Cited by 782Memory and Neural MechanismsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Fear and the brain: where have we been, and where are we going?

Open access
LeDoux, Joseph·1998·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an explosion of interest in the neural basis of emotion. Much of this enthusiasm has been triggered by studies of the amygdala and its contribution to fear. This work has shown that the amygdala detects and organizes responses to natural dangers (like predators) and learns about novel threats and the stimuli that predict their occurrence. The latter process has been studied extensively using a procedure called classical fear conditioning. This article surveys the progress that has been made in understanding the neural basis of fear and its implications for anxiety disorders, as well as the gaps in our knowledge.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-3223(98)00282-0

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The neural circuitry underlying threat and fear-related behaviors in mammals, including the amygdala-hippocampus-medial prefrontal circuit, is among the most well-understood behavioral circuits in neuroscience.

    “the neural circuitry underlying threat and fear-related behaviors in mammals, including the amygdala–hippocampus–medial prefrontal circuit, is among the most well-understood behavioral circuits in neuroscience [11–14].”
  • The amygdala has been found to be critical in regulating anxiety-like behavior.

    “Because the amygdala has also been found to be critical in regulating anxiety-like behavior (42, 43), we investigated the effects of NCoR disruption during development on juvenile anxiety-like behavior.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LeDoux, J.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
LeDoux, Joseph
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-12
Volume
44
Issue
12
Pages
1229-1238
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043348039
Cited by
782
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 36
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k02mh000956-07)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 46516, MH 00956, R01MH046516, MH38774)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
fear, neural basis of emotion, amygdala, classical fear conditioning, threat detection, anxiety disorders, fear learning, threat prediction
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Conditioning, Psychological, Fear, Humans, Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review