The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Procedural justice fosters a belief in the legitimacy of police (Sunshine & Tyler, 2003) and inspires greater compliance with the law (Lind & Tyler, 1988;McCluskey, Mastrofski, & Parks, 1999).”
From Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner‐City Young Men’s Perceptions of Police Legitimacy (2010) · cites this paper as Lind & Tyler, 1988
In the citing paper
“Any system of law or government that wishes to be seen by its masses as legitimate must obey its own laws (Lind & Tyler, 1988), and the police, therefore, must adhere to the law if they expect citizens to do likewise.”
From Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner‐City Young Men’s Perceptions of Police Legitimacy (2010) · cites this paper as Lind & Tyler, 1988
In the citing paper
“and in the public's compliance with the criminal law in general (Bouffard & Piquero, in press;Lind & Tyler, 1988;Paternoster et al., 1997;Sherman, 1993;Tyler, 1990).”
From Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner‐City Young Men’s Perceptions of Police Legitimacy (2010) · cites this paper as Lind & Tyler, 1988
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,032
Reactions to psychological contract breach: a dual perspective
Chen, Z. X., Tsui, A. S., & Zhong, L. (2007) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.481 · Cited by 173
The Perceived Glass Ceiling and Justice Perceptions: An Investigation of Hispanic Law Associates
Foley, S., Kidder, D. L., & Powell, G. N. (2002) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(02)00140-x · Cited by 174
The social context of performance appraisal and appraisal reactions: A meta‐analysis
Pichler, S. M. (2012) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21499 · Cited by 197
Contextualizing the impostor "syndrome"
Feenstra, S., Begeny, C. T., Ryan, M. K., Rink, F. A., Stoker, J. I., & Jordan, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575024 · Cited by 146
“These social evaluative cues ultimately guide individuals’ appraisals of their own self-worth, and thus shape their self-esteem and sense of being worthy or deserving of their “place” within that group or context (Lind and Tyler, 1988).”
Eddy, E. R., Stone, D. L., & Stone‐Romero, E. F. (1999) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00164.x · Cited by 176
Explaining the Whistle-Blowing Process: Suggestions from Power Theory and Justice Theory
Near, J. P., Dworkin, T. M., & Miceli, M. P. (1993) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.4.3.393 · Cited by 172
Perceived coercion and procedural justice in the Broward mental health court
Poythress, N. G., Petrila, J. P., McGaha, A. C., & Boothroyd, R. A. (2002) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0160-2527(01)00110-8 · Cited by 171
The Effects of Effort and Intrinsic Motivation on Risky Choice
Kivetz, R. (2003) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.22.4.477.24911 · Cited by 170
Selection fairness information and applicant reactions: A longitudinal field study.
Truxillo, D. M., Bauer, T. N., Campion, M. A., & Paronto, M. E. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1020 · Cited by 176
O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1111-7 · Cited by 185
Getting Off on the Wrong Foot: The Timing of a Breach and the Restoration of Trust
Lount, R. B., Zhong, C., Sivanathan, N., & Murnighan, J. K. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167208324512 · Cited by 168
An integrative model of the empowerment process
Robbins, T. L., Crino, M. D., & Fredendall, L. D. (2002) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/s1053-4822(02)00068-2 · Cited by 180
Social Exclusion and the Desire to Reconnect
DeWall, C. N., & Richman, S. B. (2011) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00383.x · Cited by 186
The roles played by interorganizational contracts and justice in marketing channel relationships
Brown, J. R., Cobb, A. T., & Lusch, R. F. (2005) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.04.004 · Cited by 168
Brands, R. A., & Fernandez‐Mateo, I. (2016) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839216682728 · Cited by 182
“Research suggests that individuals are less concerned about whether a decision favors them when they view the decision-making procedures as fair (Lind and Tyler, 1988; Tyler and Blader, 2003).”
BackgroundThird-party perceptions of a layoff: Procedural, derogation, and retributive aspects of justice.
Skarlicki, D. P., Ellard, J. H., & Kelln, B. R. C. (1998) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.1.119 · Cited by 169
van den Bos, K. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1393 · Cited by 173
Tax morale : theory and empirical analysis of tax compliance
Torgler, B. (2003) · edoc (University of Basel) · doi:10.5451/unibas-002911383 · Cited by 170
Maguire, E. R., Lowrey-Kinberg, B., & Johnson, D. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-016-9276-9 · Cited by 169
“Fair decision-making processes by authority figures convey a sense of an individual’s worth within a group (Lind and Tyler 1988; Tyler 1989).”
BackgroundExploring dimensionality in the origins of hazard-related trust
Johnson, B. B. (1999) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/136698799376763 · Cited by 167
The role of human resources in ethics/compliance management: a fairness perspective
Weaver, G. R., & Treviño, L. K. (2001) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/s1053-4822(00)00043-7 · Cited by 168
Aquino, K. F., Douglas, S., & Martinko, M. J. (2004) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.9.2.152 · Cited by 168
When Organizations Break Their Promises: Employee Reactions to Unfair Processes and Treatment
Kickul, J. R. (2001) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1023/a:1010734616208 · Cited by 168
Perceptions of Systemic Justice: The Effects of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice
Beugré, C. D., & Baron, R. A. (2001) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb00199.x · Cited by 182
Procedural fairness and self‐esteem
Koper, G., van Knippenberg, D., Bouhuijs, F., Vermunt, R. C., & Wilke, H. (1993) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420230307 · Cited by 168
Fairness and Emotions: Reactions to the Process and Outcomes of Negotiations
Hegtvedt, K. A., & Killian, C. (1999) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/78.1.269 · Cited by 167
Procedural Justice, Anger, and Prisoners’ Misconduct
Beijersbergen, K. A., Dirkzwager, A., Eichelsheim, V. I., van der Laan, P. H., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2014) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854814550710 · Cited by 175
“Procedural justice theory (Leventhal, 1980; Lind & Tyler, 1988; Thibaut & walker, 1975; Tyler, 1990) proposes that people will be more likely to cooperate and comply with authori-ties’ rules and decisions when authorities treat them in a procedurally just manner.”
InfluentialHenisz, W., Levitt, R. E., & Scott, W. (2012) · Public–Private Partnerships for Infrastructure Development · doi:10.1080/21573727.2011.637552 · Cited by 126
“, 1997) as described above or, in the absence of such pre-existing social structures, can demonstrate that, despite their outsider status, they follow norms of distributive justice (Homans, 1958; Blau, 1964) or procedural justice (Thibaut and Walker, 1975; Lind and Tyler, 1988) in the hope that the observation of such…”
BackgroundInfluentialAffect and Social Exchange: Satisfaction in Power-Dependence Relations
Molm, L. D. (1991) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2096269 · Cited by 167
Björnberg, Å., & Nicholson, N. (2012) · Family Business Review · doi:10.1177/0894486511432471 · Cited by 166
“According to relational models of procedural justice (Lind & Tyler, 1988), procedural fairness gives group members cues as to how they should evaluate the nature of their membership in terms of how safe it is to invest their social identity in it (Tyler & Blader, 2002, 2003).”
BackgroundToward a Theory of Business Model Innovation within Incumbent FirmsPreprint
dos Santos, J. K. F., Spector, B., & der Heyden, L. V. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1362515 · Cited by 185
Ballinger, G. A., & Rockmann, K. W. (2010) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2010.51141732 · Cited by 175
Lim, B. T., & Loosemore, M. (2016) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.016 · Cited by 175
Tremblay, M., Sire, B., & Balkin, D. B. (2000) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601100253004 · Cited by 165
Procedural Justice and Culture
Lind, E. A., & Earley, P. C. (1992) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00207599208246877 · Cited by 162
Self-citationOpportunities for Innovation in the Delivery of Interactive Retail Services
Berry, L. L., Bolton, R. N., Bridges, C., Meyer, J., Parasuraman, A., & Seiders, K. (2010) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2010.02.001 · Cited by 162
Zhang, A., Moffat, K. B., Lacey, J., Wang, J., González, R., Uribe, K., Cui, L., & Dai, Y. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.097 · Cited by 163
Building Community Capacity and Fostering Disaster Resilience
Gil‐Rivas, V., & Kilmer, R. P. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22281 · Cited by 185
“…justice can be seen as including two elements: procedural justice, which includes representation and having voice in decision-making processes, and distributive justice, which reflects equity in access to or allocation of resources, power, and opportunities (Kloos et al., 2012; Lind & Tyler, 1988).”
BackgroundGain–loss-frame in outcome-interdependence: does it influence equality or equity considerations?
Dreu, C. K. W. D. (1996) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199603)26:2 · Cited by 32
Self-citationThe Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court in a Polarized Polity
Gibson, J. L. (2007) · Journal of Empirical Legal Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00098.x · Cited by 193
The claiming effect: Why players are more generous in social dilemmas than in ultimatum games.
Larrick, R. P., & Blount, S. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.810 · Cited by 162
Taking stock of consumer returns: A review and classification of the literature
Abdulla, H., Ketzenberg, M. E., & Abbey, J. D. (2019) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1002/joom.1047 · Cited by 165
Perceived fairness, decision control, and commitment in international joint venture management teams
Johnson, J. P., Korsgaard, M. A., & Sapienza, H. J. (2002) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.277 · Cited by 159
Thau, S., Aquino, K. F., & Wittek, R. P. M. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.250 · Cited by 161
The productivity measurement and enhancement system: A meta-analysis.
Pritchard, R. D., Harrell, M. M., DiazGranados, D., & Guzman, M. J. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.540 · Cited by 170
When Due Process Is of No Consequence: Moral Mandates and Presumed Defendant Guilt or Innocence
Skitka, L. J., & Houston, D. A. (2001) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/a:1014372008257 · Cited by 158
Impact of performance appraisal justice on employee engagement: a study of Indian professionals
Gupta, V., & Kumar, S. (2012) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/01425451311279410 · Cited by 179
Victor, B. I., Treviño, L. K., & Shapiro, D. L. (1993) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/bf01666528 · Cited by 160
When Organizational Voice Systems Fail
Harlos, K. (2001) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/0021886301373005 · Cited by 162
Jones, D. A., & Martens, M. L. (2008) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.577 · Cited by 171
Rupp, D. E., Shapiro, D. L., Folger, R. G., Skarlicki, D. P., & Shao, R. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2014.0051 · Cited by 186
Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities
Chiu, C., Wang, E. T. G., Shih, F., & Fan, Y. (2011) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684521111113623 · Cited by 172
“Martínez-tur et al. (2006) suggest a recovery of the classical equity approach, which indicates that the process by which individuals compare costs (inputs) and benefits (outcomes) is critical in understanding their satisfaction.”
BackgroundInfluentialPauwels, L. J. R., & Schils, N. (2014) · Terrorism and Political Violence · doi:10.1080/09546553.2013.876414 · Cited by 183
Roberson, Q. M., & Stevens, C. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.379 · Cited by 160
Organizational Justice and Job Satisfaction: A Test of Three Competing Models
Clay‐Warner, J., Reynolds, J., & Roman, P. M. (2005) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-005-8567-5 · Cited by 162
Protected Areas Governance and Justice: Theory and the European Union’s Habitats Directive
Paavola, J. (2003) · Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1076/evms.1.1.59.23763 · Cited by 159
Lind, E. A., MacCoun, R. J., Ebener, P. A., Felstiner, W. L. F., Hensler, D. R., Resnik, J., & Tyler, T. R. (1990) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.2307/3053616 · Cited by 159
Self-citationFassina, N. E., Jones, D. A., & Uggerslev, K. L. (2007) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.494 · Cited by 169
Leader inclusiveness, psychological diversity climate, and helping behaviors
Randel, A. E., Dean, M. A., Ehrhart, K. H., Chung, B. G., & Shore, L. M. (2016) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/jmp-04-2013-0123 · Cited by 173
“…psychological diversity climate were important for leader-directed helping for both women and racioethnic minorities is consistent with the group-value model's argument that leaders' treatment of individuals whose status in the group is uncertain is particularly important (Lind and Tyler, 1988).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialRevisiting Who, When, and Why Stakeholders Matter: Trust and Stakeholder Connectedness
Crane, B. D. (2018) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650318756983 · Cited by 165
“This is because organizations that are perceived as trustworthy are more likely to receive support and resources (Ashforth & Gibbs, 1990) and obtain commitment and attachment from its members (Elsbach, 2003; Lind & Tyler, 1998).”
BackgroundLowe, R. H., & Vodanovich, S. J. (1995) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf02249273 · Cited by 158
The difference a manager can make: organizational justice and knowledge worker commitment
Thompson, M., & Heron, P. (2005) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/0958519042000339561 · Cited by 156
Strategic entrepreneurship within family-controlled firms: Opportunities and challenges
Webb, J. W., Ketchen, D. J., & Ireland, R. D. (2010) · Journal of Family Business Strategy · doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2010.04.002 · Cited by 162
The Social Context of Negotiation
Kramer, R. M., Pommerenke, P. L., & Newton, E. (1993) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002793037004003 · Cited by 156
Siegel, P. A., Post, C. A., Brockner, J., Fishman, A. Y., & Garden, C. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.13 · Cited by 156
Procedural justice and legal compliance: A revisionist perspective
Nagin, D. S., & Telep, C. W. (2020) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12499 · Cited by 155
Vidmar, N. J. (2005) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-47379-8_2 · Cited by 154
Necessary Evils: Amnesties and the Search for Justice
Freeman, M. (2009) · Cited by 155
Truxillo, D. M., Steiner, D. D., & Gilliland, S. W. (2004) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.0965-075x.2004.00262.x · Cited by 167
Desmet, P., David De Cremer, A., & van Dijk, E. (2010) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.10.006 · Cited by 155
Implementing Evidence-Based Medicine
Shortell, S. M., Zazzali, J. L., Burns, L. R., Alexander, J. A., Gillies, R. R., Budetti, P. P., Waters, T. M., & Zuckerman, H. S. (2001) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200107001-00005 · Cited by 154
When the “Haves” Hold Court: Speculations on the Organizational Internalization of Law
Edelman, L. B., & Suchman, M. C. (1999) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.2307/3115155 · Cited by 159
Baccaro, L., & Lim, S.-H. (2007) · European Journal of Industrial Relations · doi:10.1177/0959680107073965 · Cited by 154
Wesolowski, M. A., & Mossholder, K. W. (1997) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(199707)18:4 · Cited by 151
Animals and the Scope of Justice
Opotow, S. V. (1993) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00909.x · Cited by 154
Increasing organizational citizenship behaviors of Turkish academicians
Ertürk, A. (2007) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940710733089 · Cited by 153
Hui, M. K., & Au, K. Y.-F. (2001) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(99)00068-5 · Cited by 155
Ethical Leadership Influence at Organizations: Evidence from the Field
Demirtaş, Ö. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1950-5 · Cited by 153
“Although Bies (2001) argued that interactional justice is a separate construct which is different from procedural justice, some authors consider interactional justice as a sub-component of procedural justice (Greenberg 1993; Lind and Tyler 1988).”
BackgroundThinking Critically about Justice Judgments
Lind, E. A. (2001) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1793 · Cited by 159
Self-citationVictim Willingness to Report Crime to Police: Does Procedural Justice or Outcome Matter Most?
Murphy, K., & Barkworth, J. M. (2014) · Victims & Offenders · doi:10.1080/15564886.2013.872744 · Cited by 156
“As was noted in the introduction, the Group Value and Group Engagement models (Lind & Tyler, 1988; Tyler & Blader, 2003) have dominated theorizing in the procedural justice literature.”
BackgroundAn empirical analysis of the antecedents of web-based learning continuance
Chiu, C., Sun, S., Sun, P., & Ju, T. (2006) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.010 · Cited by 168
How the Criminal Justice System Educates Citizens
Justice, B., & Meares, T. L. (2013) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716213502929 · Cited by 156
Lemons, M. A., & Jones, C. A. (2001) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940110391517 · Cited by 164
Introducing Procedural Utility: Not Only What, But Also How MattersPreprint
Benz, M., Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.338568 · Cited by 153
Individual differences in Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice (SBI)
Schmitt, M. (1996) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(96)00028-1 · Cited by 155
Relationship Between Stressfulness of Claiming for Injury Compensation and Long-term Recovery
Grant, G. M., O'Donnell, M. L., Spittal, M. J., Creamer, M. C., & Studdert, D. M. (2014) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.4023 · Cited by 157
Ployhart, R. E., Ryan, A. M., & Bennett, M. (1999) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.87 · Cited by 156
Murphy, K. (2013) · Policing & Society · doi:10.1080/10439463.2013.802786 · Cited by 150
“An important premise of the group value model (Lind and Tyler 1988) is that people care about procedural justice because it communicates important information about the quality of their relationship with others in a group.”
BackgroundHillestad, T., Xie, C., & Haugland, S. A. (2010) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/10610421011085758 · Cited by 152
“Legitimate organizations are also more likely to gain the commitment, attachment, and identification of members (Lind and Tyler, 1988; Mueller et al., 1994).”
BackgroundExtending the Deontic Model of Justice: Moral Self-Regulation in Third-Party Responses to Injustice
Rupp, D. E., & Bell, C. M. (2010) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq20102017 · Cited by 150
The Role of Gender in Reactions to Service Failure and Recovery
McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Daus, C. S., & Sparks, B. A. (2003) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670503254286 · Cited by 195
Social distance modulates recipient's fairness consideration in the dictator game: An ERP study
Wu, Y., Leliveld, M. C., & Zhou, X. (2011) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.08.009 · Cited by 152
“The role of social distance in economic decision-making has been studied before, and from these studies we know that social distance influences people’s justice concerns (Lind and Tyler, 1988; Mandel, 2006; Parks et al., 1996; Singer, 1998).”
BackgroundPittino, D., Visintin, F., Lenger, T., & Sternad, D. (2016) · Journal of Family Business Strategy · doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.04.002 · Cited by 172
“…as an indicator of respect for a person, and can lead to an increase in the identification with the company (De Please cite this article in press as: D. Pittino, et al., Are high performance impact on employee retention, Journal of Family Business Strategy (201 Cremer, 2002; Lind & Tyler, 1988).”
BackgroundColquitt, J. A. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928309.013.0016 · Cited by 153
Just laid off, but still a ?good citizen?? only if the process is fair
Bies, R. J., Martin, C. L., & Brockner, J. (1993) · Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal · doi:10.1007/bf01419446 · Cited by 148
Consumer Evaluations of Responses to Complaints: What’s Fair and Why
Goodwin, C., & Ross, I. (1990) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/eum0000000002575 · Cited by 149
Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Mondejar, R., & Chu, C. W. L. (2013) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12067 · Cited by 170
“Informed by fairness heuristic theory (Lind, 2001; Lind and Tyler, 1988), a small but steady stream of research has started to focus on overall justice which describes a global perception of the fairness of an entity stemming from one’s experiences as well as those of others (Ambrose and Arnaud, 2005; Ambrose and Schm…”
Situating restorative justice within criminal justice
Shapland, J., Atkinson, A., Atkinson, H., Colledge, E., Dignan, J., Howes, M., Johnstone, J., Robinson, G., & Sorsby, A. (2006) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/1362480606068876 · Cited by 148
Measuring Justice and Fairness
Cropanzano, R., Ambrose, M. L., Colquitt, J. A., & Rodell, J. B. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199981410.013.8 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R.
- Affiliations
- RAND Corporation (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- Critical Issues in Social Justice
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 1988
- ISSN
- 1572-1906 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009260120
- Semantic Scholar
- e6a535e6b4da7cac2af5d41bfcccaf5f23548785
- Cited by
- 6,585
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 210 · 2025: 161 · 2024: 190 · 2023: 203 · 2022: 197 · 2021: 207 · 2020: 220 · 2019: 214 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 246 · 2016: 263 · 2015: 286 · 2014: 296 · 2013: 278 · 2012: 272
- FWCI
- 281.11
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Critical issues in social justice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- procedural justice, social psychology, perceived fairness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
