Cited by 68Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Temperament and parenting styles in early childhood differentially influence neural response to peer evaluation in adolescence

Open access
Guyer, Amanda E., Jarcho, Johanna M., Pérez-Edgar, Koraly, Degnan, Kathryn A., Pine, Daniel S., Fox, Nathan A., Nelson, Eric E.·2015·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

Behavioral inhibition (BI) is a temperament characterized by social reticence and withdrawal from unfamiliar or novel contexts and conveys risk for social anxiety disorder. Developmental outcomes associated with this temperament can be influenced by children's caregiving context. The convergence of a child's temperamental disposition and rearing environment is ultimately expressed at both the behavioral and neural levels in emotional and cognitive response patterns to social challenges. The present study used functional neuroimaging to assess the moderating effects of different parenting styles on neural response to peer rejection in two groups of adolescents characterized by their early childhood temperament (M(age) = 17.89 years, N = 39, 17 males, 22 females; 18 with BI; 21 without BI). The moderating effects of authoritarian and authoritative parenting styles were examined in three brain regions linked with social anxiety: ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC), striatum, and amygdala. In youth characterized with BI in childhood, but not in those without BI, diminished responses to peer rejection in vlPFC were associated with higher levels of authoritarian parenting. In contrast, all youth showed decreased caudate response to peer rejection at higher levels of authoritative parenting. These findings indicate that BI in early life relates to greater neurobiological sensitivity to variance in parenting styles, particularly harsh parenting, in late adolescence. These results are discussed in relation to biopsychosocial models of development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10802-015-9973-2

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The VS reacts to both positively and negatively valenced contexts, and the amygdala reacts to both negatively and positively valenced contexts.

    “Indeed, the VS reacts to not only positively valenced contexts but also negative ones (e.g., peer acceptance and rejection; Gunther Moor et al., 2010; Guyer et al., 2015, Guyer et al., 2012a, Guyer et al., 2012b), and the amygdala reacts to not only negatively valenced contexts but also positive ones (e.g., fearful and happy faces; Canli et al., 2002, or negative/threatening and positive/interest”

    From Adolescent neurobiological susceptibility to social context (2016) · cites this paper as Guyer et al., 2015

  • For brain function, the subACC and dACC, VS, TPJ, and vlPFC showed sensitivity to peer or parenting cues and contexts and/or were linked to competencies or vulnerabilities aligned with the bivalent outcomes expected by neurobiological susceptibility models.

    “For brain function, the subACC and dACC (Masten et al., 2009), VS (Guyer et al., 2006a, Guyer et al., 2006b; Guyer et al., 2012a, Guyer et al., 2012b; Guyer et al., 2015; Telzer et al., 2013a, Telzer et al., 2013b; Telzer et al., 2014b), TPJ (Falk et al., 2014; Peake et al., 2013), and vlPFC (Guyer et al., 2015) showed sensitivity to peer or parenting cues and contexts and/or were linked to”

    From Adolescent neurobiological susceptibility to social context (2016) · cites this paper as Guyer et al., 2015

  • Youths who experienced high levels of warm parenting in middle childhood showed a decreased caudate response to peer rejection in adolescence.

    “These results were complemented by the finding that youths who experienced high levels of warm parenting in middle childhood showed a decreased caudate response to peer rejection in adolescence (Guyer et al., 2015).”

    From Adolescent neurobiological susceptibility to social context (2016) · cites this paper as Guyer et al., 2015

  • In youths with versus without an early childhood temperament of behavioral inhibition, higher levels of harsh parenting experienced in middle childhood (age 7) were associated with diminished vlPFC response to peer rejection in late adolescence (ages 17-18).

    “In youths with versus without an early childhood temperament of behavioral inhibition, higher levels of harsh parenting experienced in middle childhood (age 7) were associated with diminished vlPFC response to peer rejection in late adolescence (ages 17–18), suggesting less or less flexible regulation of responses to peer rejection, as a function of adverse parenting, in the behaviorally inhibited”

    From Adolescent neurobiological susceptibility to social context (2016) · cites this paper as Guyer et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guyer, A. E., Jarcho, J. M., Pérez-Edgar, K., Degnan, K. A., Pine, D. S., Fox, N. A., & Nelson, E. E.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Guyer, Amanda E.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2015-01-16
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
863-874
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W2111290220
Cited by
68
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4
FWCI
8.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R00MH080076, U01MH074454, R21MH103627, R01MH094633, R01MH074454)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
behavioral inhibition, temperament, parenting styles, authoritarian parenting, authoritative parenting, peer rejection, social anxiety, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, caudate nucleus, amygdala, adolescence, early childhood, biopsychosocial model
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Infant, Inhibition, Psychological, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Peer Group, Social Behavior, Temperament, Parenting, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review