Cited by 186Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsStudent Stress and Coping

Examining the relations of time management and procrastination within a model of self-regulated learning

Wolters, Christopher A., Won, Sungjun, Hussain, Maryam·2017·Metacognition and Learning

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11409-017-9174-1

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolters, C. A., Won, S., & Hussain, M.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of Delaware (US)
Corresponding author
Wolters, Christopher A.
Venue
Metacognition and Learning
Published
2017-06-28
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
381-399
ISSN
  • 1556-1623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-1631
OpenAlex
W2724380630
Cited by
186
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
9.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Metacognition and Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
time management, procrastination, student self-regulation, university students, academic procrastination, active procrastination, self-efficacy, metacognitive strategies, motivation, learning strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review