712741 · Cited by 133
Seron, C., Ryzin, G. G. V., & Frankel, M. (2001) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.2307/3185408 · Cited by 132
A longitudinal analysis of citizens' attitudes about police
Gau, J. M. (2010) · Policing An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13639511011044867 · Cited by 130
Aggressive reactions to abusive supervision: The role of interactional justice and narcissism
Burton, J. P., & Hoobler, J. M. (2011) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00886.x · Cited by 148
Jones, D. A., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.363 · Cited by 132
Chen, Y., Friedman, R., Yu, E., & Sun, F. (2009) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-009-9176-x · Cited by 138
A Framework for Thinking About Oppression and Its Change
Deutsch, M. (2006) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-006-9998-3 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R.
- Affiliations
- RAND Corporation (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- Critical Issues in Social Justice
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 1988
- ISSN
- 1572-1906 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009260120
- Semantic Scholar
- e6a535e6b4da7cac2af5d41bfcccaf5f23548785
- Cited by
- 6,585
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 210 · 2025: 161 · 2024: 190 · 2023: 203 · 2022: 197 · 2021: 207 · 2020: 220 · 2019: 214 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 246 · 2016: 263 · 2015: 286 · 2014: 296 · 2013: 278 · 2012: 272
- FWCI
- 281.11
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Critical issues in social justice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- procedural justice, social psychology, perceived fairness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review