Cited by 6,585Legal processes and jurisprudenceSocial and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice

Lind, E. Allan, Tyler, Tom R.·1988·Critical Issues in Social Justice

DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 1,032

How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness.
David De Cremer, A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.858 · Cited by 438
Governing Institutional Complexity: The Ecology of Games Framework
Lubell, M. N. (2013) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.12028 · Cited by 457
The Effects of Blame Attributions and Offender Likableness on Forgiveness and Revenge in the Workplace
Bradfield, M., & Aquino, K. F. (1999) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639902500501 · Cited by 434
The effects of perceived justice on complainants' negative word-of-mouth behavior and repatronage intentions
Blodgett, J. G., Granbois, D. H., & Walters, R. G. (1993) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/0022-4359(93)90015-b · Cited by 624
The Environmental Performance of Participatory and Collaborative Governance: A Framework of Causal Mechanisms
Newig, J., Challies, E., Jager, N. W., Kochskämper, E., & Adzersen, A. (2017) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.12209 · Cited by 434
Adam Smith, Behavioral Economist
Ashraf, N., Camerer, C. F., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2005) · The Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533005774357897 · Cited by 452
Superordinate Identification, Subgroup Identification, and Justice Concerns: Is Separatism the Problem; Is Assimilation the Answer?
Huo, Y. J., Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1996) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00664.x · Cited by 430
Self-citation
Handbook of organizational measurement
Price, J. L. (1997) · International Journal of Manpower · doi:10.1108/01437729710182260 · Cited by 436
Insider or outsider? how employee perceptions of insider status affect their work behavior
Stamper, C. L., & Masterson, S. S. (2002) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.175 · Cited by 429
LMX differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes
Henderson, D. J., Liden, R. C., Glibkowski, B. C., & Chaudhry, A. (2009) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.003 · Cited by 428
Embeddedness and Identity: How Immigrants Turn Grievances into Action
Klandermans, B., van der Toorn, J., & van Stekelenburg, J. (2008) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240807300606 · Cited by 426
Making and Breaking Social Capital: The Impact of Welfare-State Institutions
Kumlin, S., & Rothstein, B. (2005) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414004273203 · Cited by 599
"Place" as an Integrating Concept in Natural Resource Politics: Propositions for a Social Science Research Agenda
Cheng, A. S., Kruger, L. E., & Daniels, S. E. (2003) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920309199 · Cited by 424
Differentiating the effects of status and power: A justice perspective.
Blader, S. L., & Chen, Y.-R. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0026651 · Cited by 427
BIASES IN THE INTERPRETATION AND USE OF RESEARCH RESULTS
MacCoun, R. J. (1998) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.259 · Cited by 436
Identity threat and antisocial behavior in organizations: The moderating effects of individual differences, aggressive modeling, and hierarchical status
Aquino, K. F., & Douglas, S. (2003) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00517-4 · Cited by 416
APPLICANT REACTIONS TO SELECTION: DEVELOPMENT OF THE SELECTION PROCEDURAL JUSTICE SCALE (SPJS)
Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Sanchez, R. J., Craig, J. M., Ferrara, P., & Campion, M. A. (2001) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00097.x · Cited by 450
Is virtue its own reward? Self-sacrificial decisions for the sake of fairness
Turillo, C. J., Folger, R. G., Lavelle, J. J., Umphress, E. E., & Gee, J. (2002) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00032-8 · Cited by 404
Procedural Justice and Legal Compliance
Nagin, D. S., & Telep, C. W. (2017) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113310 · Cited by 409
“Early research in PJ emphasized that fairness perceptions were useful to study not only because of their relationship with outcomes like compliance but also because “normative theories of justice … view fairness as a desired quality in its own right” (Lind & Tyler, 1988, pp. 63–64).”
Background
Presumed fair: Ironic effects of organizational diversity structures.
Kaiser, C. R., Major, B., Jurcevic, I., Dover, T. L., Brady, L. M., & Shapiro, J. R. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0030838 · Cited by 405
The Language of Law School: Learning to "Think Like a Lawyer"
Mertz, E. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183108.001.0001 · Cited by 403
Relationship between organizational justice and employee work outcomes: a cross‐national study
Lam, S. S. K., Schaubroeck, J. M., & Aryee, S. (2001) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.131 · Cited by 402
Modeling resident attitudes toward tourism
Lindberg, K., & Johnson, R. L. (1997) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/s0160-7383(97)80009-6 · Cited by 400
Fair Procedures: Evidence from Games Involving Lotteries
Bolton, G. E., Brandts, J., & Ockenfels, A. (2005) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.01032.x · Cited by 398
How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel: negative group members and dysfunctional groups
Felps, W., Mitchell, T. R., & Byington, E. (2006) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(06)27005-9 · Cited by 395
Tax morale in Latin America
Torgler, B. (2005) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/s11127-005-5790-4 · Cited by 395
Justice and Leader-Member Exchange: The Moderating Role of Organizational Culture
Erdoğan, B., Liden, R. C., & Kraimer, M. L. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.20786086 · Cited by 395
The Role of Perceived Injustice in the Experience of Chronic Pain and Disability: Scale Development and Validation
Sullivan, M. J. L., Adams, H., Horan, S., Maher, D., Boland, D., & Gross, R. (2008) · Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation · doi:10.1007/s10926-008-9140-5 · Cited by 389
The Social Effects of Punishment in Organizations: A Justice Perspective
Treviño, L. K. (1992) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1992.4279054 · Cited by 388
How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect.
van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1034 · Cited by 392
Self-citation
Linking justice, trust and innovative work behaviour to work engagement
A. Agarwal, U. (2014) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-02-2012-0019 · Cited by 389
Psychological Barriers to Dispute Resolution
Ross, L. D., & Ward, A. C. (1995) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60407-4 · Cited by 385
Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field investigations.
Cawley, B. D., Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (1998) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.615 · Cited by 391
Making Sense of Life: The Existential Self Trying to Deal with Personal Uncertainty
van den Bos, K. (2009) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/10478400903333411 · Cited by 395
How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective
Thau, S., Bennett, R. J., Mitchell, M. S., & Marrs, M. B. (2008) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.06.003 · Cited by 409
Contemporary Social Psychological Theories
Burke, P. J. (2020) · Stanford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781503605626 · Cited by 391
Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: What feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong.
Camacho, C. J., Higgins, E. T., & Luger, L. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.498 · Cited by 395
Pay dispersion and workforce performance: moderating effects of incentives and interdependence
Shaw, J. D., Gupta, N., & Delery, J. E. (2002) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.235 · Cited by 382
Regulating More Effectively: The Relationship between Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Tax Non-compliance
Murphy, K. (2005) · Journal of Law and Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6478.2005.00338.x · Cited by 381
Are We Family and Are We Treated as Family? Nonfamily Employees’ Perceptions of Justice in the Family Firm
Barnett, T., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2006) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00155.x · Cited by 379
The Impact of Cultural Values on Employee Resistance to Teams: Toward A Model of Globalized Self-Managing Work Team Effectiveness
Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (1997) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9708210724 · Cited by 428
PROCEDURAL JUSTICE IN ENTREPRENEUR-INVESTOR RELATIONS.
Sapienza, H. J., & Korsgaard, M. A. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256655 · Cited by 370
Institutions and Behavior: Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Democracy
Bó, P. D., Foster, A., & Putterman, L. G. (2010) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.100.5.2205 · Cited by 373
Public Confidence in Policing
Jackson, J., & Sunshine, J. (2006) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azl031 · Cited by 381
The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: A longitudinal study
Peterson, R. S., & Behfar, K. J. (2003) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/s0749-5978(03)00090-6 · Cited by 363
Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0
Nam, T. (2011) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.07.005 · Cited by 389
Examining the integrated influence of fairness and quality on learners’ satisfaction and Web‐based learning continuance intention
Chiu, C., Chiu, C., & Chang, H. (2007) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00238.x · Cited by 388
Poisoning Relationships: Perceived Unfairness in Channels of Distribution
Samaha, S. A., Palmatier, R. W., & Dant, R. P. (2011) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.75.3.99 · Cited by 366
The Decision to Blow the Whistle: A Social Information Processing Framework
Gundlach, M. J., Douglas, S. C., & Martinko, M. J. (2003) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2003.8925239 · Cited by 367
The impact of outcome orientation and justice concerns on tax compliance: The role of taxpayers' identity.
Wenzel, M. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.629 · Cited by 366
THE INFLUENCE OF PROPORTIONAL AND PERCEPTUAL CONFLICT COMPOSITION ON TEAM PERFORMANCE
Jehn, K. A., & Chatman, J. A. (2000) · International Journal of Conflict Management · doi:10.1108/eb022835 · Cited by 363
Theories in online information privacy research: A critical review and an integrated framework
Li, Y. (2012) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.010 · Cited by 367
Trust and legitimacy: Policing in the USA and Europe
Tyler, T. R. (2011) · European Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/1477370811411462 · Cited by 382
Self-citation
Discriminating among organizational politics, justice, and support
Andrews, M. C., & Kacmar, K. M. (2001) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.92 · Cited by 363
A trickle-down model of organizational justice: Relating employees' and customers' perceptions of and reactions to fairness.
Masterson, S. S. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.594 · Cited by 361
Encouraging public cooperation and support for police
Murphy, K., Hinds, L., & Fleming, J. (2008) · Policing and Society · doi:10.1080/10439460802008660 · Cited by 361
When Voice Matters
Bashshur, M. R., & Oc, B. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314558302 · Cited by 369
“…and increases individuals’ felt control over the processes that lead to outcomes (typically an instrumental concern), as well as because voice makes individuals feel like valued members of the organization (noninstrumental concerns typically couched in the “group-value model”; Lind & Tyler, 1988).”
Background
The Independent and Interactive Roles of Procedural, Distributive, and Interactional Justice in Strategic Alliances
Luo, Y. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.25526452 · Cited by 360
The moderating impact of internal social exchange processes on the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship
De Clercq, D., Dimov, D., & Thongpapanl, N. (. (2010) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.01.004 · Cited by 359
Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation
Gmür, M. (2003) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1023/a:1023619503005 · Cited by 373
Rethinking leader-member exchange: An organizational justice perspective
Scandura, T. A. (1999) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(99)80007-1 · Cited by 361
Organizational Justice and Police Misconduct
Wolfe, S. E., & Piquero, A. R. (2011) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854810397739 · Cited by 356
“Thus, organizational justice may offer a useful framework from which to build a theoretical understanding of individual-level police misconduct, given its focus on the social psychological relationship between organizations and human behavior (Lind & Tyler, 1988).”
BackgroundInfluential
CUSTOMER PERCEPTIONS OF CORPORATE RESPONSES TO PRODUCT COMPLAINTS: THE ROLE OF EXPLANATIONS.
CONLON, D. E., & Murray, N. M. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256723 · Cited by 356
Survivor reactions to reorganization: Antecedents and consequences of procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice.
Kernan, M. C., & Hanges, P. J. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.916 · Cited by 351
Is the Effect of Procedural Justice on Police Legitimacy Invariant? Testing the Generality of Procedural Justice and Competing Antecedents of Legitimacy
Wolfe, S. E., Nix, J., Kaminski, R. J., & Rojek, J. J. (2015) · Journal of Quantitative Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10940-015-9263-8 · Cited by 372
“Normative beliefs concerning what constitutes fair procedures are argued to be a relatively universal psychological trait (Lind and Tyler 1988; Tyler 1994, pp. 813-814, 827-828; Tyler, Boeckmann, Smith, and Huo 1997, pp. 207, 239).”
Influential
THIRD-PARTY REACTIONS TO EMPLOYEE (MIS)TREATMENT: A JUSTICE PERSPECTIVE
Skarlicki, D. P., & Kulik, C. T. (2004) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(04)26005-1 · Cited by 369
Situating Legal Consciousness: Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary Citizens about Law and Street Harassment
Nielsen, L. B. (2000) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.2307/3115131 · Cited by 351
Stability and Change as Simultaneous Experiences in Organizational Life
Leana, C. R., & Barry, B. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.3707707 · Cited by 330
Theories of Fairness and Reciprocity: Evidence and Economic Applications
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511610240.008 · Cited by 348
The Justice Sensitivity Inventory: Factorial Validity, Location in the Personality Facet Space, Demographic Pattern, and Normative Data
Schmitt, M., Baumert, A., Gollwitzer, M., & Maes, J. (2010) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-010-0115-2 · Cited by 374
“Sociological and psychological accounts of people’s need for justice have been offered by a number of influential theories such as relative deprivation theory (Crosby, 1976; Stouffer, Suchman, DeVinney, Star, & Williams, 1949; Walker & Smith, 2002), equity theory (Adams, 1965; Walster, Walster, & Berscheid, 1978), jus…”
Background
Authentic Leadership and Employee Voice Behavior: A Multi-Level Psychological Process
Hsiung, H.-H. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1043-2 · Cited by 347
“In a workgroup with high procedural justice climate, members are likely to feel fairly treated (Tangirala and Ramanujam 2008), and are usually allowed to participate in the decision-making process (Lind and Tyler 1988).”
Assessing the effects of service quality and justice on customer satisfaction and the continuance intention of mobile value-added services: An empirical test of a multidimensional model
Zhao, L., Lu, Y., Zhang, L., & Chau, P. Y. K. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.022 · Cited by 373
JUST AND UNJUST PUNISHMENT: INFLUENCES ON SUBORDINATE PERFORMANCE AND CITIZENSHIP.
Ball, G. A., Treviño, L. K., & Sims, H. P. (1994) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256831 · Cited by 350
VOICE, CONTROL, AND BELONGING: The Double-Edged Sword of Procedural Fairness
MacCoun, R. J. (2005) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.1.041604.115958 · Cited by 343
“Moreover, procedural justice scholars have consistently and explicitly noted the risk of false consciousness in their writings (e.g., Lind & Tyler, 1988; MacCoun, Lind, & Tyler; Tyler et al., 1997).”
BackgroundInfluential
Work-life benefits and organizational attachment: Self-interest utility and signaling theory models
Casper, W. J., & Harris, C. M. (2008) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.10.015 · Cited by 341
The effect of organizational structure on perceptions of procedural fairness.
Schminke, M. J., Ambrose, M. L., & Cropanzano, R. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.294 · Cited by 349
Antecedents and consequences of justice perceptions in performance appraisals
Erdoğan, B. (2002) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/s1053-4822(02)00070-0 · Cited by 340
Power-Distance, Gender and Organizational Justice
Lee, C., Pillutla, M. M., & Law, K. S. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(00)00052-0 · Cited by 336
Using Job Satisfaction and Pride as Internal-marketing Tools
Arnett, D. B., Laverie, D. A., & Mclane, C. (2002) · Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s0010-8804(02)80035-0 · Cited by 339
Embodying who we are: Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness
van Knippenberg, D. (2011) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.004 · Cited by 373
Factors Affecting European Farmers' Participation in Biodiversity Policies
Siebert, R., Toogood, M., & Knierim, A. (2006) · Sociologia Ruralis · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00420.x · Cited by 336
How does the context and design of participatory decision making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands
de Vente, J., Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Valente, S., & Newig, J. (2016) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-08053-210224 · Cited by 369
“Outcomes from decision-making processes that are perceived as fair and legitimate are more likely to be accepted by stakeholders over the long term (Lind and Tyler 1988, Young et al. 2013).”
Background
Identity politics: Challenges to psychology's understanding.
Sampson, E. E. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.12.1219 · Cited by 336
Social Exchange Theory, Exchange Resources, and Interpersonal Relationships: A Modest Resolution of Theoretical Difficulties
Mitchell, M. S., Cropanzano, R., & Quisenberry, D. M. (2012) · Critical issues in social justice · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-4175-5_6 · Cited by 368
Antecedents and Consequences of Organizational Commitment Among Pakistani University Teachers
Chughtai, A. A., & Zafar, S. (2006) · Cited by 330
How does justice matter in achieving buyer–supplier relationship performance?
Liu, Y., Huang, Y., Luo, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2012) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2012.03.003 · Cited by 332
“Justice (or fairness), a concept that has long been studied in organizational research, is a foundation for all types of social and economic exchanges and relationships (Adams, 1965; Greenberg, 1993; Lind and Tyler, 1988; Thibaut and Walker, 1975).”
Background
Making Sense of Procedural Fairness: How High Procedural Fairness Can Reduce or Heighten the Influence of Outcome Favorability
Brockner, J. (2002) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2002.5922363 · Cited by 333
Implementing global strategies: The role of procedural justice
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. (1991) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250120910 · Cited by 327
Knowing where you stand: Physical isolation, perceived respect, and organizational identification among virtual employees
Bartel, C. A., Wrzesniewski, A., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0661 · Cited by 331
“Physical Isolation and Perceived Respect Employees’ perceptions of their respect within the organization provide an important indicator of the quality of their relationship with the organization as a whole (Lind and Tyler 1988, Tyler et al. 1996, Tyler and Lind 1992).”
Background
Scientists’ Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement
Dudo, A. D., & Besley, J. C. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148867 · Cited by 329
“Our analyses are based on a sample of members from the world’s largest general scientific society (N = 390) and are guided by extant public engagement research, the theory of planned behavior [10] and procedural justice theory [11],”
Method
Outcomes, process, and trust of civil servants
Van Ryzin, G. G. (2011) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muq092 · Cited by 328
The Influence of Gender on the Performance of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors
Kidder, D. L. (2002) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630202800504 · Cited by 325
Faculty Experiences with Bullying in Higher Education
Keashly, L., & Neuman, J. H. (2010) · Administrative Theory & Praxis · doi:10.2753/atp1084-1806320103 · Cited by 326
Justice, Fairness, and Employee Reactions
Colquitt, J. A., & Zipay, K. P. (2015) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111457 · Cited by 376
The Role of Instrumental and Expressive Social Ties in Employees' Perceptions of Organizational Justice
Umphress, E. E., Labianca, G., Brass, D. J., Kass, E., & Scholten, L. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.6.738.24865 · Cited by 324
Do servant-leaders help satisfy follower needs? An organizational justice perspective
Mayer, D. M., Bardes, M., & Piccolo, R. F. (2008) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594320701743558 · Cited by 322
All Male Panels? Representation and Democratic Legitimacy
Clayton, A. B., O’Brien, D. Z., & Piscopo, J. M. (2018) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12391 · Cited by 333
“…in (or influence over) public decision making–such as through direct voting, expert decision making, and deliberation—shapes these beliefs (e.g., De Fine Licht et al. 2014; Esaiasson, Gilljam, and Persson 2012; Esaiasson et al. 2016; Lind and Tyler 1988; Persson, Esaiasson, and Gilljam 2013).”
Background
What is Trust and Confidence in the Police?
Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2010) · Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice · doi:10.1093/police/paq020 · Cited by 325
“Tom Tyler’s work on motive-based trust (Lind & Tyler 1988; Tyler 2006; Tyler & Huo 2002) suggests that members of the public generate a sense of the character and motives of the police which strongly influences their trust judgements.”
Background
Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Mediated Multifoci Model †
Karriker, J. H., & Williams, M. L. (2007) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206307309265 · Cited by 341
Unfairness and resistance to change: hardship as mistreatment
Folger, R. G., & Skarlicki, D. P. (1999) · Journal of Organizational Change Management · doi:10.1108/09534819910255306 · Cited by 318

Authors: Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R.
Affiliations: RAND Corporation (US)
Northwestern University (US)
ORCID: Lind, E. Allan
Tyler, Tom R.
Venue: Critical Issues in Social Justice
Publisher: Springer US
Published: 1988
ISSN: 1572-1906 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4
OpenAlex: W2009260120
Semantic Scholar: e6a535e6b4da7cac2af5d41bfcccaf5f23548785
Cited by: 6,585
References: 0
Citations by year: 2026: 210 · 2025: 161 · 2024: 190 · 2023: 203 · 2022: 197 · 2021: 207 · 2020: 220 · 2019: 214 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 246 · 2016: 263 · 2015: 286 · 2014: 296 · 2013: 278 · 2012: 272
FWCI: 281.11
Type: book
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations: Critical issues in social justice (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords: procedural justice, social psychology, perceived fairness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks