Cited by 76Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The Short-Term Longitudinal and Reciprocal Relations Between Peer Victimization on Facebook and Adolescents’ Well-Being

Open access
Frison, Eline, Subrahmanyam, Kaveri, Eggermont, Steven·2016·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract

Although studies have shown that depressive symptoms, life satisfaction, and adolescents' online peer victimization are associated, there remain critical gaps in our understanding of these relationships. To address these gaps, the present two-wave panel study (N Time1 = 1840) (1) examines the short-term longitudinal and reciprocal relationships between peer victimization on Facebook, depressive symptoms and life satisfaction during adolescence, and (2) explores the moderating role of adolescents' gender, age, and perceived friend support. Self-report data from 1621 adolescent Facebook users (48 % girls; M Age = 14.76; SD = 1.41) were used to test our hypotheses. The majority of the sample (92 %) was born in Belgium. Cross-lagged analyses indicated that peer victimization on Facebook marginally predicted decreases in life satisfaction, and life satisfaction predicted decreases in peer victimization on Facebook. However, depressive symptoms were a risk factor for peer victimization on Facebook, rather than an outcome. In addition, support from friends protected adolescents from the harmful outcomes of peer victimization on Facebook. Both theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-016-0436-z

Cites

73 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-material social assistance from friends and significant others is a need that when fulfilled can significantly impact perception of life satisfaction, as shown in several researches.

    “As human beings, non-material social assistance from friends and significant others is a need that when fulfilled can significantly impact on our perception of life satisfaction as shown in several researches [165–168].”

    From Association between friendship quality and subjective wellbeing among adolescents: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [166]

    The Perceived Friend Support as a Moderator section reports that friend support protected adolescents from lower life satisfaction after Facebook peer victimization. This supports a role for friends’ non-material support, but the finding is specific to adolescents facing online victimization; it does not establish a general human need or an effect of support from significant others on life satisfaction. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Coffman, D. L., & MacCallum, R. C. (2005). Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 235-259. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4002_4 PEER VICTIMIZATION ON FACEBOOK AND ADOLESCENTS' WELL-BEING · DOI
  2. Davidson, L. M., & Demaray, M. K. (2007). Social support as a moderator between victimization and intemalizing-externalizing distress from bullying. School Psychology Review, 36, 383-405.
  3. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Pratice of Structural Equation Modeling (Vol. 33). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  4. Steinberg, L. (2005). Adolescence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frison, E., Subrahmanyam, K., & Eggermont, S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Frison, Eline
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2016-02-15
Volume
45
Issue
9
Pages
1755-1771
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W2277256231
Cited by
76
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
7.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
Facebook, adolescents, depressive symptoms, life satisfaction, youth welfare, reciprocal effects, gender differences, age differences, social media
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Belgium, Child Welfare, Depression, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Peer Group, Risk Factors, Social Support, Crime Victims, Friends, Bullying, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review