Cited by 143Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Transcranial direct current stimulation enhances verbal working memory training performance over time and near transfer outcomes.

Richmond, Lauren L., Wolk, David, Chein, Jason, Olson, Ingrid R.·2014·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Studies attempting to increase working memory (WM) capacity show promise in enhancing related cognitive functions but have also raised criticism in the broader scientific community given the inconsistent findings produced by these studies. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to enhance WM performance in a single session [Fregni, F., Boggio, P., Nitsche, M., Bermpohl, F., Anatal, A., Feredoes, E., et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory. Experimental Brain Research, 166, 23-30, 2005]; however, the extent to which tDCS might enhance learning on a WM training regime and the extent to which learning gains might transfer outside the training task remains largely unknown. To this end, participants engaged in an adaptive WM training task [previously utilized in Richmond, L., Morrison, A., Chein, J., & Olson, I. Working memory training and transfer in older adults. Psychology & Aging, 26, 813-822, 2011; Chein, J., & Morrison, A. Expanding the mind's workspace: Training and transfer effects with a complex working memory span task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 193-199, 2010] for 10 sessions over 2 weeks, concurrent with either active or sham stimulation of dorsolateral pFC. Before and after training, a battery of tests tapping domains known to relate to WM abilities was administered. Results show that tDCS enhanced learning on the verbal portion of the training task by 3.65 items. Furthermore, tDCS was shown to enhance near transfer to other untrained WM tasks in comparison with a no-contact control group. These results lend support to the idea that tDCS might bolster training and transfer gains in populations with compromised WM abilities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn_a_00657

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Significant transfer has been reported across the majority of complex span training studies that changed both storage items and distractor activity between trained and untrained tasks.

    “Significant transfer has been reported across the majority of these studies (Harrison et al., 2013; Henry et al., 2014; Richmond et al., 2014).”

    From Are Working Memory Training Effects Paradigm-Specific? (2019) · cites this paper as Richmond et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richmond, L. L., Wolk, D., Chein, J., & Olson, I. R.
Affiliations
  • Temple University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2014-11-01
Volume
26
Issue
11
Pages
2443-2454
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2052029838
Cited by
143
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2
FWCI
8.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
transcranial direct current stimulation, working memory training, verbal working memory, near transfer, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, adaptive training, cognitive enhancement, sham stimulation
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Speech Perception, Transfer, Psychology, Visual Perception, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review