Cited by 590Diabetes and associated disordersMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsGestational Diabetes Research and Management

Caesarean section is associated with an increased risk of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of observational studies

Open access
Cardwell, C. R., Stene, L. C., Joner, G., Cinek, O., Svensson, J., Goldacre, M. J., Parslow, R. C., Pozzilli, P. +10 more·2008·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis The aim of this study was to investigate the evidence of an increased risk of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes in children born by Caesarean section by systematically reviewing the published literature and performing a meta-analysis with adjustment for recognised confounders.Methods After MEDLINE, Web of Science and EMBASE searches, crude ORs and 95% CIs for type 1 diabetes in children born by Caesarean section were calculated from the data reported in each study. Authors were contacted to facilitate adjustments for potential confounders, either by supplying raw data or calculating adjusted estimates. Meta-analysis techniques were then used to derive combined ORs and to investigate heterogeneity between studies.Results Twenty studies were identified. Overall, there was a significant increase in the risk of type 1 diabetes in children born by Caesarean section (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.15-1.32, p < 0.001). There was little evidence of heterogeneity between studies (p = 0.54). Seventeen authors provided raw data or adjusted estimates to facilitate adjustments for potential confounders. In these studies, there was evidence of an increase in diabetes risk with greater birthweight, shorter gestation and greater maternal age. The increased risk of type 1 diabetes after Caesarean section was little altered after adjustment for gestational age, birth weight, maternal age, birth order, breast-feeding and maternal diabetes (adjusted OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.04-1.36, p = 0.01).Conclusions/interpretation This analysis demonstrates a 20% increase in the risk of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes after Caesarean section delivery that cannot be explained by known confounders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-008-0941-z

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cesarean birth is associated with adverse child health outcomes including asthma, type I diabetes, allergies, and obesity.

    “established links between cesarean birth and adverse child health outcomes, including asthma, type I diabetes, allergies9–11 and obesity12”
  • The estimated relations are established after controlling for socio-economic advantage associated with cesarean birth in Australia and a rich set of perinatal risk factors commonly used in child health studies.

    “These relations are established after controlling for the socio-economic advantage associated with cesarean birth in Australia and a rich set of perinatal risk factors that (from meta-analyses)9, 11, 27 are commonly used in child health studies.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cardwell, C. R., Stene, L. C., Joner, G., Cinek, O., Svensson, J., Goldacre, M. J., Parslow, R. C., Pozzilli, P., Brigis, G., Stoyanov, D., Urbonaitė, B., Šipetić, S., Schober, E., Ionescu-Tirgoviste, C., Devoti, G., de Beaufort, C. E., Buschard, K., & Patterson, C. C.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Charles University (CZ)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT)
  • Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LT)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • University of Salento (IT)
  • Rigshospitalet (DK)
Corresponding author
Cardwell, C. R.
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2008-02-22
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
726-735
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2165387067
Cited by
590
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 28
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • AIRUS (submittedVersion)
  • Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Diabetes UK
  • Norges Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Keywords
cesarean section, childhood-onset type 1 diabetes, type 1 diabetes risk, birth weight, gestational age, maternal age, birth order, breastfeeding, maternal diabetes, confounding adjustment
MeSH terms
Adult, Birth Order, Birth Weight, Cesarean Section, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Maternal Age, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Age of Onset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review