Cited by 51Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringMuscle activation and electromyography studiesVagus Nerve Stimulation Research

Neuromuscular stimulation selectivity of multiple-contact nerve cuff electrode arrays

Sweeney, J. D., Crawford, N. R., Brandon, T. A.·1995·Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing

Abstract

The feasibility of an electrical stimulation method selectively for activating skeletal muscles innervated by a common peripheral nerve trunk has been investigated. The method utilises 'snugly' fitting nerve cuffs that incorporate an array of 12 electrodes. These electrodes have been tested as four longitudinally aligned tripoles (located 90 degrees apart on the cuff inner surface). In acute experiments on rabbit sciatic nerves, we have found that tripolar stimulation with this implant system is in general highly selective. 'Field steering,' wherein a subthreshold transverse current is used in combination with a longitudinal tripolar current, tends to increase the selectivity of stimulation. On a rabbit sciatic nerve, a combination of adjacent longitudinal tripoles of the 12 electrode array generally yields a stimulation performance similar to that which would be expected if a 24 electrode array is used. This system may find a use in functional neuromuscular stimulation applications which require highly selective control over multiple muscles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02510525

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In concurrent stimulation, different electrodes cannot be treated as independent but rather interact.

    “In concurrent stimulation, however, different electrodes cannot be treated as independentbut rather interact (Branner et al., 2001;Sweeney et al., 1995).”

    From Biomimetic approaches to bionic touch through a peripheral nerve interface (2015) · cites this paper as Sweeney et al., 1995

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sweeney, J. D., Crawford, N. R., & Brandon, T. A.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Published
1995-05
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
418-425
ISSN
  • 0140-0118 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-0444
OpenAlex
W2077666943
Cited by
51
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (5r01ns026476-03, NINDS 26476)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Keywords
neuromuscular stimulation, cuff electrodes, stimulation selectivity, sciatic nerve, peripheral nerve trunks, functional electrical stimulation, skeletal muscle activation
MeSH terms
Animals, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Electronics, Medical, Neuromuscular Junction, Peripheral Nerves, Rabbits, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review