The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Rating Formulation for Ordered Response Categories
Abstract
A rating response mechanism for ordered categories, which is related to the traditional threshold formulation but distinctively different from it, is formulated. In addition to the subject and item parameters two other sets of parameters, which can be interpreted in terms of thresholds on a latent continuum and discriminations at the thresholds, are obtained. These parameters are identified with the category coefficients and the scoring function of the Rasch model for polychotomous responses in which the latent trait is assumed uni-dimensional. In the case where the threshold discriminations are equal, the scoring of successive categories by the familiar assignment of successive integers is justified. In the case where distances between thresholds are also equal, a simple pattern of category coefficients is shown to follow.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
brms : An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan
Bürkner, P.-C. (2017) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v080.i01 · Cited by 9,476
“Using threshold = "equidistant" forces the distance between two adjacent thresholds to be the same, that is for thresholds τ k and distance δ (see also Andrich 1978a; Andrich 1978b; Andersen 1977).”
BackgroundA Rasch model for partial credit scoring
Masters, G. N. (1982) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02296272 · Cited by 3,782
Hibbard, J. H., Stockard, J., Mahoney, E. R., & Tusler, M. (2004) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00269.x · Cited by 2,748
Stewart-Brown, S., Tennant, A., Tennant, R., Platt, S., Parkinson, J., & Weich, S. (2009) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-7-15 · Cited by 1,251
(2011) · Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository · Cited by 1,209
Schmitt, D. P. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000051 · Cited by 974
Ordinal Regression Models in Psychology: A Tutorial
Bürkner, P.-C., & Vuorre, M. (2019) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245918823199 · Cited by 689
Internal construct validity of the Shirom-Melamed Burnout questionnaire (SMBQ)
Lundgren-Nilsson, Å., Jonsdottir, I. H., Pallant, J., & Ahlborg, G. (2012) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-1 · Cited by 626
Hobart, J., & Cano, S. (2009) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta13120 · Cited by 621
Forgivingness, Vengeful Rumination, and Affective Traits
Berry, J. W., Worthington, E. L., O'Connor, L. E., Parrott, L., & Wade, N. G. (2005) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00308.x · Cited by 594
Greco, L. A., Lambert, W., & Baer, R. A. (2008) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.20.2.93 · Cited by 514
Hobart, J. C., Cano, S. J., Zajicek, J. P., & Thompson, A. J. (2007) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70290-9 · Cited by 495
Hawthorne, G. (2006) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-005-7746-y · Cited by 450
Gideon, N., Hawkes, N., Mond, J., Saunders, R., Tchanturia, K., & Serpell, L. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152744 · Cited by 419
Relationships between reading, tracing and writing skills in introductory programming
Lopez, M., Whalley, J., Robbins, P., & Lister, R. (2008) · Proceedings of the Fourth international Workshop on Computing Education Research · doi:10.1145/1404520.1404531 · Cited by 363
From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system
Wilson, M., & Sloane, K. (2000) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1302_4 · Cited by 333
Construct validity and reliability of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire
Eyres, S., Carey, A., Gilworth, G., Neumann, V., & Tennant, A. (2005) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1191/0269215505cr905oa · Cited by 335
Diagnostic Validity of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 (GAD-7) among Pregnant Women
Zhong, Q.-Y., Gelaye, B., Zaslavsky, A. M., Fann, J. R., Rondon, M. B., Sánchez, S. E., & Williams, M. A. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125096 · Cited by 297
Hornberger, M., Bewersdorff, A., & Nerdel, C. (2023) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100165 · Cited by 276
Rozental, A., Kottorp, A., Forsström, D., Månsson, K., Boettcher, J., Andersson, G., Furmark, T., & Carlbring, P. (2019) · Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1017/s1352465819000018 · Cited by 230
“This can be helpful for identifying abnormal responses that might warrant further development of the instrument (Andrich, 1978).”
BackgroundHoi, V. N. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103761 · Cited by 250
Yan, Z. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1629390 · Cited by 217
Acculturative family distancing (AFD) and depression in Chinese American families
Hwang, W.-C., Wood, J. J., & Fujimoto, K. (2010) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020542 · Cited by 170
Gimeno-Santos, E., Raste, Y., Demeyer, H., Louvaris, Z., de Jong, C., Rabinovich, R. A., Hopkinson, N. S., Polkey, M. I., Vogiatzis, I., Tabberer, M., et al. (2015) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00183014 · Cited by 151
Health outcomes assessment in vulnerable populations: measurement challenges and recommendations
Hahn, E. A., & Cella, D. (2003) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/apmr.2003.50245 · Cited by 133
A conceptual and psychometric framework for distinguishing categories and dimensions
De Boeck, P., Wilson, M., & Acton, G. S. (2005) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.112.1.129 · Cited by 131
Oxytocin indexes relational distress following interpersonal harms in women
Tabak, B. A., McCullough, M. E., Szeto, A., Mendez, A. J., & McCabe, P. M. (2011) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.07.004 · Cited by 116
Machine learning–driven language assessment
Settles, B., T. LaFlair, G., & Hagiwara, M. (2020) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00310 · Cited by 106
Moullin, J. C., Sklar, M., Ehrhart, M. G., Green, A., & Aarons, G. A. (2021) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-021-01152-w · Cited by 82
Psychometric Properties of the PsychoSomatic Problems Scale: A Rasch Analysis on Adolescent Data
Hagquist, C. (2008) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-007-9186-3 · Cited by 95
The Rasch Analysis of Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities
Park, J.-Y., & Park, E.-Y. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01992 · Cited by 80
Hawthorne, G., Mouthaan, J., Forbes, D., & Novaco, R. W. (2006) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-005-0986-y · Cited by 77
Student self-assessment: why do they do it?
Yan, Z., Brown, G. T. L., Lee, J. C.-K., & Qiu, X.-L. (2020) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2019.1672038 · Cited by 67
Kao, H.-J., Chien, T.-W., Wang, W.-C., Chou, W., & Chow, J. C. (2023) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000034068 · Cited by 57
Psychometric Properties of the Death Anxiety Scale (DAS) Among Terminally Ill Cancer Patients
Royal, K. D., & Elahi, F. (2011) · Journal of Psychosocial Oncology · doi:10.1080/07347332.2011.582639 · Cited by 44
The Effects of Incomplete Rating Designs in Combination With Rater Effects
Wind, S. A., & Jones, E. (2019) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/jedm.12201 · Cited by 39
Abbitt, J. T., & Boone, W. J. (2021) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-020-09268-6 · Cited by 37
A generalized many-facet Rasch model and its Bayesian estimation using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo
Uto, M., & Ueno, M. (2020) · Behaviormetrika · doi:10.1007/s41237-020-00115-7 · Cited by 37
Evaluating composite health measures using Rasch modelling: An illustrative example
Hagquist, C. (2001) · Sozial- und Präventivmedizin SPM · doi:10.1007/bf01321663 · Cited by 34
(2017) · PubMed · Cited by 33
Guttersrud, Ø., & Petterson, K. S. (2015) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980014003152 · Cited by 32
Measuring activities of daily living in Parkinson’s disease: On a road to nowhere and back again?
Hagell, P. (2019) · Measurement · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2018.09.050 · Cited by 23
Fenwick, E. K., Cheng, G. H.-L., Man, R. E. K., Khadka, J., Rees, G., Wong, T. Y., Pesudovs, K., & Lamoureux, E. L. (2018) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310915 · Cited by 23
Ludlow, L. H., Matz-Costa, C., Johnson, C., Brown, M., Besen, E., & James, J. B. (2014) · Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development · doi:10.1177/0748175614522273 · Cited by 22
Accuracy of performance-test linking based on a many-facet Rasch model
Uto, M. (2021) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01498-x · Cited by 20
A Bayesian many-facet Rasch model with Markov modeling for rater severity drift
Uto, M. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01997-z · Cited by 19
“Furthermore, there are various polytomous IRT models that are applicable to ordered categorical data, including the rating scale model (Andrich, 1978), the partial credit model (Masters, 1982), and the generalized partial credit model (Muraki, 1997).”
MethodVidotto, G., Anselmi, P., Filipponi, L., Tommasi, M., & Saggino, A. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01100 · Cited by 16
Clinton, M., & Shehadeh, M. (2021) · SAGE Open Nursing · doi:10.1177/23779608211020919 · Cited by 14
Psychometric considerations of depression symptom rating scales
McClintock, S. M., Haley, C., & Bernstein, I. H. (2011) · Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.2217/npy.11.59 · Cited by 7
Buz, J., Á. Gómez-Martínez, M., Crego, A., Yela, J. R., & Sánchez-Zaballos, E. (2022) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/10731911211018855 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Andrich, D.
- Venue
- Psychometrika
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1978-12
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 561-573
- ISSN
- 0033-3123 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-0980
- OpenAlex
- W2051039162
- Cited by
- 2,970
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
