Cited by 743Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsComplex Network Analysis Techniques

Graph analysis of the human connectome: Promise, progress, and pitfalls

Open access
Fornito, Alex, Zalesky, Andrew, Breakspear, Michael·2013·NeuroImage

Abstract

The human brain is a complex, interconnected network par excellence. Accurate and informative mapping of this human connectome has become a central goal of neuroscience. At the heart of this endeavor is the notion that brain connectivity can be abstracted to a graph of nodes, representing neural elements (e.g., neurons, brain regions), linked by edges, representing some measure of structural, functional or causal interaction between nodes. Such a representation brings connectomic data into the realm of graph theory, affording a rich repertoire of mathematical tools and concepts that can be used to characterize diverse anatomical and dynamical properties of brain networks. Although this approach has tremendous potential - and has seen rapid uptake in the neuroimaging community - it also has a number of pitfalls and unresolved challenges which can, if not approached with due caution, undermine the explanatory potential of the endeavor. We review these pitfalls, the prevailing solutions to overcome them, and the challenges at the forefront of the field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.087

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Methods of constructing graphs from diverse neuroimaging modalities share many similar concepts, but with subtle differences that depend on the nature of the data.

    “Methods of constructing graphs from diverse neuroimaging modalities share many similar concepts (Fig. 4), but with subtle differences that depend on the nature of the data.19,37”
  • Thresholding connectomes is necessary for removing false-positive edges and facilitating between-group comparisons but can remove potentially valid information regarding differences in network topology.

    “Thresholding connectomes is necessary for removing false-positive edges and facilitating between-group comparisons but can remove potentially valid information regarding differences in network topology (Fornito, Zalesky, & Breakspear, 2013; van Wijk, Stam, & Daffertshofer, 2010).”

    From Functional and structural connectome properties in the 5XFAD transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease (2018) · cites this paper as Fornito, Zalesky, & Breakspear, 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fornito, A., Zalesky, A., & Breakspear, M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Black Dog Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Fornito, Alex
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
80
Pages
426-444
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146406922
Cited by
743
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 72 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 14
FWCI
5.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (JSMF22002082, 1050504)
  • Australian Research Council
  • Monash University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
human connectome, brain networks, graph theory, graph analysis, structural connectivity, functional connectivity, causal connectivity, network topology, connectomics, neuroimaging
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain, Humans, Models, Anatomic, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review