CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 132Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesStudent Stress and CopingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Procrastination Automatic Thoughts as a Personality Construct: An Analysis of the Procrastinatory Cognitions Inventory

Flett, Gordon L., Stainton, Murray, Hewitt, Paul L., Sherry, Simon B., Lay, Clarry·2012·Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
DOI 10.1007/s10942-012-0150-z
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10942-012-0150-z

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinical experience suggests that attending to assumptions, core beliefs, and negative automatic thoughts may be essential to prevent the individual from postponing commitments.

    “Although the general relationship between irrational beliefs and procrastination is irregular and weak (Steel, 2007), clinical experience suggests that attending to assumptions, core beliefs, and negative automatic thoughts may be essential in order to prevent the individual from postponing commitments (Flett, Stainton, Hewitt, Sherry, & Lay, 2012).”

    From Understanding and Treating Procrastination: A Review of a Common Self-Regulatory Failure (2014) · cites this paper as Flett, Stainton, Hewitt, Sherry, & Lay, 2012

  • Researchers have proposed cognitive construals of procrastination, such as procrastinatory cognitions, which reflect automatic negative thoughts related to procrastination that are important for understanding the cognitive-behavioral aspects of procrastination.

    “Similarly, researchers have proposed cognitive construals of procrastination, such as procrastinatory cognitions, which reflect automatic negative thoughts related to procrastination that are important for understanding the cognitive-behavioral aspects of procrastination (Flett, Stainton, Hewitt, Sherry, & Lay, 2012; Stainton, Lay, & Flett, 2000).”

    From A Meta–Analytic and Conceptual Update on the Associations between Procrastination and Multidimensional Perfectionism (2017) · cites this paper as Flett, Stainton, Hewitt, Sherry, & Lay, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flett, G. L., Stainton, M., Hewitt, P. L., Sherry, S. B., & Lay, C.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Flett, Gordon L.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2012-03-20
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
223-236
ISSN
  • 0894-9085 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6563
DOI
10.1007/s10942-012-0150-z
OpenAlex
W1974926588
Cited by
132
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canada Research Chairs
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
procrastination, automatic thoughts, personality traits, neuroticism, conscientiousness, psychological distress, perfectionism, achievement goal orientation, performance-avoidance goals, graduate student stress, impostor syndrome, self-realization, cognitive-behavioral intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review