Cited by 96Free Will and AgencyNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMotor Control and Adaptation

The hidden side of intentional action: the role of the anterior insular cortex

Brass, Marcel, Haggard, Patrick·2010·Brain Structure and Function

Abstract

Cognitive neuroscience research has begun to reveal the functional neuroanatomy of intentional action. This research has primarily pointed to the role of the medial frontal cortex for the voluntary control of behaviour. However, a closer inspection of the literature reveals that the anterior insular cortex (AIC) is also routinely activated in tasks that involve different aspects of intentional action. In the present article, we outline studies that have found AIC activation in various intentional action paradigms. Based on these findings, we discuss two hypotheses about the AIC's contribution to voluntary control. One hypothesis states that AIC is involved in forming intentions, by providing information about the internal states of the system. The alternative view suggests that AIC evaluates the outcomes of intentional action decisions that have been previously formed elsewhere. The limited evidence so far favours the evaluative hypothesis. AIC may provide interoceptive signals that play an essential role in evaluating the consequences of intentional action. AIC is therefore a key structure for the adaptive, affective training of the individual will, on which human society depends.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00429-010-0269-6

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The relationship between anterior insular cortex anticipatory engagement and self-reported intensity suggests that the anterior insular cortex directly affects how an event is experienced, including subjective arousal and emotionality.

    “The relationship between AIC anticipatory engagement and self-reported ratings of the intensity of the experience suggests that the AIC directly impacts the way in which an event is experienced, including the subjective arousal and emotionality evoked by the experience [42, 43].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brass, M., & Haggard, P.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Brass, Marcel
  • Haggard, Patrick
Venue
Brain Structure and Function
Published
2010-05-29
Volume
214
Issue
5-6
Pages
603-610
ISSN
  • 1863-2653 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-2661
OpenAlex
W2131765048
Cited by
96
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Structure and Function (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  • Economic and Social Research Council (RES-000-23-1571)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
anterior insula, intentional action, intention formation, interoception, outcome measurement, medial frontal cortex
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Models, Neurological, Movement, Psychomotor Performance, Volition, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review