Cited by 46Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Acute effects of alcohol on the development of intrusive memories

Bisby, James A., Brewin, Chris R., Leitz, Julie R., Valerie Curran, H.·2009·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale Post-traumatic stress disorder is characterised by repeated intrusive imagery of the traumatic event. Despite alcohol's impairing effect on memory and frequent involvement in real-life trauma, virtually nothing is known of the interaction between alcohol and trauma memory.Objective We aimed to investigate the acute alcohol effects on spontaneous memories following a trauma film as well as explicit memory for the film.Methods Utilising an independent-group double-blind design, 48 healthy volunteers were randomly allocated to receive alcohol of 0.4 or 0.8 g/kg or a matched placebo drink. A stressful film was viewed post-drink. Skin conductance was monitored throughout and mood and dissociative symptoms were indexed. Volunteers recorded their spontaneous memories of the film daily in an online diary over the following week. Their explicit memory for both gist and details of the film was tested on day 7.Results Intriguingly, an inverted 'U' alcohol dose-response was observed on intrusive memories with a low dose of alcohol increasing memory intrusions while a high dose decreased intrusions. In contrast, explicit memory performance after 7 days showed a linear dose-response effect of alcohol with both recall and recognition decreasing as dose increased.Conclusions These findings highlight a striking differential pattern of alcohol's effects on spontaneous memories as compared with explicit memories. Alcohol's effect on spontaneous memories may reflect a dose-dependent impairment of two separate memory systems integral to the processing of different aspects of a traumatic event.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-009-1496-5

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bisby, J. A., Brewin, C. R., Leitz, J. R., & Valerie Curran, H.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Bisby, James A.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2009-02-27
Volume
204
Issue
4
Pages
655-666
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W1992149145
Cited by
46
References
68
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
acute alcohol effects, intrusive memories, post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic memory, declarative memory, dose-response relationship, skin conductance, dissociative symptoms, memory impairment
MeSH terms
Adult, Ethanol, Central Nervous System Depressants, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Memory, Motion Pictures, Mental Recall, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Time Factors, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review