Cited by 432Algal biology and biofuel productionAquaculture Nutrition and GrowthMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

Food commodities from microalgae

Open access
Draaisma, René B, Wijffels, René H, (Ellen) Slegers, PM, Brentner, Laura B, Roy, Adip, Barbosa, Maria J·2013·Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Abstract

The prospect of sustainable production of food ingredients from photoautotrophic microalgae was reviewed. Clearly, there is scope for microalgal oils to replace functions of major vegetable oils, and in addition to deliver health benefits to food products. Furthermore, with a limited production surface, a substantial portion of the European Union market could be supplied with edible oils and proteins from microalgae. Yet, before microalgal ingredients can become genuinely sustainable and cost effective alternatives for current food commodities, major breakthroughs in production technology and in biorefinery approaches are required. Moreover, before market introduction, evidence on safety of novel microalgal ingredients, is needed. In general, we conclude that microalgae have a great potential as a sustainable feedstock for food commodities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copbio.2012.09.012

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The final destination of lipid-enriched biomass can vary from feed or food supplements to biodiesel production, according to the cell location where the lipid is accumulated and its profile.

    “According to the cell location where the lipid is accumulated and its profile, the final destination of the lipid‐enriched biomass can vary from feed or food supplements to biodiesel production (Caballero et al., 2003; Draaisma et al., 2013; Li‐Beisson et al., 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Draaisma, R. B., Wijffels, R. H., (Ellen) Slegers, P., Brentner, L. B., Roy, A., & Barbosa, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Unilever Research and Development Vlaardingen (NL)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Unilever (India) (IN)
Corresponding author
Draaisma, René B
Venue
Current Opinion in Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
169-177
ISSN
0958-1669 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062359547
Cited by
432
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
microalgae, microalgae oil, edible oils, microalgal proteins, food ingredients, sustainable feedstocks, biorefinery, vegetable oil replacement, health benefits, production technology
MeSH terms
Conservation of Natural Resources, European Union, Food Analysis, Food Technology, Humans, Oils, Algal Proteins, Microalgae, Food Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review