Cited by 154Virus-based gene therapy researchRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryBarrier Structure and Function Studies

Controlling AAV Tropism in the Nervous System with Natural and Engineered Capsids

Open access
Castle, Michael J., Turunen, Heikki T., Vandenberghe, Luk H., Wolfe, John H.·2016·Methods in Molecular Biology

Abstract

More than one hundred naturally occurring variants of adeno-associated virus (AAV) have been identified, and this library has been further expanded by an array of techniques for modification of the viral capsid. AAV capsid variants possess unique antigenic profiles and demonstrate distinct cellular tropisms driven by differences in receptor binding. AAV capsids can be chemically modified to alter tropism, can be produced as hybrid vectors that combine the properties of multiple serotypes, and can carry peptide insertions that introduce novel receptor-binding activity. Furthermore, directed evolution of shuffled genome libraries can identify engineered variants with unique properties, and rational modification of the viral capsid can alter tropism, reduce blockage by neutralizing antibodies, or enhance transduction efficiency. This large number of AAV variants and engineered capsids provides a varied toolkit for gene delivery to the CNS and retina, with specialized vectors available for many applications, but selecting a capsid variant from the array of available vectors can be difficult. This chapter describes the unique properties of a range of AAV variants and engineered capsids, and provides a guide for selecting the appropriate vector for specific applications in the CNS and retina.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4939-3271-9_10

Cites

135 of 135 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Examples where the tropism of a given rAAV capsid does not remain consistent in rodents and higher animals have been described.

    “With translational studies in mind, it is important to demonstrate consistent tropism of a particular rAAV, as examples where the tropism of a given rAAV capsid does not remain consistent in rodents and higher animals have been described [7].”

    From Novel oligodendroglial alpha synuclein viral vector models of multiple system atrophy: studies in rodents and nonhuman primates (2017) · cites this paper as [7]

    Section 2 (page unavailable) reports that AAV8 tropism differed between vector preparations, even under identical injection conditions. That supports the broader point that a given serotype’s tropism can vary, but the passage does not describe a difference between rodents and higher animals; the chapter’s nonhuman-primate examples do not establish that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • RPE cells can be targeted using AAV1, AAV4, AAV6, or the engineered AAV2-7m8 vector; photoreceptors and Müller glial cells are targeted by serotypes AAV2, AAV5, AAV6, AAV7, AAV8, AAV9, AAV2-7m8, and AAV8BP2.

    “RPE cells can be targeted using AAV1, AAV4, or AAV6 vectors or with the engineered AAV2-7m8 vector, and photoreceptors and Müller glial cells are targeted by serotypes AAV2, AAV5, AAV6, AAV7, AAV8, and AAV9 as well as engineered AAV2-7m8 and AAV8BP2 vectors.56,112–116”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castle, M. J., Turunen, H. T., Vandenberghe, L. H., & Wolfe, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (US)
Corresponding author
Wolfe, John H.
Venue
Methods in Molecular Biology
Published
2016
Volume
1382
Pages
133-149
ISSN
  • 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6029
OpenAlex
W2176154815
Cited by
151
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5
FWCI
23.28
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Methods in molecular biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1dp1od008267-01)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK063973)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS038690, T32NS007413)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U01HD079066)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
adeno-associated virus, AAV capsid engineering, viral tropism, retinal gene delivery, receptor binding, peptide insertion, directed evolution, neutralizing antibodies, transduction efficiency, vector selection
MeSH terms
Dependovirus, Animals, Capsid, Central Nervous System, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Organ Specificity, Retina, Gene Transfer Techniques, Viral Tropism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review