Cited by 222Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionWorkplace Violence and BullyingChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

An Investigation of Short-Term Longitudinal Associations Between Social Anxiety and Victimization and Perpetration of Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying

Pabian, Sara, Vandebosch, Heidi·2016·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that social anxiety is associated with victimization and perpetration of (cyber)bullying. The direction and causality of this relationship has not yet been empirically supported for both traditional and cyberbullying involvement. This study examined short-term longitudinal associations between feelings of social anxiety and involvement in traditional bullying and cyberbullying among 2128 adolescents aged 10-17 (56.6 % girls). A cross-lagged panel analysis provided evidence for the contribution of social anxiety to later victimization of bullying, both on- and off-line. The possibility of a reciprocal relationship was also examined, although it was not supported. Furthermore, longitudinal bidirectional relationships between social anxiety and the perpetration of bullying were investigated. Only one significant longitudinal association was found: the perpetration of traditional bullying predicted subsequent higher levels of social anxiety. The implications of these findings are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-015-0259-3

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with higher levels of anxiety, depression and anger are more likely to become victims of cyberbullying.

    “Individuals with higher levels of anxiety, depression and anger are also more likely to become victims of cyberbullying28,55,68, as they tend to be distanced from social groups and resort more to online media69,70.”

    From Umbrella review of meta-analyses on the risk factors, protective factors, consequences and interventions of cyberbullying victimization (2024) · cites this paper as [55]

    The Results (p. 17) report that higher social anxiety predicted cyberbullying victimization six months later among adolescents. The paper does not establish depression or anger as predictors of cyberbullying victimization; its Discussion (p. 19) mentions anger in relation to victimization followed by perpetration. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Other evidence suggests a bidirectional relation between social anxiety and social victimization and rejection, potentially due to poorer social performance secondary to increased use of safety behaviors.

    “Other evidence suggests a bidirectional relation between social anxiety and social victimization and rejection, potentially due to poorer social performance secondary to increased use of safety behaviors (106, 160, 161).”

    From MDMA-Assisted Therapy as a Means to Alter Affective, Cognitive, Behavioral, and Neurological Systems Underlying Social Dysfunction in Social Anxiety Disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [161]

    The background section (p. 7) describes a proposed cycle between social anxiety and victimization, and the Discussion (p. 18) considers both directions. But this study found only that social anxiety predicted later victimization; victimization did not predict later social anxiety (Results, p. 17). The Discussion (p. 18) suggests poorer social skills as a possible explanation, but our copy does not link that explanation to increased use of safety behaviors. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 2.0-world. In R. Navarro, S. Yubero, & E. Larranaga (Eds.), Cyberbullying across the globe: Gender, family, and mental health (p. in press). New York, NY: Springer.
  2. Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2001). Self-views and peer perceptions of victim status among early adolescents. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school. The plight of the vulnerable and victimzed (pp. 105-124). New York, NY: Guilford.
  3. Langos, C. (2012). Cyberbullying: The challenge to define. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking , 15 (6), 285-289.
  4. Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999). Bullying and 'Theory of mind': A critique of the 'Social skills deficit' view of anti-social behaviour. Social Development , 8 (1), 117-127.
  5. Vandebosch, H., & Van Cleemput, K. (2009). Cyberbullying among youngsters: prevalence and profile of bullies and victims. New Media & Society , 11 (8), 1-23.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pabian, S., & Vandebosch, H.
Affiliations
University of Antwerp (BE)
Corresponding author
Pabian, Sara
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2015-02-17
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
328-339
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W1965625717
Cited by
222
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1
FWCI
29.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
social anxiety, bullying victimization, bullying perpetration, cyberbullying, traditional bullying, adolescents, bidirectional relationship, causality
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Shyness, Crime Victims, Internet, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review