Cited by 259Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMedicinal Plants and Neuroprotection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 140 of the 140 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Apolipoprotein E, gender, and Alzheimer’s disease: an overlooked, but potent and promising interaction

Open access
Ungar, Leo, Altmann, Andre, Greicius, Michael D.·2014·Brain Imaging and Behavior

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is an increasingly prevalent, fatal neurodegenerative disease that has proven resistant, thus far, to all attempts to prevent it, forestall it, or slow its progression. The ε4 allele of the Apolipoprotein E gene (APOE4) is a potent genetic risk factor for sporadic and late-onset familial AD. While the link between APOE4 and AD is strong, many expected effects, like increasing the risk of conversion from MCI to AD, have not been widely replicable. One critical, and commonly overlooked, feature of the APOE4 link to AD is that several lines of evidence suggest it is far more pronounced in women than in men. Here we review previous literature on the APOE4 by gender interaction with a particular focus on imaging-related studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11682-013-9272-x

Cites

140 of 140 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 140 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ungar, L., Altmann, A., & Greicius, M. D.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Ungar, Leo
Venue
Brain Imaging and Behavior
Published
2013-11-30
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
262-273
ISSN
  • 1931-7557 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-7565
OpenAlex
W2007870551
Cited by
246
References
140
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Imaging and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS073498)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, apolipoprotein E, APOE ε4, sex differences, gender interaction, genetic risk factors, mild cognitive impairment, neuroimaging
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Female, Humans, Male, Sex Factors, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review