Cited by 232Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Modulating behavioral inhibition by tDCS combined with cognitive training

Ditye, Thomas, Jacobson, Liron, Walsh, Vincent, Lavidor, Michal·2012·Experimental Brain Research

Abstract

Cognitive training is an effective tool to improve a variety of cognitive functions, and a small number of studies have now shown that brain stimulation accompanying these training protocols can enhance their effects. In the domain of behavioral inhibition, little is known about how training can affect this skill. As for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), it was previously found that stimulation over the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) facilitates behavioral inhibition performance and modulates its electrophysiological correlates. This study aimed to investigate this behavioral facilitation in the context of a learning paradigm by giving tDCS over rIFG repetitively over four consecutive days of training on a behavioral inhibition task (stop signal task (SST)). Twenty-two participants took part; ten participants were assigned to receive anodal tDCS (1.5 mA, 15 min), 12 were assigned to receive training but not active stimulation. There was a significant effect of training on learning and performance in the SST, and the integration of the training and rIFG-tDCS produced a more linear learning slope. Better performance was also found in the active stimulation group. Our findings show that tDCS-combined cognitive training is an effective tool for improving the ability to inhibit responses. The current study could constitute a step toward the use of tDCS and cognitive training as a therapeutic tool for cognitive control impairments in conditions such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or schizophrenia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00221-012-3098-4

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In healthy adults, tDCS over rIFC combined with inhibition training significantly improved inhibition performance in a Stop task relative to sham tDCS and to inhibition training alone.

    “In healthy adults, for example, tDCS over rIFC combined with inhibition training significantly improved inhibition performance in a Stop task relative to sham tDCS (Cunillera et al., 2014) and to inhibition training alone (Ditye et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ditye, T., Jacobson, L., Walsh, V., & Lavidor, M.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Venue
Experimental Brain Research
Published
2012-04-25
Volume
219
Issue
3
Pages
363-368
ISSN
  • 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1106
OpenAlex
W2062880338
Cited by
232
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12
FWCI
9.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
behavioral inhibition, transcranial direct current stimulation, cognitive training, right inferior frontal gyrus, stop-signal task, response inhibition, cognitive control, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, schizophrenia
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Neural Inhibition, Social Behavior Disorders, Teaching, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review