The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Procedural justice fosters a belief in the legitimacy of police (Sunshine & Tyler, 2003) and inspires greater compliance with the law (Lind & Tyler, 1988;McCluskey, Mastrofski, & Parks, 1999).”
From Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner‐City Young Men’s Perceptions of Police Legitimacy (2010) · cites this paper as Lind & Tyler, 1988
In the citing paper
“Any system of law or government that wishes to be seen by its masses as legitimate must obey its own laws (Lind & Tyler, 1988), and the police, therefore, must adhere to the law if they expect citizens to do likewise.”
From Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner‐City Young Men’s Perceptions of Police Legitimacy (2010) · cites this paper as Lind & Tyler, 1988
In the citing paper
“and in the public's compliance with the criminal law in general (Bouffard & Piquero, in press;Lind & Tyler, 1988;Paternoster et al., 1997;Sherman, 1993;Tyler, 1990).”
From Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner‐City Young Men’s Perceptions of Police Legitimacy (2010) · cites this paper as Lind & Tyler, 1988
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,032 of 1,032
Yurrita, M., Draws, T., Balayn, A., Murray-Rust, D., Tintarev, N., & Bozzon, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581161 · Cited by 108
“, procedural fairness perceptions) [62, 64, 89], the treatment received by decision subjects (i.”
BackgroundNix, J., Pickett, J. T., Wolfe, S. E., & Campbell, B. A. (2017) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418825.2017.1334808 · Cited by 72
Seeking the perfect price: Consumer responses to personalized price discrimination in e-commerce
Hufnagel, G., Schwaiger, M., & Weritz, L. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.002 · Cited by 78
Nostalgia buffers the negative impact of low procedural justice on cooperation
van Dijke, M., Wildschut, T., Leunissen, J. M., & Sedikides, C. (2015) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.11.005 · Cited by 65
Culture's Impact on the Importance of Fairness in Interorganizational Relationships
Lund, D. J., Scheer, L. K., & Kozlenkova, I. V. (2013) · Journal of International Marketing · doi:10.1509/jim.13.0020 · Cited by 61
Guchait, P., Ruetzler, T., Taylor, J., & Toldi, N. (2014) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.08.004 · Cited by 55
A Model of Third Parties' Morally Motivated Responses to Mistreatment in Organizations
O'reilly, J., & Aquino, K. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0311 · Cited by 223
Family, Clinician, and Patient Perceptions of Coercion in Mental Hospital Admission
Hoge, S. K., Lidz, C. W., Eisenberg, M., Monahan, J., Bennett, N., Gardner, W., Mulvey, E. P., & Roth, L. (1998) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0160-2527(98)00002-8 · Cited by 54
Patient Perception of Coercion on Admission to Acute Psychiatric Services
McKenna, B. G., Simpson, A. I. F., & Laidlaw, T. M. (1999) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0160-2527(98)00039-9 · Cited by 50
Arvai, J. L., & Froschauer, A. (2010) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669871003660767 · Cited by 47
Outpatient commitment and coercion in New Zealand: A matched comparison study
McKenna, B. G., Simpson, A. I. F., & Coverdale, J. H. (2006) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2004.07.004 · Cited by 43
Hoogervorst, N., De Cremer, D., & van Dijke, M. (2013) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726713482150 · Cited by 33
“Indeed, a vast amount of work shows that fairness evaluations are driven by both instrumental and non-instrumental judgments (Lind and Tyler, 1988: 240–241), and that both control needs and belongingness needs are important in followers’ evaluation of the procedural fairness of authorities (e.g.…”
BackgroundPatients’ perceptions of coercion on admission to forensic psychiatric hospital: A comparison study
McKenna, B. G., Simpson, A. I. F., & Coverdale, J. H. (2003) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0160-2527(03)00046-3 · Cited by 32
Worden, R. E., Bonner, H. S., & McLean, S. J. (2018) · Police Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1098611117739812 · Cited by 31
“…a decision is reached is perceived as fair, even those who are unsuccessful will have a more favorable attitude about the outcome (Kerstetter, 1996; Lind & Tayler, 1988).3 Citizen oversight may incorporate into complaint review a number of features that could be expected to enhance procedural…”
BackgroundInfluential“It’s Not Over When It’s Over”―Post-Decision Arrangements and Empirical Legitimacy
de Fine Licht, J., Agerberg, M., & Esaiasson, P. (2022) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muab023 · Cited by 28
What’s the Appeal? Perceptions of Review Processes for Algorithmic Decisions
Lyons, H., Wijenayake, S., Miller, T., & Velloso, E. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517606 · Cited by 27
“A number of diferent theoretical approaches have been proposed since Thibaut and Walker’s seminal studies (e.g. [48, 52]).”
BackgroundSurrogate Decision Making: Do We Have to Trade Off Accuracy and Procedural Satisfaction?
Frey, R., Hertwig, R., & Herzog, S. M. (2014) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x12471729 · Cited by 24
“Even if some decision makers do not agree with the outcome, such a shared decision-making approach may make it more likely that dissenting decision makers would perceive the process as fair and therefore accept its outcome.(22,23) Aggregation, however, has a potential down side.”
BackgroundBeyond Three Faces: Toward an Integrated Social Psychology of Inequality
McLeod, J. D., Hallett, T., & Lively, K. J. (2015) · Advances in Group Processes · doi:10.1108/s0882-614520150000032001 · Cited by 20
Perceived Injustice Predicts Intention to Litigate: Findings from a Spinal Cord Injury Sample
Trost, Z., Monden, K. R., Buelow, M., Boals, A., & Scott, W. (2016) · Psychological Injury and Law · doi:10.1007/s12207-015-9245-z · Cited by 20
“It has been proposed that injustice perception is intrinsically linked with retribution motives (Lind & Tyler, 1988; Strang & Braithwaite, 2000).”
Kerstetter, W. A., & Rasinski, K. A. (1994) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/bf02337294 · Cited by 20
Fair governance with humans and machines.
Hermstrüwer, Y., & Langenbach, P. (2023) · Psychology, Public Policy, and Law · doi:10.1037/law0000381 · Cited by 19
Brummel, L., & de Blok, L. (2024) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2024.2337843 · Cited by 17
Fang, X., Zhou, H., & Chen, S. (2025) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.70015 · Cited by 13
Shaping Police Officer Mindsets and Behaviors: Experimental Evidence of Procedural Justice Training
Canales, R., Santini, J. F., González Magaña, M., & Cherem, A. (2025) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.03243 · Cited by 9
Pathways to experienced coercion during psychiatric admission: a network analysis
Silva, B., Morandi, S., Bachelard, M., Bonsack, C., & Golay, P. (2024) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-024-05968-w · Cited by 4
“…the patient perception that in the decision-making process professionals treated them fairly (fairness), listened to them (voice), took their preferences into account (validation), respected them (respect), genuinely cared about them (motivation) and sufficiently informed them (information) [31].”
BackgroundMorandi, S., Silva, B., Pauli, G., Martinez, D., Bachelard, M., Bonsack, C., & Golay, P. (2024) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.03.017 · Cited by 2
“…account (validation), are accompanied in a dignified and respectful manner (respect), perceive that professionals genuinely care about them (motivation), and receive sufficient information and explanations about the procedures (information) (Lind and Tyler, 1988; Wittouck and Vander Beken, 2019).”
Community treatment orders: A qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives
Goulet, M.-H., Lessard-Deschênes, C., Pariseau-Legault, P., Breton, R., & Crocker, A. G. (2023) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101901 · Cited by 3
(2002) · Cited by 1,687
Self-citationKluger (1998) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(199803)19:2
(2005) · PubMed · Cited by 261
(2003) · ANU Open Research (Australian National University) · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R.
- Affiliations
- RAND Corporation (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- Critical Issues in Social Justice
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 1988
- ISSN
- 1572-1906 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009260120
- Semantic Scholar
- e6a535e6b4da7cac2af5d41bfcccaf5f23548785
- Cited by
- 6,585
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 210 · 2025: 161 · 2024: 190 · 2023: 203 · 2022: 197 · 2021: 207 · 2020: 220 · 2019: 214 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 246 · 2016: 263 · 2015: 286 · 2014: 296 · 2013: 278 · 2012: 272
- FWCI
- 281.11
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Critical issues in social justice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- procedural justice, social psychology, perceived fairness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review